Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Catholic Online reports that new priests will be expected to be familiar with and promote efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
New priests to learn about global warming as part of formation
…
LOS ANGELES, CA (California Network) — The Catholic Church is intimately concerned about climate change. The Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Sciences is the world’s oldest, longest running scientific mission. That body, which advises the pope on matters of science, has concluded that global climate change is real and is caused, at least in significant part, by human activity.
This is important to the Church because creation care is part of our mission. We are called to be stewards of creation. It’s also important because climate change can exacerbate the ills of poverty. Poor people in much of the world are the most vulnerable to changes.
…
Unfortunately, the issue is politicized. In the late 1970s, when the issue threatened the financial interests of the fossil fuel industry, the political lobbies, chiefly in the United States, financed a massive political disinformation campaign to manufacture the illusion of dissent within the scientific community.
We know because this manipulation of public opinion has been caught and documented. The fossil fuel industry funds nearly all of the climate change skeptics, going so far as to commission questionable studies, to financing think tanks, and even paying individual bloggers. The deception continues today.
…
But what does this have to do with the Church?
The Church has a responsibility to care for people, and the environment. And care for one is also care for the other.
Now updated guidelines for the formation of clergy says new priests should understand this as well:
“Protecting the environment and caring for our common home — the Earth, belong fully to the Christian outlook on man and reality. Priests should be “promoters of an appropriate care for everything connected to the protection of creation.”
The new guidelines suggest that in the future, priests will also have a good grasp of the global climate change problem and will share this with their congregation.
…
Read more: http://www.catholic.org/news/green/story.php?id=72433
From the Vatican website;
The Gift of the Priestly Vocation
… For some time now, experts and researchers, active in different fields of study, have turned their attention to the emerging planetary crisis, which is reflected strongly in the current Magisterium regarding the ‘ecological question’. Protecting the environment and caring for our common home – the Earth – belong fully to the Christian outlook on man and reality. They constitute in some way the basis for a sound ecology of human relations. Hence they demand, today above all, a “profound interior conversion. It must be said that some committed and prayerful Christians, with the excuse of realism and pragmatism, tend to ridicule expressions of concern for the environment. Others are passive; they choose not to change their habits and thus become inconsistent. So what they all need is an ‘ecological conversion’, whereby the effects of their encounter with Jesus Christ become evidence in their relationship with the world around them. Living our vocation to be protectors of God’s handiwork is essential to a life of virtue; it is not an optional or a secondary aspect of our Christian experience. Therefore it will be necessary for future priests to be highly sensitive to this theme and, through the requisite Magisterial and theological guidance, helped to “acknowledge the appeal, immensity and urgency of the challenge we face”. This must then be applied to their future priestly ministry, making them promoters of an appropriate care for everything connected to the protection of creation. …
Whats next? Excommunication of scientists whose theories aren’t approved by the Pope?
Update (EW) – Added a quote from “The Gift of the Priestly Vocation” from the Vatican website.
![pope-francis-environment-encyclical[1]](https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/pope-francis-environment-encyclical1.jpg?resize=600%2C354&quality=83)
The document referred to in the article is ‘The Gift of the Priestly Vocation’ produced by the Congregation for the Clergy. The relevant section (172) states:
““For some time now, experts and researchers, active in different fields of study, have turned their attention to the emerging planetary crisis, which is reflected strongly in the current Magisterium regarding the “ecological question”. Protecting the environment and caring for our common home—the Earth—belong fully to the Christian outlook on man and reality…. Therefore, it will be necessary for future priests to be highly sensitive to this theme and, through the requisite Magisterial and theological guidance, helped to “acknowledge the appeal, immensity and urgency of the challenge we face”. This must then be applied to their future priestly ministry, making them promoters of an appropriate care for everything connected to the protection of creation.”
I have no idea who ‘California Network’ are and Eric Worrall is completely unforthcoming in terms of any enlightenment. The link he provides is of no help in terms of knowing anything about the author, Marshall Connolly, or ‘California Network’. However, in the hands of Marshall Connolly the above section becomes:
“New priests to learn about global warming as part of formation”
and
“The new guidelines suggest that in the future, priests will also have a good grasp of the global climate change problem and will share this with their congregation.”
In the hands of Eric Worrall, this becomes,
“Catholic Church: New Priests Will be Expected to Preach Global Warming”
This is what you get when people rely on other people’s reporting for their “knowledge” of the truth. Fake news, indeed.
The terms ‘global warming’ and climate change’ do not appear ANYWHERE in the original document.
But gullible people believe anything they are told of it supports their prejudices and a simple description of the facts is of no interest when biases and prejudices are at stake.
I am a big fan of Wattsupwiththat. However, the level of sheer stupidity shown by some of these anti Catholic comments is truly frightening. I thought that people who valued evidence and truth hung out here. What we find is a bunch of raving atheist lunatics, who have zero grasp of history, zero grasp of religion, and no qualms about displaying outrageous bias.
So sick of sheer naked stupidity posing as scientific atheism. You are just mocking jerks, you have nothing to do with science. Shameful to anyone who values truth and history.
You obviously hate atheists but can you cite specific comments here promoting atheists and atheism? Criticism of the catholic church is not promoting atheism. Catholicism is not the only religion on earth. Instead of hurling insults to atheists in general, it would be more productive to answer specific criticisms to enlighten everybody.
“doug December 11, 2016 at 12:39 pm
…who have zero grasp of history, zero grasp of religion,…
…Shameful to anyone who values truth…”
I will err on the side of experience and say you have no idea what you are talking about. I guess “doug” has never been at the receiving “end” of that “religion”, that “truth”. I know some who administered that “truth”, fortunately went to gaol. Christian brother indeed!
With the compliments of the season. to all.
http://www.eyeofthetiber.com/2016/03/11/breaking-the-remnant-newspaper-national-catholic-reporter-to-merge/
satire on Catholic news papers. ( by Catholics )
Cheer up enjoy Christmas in spite of yourselves…
Climate change is in effect an occult pagan religion. The RCC has no issue with this as the RCC itself is a pagan religion, despite it trying hard to look Christian…..
Its also worth noting for those who want to bother doing the digging, by way of proof, the RCC denies the foundational Christian tenet of faith in Christ alone for Justification , as outlined in the Council of Trent Canons , which I have confirmed are still valid church dogmas. As such, a roman church that effectively denies Jesus on one hand and calling itself christian on the other, is not to be trusted…..
I remember when the Church put this one guy on house arrest (back when she could do that), not for teaching science but rather for presenting his theory as Godly revelation. Sadly, the cult of Gaia has infiltrated the Church so much so that she’ll now teach the theory of man-made and accelerated climate change as fact and near-Godly revealed.
Seems the Church should put her bishops and priests pushing this on censure and house arrest. It’s one thing to state that a prominent theory has legs, it’s another to teach it as fact. The Churc won’t even define theistic evolution over straight creationism because it’s science theory either way so long as you don’t remove God from the equation.
An article By John L Allen on the Crux website, dated 10 December 2016
For many people in the developing world, the Catholic Church is the only voice of civil society that isn’t corrupt or driven by self-interest. It’s often the difference between people being fed or starving to death, or between being treated for their illnesses or dying of neglect.
Rather famously, in 2009 the late atheist pundit Christopher Hitchens and actor Stephen Fry squared off against British MP Ann Widdecombe and then-Archbishop, now Cardinal, John Onaiyekan of Abuja, Nigeria, in an Intelligence Squared debate in London over the proposition that “the Catholic Church is a force for good in the world.”
By consensus, Hitchens and Fry mopped the floor with the opposition.
Before the debate, members of the audience voted 678 to 1002 against the proposition, with 346 undecided; afterwards, the tally was 268 to 1876 against, with just 34 undecided, in what observers described as the largest landslide for one side of an argument in recent memory.
Auxiliary Bishop Robert Barron of Los Angeles, who spends a lot of time thinking about how to defend the faith in a secular milieu, looks back on that moment as a watershed – an object lesson, among other things, in how far behind the Church was (and in some ways still is) vis-à-vis skilled polemicists and “evangelists” such as Hitchens.
Among the other results of that night, it was a motive force for the birth of Catholic Voices, the most successful Church communications initiative of my adult lifetime. Co-founders Austen Ivereigh, a Crux contributing editor and papal biographer, and Jack Valero, U.K. spokesman for Opus Dei, were convinced by the night’s evidence that Pope Benedict XVI’s looming trip to the country would be a PR disaster if something wasn’t done.
I wasn’t there for the debate, though, as fate would have it, I was with Onaiyekan in Rome the day before he flew to London for the showdown. I had a strong sense it might not go well, since Onaiyekan, as an African, just had a hard time taking the topic seriously.
In his world, the Church is basically the only voice of civil society that isn’t corrupt or driven by self-interest. It’s often the difference between people being fed or starving to death, being treated for their illnesses or dying of neglect, and between children going to school or growing up trapped by illiteracy and ignorance.
Onaiyekan himself is an example of the point. He became a national hero in Nigeria in 2005 when he delivered a famous Christmas sermon essentially shaming Olusegun Obasanjo, a former general who ruled the country in the 1970s as a military dictator and as its elected president from 1999 to 2007, into not amending the constitution to give himself another term.
For people such as Onaiyekan, the claim that the Church is a force for good is basically a tautology, something so blindingly obvious that the idea it requires a defense just doesn’t compute.
All this comes to mind in light of an initiative by Catholic Relief Services, the overseas development arm of the U.S. bishops, to capture the work it does around the world in the form of a “photo of the month.”
This month’s image also comes from Nigeria, where CRS is helping to teach adults in 42,000 farming families how to read and write so they can access better seeds and fertilizers to increase their crop yields and family income.
That’s part of CRS’s broader commitment to Africa’s rising superpower, the most populous nation on the continent, where they put a special accent on empowering Nigerian women. Most of CRS’s savings and lending communities, intended to foster the growth of small businesses, are led and populated by women in the fields of agriculture, nutrition and health.
One such program is SMILE, intended to reduce infant mortality by supporting vulnerable children and caregivers. It’s targeted at household economic strengthening, food security, nutrition, child protection and health, and HIV, and by the end of the program in 2018, 500,000 children and 125,000 caregivers will have been reached.
CRS also runs a $170 million portfolio of anti-malaria programs, especially focused on children under five, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea, Niger, Nigeria, and Senegal. Given that there were 214 million cases of malaria worldwide in 2015 resulting in almost a half-million deaths, 90 percent of which were in Africa, that’s no small thing.
CRS is also involved in the USAID “Feed the Future Nigeria Livelihoods Program” (FTFNLP), which uses a system of peers and influential leaders to improve agricultural livelihoods and nutrition. Through it, CRS trained 139 Community Health Extension Workers to provide counseling in 2015. They have reached over 195,000 individuals with health and nutrition messages.
On another front, CRS is helping a small number of vulnerable children attend a Catholic school in northeastern Nigeria. They’re paying their school fees and buying materials such as notebooks, pens, uniforms, and so on, and these are children affected by Boko Haram violence.
In turn, Nigeria is merely one among 90 countries in Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe where CRS is active, serving a grand total of 130 million people with no distinction whatsoever in terms of religion, gender, ethnicity or social class.
The scope of CRS’s commitment is awesome – more than 5,000 employees around the world and a total budget of almost three-quarters of a billion dollars.
Pulling back even further, CRS is one of the major players, but hardly the only one, in the broader Caritas Internationalis network, meaning the federation of 165 national-level Catholic charities active in 200 countries and territories worldwide.
For Catholics aware of that staggering investment in serving the most vulnerable and marginalized around the world, the idea that the Church as a force for good requires some sort of apologia is almost self-parodying.
That, of course, is quite apart from the root conviction of believers such as Nigeria’s Onaiyekan that the Christian Gospel is the truth about humanity’s origins and destiny, and therefore proclaiming it to the world is, by definition, a good thing.
Perhaps what Catholic apologists today ought to consider is a “show, don’t tell” approach. Rather than slugging it out on principle with pundits such as Hitchens and Fry, they could simply stand back and let the CRS’s of the world tell the story.
To paraphrase Samuel Johnson, you think the Catholic Church isn’t a force for good in the early 21st century? Look at what CRS is doing in Nigeria, and in countless other spots around the world, and the most compelling answer may well be, “I refute it thus.”
https://cruxnow.com/analysis/2016/12/10/catholic-church-not-force-good-refute-thus/
This pope has lost his way. He wants to fight an imaginary unicorn, while ignoring the selling of baby parts. While the issue of Abortion is up to an individual, the position of the Catholic Church is unequivocal. He is ignoring the holocaust to focus on his unicorn.
“Catholic Church: New Priests Will be Expected to Preach Global Warming”
Thus proving conclusively that Global Warming is a religious belief.
BINGO! You get the prize for BEST comment of the day.
Thank you kindly starknakedtruth
Figures that “climate change” should wind up in the Holy Venue. In the total absence of any supporting hard evidence for the theory, it needs all the religious backing it can get.
Eric Worrall has not established that either Catholic Online or Catholic.org has anything to do with the leadership of of the catholic church.
If he can tell us who is managing these fake news sources the Eric Worrall is obligated to do so.
I emailed catholic.org and there was no response. Whois shows a shell front legal firm.
catholic.com is another private company who published their management, their address and their phone numbers. Same with USCCB which cites the vatican. But Eric Worrall did not cite or quote the Vatican or Catholic.com.
Rather he quoted catholic online and catholic.org. Fake news!
tell me Eric,
Is catholic.org yours? If not,then whose is it?
You made a pretty big deal about it, can’t you at least verify your source?
The deception that is perpetrated by the left to advance the lies in science and CAGW is what makes them so disgusting, now we have one of our own, who writes an anti-information piece… for what?
Get your facts straight.
Pope Francis may seem like a nice guy; but he’s either a fool when it comes to climate change, or he’s a manipulative monster. Read the same across the board when it comes to the rest of the Vatican. Point is, this kind of instruction is precisely what I would suspect a hierarchical, totalitarian organization would push after setting up investments to benefit from just such actions by their followers.
I was raised and confirmed as a Roman Catholic, but I no longer support the Church as an organization, and I don’t trust anyone over the level of local parish priest; and I strongly scrutinize whatever they might be saying for pushing agendas as instructed by their superiors.
The pope does NOT speak infallibly about climate science.
http://www.climatedepot.com
The Pope has only spoken “infallibly” twice in the history of the Church and both times it was on the subject of the Virgin Mary.