Over the top: the sad case of Tripp Funderburk & the Coral Restoration Foundation International

Trip Funderburk – from his public Facebook page

Sometimes, people just go “over the top”. That’s a nice way of putting what happened to Tripp Funderburk when he got too wrapped up in blind disagreement over a story we recently carried at WUWT by Jim Steele:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/04/05/falling-sea-level-the-critical-factor-in-2016-great-barrier-reef-bleaching/

Note the picture shows exposed coral, and some of the coral has bleached. Seems a no-brainer to me and many other people that coral can’t survive without being submerged, and as Jim Steele argues in his essay:

…Indonesian biologists had reported that a drop in sea level had bleached the upper 15 cm of the reefs before temperatures had reached NOAA’ Coral Reef Watch’s bleaching thresholds. As discussed by Ampou 2017, the drop in sea level had likely been experienced throughout much of the Coral Triangle including the northern Great Barrier Reef (GBR), and then accelerated during the El Niño. They speculated sea level fall also contributed to the bleaching during the 1998 El Niño.

Jim is drawing on findings of a peer reviewed publication, Ampou 2017, not his own opinion. See the abstract:

Coral mortality induced by the 2015–2016 El-Niño in Indonesia: the effect of rapid sea level fall

Abstract.

The 2015–2016 El-Niño and related ocean warming has generated significant coral bleaching and mortality worldwide. In Indonesia, the first signs of bleaching were reported in April 2016. However, this El Niño has impacted Indonesian coral reefs since 2015 through a different process than temperature-induced bleaching. In September 2015, altimetry data show that sea level was at its lowest in the past 12 years, affecting corals living in the bathymetric range exposed to unusual emersion. In March 2016, Bunaken Island (North Sulawesi) displayed up to 85 % mortality on reef flats dominated by Porites, Heliopora and Goniastrea corals with differential mortality rates by coral genus. Almost all reef flats showed evidence of mortality, representing 30 % of Bunaken reefs. For reef flat communities which were living at a depth close to the pre-El Niño mean low sea level, the fall induced substantial mortality likely by higher daily aerial exposure, at least during low tide periods. Altimetry data were used to map sea level fall throughout Indonesia, suggesting that similar mortality could be widespread for shallow reef flat communities, which accounts for a vast percent of the total extent of coral reefs in Indonesia. The altimetry historical records also suggest that such an event was not unique in the past two decades, therefore rapid sea level fall could be more important in the dynamics and resilience of Indonesian reef flat communities than previously thought. The clear link between mortality and sea level fall also calls for a refinement of the hierarchy of El Niño impacts and their consequences on coral reefs.

http://www.biogeosciences.net/14/817/2017/

He also cites supporting data that shows sea level falling at a GBR tide gauge:

clip_image004

So, this all seems pretty straightforward, if you bother to read beyond the title. Apparently, one Tripp Funderburk, a newcomer to WUWT in our comments section, did not, and left this comment:

Tripp Funderburk

Jim does not post these pieces of fiction in science journals. He could never survive peer-review when his only real aim is to try and pretend that that climate change and global warming are not happening. Tough to get approval for propaganda that ignores the obvious reality of hot water caused by climate change and global warming causing coral bleaching and death.

Meh, we get angry non-readers all the time, I didn’t think much of it, but then he posted THIS comment:

Tripp Funderburk

April 11, 2017 at 8:30 pm

Jim Steele, the bird call expert, says: “widescale bleaching not worrisome.” That is one of the dumbest statements I have ever read. The fact that so many sheep believe in this fiction is sad. Bleached corals expel algae that provide 90% of their food. Bleached corals do not grow, they do not reproduce, they have lost their food source and energy. Starving not worrisome? The fact that the denialists are so hopeful that widescale bleaching is not glaring obvious example of the destruction of climate change that they prop up Jim Steele, a nature walk expert, is unseemly. He is a charlatan, and pretending that the Great Barrier Reef is not bleaching due to anything but climate change is poppycock.

I felt compelled to reply, so I added this note, since Tripp included links to his Facebook page in his comments (click his name), looking at his Facebook page was fair game:

[NOTE: according to his Facebook page (linked in his response name section) Tripp has an MBA from Duke University and is the “Director of Operations at Coral Restoration Foundation International”. Looking at that website’s staff directory, https://coralrestoration.org/about/meet-the-team/ his description reads:

===

Tripp Funderburk

Policy Director

Tripp Funderburk is a PADI certified Divemaster and has received SSI Ecological Diver Recognition for Coral Restoration Theory and Methods, Coral Nursery Construction and Maintenance, and Coral Abundance and Health Assessment. Before joining Coral Restoration Foundation, Tripp worked in public policy in Washington, DC, including eight years as a legislative assistant to US Representative Bob Livingston. Tripp served as staff on both the House Appropriations and the House Administration Committees. Tripp also worked in government relations for The Washington Group and The Livingston Group where he represented Fortune 500 companies, trade associations, and non-profit organizations. Tripp received his M.B.A. from Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business and his undergraduate degree in economics from the University of Virginia.

===

So it seems Tripp is just an policy/politics/business management guy with an interest in diving that found a job after his patron, Rep Bob Livington, imploded and resigned after a series of adulterous affairs made him national news. Other than surroundign himself with people who on this coral foundation, he appears to have no scientific training, unlike Jim Steele, otherwise he would not have to resort to to ad hom attacks on Mr. Steele’s training, and no other substantial arguments. Given coral is his sole source of employment, this famous quote is applicable to Tripp

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!” – Upton Sinclair, 1935

– Anthony Watts]

A mild admonishment, but apparently, Tripp upped his game, and his game was a might bit ugly as Jim Steele shared both with me privately via email…

Hi Anthony,

Thanks for pushing back on Trip Funderburk. He has been relentlessly stalking and denigrating me at WUWT and Climate etc. He  called my house again last night to verbally assault me.

…and with WUWT readers via comments:

Jim Steele

April 13, 2017 at 8:30 am

Trip is now calling my house, dropping F bombs and launching insulting rants.

I really like what Nedimyer and the Coral Restoration Foundation International are doing. Trip is a business major overseeing their operations. The tremendous loss of staghorn and other Acropora sp coral in the Caribbean due to disease and predation makes it difficult for those species to recover because they reproduce mostly by fragmentation. A complete loss of staghorn on a reef usually means that reef needs to be colonized from a fragment from another reef. Coral Restoration Foundation collects living staghorns breaks them up into many smaller pieces and grows them and then replants them.

It would be a shame if Trip’s low life behavior threatens the foundation’s good work. Perhaps a few emails or calls to the foundation would alert them to Trip’s detrimental behavior

(305) 453-7030 info@coralrestoration.org

Jim Steele

April 13, 2017 at 8:37 am

Trip dishonestly cherry-picks a few words from one sentence that said, “However bleaching without mortality is not a worrisome event no matter how extensive. Rates of mortality and recovery are more important indices of reef health.”

If bleaching persists then mortality will follow. If bleaching is temporary, then observation after observation reports recovery to pre-bleaching conditions and every thing Trip is worried about is no longer a problem. Not being a biologist such simple facts elude him.

This reminds me of climate activist and self-proclaimed journalist Anna Haynes, who so disagreed with me and others in Northern California, that she took to calling our homes, and in my case, showed up at my office to confront me. Dr. Judith Curry also had some ugly scuffles with Haynes.

Hopefully Tripp gets the message this time, that this sort of behavior is not acceptable, especially from somebody who is supposed to be a professional for an organization who according to Jim Steele, does good work he approves of.

It’s OK to disagree, it’s even OK to rant on blogs about things you disagree on, but taking the disagreement off the blog and into the person’s home is a big no-no.

Cool it, Tripp.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
256 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
troe
April 13, 2017 3:18 pm

Oh oh. We like Jim Steele around here. In my humble opinion he is one of the best educators on the site.

This isn’t Washington and you are not Rahman Emmanuel Tripp.

PiperPaul
April 13, 2017 3:22 pm

Climate Change Catastrophism: Weaponizing the unstable.

DCA
April 13, 2017 3:22 pm

This reply from trip made me laugh.

“Don132,
What does a 2014 explanation of coral stress have to do with documented, widespread coral bleaching and death in 2016, and further bleaching in 2017? But congrats for propping up a strawman and beating the crap out of it.”

When Don132 also cited this 2017 paper,

“Let’s not forget Ampou et al 2017: http://www.biogeosciences.net/14/817/2017/bg-14-817-2017.pdf

Trip is just blowing smoke.

MRW
Reply to  DCA
April 14, 2017 2:35 am

More than blowing smoke. He doesn’t have the backing of the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Russell Reichelt. Reichert said the following less than year ago (June 2016). In
The Australain

Activist scientists and lobby groups have distorted surveys, maps and data to misrepresent the extent and impact of coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef, ­according to the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Russell Reichelt.

A full survey of the reef ­released yesterday by the author­ity and the Australian Institute of Marine ­Science said 75 per cent of the reef would escape unscathed.

Dr Reichelt said the vast bulk of bleaching damage was confined to the far northern section off Cape York, which had the best prospect of recovery due to the lack of ­onshore development and high water quality.

And further down,

Dr Reichelt said the authority had withdrawn from a joint ­announcement on coral bleaching with Professor Hughes this week “because we didn’t think it told the whole story”. The taskforce said mass bleaching had killed 35 per cent of corals on the northern and central Great Barrier Reef. [What Tripp is screaming.]

Dr Reichelt said maps accompanying the research had been misleading, exaggerating the ­impact. “I don’t know whether it was a deliberate sleight of hand or lack of geographic knowledge but it certainly suits the purpose of the people who sent it out,” he said.

“This is a frightening enough story with the facts, you don’t need to dress them up. We don’t want to be seen as saying there is no ­problem out there but we do want people to understand there is a lot of the reef that is unscathed.”

Dr Reichelt said there had been widespread misinterpretation of how much of the reef had died.

“We’ve seen headlines stating that 93 per cent of the reef is prac­tic­ally dead,” he said.

“We’ve also seen reports that 35 per cent, or even 50 per cent, of the entire reef is now gone.

“However, based on our ­combined results so far, the overall mortality rate is 22 per cent/b> — and about 85 per cent of that die-off has occurred in the far north ­between the tip of Cape York and just north of Lizard Island, 250km north of Cairns. Seventy-five per cent of the reef will come out in a few months time as recovered.”

So much for Mr. Funderburk’s mewling. He doesn’t have Russell Reichelt’s scientic and research stones: Reichelt has been studying the Great Barrier Reef since 1968, and has a Ph.D in Marine Science, among many illustrious academic achievements.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/great-barrier-reef-scientists-exaggerated-coral-bleaching/news-story/99810c83f5a420727b12ab255256774b

April 13, 2017 3:33 pm

This reminds me of fans of the University of Kentucky who began to harass referee John Higgins after their loss to UNC in the NCAA basketball tournament. They were so bad that the FBI actually got involved. College basketball officials are not full-time employees, but contracted to do games. Thus they have other jobs. John Higgins owns a roofing business and the UK fans tried to hurt his business too.

People become too invested in something: a cause or a sports team or their wallets. And then along comes that threatens their beloved. This triggers something in them and they become completely irrational. You see it a lot in sports, religion, and politics. I have observed that people are most irrational when they cannot dispute you. I like to say the quickest way to make someone angry is to be right. Scott Adams (of the Dilbert comics) talks a lot about cognitive-dissonance. A person’s beloved is threatened by something that cannot be disputed. But in your mind you are right. And so you have to invent a way to make the other person wrong so that you feel safe again knowing your beloved is still alive.

“Kentucky didn’t lose the game to a Luke Maye gaming winning shot. John Higgins cheated us.” “Of course the Trinity is real. When Jesus prayed for help he was in a different form on the earth.” (P.S. I am not making that up. That is what someone said when I asked them if Jesus was God and part of a trinity, why did he have to pray to God and why did he pray for God’s will to be done, not his?) “Of course I am right about coral bleaching! Jim Steele lacks the qualifications like I do.” And so on. The pattern is clear: The person will invent some reason to keep their beloved safe, even if it means a call to action in a holy war.

JohnKnight
Reply to  alexwade
April 13, 2017 7:25 pm

alexwade,

““Of course the Trinity is real. When Jesus prayed for help he was in a different form on the earth.” (P.S. I am not making that up. That is what someone said when I asked them if Jesus was God and part of a trinity, why did he have to pray to God and why did he pray for God’s will to be done, not his?)”

I see nothing at all strange in that response . . What’s the problem? You had a different notion of what it would entail for God to take on human form? So what? ?

“The person will invent some reason to keep their beloved safe, even if it means a call to action in a holy war.”

Invent? The Book says speaks to this . . in Philippians 2 for example;

Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:

Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

I don’t get it . . I honestly don;t see what you’re “triggered” by there . . Or any indication that the other person did anything to warrant references to holy wars . .

Am I doing something to warrant such . . warnings, right now?

KevinK
April 13, 2017 3:35 pm

Well, This is exactly why I don’t use my full name when posting on blogs. I have a very unique last name and I could be found very easily these days with all the public record search engines on the web. If you ever had a mortgage (who hasn’t) it is a matter of public record and easily searched. The most galling part is the local gubermint makes money selling access to these records….

Used to be these records where for legit legal purposes so someone could find the owner of a delinquent property, or collect debts or taxes. Now they can be used to track down just about anyone.

Sure sounds like Tripp is wound just a wee bit too tight for his own sanity and everybody’s safety.

From my readings of Mr. Steele’s work it all sounds quite reasonable and logical from someone trained in a relevant field. Disagree, sure thing, threaten and harass, way off limits….

Cheers, KevinK

Wharfplank
April 13, 2017 3:51 pm

Dude is the last line of Positively 4th Street.

J Solters
April 13, 2017 4:14 pm

If Funderbugger pulled that stunt of personal confrontation at someone’s home with the wrong guy he could get perp-marched off the property in quick order. Many men would not tolerate that threatening behavior on their personal property, and would remove the threat immediately. Funderbuggar best pick his trespass spot very carefully. An email fight is an entirely different proposition.

Felflames
Reply to  J Solters
April 13, 2017 4:35 pm

Not just men. Many women I know would deal with him in a very blunt manner.

Hugs
Reply to  Felflames
April 14, 2017 10:48 am

Thy home is thy castle, but being murderous in confrontation is something I place to Sicily without admiration.

MarkW
Reply to  Felflames
April 14, 2017 2:46 pm

Interesting how you assume they were talking about killing.
Says a lot about your own personal biases and bigotries.
For example, the first post merely mentioned having the offender perp marched off the property.

April 13, 2017 4:21 pm

Am I allowed to say [pruned] off, Tripp?

[No. .mod]

Graham
April 13, 2017 4:21 pm

Here’s a tip, Tripp. Change your name, pronto. I mean, Fund a Burk? It’s obvious, mate.

Hugs
Reply to  Graham
April 14, 2017 10:51 am

From the burgh. Burger. A good name put to disgrace.

April 13, 2017 4:38 pm

@Lattitude 3.53pm above:
“If corals setted naturally on his live rock piles….they will settle naturally on any exposed or damaged reef.”
Yes. But most fragments float, some spectacularly. Here’s a report of mine, following a recent check on stuff dumped on my local shoreline following Cyclone Yasi 6 years ago.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/x8ml4qnwr4px393/CoralandCyclones.pdf?dl=0

Reply to  Martin Clark
April 13, 2017 5:45 pm

Martin, the floaters are more likely to be pumice. In my experience, I have not seen coral fragments / rubble floating … it always sinks to the bottom in my tanks ;-0

Reply to  Streetcred
April 14, 2017 1:26 am

Duh. Looks like you are right. Thanks. My fault for listening to local patrol officers. Maybe they are confusing it with the occasional stag coral debris.
There is an underwater volcano, Havre Seamount, 1000km north of Auckland. Been spewing pumice for a while. That gets to the Sunshine Coast so would eventually get here.

Michael Jankowski
April 13, 2017 4:43 pm

We need to involve someone who knows about ethics, like Peter Gleick.

Reply to  Michael Jankowski
April 13, 2017 5:31 pm

The stiletto always makes the most elegant wound. 🙂

Hivemind
Reply to  Pat Frank
April 14, 2017 12:14 am

Shoe?

Kalifornia Kook
Reply to  Michael Jankowski
April 13, 2017 5:32 pm

Oh,excellent snark!

J Mac
April 13, 2017 4:48 pm

This ‘Tripp’ really has a virulent case of the Nobel Cause/social justice warrior derangement syndrome, doesn’t he???
From https://judithcurry.com/2017/04/09/bullying-as-scientific-misconduct/#comment-845823
“If you think I belittle Jim Steele, then you undercount how little I think of this fraudulent science and climate denier. ………. Let me repeat myself, he is a liar and a fraud. He has a long history of attacking legitimate scientists while posting lie-filled climate denial propaganda on climate denial websites. Those are just facts whether you like them or not.” Why is he so rude? Because ‘he cares soooooo much’…..

M’thinks his NOAA funding source might be jeopardized this year and on, given the pending budget cuts!
No more jetting around the globe, diving on remote reefs, and soaking up the sun from the deck of a 40 foot cruiser can really pique ones ire, eh Tripp? Couldn’t happen to (ahem) ‘a nicer person’, bless his heart!

Reply to  J Mac
April 13, 2017 5:14 pm

John Kerry and Mikey Mann have a case of Nobel Cause Derangement, i.e. rhey wanted one so bad they did stupid stuff. I think Trppy’s problem is TDS with underlying Noble Cause Corruption.

Gloateus
Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
April 13, 2017 5:26 pm

Now that is funny.

Sad, because so many deaths and so much squandered treasure have resulted, but the sad situation stated in a humorous way.

FerdinandAkin
Reply to  J Mac
April 14, 2017 8:48 am

Riding the gravy train is not about the destination; it is about the journey.

Peter Morris
April 13, 2017 4:56 pm

Ugh. He went to Duke. That’s half the problem right there.

Mike McMillan
Reply to  Peter Morris
April 14, 2017 12:56 am

Perhaps he was an all-star on their Lacrosse team.

MarkW
Reply to  Mike McMillan
April 14, 2017 6:52 am

That case was proven to be a false accusation.
The DA in the case was actually disbarred because of misconduct.

Tom Harley
April 13, 2017 5:07 pm

After the ‘Tripping’ comments the other day, I checked a few West Australian sea level changes. A rather sharp drop since the last high tides in 2011. https://pindanpost.com/2017/04/13/falling-sea-levels/

lee
Reply to  Tom Harley
April 13, 2017 8:13 pm

Don’t forget overdrawing the Yarragadee Aquifer, causing subsidence at Hillarys.

Another Doug
April 13, 2017 5:08 pm

[P]retending that the Great Barrier Reef is not bleaching due to anything but climate change is poppycock.

I had to read that a few times to be sure, but I believe Tripp is correct.

Smokey (Can't do a thing about wildfires)
Reply to  Another Doug
April 16, 2017 2:58 am

Oooh, good catch Another Doug.
I don’t know if he is correct in saying that “Climate change is the only reason corals are not bleaching; pretending otherwise is poppycock,” but I’d bet money that it’s not what he intended to say. I think maybe he’s still just wrong. ~_^

rw
Reply to  Another Doug
April 16, 2017 11:53 am

Yes, getting all those negations linked up properly can be a problem for an engaged SJW (and often for an unengaged one as well).

April 13, 2017 5:09 pm

I’ve always said Liberalism (the US version of Liberals, aka Progressives) is a mental disorder. Most of them are spirally downward in Trump Derangement Syndrome. (TDS) that can no longer remain in rational discourse. They are becoming more and more sociopathically deranged (as TDS implies) with each “triggering” event, and they are unable to cope.

I would suggest Tripp should seek professional psychiatric care and possibly get on a regimen of Xanax (or similiar) anti-anxiety pharmacologic agent. Alcohol should avoided even if not on Xanax as we all know a pint’o courage can bring… only more irrational behavior.
(BTW: Xanax and similar Rx come with very strong alcohol contraindications.)

Dav09
Reply to  Joel O'Bryan
April 13, 2017 6:02 pm

No, it’s a
philosophical disorder. The most psychiatrists and / or drugs will do is obscure the necessity for the victim (not to mention the rest of us) to confront it.

Hivemind
Reply to  clipe
April 14, 2017 12:17 am

And they all think that personal abuse is something they are allowed to get away with.

MarkW
Reply to  Hivemind
April 14, 2017 6:57 am

When you are right, everything you do is justified.
In the mind of a leftist, not only are they never wrong, they can’t be wrong.

MarkW
Reply to  Hivemind
April 14, 2017 6:57 am

Replace “right” with “correct” and my meaning becomes more clear.

Aphan
April 13, 2017 6:09 pm

Wait…Sea levels DROPPING?? Aren’t they supposed to be RISING due to ice melt AND warm water expansion? If coral is getting exposed (and thus bleached) by [FALLING] sea levels, A. Someone is lying about sea level rise and B. Sea level rise might be a GOOD thing. “Save the Coral! Warm the Earth!”

observa
Reply to  Aphan
April 13, 2017 6:29 pm

Shhhh, that’s logic man and we’re talking pure emotion here. You have to compartmentalize and contextualize these things.

Reply to  Aphan
April 14, 2017 12:43 pm

“Aren’t they supposed to be RISING due to ice melt AND warm water expansion? ”
Perhaps you forgot that CO2 is the magic molecule.
Falling sea levels are just as much a proof of impending catastrophe as the more commonly noted and exaggerated sea level rise.

MarkW
Reply to  Menicholas
April 14, 2017 1:04 pm

CO2 is making the atmosphere heavier, and it’s pushing the water out of the way.

J Mac
April 13, 2017 6:09 pm

Given the virulence of Tripp’s accusations (see quotes and link at J Mac April 13, 2017 at 4:48 pm), I encourage you all to follow Jim Steele’s suggestion ” Perhaps a few emails or calls to the foundation would alert them to Trip’s detrimental behavior.”
(305) 453-7030
info@coralrestoration.org

Pamela Gray
April 13, 2017 6:30 pm

Allowing bleaching, even coral death may be the equivalent of natural forest fires punctuated by the less frequent natural catastrophic wildfire. This is something that bleeding heart liberals, given free reign, could really f**k up by over-protecting coral beds from bleaching.

Reply to  Pamela Gray
April 13, 2017 6:33 pm

Do we have refrigerator ships in our future…what to cool down the reef waters wit’?

Beliaik
Reply to  Menicholas
April 13, 2017 6:57 pm

Menicholas, it’s worse than we thought – they want cold-water pumping stations. This is from the Cairns Post newspaper in Queensland.

Pipeline scheme to cool down Barrier Reef not such a “wacko” idea: scientist
Daniel Bateman, The Cairns Post
March 23, 2017 5:00am

http://www.cairnspost.com.au/news/cairns/pipeline-scheme-to-cool-down-barrier-reef-not-such-a-wacko-idea-scientist/news-story/352cab5dc02054125c53a2f990060059
– paywalled

A PLAN to save the Great Barrier Reef by building a pipeline pumping cool water to protect corals from bleaching may not be as crazy as it sounds.

The Cairns based Reef and Rainforest Research Centre has requested $9 million in federal money towards a pilot scheme that aims to channel colder waters to certain areas within the marine park to safeguard against coral bleaching.

Australian Institute of Marine Science researcher Dr Richard Brinkman, who has a background in oceanography, said the scheme – which sounded like a “wacko idea” – could work in theory.

“For some of the reefs that are prime tourist sites, the proximity to cold water is quite close,” he said.

“You might only have to go down 50m or so.

“Potentially this could work, but it’s an engineering question more than anything.”

He warned, however, there would need to be more research before the scheme was instigated.

“What will work at one site, may not work on another site,” he said.

“If you’ve a place where the current is always screaming past, and you’re putting colder water in it, it will just mix away very rapidly,” he said.

“If you’ve got a place that’s a little bit benign, your cool water is close and you can get it to the surface relatively cheaply, it may actually present a solution.”

James Cook University and technology and innovation festival Myriad is hosting a ‘hackathon’ in Townsville on Saturday to find creative ways to help the Reef.

Facilitator Dr Allan Dale, from JCU’s Cairns Institute, said the event would draw together many diverse thinkers around possible solutions to maintaining and improving the health of the natural wonder.–

Reply to  Menicholas
April 13, 2017 9:07 pm

Beliaik,
Methinks they best sharpen up their pencils and recalculate that plan.
How much water must be moved, over what distance and head?
Oh, and do so 24/7 forever.
There is that.
But hey, it is not like it take a lot of energy to pump water, does it?
Oh, wait…that’s right…it does!
Best add up the carbon *gasp* budget on that plan, eh?
Cool down the ocean by pumping water around…OMeffinG!
I thought I was kidding!
Well, it sounds like they have nine millions reason for their insane stupidity.

Beliaik
Reply to  Menicholas
April 13, 2017 9:19 pm

Menicholas, isn’t it ironic when reef scientists jump the shark? I’d laugh out loud were it not so sad.

I started a petition to the Queensland Environment Minister to try and get them stopped. It’s gained 440 supporters in three weeks with almost no promotion.

https://www.change.org/p/steven-miles-save-the-great-barrier-reef-from-industrial-scale-experiments

J Mac
Reply to  Menicholas
April 13, 2017 9:47 pm

Can they pump enough cold water to flood and recover the reef, when the sea level is low and 15cm of coral is exposed for extended periods of time (Ampou 2017)? And how viable would that really be? Hmmmm….

Donna K. Becker
Reply to  Pamela Gray
April 14, 2017 8:26 am

Did you mean free rein?

Pamela Gray
Reply to  Donna K. Becker
April 14, 2017 5:13 pm

Nope. I meant free reign, as in the king know best and there will be no vote on this. Dems are gearing up to take back their squandered control with a vengeance. Yet we have a litany of failed interference in that natural world, such as giving endogenous people free stuff, and closing forests to human access.

Selv
April 13, 2017 6:38 pm

I’ve always said Liberalism (the US version of Liberals, aka Progressives) is a mental disorder. Most of them are spirally downward in Trump Derangement Syndrome. (TDS) that can no longer remain in rational discourse. They are becoming more and more sociopathically deranged (as TDS implies) with each “triggering” event, and they are unable to cope.

I would suggest Tripp should seek professional psychiatric care and possibly get on a regimen of Xanax (or similiar) anti-anxiety pharmacologic agent. Alcohol should avoided even if not on Xanax as we all know a pint’o courage can bring… only more irrational behavior.
(BTW: Xanax and similar Rx come with very strong alcohol contraindications.)

Given the virulence of Tripp’s accusations (see quotes and link at J Mac April 13, 2017 at 4:48 pm), I encourage you all to follow Jim Steele’s suggestion ” Perhaps a few emails or calls to the foundation would alert them to Trip’s detrimental behavior.”
(305) 453-7030
info@coralrestoration.org

What a bunch of deluded retarded fuckwits you are. Eat your own shit while you fuck your disgusting selves with your filthy deluded wastoid minds.

Reply to  Selv
April 13, 2017 9:10 pm

Heavens to Betsy!
Do you kiss your children with that mouth?

J Mac
Reply to  Selv
April 13, 2017 9:52 pm

Tripp,
Is that you?

Reply to  Selv
April 14, 2017 7:35 am

Case in point.

Pamela Gray
Reply to  Selv
April 14, 2017 5:17 pm

Selv, who let you in on a science blog? Go away. You add nothing to the discussion, and degrade conservative values, if you even know what that means.

Smokey (Can't do a thing about wildfires)
Reply to  Selv
April 16, 2017 3:15 am

Umm, Selv?
Just a suggestion, do as you like, I’m sure … but how’s about we turn down the crank on that flamethrower? Just a notch or two, maybe? Only, you’re red & blistered in the face, the burgers & franks are long since ash, & even your neighbors are approaching medium-well, if you take my meaning.
No matter how good it feels to say stuff like that last bit you wrote, it doesn’t convince anyone of anything (unless it’s that you yourself might could use some of that Xanax you’re prescribing, e.g.).
Simmer down, my dude.

Mickey Reno
April 13, 2017 7:01 pm

Tripp, one of your fellow travelers, Phil Plaitt gave a talk titled “Don’t be a dick” to all the JREF sycophants attending one of their annual symposiums. These “Reason” readers have jumped the shark, and cannot fathom that they’ve actually co-joined in a cult of dogmatic adherence to something they call skepticism. The irony surrounding that group is a rich vein. These cultists hate climate change “deniers” so much that they even threatened to turn on the venerable old James Randi himself when he spoke with some scientific circumspection and didn’t ape the full alarmist party line as they thought he ought. Anyway, Phil, who’s one of them, seemed to twig to the idea that something was wrong with the home team. it was an interesting topic for the head of such a group. Again, the point is, well, don’t be a dick.

Ore-gonE Left
April 13, 2017 7:41 pm

“A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep”
SAUL BELLOW
I couldn’t help thinking of this quote as I learned about Trip Funderburk’s comments.

John Harmsworth
Reply to  Ore-gonE Left
April 15, 2017 1:05 pm

This pretty well describes politics.

Gary Pearse
April 13, 2017 8:30 pm

The largest proportion of the activist crowd are non scientific, zealous, angry, unhappy, people, rebels with a dubious cause based on faith alone. I’m not surprised about this. What continues to surprise me are actual scientists in the climate science family who remain quiet, seemingly okay with the worst excesses of such juvenile behavior as long as it supports their viewpoint.

How does this tolerance of ugly, empty vitriol serve AGW proponents? It doesn’t. This stuff is the reason they are casting about in vain for ways to pitch their message to convince people to take AGW seriously. It’s telling that pricey Madison Avenue, so called PR specialists, don’t see the damage being done by such as this hot headed guy. I’d report this possibly dangerous fellow to the authorities if it continues.

Felflames
Reply to  Gary Pearse
April 13, 2017 9:05 pm

A dying animal often strikes out at everything around it.
Sometimes it is best not to draw attention to yourself until after the beast is dead.

Reply to  Felflames
April 13, 2017 9:18 pm

The bright light of attention is the only thing that will kill this beast.

Michael Carter
April 13, 2017 9:09 pm

Would people ALWAYS please use the word “relative” or “eustatic” when referring to sea level!

Unless supported by strong evidence that eustatic (mean, global) is the prime driver then “relative” MUST be used. ENSO cycles and tectonic displacement (in influencing relative sea level change) are far more dynamic than eustatic sea level change. Neither of the former (while killing coral) need be be an indicator of AGM. This is first year Earth Science stuff for goodness sake

TA
Reply to  Michael Carter
April 14, 2017 9:46 am

Relative Sea Level Good point. The sea level is not the same all around the globe.