Claim: Electric cars could ‘power our lives’

Energy from electric cars could power our lives — but only if we improve the system

Two apparently contradictory studies come together with recommendations

Oxford, November 22, 2017 – Power stored in electric cars could be sent back to the grid – thereby supporting the grid and acting as a potential storage for clean energy – but it will only be economically viable if we upgrade the system first. In a new paper in Energy Policy, two scientists show how their seemingly contradictory findings actually point to the same outcome and recommendations: that pumping energy back into the grid using today’s technology can damage car batteries, but with improvements in the system it has the potential to provide valuable clean energy – and improve battery life in the process.

Electric cars store excess energy when they are idle. Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology makes it possible to transfer that energy back to the grid when the car is not being used. This energy could help regulate the frequency of the electricity supply, reduce the amount of electricity purchased at peak times and increase the power output of the system.

Two recent studies, one by Dr. Kotub Uddin at the University of Warwick in the UK and the other by Dr. Matthieu Dubarry at the Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, seem contradictory, with one suggesting that V2G degrades car batteries and the other that it improves battery life. But the two scientists worked together to look at how their studies overlap, showing that they actually come to the same conclusion.

“Although both our papers seem contradictory, they are actually complimentary,” said Dr. Dubarry. “V2G is not going to be easy, but, if done properly, it has a chance to make a difference for both utilities and electric vehicle owners. We need more research to understand the process better and benefit from the technology.”

The two authors agreed that in order to be economically viable, V2G has to be optimized between the requirements of the car owner, the utilities and the capability of the grid. In other words, the needs of the different people and systems involved have to be balanced. The question then became ‘can this technology be profitable?’

The previous studies had different approaches to answering this question: Dr. Dubarry showed that using today’s V2G technology can be detrimental to the car battery, while Dr. Uddin found a smarter grid would make the process economically viable, and even improve the battery. In the new paper, they critiqued each other’s work and found shared conclusions. With improvements to the system, V2G could actually improve electric car battery life and be profitable for everyone involved.

Measuring the impact of the technology on the battery is challenging. After two years of analyzing lithium-ion batteries, Dr. Uddin and his team developed an accurate battery degradation model that can predict the capacity and power fade in a battery over time under different conditions, such as temperature, state of charge and depth of discharge. That means the model can predict the impact of V2G on battery health. Using this model, they created a smart grid algorithm that shows how much charge a battery needs for daily use and how much can be taken away to optimize battery life.

Dr. Uddin says funding is needed to develop new testing standards and control strategies to guide policies that support V2G. One key element to improving the system, he says, will be the measurement of battery degradation.

“The metrics used to define battery degradation may also impact the optimization process,” he explained. “A critical component is who is responsible for estimating battery degradation? Utilities are currently taking the lead in the EU, but it might be more economical for the battery manufacturers or car manufacturers to do it. In this case, standards need to be written which define what we mean by ‘state of health’ when it comes to batteries, and the metrics that are used to determine it.”


The paper:

“The Viability of Vehicle-to-Grid Operations from a Battery Technology and Policy Perspective” by Kotub Uddin, Matthieu Dubarry, and Mark B. Glick. (DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.015). The article appears in Energy Policy (November 2017), published by Elsevier.

Link to the paper:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 23, 2017 10:08 am

Ok…so who pays me for my worn out battery after 700 cycle discharges if I am helping to stabilize the grid?

Joel O’Bryan
Reply to  Earthling2
November 23, 2017 10:24 am

Don’t be silly. In Marxism, everything belongs to the State.

Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
November 23, 2017 11:41 am

It’s for the common good, don’t you know

Reply to  Earthling2
November 26, 2017 11:27 pm

What do you if your house catches fire just as your contribution to the grid has depleted the battery?
i guess you can push the car down the street.

Alan Robertson
November 23, 2017 10:11 am

“After two years… Dr. Uddin and his team developed an accurate battery degradation model… Dr. Uddin says funding is needed.”
Happy Thanksgiving!

November 23, 2017 10:11 am

Just don’t use your car in an emergency or unexpectedly and everything will be fine…

Reply to  Phoenix44
November 23, 2017 10:46 am

Just don’t use your car. That’s the goal.

Reply to  Adrian Roman
November 24, 2017 9:27 am

It would appear that the energy usage in the morning and early evening is the highest which is also when we need our cars, to go to and come from work. How would the system make sure that cars are available with charge exactly when the system is most likely to be sucking the cars dry of energy? It wouldn’t.

They are make one really bad assumption. They assume that electric cars would not be needed during times of high energy demand and low energy production from our unreliable green energy sources. It also means that we would have no ability to rely on having a working car at any time needed. It also makes electric cars part of the grid which would necessarily lead to efforts by the government to control the plugging in of the cars. We cannot have the grid at the whim of the people can we? Clearly cars would no longer be privately owned and permanent plug-in would be the state’s preference, with the “owner”, of course, paying the maintenance and replacements of the batteries.

Reply to  Phoenix44
November 23, 2017 10:59 am

That’s why the bicycle is there. !!

Reply to  AndyG55
November 23, 2017 11:08 am


My current bicycle has 4 cylinders, 95BHP, 1200cc’s and if I pedal hard enough it’ll do 150MPH with a 0 – 60 time of around 3.5 seconds. Tiring, but fun.

Reply to  AndyG55
November 23, 2017 11:34 am

Kawasaki VN800 😉

Reply to  AndyG55
November 23, 2017 2:01 pm

Mine ISBN Honda 600 Shadow my son has HD ElectraGlide.

Reply to  AndyG55
November 23, 2017 7:17 pm

BMW R 1200 R. Only 125 hp.

John Schneider
Reply to  AndyG55
November 24, 2017 9:13 am

Triumph Trophy SE (1200 cc’s)

Reply to  AndyG55
November 29, 2017 9:05 am

ZX-10R :^)

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Phoenix44
November 23, 2017 7:46 pm

Fergawdsake, the battery in a Leaf won’t even power your house for long, how can it backfeed the freakin’ grid? Total INSANITY!

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Pop Piasa
November 23, 2017 7:52 pm

Okay, I get it! Use my portable gas generator to charge my car while it feeds the grid in case I need to go anywhere. Yeah, that’s the ticket!

Reply to  Pop Piasa
November 24, 2017 5:08 am

Hey, yes, that is the answer. Car battery energy is Green, so must pay three times the price of fossil fuels. So you charge the car with a diesel generator, and sell the car battery energy back to the grid at three times the price. Ok – sign me up……


November 23, 2017 10:19 am

Image going out to your car to drive it to work, and finding it’s half drained by the power company to help balance the load from an wind power not meeting needs.


Reply to  schitzree
November 23, 2017 11:23 am

You should be willing to sacrifice your and your family’s well-being in order to help SaveThePlanet™, comrade. Why do you hate the planet and everyone on it?

Pop Piasa
Reply to  PiperPaul
November 23, 2017 8:04 pm

Paul, you left out the ‘caring about your grandchildren’ part… 3 demerits!

Ian Magness
November 23, 2017 10:22 am

“The question then became ‘can this technology be profitable?”
Well, the UK’s wondrous Chancellor – Spreadsheet Phil – answered that in yesterday’s Budget. The answer is: for employees, yes, absolutely, for employers, not. He decided that electricity charged into batteries from the expected free, save-the-plant, workplace EV charging facilities would not be regarded as a taxable benefit in kind for the employee. So, following the finest traditions of unexpected consequences, anticipate employees across the UK to queue up every working day to charge their batteries to the full (and, hang on, why not have several batteries for this purpose?). Then drive those batteries home and use all that lovely free energy!!
Well done Phil! You have a clear grasp of all the eventualities here.

Joel O’Bryan
Reply to  Ian Magness
November 23, 2017 10:26 am

It’s easy when it’s OPM.

The Original Mike M
Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
November 23, 2017 6:47 pm

OPE – Other People’s Electrons

Carl Friis-Hansen
Reply to  Ian Magness
November 23, 2017 10:30 am

Ian, I think the idea is to discharge during peak hours and charge during off-peak. As most are at work during peak hours, you may expect to only come half way home from work 🙂

Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
November 23, 2017 10:37 am

Too bad for the poor folk who work night shift with no charger until going home to plug in all day. They will even have to pay more for time of day use…

Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
November 23, 2017 2:21 pm

If everyone is charging massive battery banks overnight there is no “off-peak”. The term becomes a non-concept.

Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
November 23, 2017 3:36 pm

Then they put the Smart meter in for nothing…except for saving on labour for reading the bill remotely. Might even be someday, that the electricity is higher priced at night because everyone is charging their EV car at home at night. Whether or not there is actually more demand load on the grid or not. They have a captive ‘audience’ who need a fully charged car the next morning.

Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
November 23, 2017 7:01 pm

I recall that Gavin Schmidt, when confronted with a similar question mentioned Rebates as a solution.
Yeah, that’ll work…

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
November 23, 2017 8:19 pm

It’s simple. Trans-oceanic grids carry the power from the day side to the night side and vicey-versey (nyuk nyuk). We’ll have a green-wired Gaia. All that is missing is your contribution! Send your pledge now!

Reply to  Ian Magness
November 23, 2017 10:48 am

Profitable????? I can’t see this as even being feasible. But send money so we can further research the matter.

Reply to  barryjo
November 23, 2017 11:52 am

Has academia ever actually been the group to decide if anythng is profitable? outside tuition and climate scamming of course

Reply to  Ian Magness
November 23, 2017 11:12 am


Never mind night shift.

I don’t have a drive, like 40% of the UK.

WTF do I do? Raid the nearest lamp post?

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 12:17 pm

I guess time to emigrate? We need more WASP’s over here.

Or maybe you just answered your own question. The lamp posts could all be wired up to plug in a few cars with some wiring upgrades. Sort of kidding…I see some lamp posts are now wi-fi access points/repeaters for cities offering up free wi-fi.

I have a private drive 2 miles long at one of my places. What a pain to keep that clear of snow in winter.

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 1:08 pm


I’m emigrating OK, ideally back to Scotland (I live in SE England, Dartford, Kent; the garden of England…..ahem) however, I’m not bothering whilst the insane socialist Scottish Nationalist Party is still in government up there. I would seriously consider Australia, but their government is just as nutty, Canada? No better as far as I can gather.

Where are you? I like the idea of a 2 mile long driveway (“at one of my places”?!!**!&?) snow or no snow. But on a budget of £300-400K, I don’t expect to find anything like that within easy striking distance of a reasonably sized town anywhere in the civilised west.

BTW, although you are correct, perhaps a bit assumptive describing me as a WASP. I mean, we hardly know each other. ~coquettish turn of the head, with fluttering eyelashes and a seductive smile as I exit stage left~. (difficult for an overweight, bald 6′ 2″ guy, but I carried it off well, don’t you think?)


Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 1:09 pm

Errrrrrrrr……….I forgot the heterosexual bit. Definitely hetro!

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 1:51 pm

Hotscott…bring women. I have a nice property(s) that most people on the planet would die for, albeit a little bit isolated but it is in the northern hemisphere around your same latitude. Very pleasant overall. It is just the damn internet and TV where I see all this grief. And the odd grizzly bear or cougar out making a living.

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 4:41 pm

I have lots of women mate, arguably too many.
Tell you what, I’ll deal with the Grizzly’s and Cougars, you deal with the women.
But to be honest, all the stuff you see on TV and the internet isn’t worth anything. Tomorrow, next week, next year, whenever, it’ll all change again, and the politicians will make out like bandits at our expense, again.
If you have a few quid in the bank and a comfortable life, if I were you, I would disengage from all this crap. We know the truth, the world has a climate, it changes, and there’s f*ck all mankind can do about it.
The politicians will screw us until there is another revolt, which will happen at some time, just history repeating itself. Natural events don’t respect, respect. We are a global, tribal community. Whatever anyone does in terms of globalisation, immigration, or integration, we will ultimately fracture into tribal communities. Humanity defies management.
The lunacy is, that politicians continue to try to manage humanity, largely by the blunt instrument called taxation. So far, many have lost their heads over their arrogant manipulation, and many will in the future.

Andy Pattullo
Reply to  Ian Magness
November 24, 2017 8:24 am

This sounds accurate. The proposal is the technology version of paying individuals to dig holes and then paying them again to fill them in. And of course the paying is done by all of us taxpayers, and there should be no limit to that resource, right?

November 23, 2017 10:25 am

What happens to the the system when everybody goes to work each morning, fully discharging the battery, then goes home again fully discharging the battery. There are 2 major peaks each day that will have to be filled. Only then could the batteries be used to stabilize the grid. Sounds like the power companies will have to spend even more for peaking plants just to make this idea workable.

Reply to  stephana
November 23, 2017 11:16 am


To be fair, most commuter journey’s are probably less than half an hour at, probably, less than 20MPH (in London the average speed is 11MPH) so daily discharge won’t amount to much.

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 11:56 am

most commuters journeys are less than half an hour ??? based on what? I have never in a lifetime had a commute that short, and observing peak hours that last 2-3 hours leads me to think that many/most have commutes way over 30 minutes.

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 12:08 pm


I have no idea where you live, but generally speaking, most people in the UK live within reasonable striking distance of where they work. So teachers, nurses, doctors; factory workers etc. etc. generally live in the immediate vicinity of work, mostly well within 30 minutes.

I live on the South East border of London. I used to drive to the North West corner which took me around 90 minutes, across one of the busiest cities in the world. Everyone I knew thought I was insane. I packed that in, bought a motorbike and halved my journey time.

My personal opinion is that if one is adding more than an hour or so onto each end of a working day, it’s not worth the angst or one’s family time.

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 12:13 pm

The difference between a Brit and a Murrican; you think a hundred miles is a long distance, we think a hundred years is a long time.

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 12:43 pm


I suspect 100 miles on an American road is quite a different prospect to 100 miles between London and Birmingham (not quite, but close enough for this purpose) simply because of congested traffic.

I frequently travel between south east London and Glasgow, around 400 miles. Whenever I can, I drive at 95MPH and I have yet to do that journey in less than 8 hours. I usually have one splash and dash of 15 minutes or so. The journey has frequently taken me far longer, my worst example, over 12 hours.

An exception, but I went from Dartford in Kent, to Colchester in Essex. The round trip is around 2 hours. One particular day, it took me 12 hours. Nor is that unusual as the road network around the M25 (London orbital, 3 lane motorway) is frequently gridlocked.

Reply to  HotScot
November 24, 2017 1:18 am

Akatsukami – brilliant definition of the national difference!

Hotscot is right about UK car commuting…

But note that most of commuters into London use rail, then bus (and car journeys and ownership in London are still falling).

this link is interesting because it gives the commuting stats for 1854!

Reply to  HotScot
November 24, 2017 3:24 am


With respect, what a London centric mentality overlooks is that life beyond London carries on without it. Throughout the home counties alone there are towns and cities where people work and flourish, largely without the transport services devoted to London.

Glasgow (a single, circular tube line), Edinburgh, Manchester, York, Newcastle, Oxford etc. have nothing like the transport infrastructure of London so people drive to work. And with all the tube lines available in London, they are building Crossrail, and planning a north south version. Edinburgh, the capital of Scotland gets a tram line, no better than Croydon.

Try going to your local school, the biggest car parking allocations are devoted to teachers, guaranteed! (And when the caretaker tried to chase me out of the ‘staff only car park’, I asked him how many teachers are declaring free car parking at work to HMRC; and should I make some enquiries? I now park in the Head Teachers ‘Reserved’ spot whenever it’s available). The vast majority of those teachers are local. Similarly, out of town factories, supermarkets, construction sites etc. etc. are almost always, only reliably accessible with a car.

Which forms much of my objection to many policies imposed on the rest of the country, like air quality. London doesn’t like diesels, so the rest of the country unaffected by them, pay to clean up London. And I understand a recent air quality survey found London’s air to be cleaner than Blackpool, a coastal town, that’s just not credible, or, something’s wrong with the London/restofUK balance.

Frankly, the sooner London becomes it’s own country and the UK can extract rent from it, the better as far as I’m concerned. We can squeeze it till the pips squeak, just as it’s been doing to the rest of the country throughout history.

Dodgy Geezer
November 23, 2017 10:26 am

i didn’t want to read the latest explanation of why some activist’s idea will work if I alter my life to help it.

I am just getting sick of idiots

November 23, 2017 10:32 am

This may be the dumbest study EVAH!! These yokels for some reason think that electric car batteries are somehow a mostly free unused resource the utilities can tap. They are attempting to determine the effects on the batteries from utility usage, presumably in order to determine how much the car owners need to be compensated. And they also talk of massive changes to the grid, apparently to allow utilities to tap car batteries, apparently during the day, while at work, etc. We are therefore talking potentially very large changes. The first criticism I can think of this scheme is that
it stupidly attempts to determine costs due the car owner , when the costs can be accurately determined in the manner any sane person would follow – simply buy batteries and don’t “rent” them
by using electric car owner batteries. By owning the batteries, there is no need to make any massive changes to the grid, and the battery energy would be available to the grid 24/7. Since paying owners will essentially cost the same as buying batteries and requires a whole lot of expensive grid changes, the idea of “renting” electric car batteries cannot possibly make any economic sense, or sense of any sort. The second issue is why these people think that
energy stored in batteries is going to solve the problem of non-dispatchability of renewable power generators wind and solar. Batteries STORE energy. They don’t GENERATE energy, folks. The energy to charge the batteries has to come from somewhere.If it comes from fossil fuel plants, then why the need for batteries? Just have enough fossil capacity to back up the renewables. If it comes from the renewables then you have a big guessing game : how much battery capacity is needed and how much renewable capacity is needed? Renewable capacity is an inexact number, dependent upon the amount of solar radiation or wind. So there is no answer – no matter how much battery and renewable generation capacity one amasses, your power generation remains unreliable. A suggestion : instead of all these nutty and complicated schemes that attempt to make an unreliable source of power reliable (an impossibility actually – at some point one needs a reliable generator, and a battery ain’t one), why not simply realize that molten salt small modular reactors are the answer and get in line to order a couple? It’s not as though doing something today will have any different effect from doing something 5 years from now. So quit trying to save the planet and avoid screwing up things you really don’t understand.

Reply to  arthur4563
November 23, 2017 11:56 am


Calm down mate, this sort of thing isn’t going to affect you and I much, unless you’re in your 20’s, even then, it’ll probably be our grandkids who’ll have to deal with it all.

I suspect the overriding theory rumbling around in these guys heads is that we’ll eventually end up with a globally connected electricity grid, so when one side of the planet’s using juice, the other side ain’t.

Nice idea, until Russia, China, the USA and good old N.Korea get involved. Then the French’ll pitch up and really screw everything up.

I mean, the idea’s nice, but the infrastructure cost of something like that will make even a socialist’s eyes bleed……well, maybe not quite.

It’s a bit like mobile phones and internet access. Fantastic if you live in London, Paris, LA, Sau Paolo or Beijing, but venture anywhere even remotely, remote and Bps speeds in the UK drop to 8 or 9 as standard. And when I say remotely, remote, I mean within 5 or 10 miles of a small city like Glasgow or Edinburgh. If they can’t manage a now basic service with lightweight cables and fibre, what chance have they got with heavy duty high voltage electricity cables. The whole of the UK would be criss crossed with pylon mounted cables beefing up the current (no pun intended) wimpy network, because they certainly won’t spring for underground cables.

But seriously, we’ll be pushing up the daises by the time it happens, and unlike the greens, I’m happy for our kids and grandkids to sort the problem out themselves, just like our ancestors paid for the Napoleonic wars fought by their ancestors, and we paid for WW1 and WW2 fought by our parents and grandparents.

What really p*sses me off though, is that income tax was first introduced in the UK to pay for the Napoleonic wars, so how has it been distorted into the mass social, financial hammock it’s now become?

WTF did we all miss there?

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 1:47 pm

Yep, the problem with with the idea of a globally connected electricity grid is that you will eventually run out of other people’s electricity.

Reply to  HotScot
November 23, 2017 4:00 pm


It’s the lure of perpetual motion. The holy grail of science.

Everyone recognises it’s unachievable, yet it remains the unutterable source of wealth and fame.

So the objective is, to get as close to it as possible, no matter the cost.

Nirvana, on an inexhaustible budget, exhausted when mankind finally ceases to exist.

It’s very source represents it’s futility.

But at least it represents hope and ambition, which has done mankind very well so far.

Joel O’Bryan
November 23, 2017 10:37 am

Dr. Dubarry showed that using today’s V2G technology can be detrimental to the car battery, while Dr. Uddin found a smarter grid would make the process economically viable, and even improve the battery.

Okay, any votes on which of these guys you would trust with your wallet.

a) Duberry
b) Uddin
c) neither.

I’m in for c.

November 23, 2017 10:37 am

More science leeches making sciency noises.

Joel O’Bryan
November 23, 2017 10:40 am

AW, Is Google-WordPress shadow blocking comments? I have a comment lost somewhere in moderation that will not post, yet there is nothing that should send it to moderation language or vocabulary-wise.

Joel O’Bryan
Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
November 23, 2017 11:38 am

On another discussion thread (the Google post) here at your WUWT, I verified that WordPress would not let me post a URL linking to a UK DailyMail article that exposed E Schmidt’s girlfriends.

It seems to me you may be getting certain posts shadow banned, where they don’t show up for a certain time (a delay), which prevents immediate impact.

Scott Adams (of Dilbert fame) exposed shadow banning by Twitter, whereby many of his high impact followers would not see his tweets for many hours, greatly inhibited his ability to trend his Tweet and to get re-tweets.

The big data companies are clearly silently at work on censorship with hard to detect methods.

Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
November 23, 2017 12:07 pm

“I verified that WordPress would not let me post a URL linking to a UK DailyMail article that exposed E Schmidt’s girlfriends.”

Wow, that is Big Botheresque. Sort of like being put on moder@tion here if you use the wrong word. Which is understandable here, and/or if you are real bad here, requiring a human to read the comment to see if it is fit to post.

Steven Fraser
Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
November 23, 2017 1:30 pm

Encode it so that it can be re-assembled by a person, but not detected by a program.

David Wells
November 23, 2017 10:41 am

Electric Phillip Hammond chancellor apparently knows more than Jeremy Clarkson about cars and about how electric driverless cars might behave. Jeremy apparently within 50 miles on the M4 was nearly killed twice by a driverless car. Phillip Hammond says driverless cars will allow the elderly to become independent again once they have had to give up their licence. Imagine minus 15C fog believing that the guy has input the right data into the GPS sets off and within 15 minutes goes to sleep – not unusual at 90 – only to wake up believing he was still safe in bed being driven at 90mph in thick fog hits a stretch of black ice and then slams into the back of pile up. Whose fault?? Or is this just another Paul Ehrlich type plot to reduce the population after the Co2 ploy has failed??

Joel O’Bryan
Reply to  David Wells
November 23, 2017 10:54 am

There are levels of survival the Progs are willing to accept. Your elderly pensioner will just be collateral damage on the road to Prog Utopia.

Reply to  David Wells
November 23, 2017 1:45 pm

Just look at the pile-ups we have here due to fog, black ice, blowing snow across roads, blizzards. And many of these with fatalities.

Some years back a Yugo was lifted off the Mackinaw Bridge just by wind. Victim’s body not recovered until spring. At the time the bridge was clear of ice and snow.

Gerry, England
Reply to  David Wells
November 25, 2017 12:40 pm

For the first time in years I actually learnt something from the drivel that pretends to be the magazine of a learned engineering institution. And that was that the signal from the GPS system is so weak it is easily jammed. Yes, see all the fun we can have with self-driving cars for only a small outlay on ebay. But, there was something else. You can actually spoof GPS. They didn’t think it was possible but it seems to be happening in places. You can ‘move’ location 30 miles or so. Think of the fun in that.

You don’t have to be 90 to fall asleep in cars. I can do it easily and if I have nothing to do to keep me alert it is almost certain. I always fall asleep on the train home from work everyday. And as far as I can see the only advantage of self driving cars is to get you back from the pub after getting tanked up, where once again you will probably be asleep.

November 23, 2017 10:50 am

This is tremendously efficient. Convert AC to DC to charge the battery. Discharge the battery back into the grid, changing the DC to AC. Repeat as many times as possible.

Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
November 23, 2017 11:27 am

It’s not just DC to AC though – like the feed in from domestic solar and wind, it would need to be converted from low voltage to high voltage to supply anything other than the immediate area.

Reply to  rjwooll
November 23, 2017 11:54 am

Nah.. Just re-wire every house to run off 24VDC !

Reply to  rjwooll
November 23, 2017 11:58 am

Electrons go both ways on a circuit…same transformer would send out AC electrons at 240 AC on secondary, and up to primary voltages on the HV transformer for Distribution to the neighbourhood. No rocket science required for any of this, other than some simple load management/priority switching in your house.

Reply to  rjwooll
November 23, 2017 12:50 pm

Should qualify that by saying electrons (can) go both ways on a circuit, obviously. But electrons on the same circuit always go to the closest load where they are utilized. Just like if you spin an Induction motor over speed by say 50 RPM, it becomes a generator and those electrons will be consumed at the closest load location at nearly the speed of light. You can even get near 3 phase efficiency on single phase induction generation if you put the right amount of capacitance on the unused legs of a 3 phase generator producing at single phase. The induction generator runs smoother, since less heat is wasted in the two unused legs. At 100% PF. You can even ‘lead’ the utility with excessive PF using excess capacitance, sending out free KVARS to the utility, (a benefit to the utility) although you risk ‘islanding’ your generation if the utility goes down, and you self excite. Would be very much frowned upon by the utility.

Reply to  rjwooll
November 23, 2017 1:42 pm

Sooo whats powering that induction motor?

Reply to  rjwooll
November 23, 2017 1:59 pm


Joel O’Bryan
Reply to  rjwooll
November 23, 2017 7:39 pm

Ohm’s Law.
The current loads at 24VDC would require doubling or more the wire gauge to prevent overheating and a fire.
I = V/R.

At 24 VDC, the power losses due to wire heating would become substantial.

November 23, 2017 10:54 am

I’m always suspicious of academics who say their work indicates the need for more research and funding.

The claim that the energy is ‘clean’ once it’s been in the battery sounds like energy laundering to me!

Reply to  rjwooll
November 23, 2017 11:13 am

What I find suspicious is when a academic admits the evidence is contradictory but decides it still proves his belief.


Reply to  rjwooll
November 23, 2017 12:02 pm

I used to work in an IT consultancy. All our reports suggested what the next area of work should be. Nothing suspicious just self promotion.

Sandy In Limousin
November 23, 2017 10:55 am

Wouldn’t it be simpler just to have the battery and drive a vehicle of whatever type suits your needs best? Has no-one thought of having domestic battery backup for problems on an unreliable grid. Or even simpler use a reliable power source for a National Grid.

Carl Friis-Hansen
Reply to  Sandy In Limousin
November 23, 2017 11:02 am

Living in rural Sweden, I have both battery UPS and three-phase diesel generator.

Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
November 23, 2017 11:20 am

On my boat I have 7 batteries (engine, genset, windlass/bow thruster, house loads(x4), all lead acid), a windmill, two solar panels, a solar/wind charge controller, a battery charger, an inverter, a connection to shore power (the grid) with a large isolation transformer and very large wires that need to be manually connected/disconnected, a diesel genset, a high-output alternator on the main engine, monitoring equipment, and more switches than you can imagine. Plus I have sails to move the boat if I don’t want to use the engine.

I am an engineer, and even I get the switch lineups wrong, occasionally. My wife has no idea how the system works. My mother would not understand anything about it if all this was powering her house.

Sara Hall
Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
November 23, 2017 12:46 pm

rxc, living on a boat for a long time, sailing to remote places with no chance of shore power or easy access to a diesel supply, you quickly learn just how and where the power comes from and just how much you can safely use! Maybe we should send some of these ill informed greenies to sea on a long ocean voyage.

Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
November 23, 2017 2:49 pm

rxc and Sara Hall: without a doubt! Running pretty much the same setup on a boat as rxc with no turbine – as yet – but beefed-up solar and a nice efficient 2 kW petrol generator with smart throttle.

The halfwit academics proposing their unphysical politically correct lunacy do indeed need to make personal practical demonstrations before the halfwit politicians oblige us all to live – or more likely die – in their fantasy world.

November 23, 2017 11:02 am

Perhaps a scenario where I could use my own car battery during peak times in my own house using time of night low rates, so when the EV is plugged into the house, I am using my own battery power, perhaps also combined with my own solar off the roof. The losses may not cancel out, but even if I had the house wired up such, then I would still have electricity in the house if the utility was down, or was on a rolling black out. Which would also take some load off the grid if I were using my own battery and/or solar.

The utility making use of my battery for peaking/stabilizing would technically work, but the losses on charging and discharging might make it a moot point. And not to mention my battery is wearing out with every charge and discharge cycle. I doubt there is enough Net left over to pay me a premium for using my battery. But I think it good to perfect the technology. I should be able to program my charger to keep it fully charged, and not be drained by the utility. This concept is good and might work if it were driven by honest market forces, but the problem is sooner or later, the Nanny State takes over and ruins everything. Just like OZ or Kalifornia, which is going down the tubes due to Marxist tendencies.

Reply to  Earthling2
November 23, 2017 11:09 am

invest in after market battery futures…..

Erik Magnuson
Reply to  Earthling2
November 23, 2017 1:08 pm

A couple of things.

First is that Li-ion batteries are relatively efficient in energy storage, significantly better than lead-acid batteries. With a significant price differential between peak and base load rates, it would be relatively easy to come out ahead if battery cost and lifetime are reasonable. That is cost per kw-hr divided by cycle life must be less than the peak versus non-peak rates.

Second is specifics on how battery charge is maintained can have a large effect on battery life, with the worst case of maintaining close to 100% charge at high battery temperatures. I also suspect that rate of discharge will have some effect on battery life, and a V2G application would probably have a lower discharge rate than freeway diving.

V2G is likely to be part of the solution to the solar duck problem, but poor battery management will kill the economics.

Reply to  Earthling2
November 23, 2017 1:49 pm

How long of an outage would the battery be good for and then what? How many people would have the knowledge to adjust load during a prolonged outage? I have fuel on hand for my generator for three days then there is the fuel in my vehicles.

Reply to  nc
November 23, 2017 2:17 pm

Would depend on the size of your battery. At that point you would be islanded to your battery, so then you would be best to have an auto load controller, priority panel. So then your fridge/freezer is highest on the pecking order, and your electric heat or A/C etc, is last, or is a load dump priority if you have surplus generation from whatever you are generating with. i.e. solar, water, gen-set. The voltage level of the battery would be the guidance for the priority load controller. This is why I am keen on a PHEV 4×4 Jeep. Just autostart up the micro diesel ICE generator in the Jeep when the voltage drops and plug yourself into the Jeep. Imagine towing that down to Arizona in the winter behind the RV. As long as you have diesel/gas, you have all the convenience of home with the efficiency of electricity. I figure .35 cents USD per Kw/hr would be a break even, maybe with 2-3 Kw of solar panels on the RV, it is the same price as the utility power. And you are beholden to no-one.

Snarling Dolphin
November 23, 2017 11:05 am

Uh, no.

November 23, 2017 11:08 am

They are going to re-wire us all….top down…so they have more control over us

November 23, 2017 11:08 am

No. Even in the unlikely scenario of electric cars having their own portable power source, who’d feed the grid with it?

geoffrey pohanka
November 23, 2017 11:18 am

I was told by someone in the know….they use the Tesla S as taxi cabs in Sweden. They average 390 km a day. After 360 charges, or about 80,000 miles, the batteries need to be replaced. The limits of electric cars…exposed.

Joel O’Bryan
Reply to  geoffrey pohanka
November 23, 2017 11:32 am

83% of electricity production in Sweden comes from nuclear and hydroelectric power. Their electricity is one of the cheapest in the EU because hydroelectric power provides about 47% of their grid demand.

steven F
Reply to  geoffrey pohanka
November 23, 2017 1:13 pm

Actually they passed 250,000 miles on the original battery. They only lost 7% of the battery capacity.

There are other taxi services that also use Teslas and they have the same experience. Generally the observation of owners is the battery looses 5% rather quickly and the battery loss slow dramatically to almost nothing. Also not these tesla taxies are using the tesla supper charger at least once daily which charges the car to 80% of capacity in about 20 to 30 minutes.

Reply to  geoffrey pohanka
November 24, 2017 10:38 pm

geoff – what’s wrong with
a new battery every
80 k miles?

think of all the
pollution that was

Vincent Causey
November 23, 2017 11:24 am

When/if all cars become electric, what happens to motor bikes? The only electric bikes I’ve seen are push bikes with a gentle electric motor assist. So, if electric motor bikes are impossible, and there are no longer any gas stations left . . . well, you get my drift.

Reply to  Vincent Causey
November 23, 2017 11:35 am

There are some purdy nice e-motorbikes on the market. Some of them extremely fast in the 1/4 mile. Here is a nice one for general riding…

Reply to  Earthling2
November 23, 2017 11:49 am

$21K, could get to town and wait 11 hours for the batteries to recharge for the return 100 mile trip.
The ‘Cost of Charge’ figures must be with unicorn dust.

Reply to  Earthling2
November 23, 2017 12:23 pm

Well, I did say some of them went extremely fast in the 1/4 mile. I didn’t say they went 300 miles on a charge.

November 23, 2017 11:37 am

The reason I charge my car is so I can use it. Why would I let anyone drain it so it might not have the range I need the next day?

I suppose there are some circumstances when I might be willing to do so for a fee, but I generally need my car fully charged.

Tractor Gent
November 23, 2017 11:40 am

Hmm. Network stability? Current electrical networks are designed such that generators are connected near the top of the grid hierarchy, where the network is ‘stiff’, that is moderate changes in power flow don’t impact on the network parameters too much. Consumers are mostly connected at low levels in the hierarchy, where the network is much less ‘stiff’ due to long transmission lines and their R, L and C values. Now, if we’re going to invert this significantly during certain periods, and a lot of power flow upwards occurs, I would not like to be the guy who tries to design the stabilisation systems, or the guy who manages the network, to maintain the supply at the edges within the tolerances mandated by the regulators. Or will these limits have to be relaxed, and we’re back to an early 20th century experience?

Reply to  Tractor Gent
November 23, 2017 12:14 pm

Plus a poorly designed controller, such that your car sits in the garage dithering between charge and discharge cycles every few seconds.

Reply to  Tractor Gent
November 23, 2017 1:53 pm

Protection engineers are already pulling their hair out.

Reply to  nc
November 23, 2017 4:23 pm

Especially with wind. A 100 Mw wind park could be producing 100% one minute, and the whole thing comes to a crashing stop with a lull in the wind and somehow they have to make up that 100 Mw with something else immediately without losing frequency and a possible blackout, probably with coal, gas or hydro base load from some other source on another distant circuit. Or what many jurisdictions have had to do, install diesel back-up and have a back-up spinning reserve. At least solar doesn’t usually collapse to 0 in the middle of the day… you maybe still get 20%-25% of what you had even with a big cloud floating by. But I get why people are so angry with some of this, especially when their electricity bills have gone up 100%-200% in the last 5-10 years.

Reply to  nc
November 24, 2017 10:59 pm

smart grids.

November 23, 2017 11:42 am

Blah blah blah, the energy first must be generated. As long as coal and gas are a primary source, electric cars won’t be that green.

Reply to  RHS
November 24, 2017 11:00 pm

the us pct of sustainable energy is rising year-by-year.

you seem to prefer that it not…….

November 23, 2017 11:47 am

This type of a setup will be ripe for a hacker to bring commuters to their knees.
Can’t wait to see the media commentary it would generate!

Reply to  RHS
November 23, 2017 2:55 pm

I can definitely see a super hack on Tesla someday, (maybe by a state actor like NK) where the EV is hacked big time, perhaps on the auto pilot whereby there is many accidents and cars quit in the middle of the roads. And all the time, the Norks have shorted Tesla stock big time, and make a tidy sum on the markets as the stock implodes. Better than counterfeiting foreign currencies and having to launder that.

Reply to  Earthling2
November 24, 2017 11:01 pm

and why can’t a grid from coal & nat gas be hacked?

Dave in Canmore
November 23, 2017 11:52 am

This nonsense reminds me of a wonderful “Rick and Morty” scene

November 23, 2017 11:55 am

This is such a good idea we should all get inverters and make money running our cars all night and banking the feed in tariffs.

Bruce Cobb
November 23, 2017 12:00 pm

They are merely piling more stupidity on top of stupidity, and somehow, I get the feeling that once again, ratepayers as well as taxpayers are going to be on the hook for this nonsense.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
November 24, 2017 11:03 pm

and who is on the hook for all the health costs
from fossil fuel pollution? costs about
$200 bill per year in the US alone.

November 23, 2017 12:02 pm

Hey it’s just a system problem–nothing that an authoritarian government couldn’t easily handle. Big Brother could just force everyone (except party leaders, of course) to work when and where it makes the system work best. One week (or day) you could start work at 2 AM, on another at 3 PM. And of course you could be moved around the country at anytime to wherever your services could be most efficiently used.

Resistance will be futile. You could be working from a re-education camp until you learned to be a more loyal citizen and not so selfish and learn to say from your heart, “I love Big Brother.”

Reply to  Ralph Dave Westfall
November 23, 2017 12:17 pm

I enjoyed the latter half of my career as a systems engineer. “Hey it’s just a system problem” is a phrase I and my colleagues loved / hated to hear, especially from our Program Manager. We hated it because it indicated the he.she hadn’t a clue. We loved it because we got paid to try to clean up the mess later on – “you can pay me now, or you can pay me later”.

November 23, 2017 12:05 pm

Was someone being a little subversive in placing a bicycle in that picture? because if electric cars become universal, bicycles will be the way that most of us will be getting around. I feel slightly blessed as I am quite a keen cyclist and, even at the age of 59 will be spared the indignity of standing in the rain waiting for the next cattle truck to arrive.

Regarding the OP. The problems of keeping your worthless piece of shit electric car charged with intermittent renewable power are big enough without the idiots flattening your batteries on the rare occasions that you do manage to get them charged up.

Reply to  Stonyground
November 23, 2017 12:31 pm

Isn’t that a pic of Anthony’s car charging up in his garage? With the bike parked next to the car…is that the subtle message? Naw, bicycling is fun exercise too. But maybe take the bike with you in the EV, just in case.

Reply to  Earthling2
November 24, 2017 3:20 am

“bicycling is fun exercise too” There was me thinking that it was a way to dramatically increase the odds of random suicide on the road.
Several cyclists I knew never thought it would happen to them.


November 23, 2017 12:07 pm

Sometimes this stuff is so stupid its annoying. I think this is one of those occassions.

I Came I Saw I Left
November 23, 2017 12:15 pm

If this madness ever becomes reality expect the availability of 3rd party devices to sense when the power is flowing the wrong way and disconnect.

John Hardy
November 23, 2017 12:15 pm

Short term an easier answer may be to dial the charge rate up and down to smooth the load on the grid. V2G is not going to permit significant time shifting of power generation over more than a few hours at most.

BTW based on extensive research on many types of lithium ion batteries, I wouldn’t trust their battery degradation model any more than the climate models.

Reply to  John Hardy
November 23, 2017 3:00 pm

But John, they can do real time testing on the battery degradation over many cycles…no models required like climate science. We all have biases…time to read the next article.

Melvyn Dackombe
November 23, 2017 12:18 pm


Agree one trillion somethings.

Tim Crome
November 23, 2017 12:21 pm

Sounds like perpetual motion!

Sceptical lefty
November 23, 2017 12:21 pm

I think that this story should not be taken too seriously. It reminds me of the ‘CO2 sequestration’ proposals that were being bruited about a few years ago. It was all good, clean academic fun — impractical rubbish, but fun.

November 23, 2017 12:23 pm

Hey guys, sorry am I allowed to say that or should I say hi persons. Let’s just stop feeding the politicians with their ‘stupid’ pills, forget about EVs and just keep with the old ICE. They work, there is an infrastructure to keep them running and we don’t need to pay billions to muck around changing things.

November 23, 2017 1:01 pm

Nice size garage, unfortunately cars wont fit in the garages of the dwellings in the new high density developments now being constructed in the Uk, These houses are so small the so called garages are needed for general storage.

Be it a 2 bed or 4 bed dwelling only 2 parking spaces are allocated per dwelling, some have only 1 space therefore cars are predominantly parked half on the walkway half on the roadway, in the evening and weekends virtually the full extent of the walkway accommodates parked cars.

November 23, 2017 1:14 pm

“Although both our papers seem contradictory, they are actually complimentary,”
Define “seem”, then “actually”, and then make me guess what the next non-sequitur might be.
This is like a game right ?
A “proper” game nonetheless.

Reply to  u.k.(us)
November 23, 2017 4:45 pm

… and also define ‘”complimentary”. I reckon he means “complementary”.

Svend Ferdinandsen
November 23, 2017 1:28 pm

All what these studies shows are that windmills and solar panels have large deficiencies, like not making power when needed, and sometimes making power when not needed.
It is always the users that should change behavior, but what if the providers corrected their problem them selves, just a simple thaught.

Reply to  Svend Ferdinandsen
November 24, 2017 8:25 pm

why shouldn’t it be
users responsible for
not creating dangerous
climate change?

would you change your behavior
if the lives of your ancestors
depended upon it?

or complain about it?

November 23, 2017 1:34 pm

This proposal shares the same defects of all perpetual motion machines….it doesn’t work in reality.

Robert of Ottawa
November 23, 2017 1:52 pm

Perpetual motion or perpetual fraud?

November 23, 2017 1:56 pm

These two have no idea how the grid operates and they left out soccer moms, the elephant in the room.

Reply to  nc
November 23, 2017 2:22 pm

Literally? Or Figuratively? Or both?

November 23, 2017 2:05 pm

From the paper: “We need more research to understand the process better…”

To be read we need more money.

Reply to  mkelly
November 24, 2017 8:24 pm

research was once free? when
was that?

November 23, 2017 2:07 pm

The same problem as with the EV in general — massive changes/additions to the power grid and associated infrastructure, all the way to the individual customer level, will be required — re-wiring every home with new drops, main breaker boxes, two-way AC/DC converters, etc etc.

When all that is done, then all you have is a widely distributed battery system – capable of smoothing the grid, maybe, but not acting as massive storage, I don’t think.

The EVs need to be charged at night/when not in use. Unless there are big advances in technology, the customer base of EVs can’t both be charging up and powering the grid at the same time.

November 23, 2017 2:25 pm

Seems to me the electric self drive car thing is coming from people who live in coastal California where for most of the time the weather is rather benign. Hope they test under bad conditions with icy roads, snow, heavy rain etc. Heavy rain might cause a problem for camera vision and also perhaps for radar.
As for V2G lunacy, can we just build nukes? Then we won’t need anything else and electric cars may be somewhat sensible. I see Elon Musk is talking about nukes for power on Mars as he recognises the limitations of solar power there as revealed by Tom Mueller, his rocket engine designer, in a recent interview.

Reply to  Mike Borgelt
November 24, 2017 8:23 pm

yes, i’m sure all the ev engineers
have never thought about
rain or the need to test in it.

Reply to  Mike Borgelt
November 24, 2017 9:44 pm

ps mike – elon musk’s
role isn’t to be

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
November 23, 2017 3:00 pm

I think I need a massive studies grant to develop my idea for putting a retractable mast and sails through the sunroof window of my car so enabling me to cut out all this electricity crap and use wind power directly. That should be good on motorways.

Ian Macdonald
November 23, 2017 3:16 pm

The factor they overlook is that thew average worker needs his or her car to get to work, and not getting to work on time, more than few times in succession, can mean the end of that job. Thus a situation where your car’s battery might be drained in the morning is simply no good. .

“I think I need a massive studies grant to develop my idea for putting a retractable mast and sails through the sunroof window of my car ” Until you encounter the first bridge.

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
Reply to  Ian Macdonald
November 24, 2017 8:44 am

Ian – I did say a telescopic mast so that I can tastefully momentarily dip the sail under the bridge and continue. This is no more insane than the idea that within a few years we will have our current (sorry about the pun) transport needs replaced by electric go-karts. I travel early in the mornings 30 plus miles on roads on which a steady procession of cars is taking people to work. There is no direct public transport and the reliability of ICE engines is such that there are few interruptions.
In the dark and cold of winter I can guess how electric cars will be failing that particular test.
Perhaps they could have retractable floors so that the green virtue signalling drivers can imitate Fred Flintstone.

Reply to  Ian Macdonald
November 24, 2017 8:21 pm

my brother-in-law has
an electric bmw…. he
gets to work on time all
the time…. and then he plugs in
there — employer benefit —
and then comes home on time

November 23, 2017 4:50 pm

“Although both our papers seem contradictory, they are actually complimentary,” said Dr. Dubarry. Surely that should be “complementary” in the mathematical sense of an opposite set of results. The same way that Anthropogenic Global Warming / Climate Change / Chaos causes drought/flood/ice/melting/hurricane/calm – all mutually exclusive sets of results are covered, and we simply didn’t fully comprehend the contradictory study which can be ignored once the actual results are in.

John Wilson
November 23, 2017 5:37 pm

Either your car generates excess capacity when you drive or it functions as a capacitor for the grid. Both concepts are nonsensical.

Leo Smith
November 23, 2017 5:52 pm

run the numbers and it doesn’t add up, like all ‘renewable’ ‘new age’ technology…

Reply to  Leo Smith
November 24, 2017 8:19 pm

wanna talk about all the negative externalities
of fossil fuel use?

Reply to  crackers345
November 25, 2017 2:10 am

i didn’t
think so

Reply to  crackers345
November 27, 2017 8:04 am

crackers345 – two things, quit smoking crack and being late to the discussion.
Having the last laugh doesn’t make you superior, just makes you slow on the uptake.

November 23, 2017 5:52 pm

“This is why I am keen on a PHEV 4×4 Jeep. Just autostart up the micro diesel ICE generator in the Jeep when the voltage drops and plug yourself into the Jeep. Imagine towing that down to Arizona in the winter behind the RV.”

Now that is funny, on so many levels.

First, the solution to making electricity with fossil fuels is making electricity with fossil fuels.

Second, what can you do with a ‘micro diesel ICE generator’? Charge your batteries so you can start your micro ice again.

People just do not understand the power requirements of things and why that makes things very heavy. The inverter/charger in our motor home is sized to charge the batteries in a couple of hours at 2500 watts. Replacement cost is $2000+

Who want to run a generator all day? Our motor home Onan 6500 watt generator is sized to charge the batteries and run two A/C units when it 100+ degrees F in the Arizona desert.

The problem with charging our motor home batteries with other sources of electricity is line loss. As voltage drops, the battery charger output. On the installed generator, it charges at 120 amps dc. At the house, we get 90 amps. Our micro generator (can be lifted with one hand) and some campgrounds with an extension cord we get 15 amps dc charging.

Making 120 Vac with the inverter from 12 vdc has similar issues. Using the microwave or coffee maker puts a big load on the battery. Depending on the battery charge, the inverter might trip on low voltage.

Of course there is always the convenience of propane. Before electric coffee makers, we boiled water.

Who knew, right?

I suspect V2G advocates only know how to order coffee at Starbucks.

November 23, 2017 6:49 pm

V2G is very bad solution looking for a problem.

The power industry does not have a problem providing power to match load. The environmental impact is insignificant as required by regulations. This is not to say politician are not equally good at manufacturing fake problems.

The power industry uses automatic control systems at steam plants to provide power to match load. It works very well.

Modern motor homes have a V2G. The inverter/charger in our motor home charges the battery when a source of 120 Vac power is available. When no ac power, the inverter supplies 120 Vac 60 hz to the mini motor home grid from 12 Vdc batteries. It load follows very well.

It is sized to charge the batteries in a couple of hours at 2500 watts. Replacement cost is $2000+.

Who sees the problem of feeding power to the larger grid?

A large steam plant would not have problem changing a load of 25 MWe. This would require 10,000 BEV. I am assuming the solid state technology that works on my mini grid would work on a large scale. While I am familiar general electrical theoty, I am not an electrical engineer.

To put this in perspective, the 2000/2001 California rolling blackouts would require a million BEV all parked during the day at V2G inverter/charging stations.

This would have a capital cost of at least 100 billion dollars. This does not include maintenance of equipment out in the weather. That is just one silly state that did not build the needed steam power plants.

November 23, 2017 7:19 pm

‘With improvements to the system, V2G could actually improve electric car battery life and be profitable for everyone involved.’

Great! Get back to us when you have improved the system.

November 23, 2017 8:48 pm

All storage schemes are net consumers of energy.

Reply to  dp
November 24, 2017 10:34 pm

and FFs aren’t?

November 23, 2017 10:51 pm

Very interesting
Thank you

November 23, 2017 11:43 pm

Sorry boss, can’t come to work today. Big demand on the grid.

Reply to  spidly
November 24, 2017 10:36 pm

as i wrote above,
hasn’t happened to my
brother in law in 1.5 years
of owning an ev bmw.

i think you’re just making that up

November 24, 2017 2:10 am

There is so much stupidity being advocated by this pair of rent seekers, rational thinking is getting swamped

November 24, 2017 3:57 am

Best solution long term will be cheap and safe Nuclear Power, which can be done if you don’t force everyone to build reactors that must be used for making bombs too.

Take that cheap Nuclear Power and use it to convert water into hydrogen, and use hydrogen as a portable power source. Burn the hydrogen which turns it back into water, and repeat.

Hocus Locus
Reply to  Hoffman Milo
November 24, 2017 5:23 am

THANK YOU for that. Spread tthe word with special attention to the young… for we are reaping a foul harvest of faux-eco warriors who think wind’n’solar’n’storage is tomorrow, fusion containment and utility scale the day after that. And on radiation assessment measurablle-vs-actionable, logarithmically challenged.

Reply to  Hoffman Milo
November 24, 2017 8:18 pm

hoffman – sure. can we bury
the waste in your neighborhood?

or nimby?

Hocus Locus
November 24, 2017 5:11 am

I just paid a record sum of $2600 for a used car [2004]. Most recent was a 1993 purchased in 2008 for $900 which I got 8 good years from. Have never owned a new or even almost-new car. For some I paid less than $1500 but on average by the end of the first year there’s at least one repair that takes it up to that.

Kids today are being fed useless garbage about internal combustion machines, and the distance they have taken us for a pittance of a penny per mile in purchase and upkeep.

Let me guess. I’m expected to drop a $30k premium for a computer and Internet-infected monstrosity of insane complexity that trades gallons you can carry in a can for kilowatt-hours that cannot, and would dim my house lights and blow the wiring anyway. I see a lot of these things being expensively towed by (gas powered) trucks. If I was a billionaire I wouldn’t be tempted.

I used to think Musk’s batteries were just “pin the tail on the electric car” donkey.
Now I realize his cars are “pin the tail on the battery” donkey.

Reply to  Hocus Locus
November 24, 2017 8:17 pm

most people want nicer cars than
a 1994 whatever…..

Reply to  Hocus Locus
November 24, 2017 10:36 pm

ps – and i own a 2001 car,
purchased in 2005

November 24, 2017 8:04 am

This is yet another example of pushing a bad idea like dependence on expensive unreliable energy sources then trying to fix it with another expensive bad idea by the elites, who will have a backup fossil fueled generator, and demanding that the average Joe pay the consequences by suffering or go broke.

Janice The American Elder
November 24, 2017 10:25 am

It is Friday. I woke up early this morning, and discovered that the power had gone out. It was out for about two hours. It’s been cold, and the furnace didn’t kick on because it is electric ignition, and the fans need to be able to turn. So, went out to my pilot-light wall furnace, huddling against it in the cold. And I got to thinking about electric cars. If I had an electric car, that could be hooked up to run the house for a few hours (just furnace fans and keeping the refrigerator cycling a few times), that would actually be useful. Wouldn’t want to have much else running other than the essentials of keeping food from spoiling, and keeping me from freezing. Of course, a moderate-sized UPS would also work for that, and be a lot cheaper.

Mark - Helsinki
Reply to  Janice The American Elder
November 24, 2017 1:57 pm

exactly, re UPS.

Otherwise, I cant see how I am going to hook up electric cars to server racks in the comms room 😀

Reply to  Janice The American Elder
November 24, 2017 8:15 pm

janice – most people don’t live
somewhere where the power goes

maybe for a couple of hours every
couple of years. but hardly routinely.

not when i was a kid……..

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights