
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
So much for fire control – JoNova reports that raptors have been photographed congregating on the edge of large Australian bushfires, picking up burning sticks, and deliberately setting new spot fires in advance of the main blaze to flush out small mammals and other prey. This discovery potentially has profound implications for fire management in places like California.
Burn, Baby, Burn: Australian Birds Steal Fire to Smoke Out Prey
By Mindy Weisberger, Senior Writer | January 9, 2018 11:23am ET
Grassland fires that are deadly and devastating events for many kinds of wildlife are a boon to certain types of birds known as fire foragers. These opportunists prey on animals fleeing from a blaze, or scavenge the remains of creatures that succumbed to the flames and the smoke.
But in Australia, some fire-foraging birds are also fire starters.
Three species of raptors — predatory birds with sharp beaks and talons, and keen eyesight — are widely known not only for lurking on the fringes of fires but also for snatching up smoldering grasses or branches and using them to kindle fresh flames, to smoke out mammal and insect prey.
Scientists recently collected and evaluated reports from Aboriginal and nonindigenous people of these so-called firehawks — black kites (Milvus migrans), whistling kites (Haliastur sphenurus) and brown falcons (Falco berigora) — to better understand this unusual behavior, and to evaluate its implications for fire management in regions where the birds are active, the researchers wrote in a new study.
Aboriginal people in some parts of northern Australia referenced the fire-spreading actions of firehawks in sacred rituals and noted numerous sightings of the firehawks. In total, the study authors identified 12 Aboriginal groups in which people described firsthand sightings of raptors deliberately setting new fires with smoldering brands salvaged from existing fires, acting on their own and cooperating with other birds.
…
Read more (contains photographs): https://www.livescience.com/61375-fire-spreading-raptors.html
The abstract of the referenced study;
Intentional Fire-Spreading by “Firehawk” Raptors in Northern Australia
Mark Bonta, Robert Gosford, Dick Eussen, Nathan Ferguson, Erana Loveless, and Maxwell Witwer
We document Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and non-Indigenous observations of intentional fire-spreading by the fire-foraging raptors Black Kite (Milvus migrans), Whistling Kite (Haliastur sphenurus), and Brown Falcon (Falco berigora) in tropical Australian savannas. Observers report both solo and cooperative attempts, often successful, to spread wildfires intentionally via single-occasion or repeated transport of burning sticks in talons or beaks. This behavior, often represented in sacred ceremonies, is widely known to local people in the Northern Territory, where we carried out ethno-ornithological research from 2011 to 2017; it was also reported to us from Western Australia and Queensland. Though Aboriginal rangers and others who deal with bushfires take into account the risks posed by raptors that cause controlled burns to jump across firebreaks, official skepticism about the reality of avian fire-spreading hampers effective planning for landscape management and restoration. Via ethno-ornithological workshops and controlled field experiments with land managers, our collaborative research aims to situate fire-spreading as an important factor in fire management and fire ecology. In a broader sense, better understanding of avian fire-spreading, both in Australia and, potentially, elsewhere, can contribute to theories about the evolution of tropical savannas and the origins of human fire use.
Read more: http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2993/0278-0771-37.4.700
I’ve personally seen Aussie raptors do phenomenally clever things. Australia used to have a serious problem with introduced cane toads. The toads are toxic, so they spread like crazy, the predators which would normally keep such a pest under control all died when they tried to eat the toads.
Then somewhere, somewhen, an Australian bird figured out how to eat the toads without getting poisoned – they flip the toads over and eat out their stomachs, leaving the toxic parts of the flesh uneaten.
Nowadays cane toads are a lot rarer, and in toad season it is not unusual to find dried out toad corpses with no stomachs.
I have never seen a bird deliberately spreading fire in the way described by the study – but it never occurred to me to hang around and observe, on the few occasions I found myself uncomfortably close to a dangerous fire. From what I have personally seen of Australian birds using sticks as tools, and other highly intelligent behaviour, I think this claim is credible.
If Australian raptors have learned to use fire to flush out prey, perhaps birds in other fire prone places like California also deliberately start spot fires using embers from other fires. I suggest this possibility is worth investigating, because if birds in your neighbourhood help fires jump fire breaks, this needs to be considered when preparing local fire management plans.
Bird grabs lizard joined to burning stick.
Bird drops lizard because it’s hot.
Scrub below catches fire.
More lizards appear from cover.
Bird feasts big.
Bird takes note.
My sister told me today that she saw a news clip where they showed a yellow school driving down the road with a rooster running just as fast as it could behind the bus, and when the bus stopped, a little girl got off the bus, and the rooster jumped into her arms. It was her pet.
The bird knew she was on the bus.
I believe that news clip.
Roosters are cunning if nothing else.
Kept several as pets when young.
Interesting study here:
http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2010/08/crafty-chickens-use-complex-clucking
“raptors have been photographed congregating on the edge of large Australian bushfires, picking up burning sticks, and deliberately setting new spot fires in advance of the main blaze to flush out small mammals and other prey.”
No they haven’t. No photos or videos of this happening.
“This discovery potentially has profound implications for fire management in places like California.”
No it doesn’t. Even if it were true different raptors species do different things.
As a birder for 50+ years I don’t find this story even remotely credible, and won’t until I see actual photographic evidence. Not just one isolated iffy image but clear and repeated use of this method – because that is what is implied. I am confident I will never see that evidence outside of digital fakery.
Other have noted how intelligent some birds can be. True. They are also intelligent enough to NOT burn their feet or risk burning their feathers for some questionable gain.
So I call this whole story BS.
Extreme Hiatus writes “I don’t find this story even remotely credible, and won’t until I see actual photographic evidence.”
Perhaps you mistake this report as an attempt to convince you. As it happens, I believe these reports, partly because I have seen many birds do amazing things, and partly because there is no harm in believing it.
What is the risk factor to you? Why the resistance?
I have seen our bigger hens or rooster wait for the barn cat to catch a mouse and take it away from him if the cat isn’t careful. Free range chickens socially complex and interesting to watch.
Note the photos of the Black Kite. Note how far down its legs its feathers go. Setting aside the problem of its feet being burned, does that look like a bird adapted to carry a burning object without burning its feathers?
“does that look like a bird adapted to carry a burning object without burning its feathers?”
I must admit to not having spent a lot of time trying to guess what a bird would look like optimized for certain behaviors, and then deciding a-priori whether the bird does, or does not, engage in any particular behavior based on my own decision.
OK, my two cents and a tangent.
About twenty odd years ago I heard a bird singing its heart out on my deck. I scooped up a handful of bird seed and went outside. I held out my hand containing the seed; a large male GST (Grey Shrike Thrush) flew down, landed on my hand, and ate the seed.
Twice a day for about two weeks, he would land on my kitchen window ledge, tap on the glass, and eat from my hand when I came out.
He did this twice a year as he migrated, for about ten years.
Then he stopped coming.
About three years after his last visit, I heard the tapping on my kitchen window.
I went outside with the birdseed, and a young female GST flew over, landed on my hand and ate the seed.
She did this for about two weeks, twice a year for about three years. She stopped coming about four years ago.
As we speak, I can hear a GST in my back yard, singing away. He has been here about a week, but has not yet come to my deck or tapped on my window.
I live in hope and anticipation.
Great story, William.
bbq kookaburra. yum.
Rubbish…. Show video, or it never happened. Photoshopped videos don’t count either.
I’m pretty sure that they’ve had their leg pulled.
There is one human casualty from birds using tools, Aeschylus. Valerius Maximus wrote that he was killed outside the city by a tortoise dropped by an eagle which had mistaken his bald head for a rock suitable for shattering the shell of the reptile.
The bearded vulture (aka Lammergeyer) drops bones on rocks to crack them open, and is the suggested guilty party. In the days when milk was delivered in the early morning in aluminium foil topped bottles Blue Tits learnt that they could get at the cream by pecking a hole in the top.
This 1985 BBC programme makes fascinating viewing
So I’m sure that this reported behaviour may well be true.
It’s not unusual behavior native Americans also practiced controlled burns to flush game.
Can I put up a defense for raptors here. I used to go out intoo the countryside wityh a person who kept and hunted with birds. One particular Harris Hawk was so clever I watched hime catching a rabbit by flying over a hedge into another field then fly upto the perfect point to come back over and get the rabbit it one strike. Very impressive and very intelligent.
Are these the birds that Sam Neill was so casual about their leaving the island in Jurassic Park 3?
Crows have extraordinary memories and a unique language. They can remember someone passing through their area after one sighting, and tell each other if the same person is returning. They know and identify neighborhood cats by sight.
When I put out bird food in the winter for birds that stay in my area, I use the plain generic mix that Ace hardware sells for about $9/bag. No special menus, just that stuff.
Yes, I get plenty of birds. This winter it’s mostly the mourning doves. I’ll got plenty of sparrows and juncos when the weather started turning cold, and squirrels, of course.
However, in the spring three years ago, common field birds like grackles, redwinged blackbirds and cowbirds showed up at my feeding station in large numbers for no reason at all other than the snows had continued into normal migration time, the temps were too cold for bugs to start emerging, and the ground worms and grains that they are usually dependent on for early food sources were not available. I don’t put out signs or advertise in the “Bird Flyway News”, so how would these normally NON-CITY LOCATED birds fidn their way to my feeding station if the other birds didn’t communicate the information to them?: They still show up, and will most likely show up again, come spring and migration, because the weather promises to be crappy and offer foodless locations when they return.
And yes, I have plenty of pictures, including 22 pairs of mated brownheaded cowbirds stuffing themselves on my front steps. I also have a fine photo of one redwing who kept showing up at my place in July, looking at me for a handout. I have photos of goldfinch pairs assaulting my sunflowers last summer, which is the ONLY year I’ve grown sunflowers in my yard.
When some “birder for 30-40-50′ years says he’s never heard of such a thing as birds being smart, it shows a lack of real observation. It means you only go look at them through binocs and then you go home.
Sara – If you are referring to my comments, you missed my point. Birds, some families more than others, are highly intelligent. That is one of the main reasons I find this particular story implausible. They are all intelligent enough to not put their lives at risk for some dubious potential gain.
Think it through. Let’s say a hawk manages to pick up a burning stick, holding an unburned part so it doesn’t burn its feet. Then it carries it away carefully enough not to burn its wings or other feathers when it is flying. If it makes a mistake in this just once, that could be a fatal mistake.
But let’s say it does this successfully. Then it drops that stick. Then what? It will take time for that fire to have the desired effect: to create an open area where panicked rodents or lizards are easy to catch. What does that bird do in the meantime? Hovering over it for a long time takes too much energy so there needs to be a perch nearby. Then, when enough area is burned, one or more other hawks – which are attracted to burned or burning areas, as is the whole basis of this story – could arrive and the bird which took all those risks could end up with nothing.
That does not make any evolutionary survival sense for hawks. They are not altruistic food-sharing communists. And even if they were, their arriving competition could be another species altogether which would make it even more pointless.
Also consider my final comment above. Does a bird with feathers on its legs like that look like one adapted to carry burning sticks? No.
Lastly, about going birding then going home… I have well over 200 species on our home property list so the birding and the close observations never end.
Should add that, while waiting for the fire to start and spread sufficiently they could also just circle around on the thermals which would be more energy efficient. But that would also attract their competition.
I knew a guy once who worked on a nut orchard near the South Australia/Victoria border and they had a crow problem. So Mick said to his boss “why don’t I try to scare them off with my ultralight?”. Boss agreed and Mick would pretend to strafe the orchard but it took the crows only a couple of days to decide that the aircraft was harmless. So Mick took a shotgun and fired it at low level over the orchard but again the crows figured it was no problem after initially flying off. So Mick changed tactics and decided he would target one particular crow when the flock took off and make sure he shot it. This actually worked as the crows figured out quickly that one of us was going to die every time they heard the ultralight start up. Mick said he once had to chase one to 4000 feet to get him (ultralight had open cockpit with pusher prop with shotgun mounted in front of pilot). The crows left the orchard.
Unfortunately there were two orchards and the crows went to the neighbor’s orchard. That idiot, instead of getting Mick to chase the crows away from his orchard too, called the Australian aviation regulator who arrived one morning to bust Mick. Mounting guns on aircraft and firing them is only allowed to be done by the Air Force in Australia (Australia is a totalitarian thuggocracy when it comes to aviation and guns – if you like both, don’t bother to come here). The smart thing would have been to give Mick guidance and permission to protect agriculture in this way. Fortunately the regulator is also incompetent and forgot to file charges in time. Mick is now a Flying Doctor pilot.
I guess crows are smarter than some people.
If you are interested in this, you should read the original news item — it is about a study in which “Scientists recently collected and evaluated reports from Aboriginal and nonindigenous people of these so-called firehawks ” They relate stories and anecdotes that go back to the 1960’s — there are no actual verifiable or confirmed instances known.
It may be simply be an aboriginal urban legend — being reported as “science” in reference to “Indigenous Ecological Knowledge”
I would read it another way.
The aborigines spend time in the wilderness doing their indigenous thing and observing nature around them.
The scientist interviewed the aborigines but didn’t do any field work.
Thus: “there are no actual verifiable or confirmed instances (witnessed by the scientists)”. Clearly the aborigines (and others) say they did witness such things.
Greg Cavanagh ==> Free living humans make the worst possible “eye-witnesses” — this is true in forensics and is true in nature studies, particularly in “Indigenous Ecological Knowledge” where the knowledge is related to myth. If you have been taught [by] your grandfather that “firehawks” swoop down at the edge of wildfires to catch up burning grass or twigs and spread the fire, then when you see a hawk swoop down to catch up a rodent running before the fire, catch a rodent or maybe a bit of burning grass instead or as well in the same talon-full, then dropping the burning material once realized, or settling down with its meal of rodent with a bit of smouldering grass, you will see what your grandfather described — not the reality. That is how human minds work – they see what they expect to see.
Scientists, however, are supposed to be disinterested, careful, observers to avoid polluting their observation with cultural prejudice.
There may be enough interesting anecdotal material to warrant some biologist getting out to interview firefighters in Australia on the subject or send out students with video cameras to see if such behavior can be captured on film. But I wouldn’t advise any doctoral biology students to pick this as a dissertation topic — unless one has a very forgiving institution that will accept “no such thing witnessed in three years of research”.
There is always something to be gained from ancient “knowledge” — but it must be carefully sifted to find the parts that match actuality — the real parts. Some “ancient” remedies have been found to have value — willow bark (which contains the equivalent of “aspirin”), other bark with quinine, etc. But hundreds of remedies are found worthless or harmful for every one that is found beneficial.
“It may be simply be an aboriginal urban legend”
Yup. It is interesting to see people takes sides on this non-issue.
Just as well we are wiping out these arsonists with windmills.
Speaking of urban legends and fake video, how about them peregrine falcons diving at 240mph (107m/sec)? There’s no end to the gullibility of National Geographic, the Smithsonian, Nature, BBC, etc. –AGF
According to Air & Space Magazine a peregrine falcon has been clocked at up to 242 mph, why don’t you believe them?
Why should I believe one more parroting of an urban legend (over 100 years old)? Show me these data that stretch the rules of aerodynamics (Vance Tucker notwithstanding). –AGF
It’s not parroting of an urban legend as I said it has been ‘clocked’, i.e. measured, in 1999 in one case.
Why do you think it ‘stretched the rules of aerodynamics’, perhaps you think that dimples on golfballs have no effect?
I showed Franklin was a fraudster years ago: his special effects man had a heyday with the raw footage (unavailable, of course). Nobody has even made an attempt to compare stoop speeds by species, subspecies, gender, weight, wing position, kill strategy, collision speed, etc. Allerstam came the closest, but he blows his credibility when he claims 110mph at a shallow angle (video+radar, wings out). Sorry, duck hawk science is no better than climate science. –AGF
Really?
http://jeb.biologists.org/content/201/3/403
Most of the readers here are acquainted with the shortcomings of models (like Tucker’s) as opposed to measured reality. From Tucker:
“Estimates of their top speed in a dive range up to 157 m/s, although speeds this high have never been accurately measured.”
157 m/sec = 351mph!
“They would encounter both advantages and disadvantages by diving at the top speeds of ideal falcons, and whether they achieve those speeds remains to be investigated.”
20 years later this is still true.
To his credit Tucker took wind tunnel measurements of both a frozen falcon and another with wings removed, and in both cases got a terminal speed of 70mph–a far cry from 351mph or his “ideal” falcon. Except for the case noted above Allerstam never gunned a bird at over 90mph, plus or minus, somewhat in the realm of reason.
One would think that with the miniaturization of GPS the truth would come out. I suspect it has, and nobody likes it.
And if we want to talk theory, we might consider the usefulness of such a phenomenal speed, how it evolved, when it is of any use, how fast is the gyrfalcon, why is there such a prowess imbalance between predator and prey, and so on. Typically the predator is just a wee bit faster than the least able prey. If this were not the case population balance would fluctuate dangerously.
Nobody seems to know how to ask the right questions, let alone answer them.
For the record, DNA analysis has indicated falcons are related to parrots rather than hawks, potentially throwing the taxonomy and nomenclature into a quandary. –AGF
One advantage of having extra speed:
Here in the states, the U.S.Forest Service has had conferences on Pyroterrorism, or terrorists starting fires.
I took a year off work in 1990 and travelled around Australia in a 4WD and a caravan. We saw this happening in the Northern Territory around the edges of a bush fire.
It is fascinating to watch and we watched the Kites (birds) doing it for about 30 mins. I assumed it was well known behaviour. Certainly, the National Parks guy I spoke to said he had seen it many times.
1) The more common the phenomenon the more easily it is documented. Why can’t anyone show us any video?
2) Is the claim peculiar to Australia? I’ve never heard it in these parts, where fires are pretty common (Mountain West , U.S.).
3) So firebreaks don’t work in Australia; the birds are too smart.
4) They are not satisfied with the speed of the fire line. Too many birds, not enough mice. This fire is too small.
5) They can increase their chances of catching lunch by abandoning the big fire and starting a little one.
6) If they succeed in lighting a new fire, the two may soon merge. Do they start new fires selfishly or altruistically?
7) Do some have marital problems and choose to burn the nest instead?
8) If they are such experts in starting fires, why don’t they just pool their resources and maintain a permanent camp fire?
9) Maybe Josh could draw a cartoon of birds sitting around the fire, telling old forest ranger tales.
–AGF
This sounds like BS to me.
Anyone who posts an article like this,
without an honest video or at least some pictures
of it happening, is a BSer.
The comments were interesting, however.
Richard Greene writes “It matters because this website is dedicated to real climate science and finding and exposing junk climate science”.
It does that fairly often but isn’t exclusive. I very much enjoy the occasional W.E. sailing adventure.
“This boid article is off topic and I think it’s BS.”
Of course it’s BS and from time to time a BS story is posted here so we can see what the world is saying without having to go to all these places and give them clicks.
The story is also useful to remember that sea level rise after the last glacial period was HUGE compared to the 1 meter anticipated rise.
“We skeptics don’t like to be fooled.”
There is no “we” skeptics! Skeptics are like libertarians; I’m skeptical of you, and you are skeptical of me. I like being fooled if it is a really good joke, something like a puzzle.
“it has taken bandwidth away that could have been used for a climate science article.”
Plenty of bandwidth and space exists on the world’s disk drives and more can be made.
“from some poor struggling climate writer who got bumped for bird fiction.”
I happen to like bird fiction. In fact, in that day’s postings it was what I first reviewed. Perhaps the moderator can chime in whether anyone was “bumped” for this.
“And you have annoyed me too Michael 2 so tell me where you live and I’m coming over there to get you”
Chuckle out loud. One of the small benefits of having an extremely common name (and a proxy).
“No American birds are starting fires.”
Not intentionally anyway. I wonder what happens to the flaming birds that crash in the desert at the Ivanpah solar thermal facility.
Richard Greene writes “This sounds like BS to me” and “The comments were interesting, however.”
Indeed they are interesting, particularly the people proclaiming their disbelief. Why does it matter?
It matters because this website is dedicated
to real climate science and
finding and exposing junk climate “science”.
This boid article is off topic and I think it’s BS.
We skeptics don’t like to be fooled.
If so it has taken bandwidth away
that could have been used
for a climate science article.
from some poor struggling climate writer
who got bumped for bird fiction.
Something is wrong with the article / author
if the comments are much better than it was.
And you have annoyed me too Michael 2
so tell me where you live and I’m coming
over there to get you — just give me a few
moments to catch my breath before
the rumble starts.
Here’s how I feel about boids:
— I feed the ones near my house with three
nyjer seed feeders and a heated bird bath.
I hate to see birds in cages or any other animals.
No American birds are starting fires.
And the Australian birds are not smart enough!
Richard Greene January 15, 2018 at 2:11 pm
It matters because this website is dedicated
to real climate science and
finding and exposing junk climate “science”.
Not according to the host:
About Watts Up With That? News and commentary on puzzling things in life, nature, science, weather, climate change, technology, and recent news by Anthony Watts