Gore's new movie: an 'inconvenient bomb' at the box office

The numbers for weekend movie sales are in, and Al Gore’s new movie, a sequel to An Inconvenient Truth, called An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power  (AIT2) tanked at the box office this weekend according to numbers gathered by movie sites “Box Office Mojo” and IMDB.

The opening weekend for any new movie is usually when the public, rife with anticipation, lines up to buy tickets at theaters. In this case, the opening weekend seemed to signal a major lack of interest on the part of the public, but more importantly, lack of interest in promoting the film by the studio itself, Paramount, who limited the opening weekend to just 4 theaters nationwide.

According to Box Office Mojo, AIT2 opened in just 4 theaters, and earned a measly $124,823.00 and put it at number 28, well behind other movies opening that weekend:

This is quite a departure from how the film was received at the preview at the Sundance Film Festival back on January 19th. According to Variety:

An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power” kicked off the 2017 Sundance Film FestivalThursday night, bringing a strongly positive response from an audience of 1,200 at the Eccles Center Theater.Though Al Gore announced in “An Inconvenient Sequel” that he is a recovered politician, the audience at the Sundance Film Festival reacted to the follow-up to 2006’s “Inconvenient Truth” like they wish he would get back in the game.Many stood at the end of the film to applaud Gore, who compared the cause of slowing climate change to other great moral causes of the modern era — like women’s suffrage and civil rights.

Reminiscent of the original, “An Inconvenient Sequel” depicted dire consequences of a warming earth — from flooding in Miami and the Philippines, to the worst drought on record in Syria, bringing human suffering there that predated the ongoing civil war, to air pollution so bad in some parts of China that life expectancy has declined by six years.

The now 68-year-old Gore acknowledges that he “would be lying” if he didn’t admit slow progress on slowing greenhouses gases sometimes causes him despair. “In order to fix the climate crisis we have to fix the democracy crisis,” he declares.After receiving his standing ovation following the premiere, Gore told the crowd that despite repeated setbacks there is reason to have hope for progress on climate change.

In essence, Gore is admitting that there’s not a lot of interest for action on his cause. Could it be because the majority of people just don’t believe him?

I’m not sure Mr. Gore will recover any momentum like he had with the original AIT film in 2006. In my opinion he’s become largely irrelevant in the climate debate, mainly due to the multitude of failed claims and factual errors in his statements overs the years. For example, it was shown that in a Gore-produced “high school science experiment” film about carbon dioxide, that the results demonstrating warming had to be faked in post production to make the experiment work. We caught and called him out on it, and yet the video remains on his website today, years later.

If Gore really speaks “Truth to Power” you’d think he’d want to remove that video, especially when a rival has clearly shown his “high school science experiment” results to be entirely fabricated. Apparently, the man has no scruples.

In AIT2, there’s similar failures and fabrications, as Bjorn Lomborg points out in a Wall Street Journal article

The former vice president has a poor record. Over the past 11 years Mr. Gore has suggested that global warming had caused an increase in tornadoes, that Mount Kilimanjaro’s glacier would disappear by 2016, and that the Arctic summers could be ice-free as soon as 2014. These predictions and claims all proved wrong.

“An Inconvenient Truth” promoted the frightening narrative that higher temperatures mean more extreme weather, especially hurricanes. The movie poster showed a hurricane emerging from a smokestack. Mr. Gore appears to double down on this by declaring in the new film’s trailer: “Storms get stronger and more destructive. Watch the water splash off the city. This is global warming.”

This is misleading. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—in its Fifth Assessment Report, published in 2013—found “low confidence” of increased hurricane activity to date because of global warming. Storms are causing more damage, but primarily because more wealthy people choose to live on the coast, not because of rising temperatures.

In the trailer, Mr. Gore addresses “the most criticized scene” of his previous documentary, which suggested that “the combination of sea-level rise and storm surge would flood the 9/11 Memorial site.” Then viewers are shown footage of Manhattan taking on water in 2012 after superstorm Sandy, apparently vindicating Mr. Gore’s claims. Never mind that what he actually predicted was flooding caused by melting ice in Greenland.

Mr. Gore declares in his new film that “it is right to save humanity.” No argument here. But is using scare tactics really the best way to go about it?

Gore is clearly mostly about propaganda, and both sides of the climate debate now recognize this. One wonders if Mr. Gore isn’t past his expiration date when it comes to climate.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

135 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 2, 2017 7:48 am

I assume that it did so well per theatre because the 4 where it was being shown were in the middle of areas where Paramount knew there were a lot of Gore supporters and that true believers would travel a considerable distance to see their hero’s movie. Although I am sure the film is a disaster and the fact that Paramount only showed it in 4 theatres shows their lack of support, it did make significantly more per theatre than almost any other film listed for that weekend.

manicbeancounter
Reply to  nicholasjlennox
August 2, 2017 10:33 am

Being shown in just 4 theatres, then promoting heavily within the pro-Gore community will produce the high level of revenue per theatre. It will remain to be seen if this initial hype leads it to be shown in a large number of other theatres.

Amber
August 2, 2017 11:26 am

After the public has been lied to for years why would they pay to see a 20 year old con job rerun ?
Could an Academy Award nomination for Eco scare comedy be in the wind ?
No ice free Arctic , drowning polar bears , sinking New York etc etc . The jig is up .
Paramount = Suckers .

SuffolkBoy
August 2, 2017 12:31 pm

The new Nature film critic thought it was “deliciously inconvenient” to the “vested interests” and to Gore.
Oh, the critic is one Michael E Mann.

RobbertBobbert
August 2, 2017 10:18 pm

Mr Watts (Anthony) and readers,
AL GORE GASSES ON AT HOME 3rd August 2017.
This is an article by Aussie Conservative commentator Andrew Bolt from his website today.
Initially, I thought it referred back to that well-known occasion when The Gore Household used up a staggering amount of electricity back in 2007 but a link takes us to an article by The National Centre for Public Policy Research by Drew Johnson. August. 2017. # 679.
‘Al Gore’s Inconvenient Reality:
The Former Vice President’s Home Energy Use Surges up to 34 Times the National Average Despite Costly Green Renovations’
Some bullet points from that article…
• The past year, Gore’s home energy use averaged 19,241 kilowatt hours (kWh) every month, compared to the U.S. household average of 901 kWh per month.3,4
• Gore guzzles more electricity in one year than the average American family uses in 21 years.5
• In September of 2016, Gore’s home consumed 30,993 kWh in just one month – as much energy as a typical American family burns in 34 months.
• During the last 12 months, Gore devoured 66,159 kWh of electricity just heating his pool. That is enough energy to power six average U.S. households for a year.
• From August 2016 through July 2017, Gore spent almost $22,000 on electricity bills.6
• Gore paid an estimated $60,000 to install 33 solar panels. Those solar panels produce an average of 1,092 kWh per month, only 5.7% of Gore’s typical monthly energy consumption….’
These figures ..gobsmacking ones…given the previous well-publicised incidence of wasteful devouring…requires someone with more experience and expertise than I have so could I request that WUWT readers study this new data and report back to us just how much of a hypocrite be Mr Gore and if he has any credibility left after this…???
But, then again, did he ever have any credibility at any stage!

2hotel9
Reply to  RobbertBobbert
August 3, 2017 4:05 am

Actually it is worse than this article shows. Al Gore:TheGoreacle is not even at this residence for a good bit of the year, it just sits there idling along and sucking up vast amounts of electricity, gas and water, all the while Al Gore:TheGoreacle is jet-setting about the globe spewing jet-A exhaust and guzzling wine. And lets not get started on his multiple other residences! I mean come on, didn’t he just purchase a $6.1 million beachfront home in Malibu? Whats the energy use curve for that vacation “cottage”? And just how often does The Great Man’s feet even tread the threshold of the place? Does he lease it out on a time share basis to make up the balance? Inquiring minds and what not!

Brenda Tracey
August 2, 2017 10:31 pm

I am positively sure I am not the only one waiting for it to come to my town.

Reply to  Brenda Tracey
August 2, 2017 11:04 pm

If you’re where your IP address says you are, that could be a long wait.

2hotel9
Reply to  Brenda Tracey
August 3, 2017 4:10 am

Why? Are you going to stand out front and throw eggs at the marquee? That could be fun! You’ll certainly not hit any people.

Jaakko Kateenkorva
August 2, 2017 11:13 pm

Why waste a second of time-limited life to manmade apocalypse scare tales? They are handed over for free in public. Just like Al’s first.

2hotel9
Reply to  Jaakko Kateenkorva
August 3, 2017 4:11 am

I’m surprised they don’t send them out in the mail the way other religious groups send round their tracts.

Ken
August 2, 2017 11:30 pm

This story is one big lie. Look at the number of theatre’s and average take. The film had an overall average that was at the top and from what I understand was #1. I’m not here to try and convince anyone of global warming or climate change. The bottom line like any story, do your research.

2hotel9
Reply to  Ken
August 3, 2017 6:00 am

Al Gore:TheGoreacle’s movie is a flop, it has no chance of making back it’s production costs, much less all the money pissed away on advertising. But hey, go ahead and tell yourself whatever you need to hear to make it through the night.

Pamela Gray
Reply to  Ken
August 3, 2017 6:54 am

Judicious selection of cities and the theater in which to premier a movie is a deceiving artform. Final numbers and declared statements as to “block buster” status, or even low status, cannot be statistically validated with such a small sample of non-random site-selections.
Anthony’s editorial is not a big lie. The hyped conclusions from some film festival or limited release rankings most definately are until the “study” design has been shown to be statistically valid and reliable.
Ken, do YOUR research. Your “understanding” leaves much to be desired in terms of your knowledge related to study design, which when applied to movie rankings, is a sticky wicket.

richard
August 5, 2017 4:54 am

I can highly recommend 23 mins of –
Wrecking Ball – Demolishing The Democrats Fake Claims About Climate

John
August 5, 2017 9:52 pm

Miami is built on a swamp. There is a highway “pass” in the Everglades NP that reports an elevation of “3 feet”. When torrential rains soak Miami it isn’t rising oceans. It’s because water on asphalt in flat swampland has nowhere to go…the pumps can’t keep up if they have any. The baloney hysteria distorts the truth about Miami that has been around since the first tent was pitched there.

Diana Hawkins
August 6, 2017 11:19 am

Your opinion is very bad. In fact I would say that it sucks. L Gore is a wonderful man who cares deeply about our planet. Just because you don’t doesn’t give you a platform to berate others. Holy cow. That’ll be the last I read any of your crapolla

PolitiJim
Reply to  Diana Hawkins
August 6, 2017 12:25 pm

Please explain what constitutes “wonderful.” Would it be:
– Personally using 37 times more energy than the average home?
– Purposefully lying about sea level studies (distorting them by 50,000%) and then not explaining to anyone why every prediction he made in his first film was wildly off?
– Complicity selling US secrets to the Chinese for campaign donations?

dogitydog
August 8, 2017 3:32 pm

Does it seem fair that Sasquatch is genetically destined to leave a bigger footprint than the rest of us? I doubt that he even drives a car!

Allen Stevens
August 9, 2017 4:07 pm

Isn’t this the guy who got a half billion
dollars in Al Jazera oil money for his media company? The same guy who
pumps out as much CO2 as he feels like flying on private jets. At the end of the day just another “Leer Jet Leftist”
of the Democratic Party.

August 15, 2017 3:40 am

L Gore is a wonderful man who cares deeply about our planet. ” Would it be:
– Personally using 37 times more energy than the average home?