From The National Post
China will also likely order an end to sales of all polluting vehicles by 2030, the chairman of electric-carmaker BYD Co. said Thursday
The internal combustion engine’s days may be numbered in California, where officials are mulling whether a ban on sales of polluting autos is needed to achieve long-term targets for cleaner air.
Governor Jerry Brown has expressed an interest in barring the sale of vehicles powered by internal-combustion engines, Mary Nichols, chairman of the California Air Resources Board, said in an interview Friday at Bloomberg headquarters in New York. The earliest such a ban is at least a decade away, she said.
Brown, one of the most outspoken elected official in the U.S. about the need for policies to combat climate change, would be replicating similar moves by China, France and the U.K.

“I’ve gotten messages from the governor asking, ‘Why haven’t we done something already?’” Nichols said, referring to China’s planned phase-out of fossil-fuel vehicle sales. “The governor has certainly indicated an interest in why China can do this and not California.”
Embracing such a policy would send shockwaves through the global car industry due to the heft of California’s auto market. More than 2 million new passenger vehicles were registered in the state last year, topping France, Italy or Spain. If a ban were implemented, automakers from General Motors Co. to Toyota Motor Corp. would be under new pressure to make electric vehicles the standard for personal transportation in the most populous U.S. state, casting fresh doubts on the future of gasoline- and diesel-powered autos elsewhere.
The Association of Global Automakers said consumers must be able to afford the cleaner cars that California says are needed to meet its climate goals. The trade association represents Toyota, Honda Motor Co. and other overseas carmakers in the U.S.
“We have been working with California on intelligent, market-based approaches to emissions reductions beyond 2025, and we hope that this doesn’t signal an abandonment of that position,” Global Automakers Chief Executive Officer John Bozzella said in a statement.
California has set a goal to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 80 per cent from 1990 levels by 2050. Rising emissions from on-road transportation has undercut the state’s efforts to reduce pollution, according to Next 10, San Francisco-based non-profit.
“To reach the ambitious levels of reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, we have to pretty much replace all combustion with some form of renewable energy by 2040 or 2050,” Nichols said. “We’re looking at that as a method of moving this discussion forward.”
California has the authority to write its own pollution rules, which dates back to the 1970 Clean Air Act. Those rules are underpinned by waivers granted by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Nichols said the state would likely take a different legal route to enable a possible ban rather than use an EPA waiver, since the Trump administration would be unlikely to approve one. For example, California could use vehicle registration rules or control the vehicles that can access state highways, she said.
Read the rest of the story here.
HT | Earthling2
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It would likely lead to revolution, so I think they should.
You’re talking California. If it is presented as a left idea, it could never cause revolution, they’ll just move into their 300 sq ft apartments and say how green we are!
Can’t wait to see this in operation;
http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/tesla-founder-elon-musk-inks-deal-with-energy-regulators-to-build-worlds-biggest-battery-in-jamestown/news-story/097ac71a1759bb836b79e741a6a37d6f
Why waite? If fossil fuels are so bad the state should immediately ban all goods and services that have anything to do with fossil fuels and that even includes shelter, transportation, food, water distribution, and clothing. People who want to live will have to leave the state immediately. For California, no people means no problems. But such an effort will have no effect on climate change because the climate change we have been experiencing is caused by the sun and the oceans over which Mankind has no control.
The inconvenient truth about banning gas engines
Extended-range EVs with on-board gas generators are an immediate and real-world solution to emissions
France and England have banned internal combustion engines. Oh, the consequences are still a long way off — ink still fresh, the decrees won’t take effect for 23 years — but, in the few short months since Paris and London started this trend, there’s been an avalanche of anti-ICE (internal combustion engine) legislation: Germany (home to the diesel scandal that empowered these bans) is contemplating similar proscriptions. So is Scotland. Even China, home to roughly 47 per cent of the world’s coal use, wants to at least appear environmentally friendly and is contemplating identical restrictions. No one is talking about such blanket bans in North America yet, but the pendulum has swung and my 40-year-old engineering curriculum reminds that momentum, once initiated, is an energy not easily subdued.
What will be the effect of such bans?
http://driving.ca/auto-news/news/motor-mouth-the-inconvenient-truth-about-banning-gas-engines
Part 2
More inconvenient truths on banning gas engines
High-speed EV recharging stations on highways sound great – until you hear how much they would cost
http://driving.ca/auto-news/news/motor-mouth-more-inconvenient-truths-on-banning-gas-engines
Cam, costs don’t matter to the copper “scavengers,” who will greatly benefit from more stuff to steal.
To see what our future looks like, look at Cuba today. For a different reason, but there has been a shortage of new ICE vehicles there for quite a while.
Currently there is not a scientific basis for doing something as today’s climate models provide us with no information about the conditional outcomes of events and information of this kind is required for control of the climate system.
I have a feeling that once California’s leftist government tries to implement this madness that the political landscape in Sacramento will see a sudden shift to the right as this is political suicide.
Perhaps this shift can be triggered by publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal of a proof of the contention that the IPCC climate models convey no information to the EPA or the California Air Resources Board that is predictive of the outcomes of events for Earth’s climate system. To prove this contention would be easy for the right person to accomplish.