Wacky Claim: Forests 'held their breath' during global warming hiatus

From the UNIVERSITY OF EXETER comes this wacky headline:

Forests ‘held their breath’ during global warming hiatus, research shows

Global forest ecosystems, widely considered to act as the lungs of the planet, ‘held their breath’ during the most recent occurrence of a warming hiatus, new research has shown

Global forest ecosystems, widely considered to act as the lungs of the planet, ‘held their breath’ during the most recent occurrence of a warming hiatus, new research has shown.

The international study examined the full extent to which these vital ecosystems performed as a carbon sink from 1998-2012 – the most recent recorded period of global warming slowdown.

The researchers, including Professor Pierre Friedlingstein from the University of Exeter, demonstrated that the global carbon sink — where carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere and stored in the natural environment – was particularly robust during this 14 year period.

The study shows that, during extended period of slower warming, worldwide forests ‘breathe in’ carbon dioxide through photosynthesis, but reduced the rate at which they ‘breathe out’ — or release the gas back to the atmosphere.

The team believes the crucial study offers a significant breakthrough for future climate modelling, which is used to predict just how different ecosystems will respond to rising global temperatures.

The pioneering study is published in leading science journal, Nature Climate Change, on Monday, January 23 2017.

Professor Friedlingstein, Chair of the Mathematical Modelling of Climate Systems research group at the University of Exeter said: ” Disentangling the feedback between global warming and the carbon cycle is critical for us to anticipate future climate change. In this study, we analysed what happened during the recent period of reduced warming, the so-called hiatus, highlighting the importance of ecosystem respiration as a key control of land carbon sinks.”

The Earth’s vast ecosystems, such as forests and oceans, are known to counteract the adverse climate impacts of fossil fuel consumption by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by acting as a carbon sink.

However, uncertainties remain about how these ecosystems will respond to future climate change, whether by consuming more carbon or, conversely, releasing greater volumes of carbon back into the atmosphere.

The study focused on Earth’s natural carbon cycle responded during both periods of rapid, and less rapid, warming that would normally be expected.

It revealed that the total amount of carbon taken up by land ecosystems slowed during periods of rapid warming, and sped up during periods of slower warming.

More significantly, the team demonstrated that while rates of photosynthesis remained constant during the periods of slower warming, the forests released less carbon back into the atmosphere – meaning the Earth is storing much more carbon during these warming hiatuses.

“The global carbon sink has been surprisingly strong during the period from 1998 to 2012, and we now begin to understand the causal mechanisms”, says Ashley Ballantyne of University of Montana, and lead author of the new research. Pekka Kauppi a forest ecologist from Helsinki University and co-author added the results were “As if forests have been holding their breath”.

‘Accelerating net terrestrial carbon uptake during the warming hiatus due to reduced respiration’ will be published online in Nature Climate Change on Monday, Jan. 23 2017.

###

Meanwhile, in the real world:

International team reports CO2 fertilization prompted plants and trees to sprout extra green leaves equivalent in area to two times the continental USA, or nearly 4.4 billion General Shermans (largest giant Sequoia tree)

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/04/25/inconvenient-study-co2-fertilization-greening-the-earth/

What’s even funnier is that Zeke Hausfather et al. has told us with absolute certainty, that the “hiatus” didn’t exist. Gosh, who to believe?

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

183 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
hunter
January 23, 2017 8:14 pm

More climate hype post hoc bs. So much of what is allegedly climate science actually resembles solid ore from a turd mine.

AGW is Not Science
Reply to  hunter
January 24, 2017 9:21 am

“So much of what is allegedly climate science actually resembles solid ore from a turd mine.”
LMAO Can I use that one – frequently??

Reply to  AGW is Not Science
January 24, 2017 12:35 pm

Be careful the anthropologists will get you for destroying records deposited via an outhouse!

Auto
Reply to  hunter
January 24, 2017 12:33 pm

Hunter
+ several! Nice one, pal.
Auto.

Eliza
January 23, 2017 8:15 pm

Time something was done about googles and facebook’s mainstream “NEWS” media global warming BS! ie boycott them!

MikeN
January 23, 2017 8:22 pm

Might they have cause and effect backwards?

Michael Sexton
January 23, 2017 8:57 pm

And how does a tree hold its breath ??

Admad
January 24, 2017 1:21 am

Beyond stupid. Beyond satire. I am speechless.

M Seward
January 24, 2017 1:54 am

Well since the trees drive a significant part of the eveporo coolong system ( at 2.23 kJ/Kg H2o and long term energy storage system ( at about 30-40 MJ / kg of dry wood) I wonder what the ‘hiatus ‘ would have looked like if they had not ‘held their breath’?
What in model mania are these idiots drinking?

Auto
Reply to  M Seward
January 24, 2017 12:36 pm

M Seward,
If we could get the recipe, we’d be made for life . . . .
Auto – only drinking ‘La Villageoise’ – French Red Wine.

Craig W
January 24, 2017 2:22 am

And I plugged my nose for the last twelve years top that trees!

tango
January 24, 2017 2:35 am

? what global warming it never started

ozspeaksup
January 24, 2017 3:50 am

ok so lemme run this by you all
ABC radio National in Aus this past week ran an item on..trees in WA
seems the naughty things are growing well due to co2 in spite of lowered rains due to..umm err agw
they are stopping rain from accumulating in topsoil and running off into rivers n streams that feed the reservoirs for perth? etc
so the solution proposed is?
removing 1/3 of all trees in catchment areas in WA
the tiny detail that rain IS actually slowly percolating into aquifers anyway escapes them it seems.
and of course after they clear and it floods and the topsoils wash away..into the rivers and dams? hmm oops?
and more trees =more chance OF rain.
the saner idea was to allow 2km wide bands of trees in areas now fully cleared to create cooling and encourage rainfall over larger areas
this is considered too hard.

tadchem
January 24, 2017 6:23 am

In the ultimate expression of the psychological phenomenon of projection, they seem to believe we are as stupid as they are, but the Dunning-Kruger effect keeps them from recognizing how stupid they really are.

TjW
January 24, 2017 7:42 am

Let’s see… carbon going into the forest, not being released. I think they call that “growing”.

dp
January 24, 2017 9:12 am

So it wasn’t bark beetles what turned them all brown – they was just restin’.

Johann Wundersamer
January 24, 2017 10:01 am

“The global carbon sink has been surprisingly strong during the period from 1998 to 2012, and we now begin to understand the causal mechanisms”, says Ashley Ballantyne of University of Montana, and lead author of the new research. Pekka Kauppi a forest ecologist from Helsinki University and co-author added the results were “As if forests have been holding their breath”.
____________________________________________
That’s the burger, where’s the ham.

January 25, 2017 12:57 pm

Here’s a thought — how about the authors of this study remove the article from a pay wall so solid that people cannot read it online.
No read = no fair judgement of the work, only hearsay versions. Sorry, guys, NOT paying to read it. I tried, but you make it totally impossible without $$$.
Moving on .

Brooke
January 26, 2017 2:42 am

So now we get acceptance that the temperature hasn’t increased for nearly 20 years and simultaneously we have a new model and theory to explain it.
….BS BS BS sigh.

Verified by MonsterInsights