
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Does record breaking winter cold cast doubt on climate predictions of milder winters? Could ANY weather or climate shift cast doubt on the dominance of that wicked little trace molecule? Apparently not, according to leading climate explainers.
It’s cold outside, but that doesn’t mean climate change isn’t real
Sammy Roth, USA TODAY Published 5:13 p.m. ET Dec. 28, 2017
This week’s cold snap has brought record-low temperatures, freezing rain and heavy snow to much of the United States. But 2017 is still on track to be the second- or third-hottest year ever recorded globally — and scientists say climate change is to blame.
…
Even this week’s cold weather is probably being caused at least in part by global warming, said Jonathan Overpeck, a climate scientist at the University of Michigan.
The Arctic is warming much faster than most of the planet, leading to a dramatic decline in the amount of sea ice that covers the region each winter. That loss of ice has allowed more heat to transfer from the ocean to the atmosphere, causing a weakening of the polar vortex winds over the Arctic. Those winds usually “insulate the rest of the Northern Hemisphere” from freezing Arctic temperatures, Overpeck said. But as the winds have weakened, it’s gotten easier for freezing Arctic air to swoop further south, he said.
“That is due to the warming of the Arctic, which in turn is due to human emissions of greenhouse gases and primarily burning of fossil fuels,” Overpeck said in an interview.
Arctic warming may also be contributing to the long-term drying of the U.S. Southwest, although the science on that front is less certain, Overpeck said. Unlike most of the rest of North America, the Southwest is warmer than usual right now, and 2017 will “without a doubt” go down as one of the region’s hottest years ever measured, Overpeck said.
“This is contributing to our record wildfires in California, and the drying out of vegetation that’s leading to those wildfires, and the drying out of the Southwest’s water,” he said.
…
So what happens if global temperatures take a real plunge for a sustained period? Don’t worry, the explainers have that one covered as well – James Hansen, former NASA GISS Director, published a paper which suggests global warming will trigger a short ice age in the near future (see the graph at the top of the page).
… Global temperature becomes an unreliable diagnostic of planetary condition as the ice melt rate increases. Global energy imbalance (Fig. 15b) is a more meaningful measure of planetary status as well as an estimate of the climate forcing change required to stabilize climate. Our calculated present energy imbalance of ∼ 0.8 W m−2 (Fig. 15b) is larger than the observed 0.58 ± 0.15 W m−2 during 2005–2010 (Hansen et al., 2011). The discrepancy is likely accounted for by excessive ocean heat uptake at low latitudes in our model, a problem related to the model’s slow surface response time (Fig. 4) that may be caused by excessive small-scale ocean mixing.
Large scale regional cooling occurs in the North Atlantic and Southern oceans by mid-century (Fig. 16) for 10-year doubling of freshwater injection. A 20-year doubling places similar cooling near the end of this century, 40 years ear- lier than in our prior simulations (Fig. 7), as the factor of 4 increase in current freshwater from Antarctica is a 40-year advance.
Cumulative North Atlantic freshwater forcing in sverdrup years (Sv years) is 0.2 Sv years in 2014, 2.4 Sv years in 2050, and 3.4Sv years (its maximum) prior to 2060 (Fig. S14). The critical issue is whether human-spurred ice sheet mass loss can be approximated as an exponential process during the next few decades. Such nonlinear behavior depends upon amplifying feedbacks, which, indeed, our climate simulations reveal in the Southern Ocean. …
Read more: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/3761/2016/acp-16-3761-2016.pdf
Global warming is an infinitely flexible, unscientific, unfalsifiable theory which can be stretched to accommodate any observation. Some Climate Scientists even shamelessly reject the very concept of scientific falsification with regard to the conduct of climate science.
…
1. Methods aren’t always necessarily falsifiable
Falsifiability is the idea that an assertion can be shown to be false by an experiment or an observation, and is critical to distinctions between “true science” and “pseudoscience”.
Climate models are important and complex tools for understanding the climate system. Are climate models falsifiable? Are they science? A test of falsifiability requires a model test or climate observation that shows global warming caused by increased human-produced greenhouse gases is untrue. It is difficult to propose a test of climate models in advance that is falsifiable.
Science is complicated – and doesn’t always fit the simplified version we learn as children.
This difficulty doesn’t mean that climate models or climate science are invalid or untrustworthy. Climate models are carefully developed and evaluatedbased on their ability to accurately reproduce observed climate trends and processes. This is why climatologists have confidence in them as scientific tools, not because of ideas around falsifiability.
The Conversation: Climate change has changed the way I think about science. Here’s why
No matter what happens to the weather, the climate explainers shamelessly cobble together an explanation which blames bad weather on your sinful lifestyle.
Whatever the observation, the climate explainers have their theory – their infinitely adaptable theory, which they claim is science. Warm weather confirms their worst fears. Cold weather is waved away. Whatever the observation, the explainers shamelessly adapt their theory to provide an explanation, based on their “scientific” theory which cannot be falsified by any conceivable observations, event an abrupt plunge into a new ice age.
I have been reviewing Chesapeake Bay water levels for 22 years. The ocean is not rising. Do the research yourself. My co-worker has been keeping record of Bay water levels for 48 years. His conclusion is the same. Tangier Island levels have actually gone down. Trump saved the USA trillions. Now it’s time to cut back on billions of wasted foreign aid. Happy New Year!
I am appalled that you would bring observed realities into this “political science” issue!
To say that there is a greater chance that Arctic blasts are due to “global warming” than the drying of the American Southwest is both rather mind boggling and Orwellian. The environmental movement has put almost all of its eggs in the global warming or climate change basket. As a result, it has become a faith of theirs, they get even more absurd with their predictions, and they cannot tolerate any skepticism. We’ve seen some wild predictions – over 30 years ago I was told in science class that the ocean would have risen a foot by now – but they are going to get even wilder. Perhaps they will start to use this to explain plate techtonics as well as extraterrestrial changes in temperature.
This things gets more like religion every day.
To say that record cold is the result of heat is literally insane.
Wow, it is as if they make this shit up as needed. Notice how their model did not predict deeper, longer and more frequent blasts of arctic air? But a model must be able to predict events and not merely “explain” them away when they occur. This is exactly what intelligent skeptics point out. These models HAVE NO PREDICTION VALUE. Ad hoc jargon-choked SCIENCEY speculations replace predictability.
It appears that the sophists (click here http://www.iep.utm.edu/sophists/ for an article on sophists in ancient Greece) in “Anthropological Global Warming” camp have a handy fallacy on every occasion. What they mostly do is that they construct various “possible” scenarios, virtually none of which has been verified as actual or even possible.
But the most serious flaw in their “theory” is that they have switched the burden of proof. First, they failed to prove that their “theory” is valid, providing extensive sophistry that masqueraded as “proof”. Then they self-proclaimed their “theory” as “settled science” (which is neither settled nor science). Now, they reject all the evidence that their “theory” is contradictory with the reality by insisting that the observed facts do not disprove global warming.
The shortest fallacious inference of this kind I have seen was “The existence of winter does not disprove the global warming.” It tacitly assumes that the global warming has been proved and anyone who questions it must prove it is not happening. And that is the real scientific fraud.
It is always something horrible with these purveyors of negativity.No matter what it is doom and gloom.If It were warm we would melt .wWhrn it is cold and does not mesh with previous predictions — they will create new farces. There is s method underlying this approach.It is their hatred of capitalism and freedom.Objective ultimately collectivism a one world Marxist style totalitarianism.Just listen carefully to the rhetoric and their philosophical bent.
What does this mean censorship
It is always something horrible with these purveyors of negativity.No matter what it is doom and gloom.If It were warm we would melt .When it is cold and does not mesh with previous predictions — they will create new farces. There is s method underlying this approach.It is their hatred of capitalism and freedom.Objective ultimately collectivism a one world Marxist style totalitarianism.Just listen carefully to the rhetoric and their philosophical bent.
The AGW loons and luddites are only searching for a pry-bar with which to force their statist cult on the rest of society. They care not for the costs, financial or in human lives, for ham-stringing economies or technological advancement. They only care about virtue signaling to other smug liberals while driving their Teslas.
All I can say is mini ice age is coming and you global warming fools will be sitting in prison for stealing billions in funding on lies
Trofim Lysenko would have been welcomed into this crowd with open arms!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
If this is expected they why did they tell us cold weather/snow was going to nonexistent?
Sigh. If only Hansen had a clue…
All the scientific evidence is truely hard to produce the logic why is the Weather so strange. But it is up to us humans to try to adapt. All i no its weird.
So… wonder how much in government grants Jonathan Overpeck, climate scientist at the University of Michigan, get paid / year? UofM has become a real next of idiots… Coach Bo would be spinning in his grave!
Climate-Splainers.
A new word.
I like it.
Falsifiability is the idea that an assertion can be shown to be false by an experiment or an observation, and is critical to distinctions between “true science” and “pseudoscience”.
Science is complicated – and doesn’t always fit the simplified version we learn as children.
So “Conjectures and Refutations” by Karl Popper – about science needing to be falsifiable – is reading for children? I don’t think so.
Moving from childhood to adulthood the biggest new learned behaviour is dishonesty, and the sophistication thereof.
We change from being curious about the atmospheres, ocean and climate history, to being drones cynically obedient to a climate AGW doctrine that deep down we know to be false. And call the “childlike” ones who disagree “denyers”.
Fact, we’ve had the Farenhieght thermometer for approx. 500 years. Assuming the MILLIONS of years that the earth has existed how can anyone reasonably assume they have a clue about what is “normal” for the climate? It’s pure hubris. A wiser man would recognize that that it’s the equivalent of a mayfly complaining it was too hot on the day it was born & died.
Dear WattsUp, you’re blog is awesome! Two questions: Wouldn’t warmer climate self-regulate by additional evaporation forming more clouds increasing earth’s albedo reflecting more heat back into space? And, doesn’t minimal atmospheric co2 absorb all the light at its own bandwidth anyway, so that increasing it won’t hold in more heat anyway? -Bob E., Real Science Radio, Denver, Colo.
And yet, if we turn our economy and freedom over to climate alarmists to “do the right thing” you will never see another article about its dangers. Even if the earth actually does get warmer. All this is is a scheme to get and retain power, privilege and celebrity. Nothing else.
Anything to justify their cause
The truth is had to ignor
Once again the Man Made Climate change goofs prove that Man Made Climate change is not a science but a religion! You must believe!!!!!
Man Made Climate change has failed and continues to fail the scientific method.
I think I’ll go sun bathe now.
I read through every one of the so-called “explanations” as to why in spite of the weather becoming more artic, the planet was still “warming”. Not one of these “scientists” mentioned solar activity. Excuse me, but as a scientist, or even a meteorologist, would not the single major factor in the earth’s temperatures have something to do with any model? Apparently not if you wish to maintain a falsehood that you know is false.
I don’t care if the world spontaneously combusts tomorrow. I’m increasing my carbon footprint!