Peak Oil Indefinitely Postponed

Guest post by David Middleton

Wolfcamp.PNG

The U.S. Geological Survey has made its largest discovery of recoverable crude ever under parts of West Texas, the federal agency announced Tuesday.

A recent assessment found the “Wolfcamp shale” geologic formation in the Midland area holds an estimated 20 billion barrels of accessible oil along with 16 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 1.6 billion barrels of natural gas liquids. That’s three times higher than the amount of recoverable crude the agency found in the Bakken-Three Forks region in the upper midwest in 2013, making it “the largest estimated continuous oil accumulation that USGS has assessed in the United States to date,” according to a statement.

“The fact that this is the largest assessment of continuous oil we have ever done just goes to show that, even in areas that have produced billions of barrels of oil, there is still the potential to find billions more,” said Walter Guidroz, program coordinator for the USGS Energy Resources Program.

Guidroz attributed that potential to “changes in technology” — i.e., the advent and perfection of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. Such advances “can have significant effects on what resources are technically recoverable,” he said.

[…]

Texas Tribune

midland-basin-map

USGS Press Release

USGS Report

While I take issue with describing this as a “discovery” and with crediting the USGS for the “discovery,” this should not be surprising.   Past history shows us that government agencies always grossly underestimate what the oil industry will find and produce. Alaska’s North Slope has already produced 16 billion barrels of petroleum liquids. Currently developed areas will ultimately produce a total of about 30 billion barrels. The government’s original forecast for the North Slope’s total production was 10 billion barrels. The current USGS estimate for undiscovered oil in the Bakken play of Montana & North Dakota is 25 times larger than the same agency’s 1995 estimate. In 1987, the MMS (now the BOEM)undiscovered resource estimate for the Gulf of Mexico was 9 billion barrels. Today it is 45 billion barrels.

The MMS increased the estimate of undiscovered oil in the Gulf of Mexico from 9 billion barrels in 1987 to the current 45 billion barrels because we discovered a helluva a lot more than 9 billion barrels in the Gulf over the last 20 years. Almost all of the large US fields discovered since 1988 were discovered in the deepwater of the Gulf of Mexico. In 1988, it was unclear whether or not the deepwater plays would prove to be economic.

Based on the government’s track record, the estimated 116 billion barrels of undiscovered oil under Federal lands is more likely to be 680 billion barrels. That’s close to 100 years worth of current US consumption – And that’s just the undiscovered oil under Federal mineral leases.

When you factor in unconventional oil plays, the numbers become staggering. “Peak Oil,” if it exists, won’t be reached for hundreds of years if the government would just get the Hell out of the way.

It’s just a matter of economics and technology. There will be periods of economic expansion in which demand out-paces supply and there will be periods of supply out-pacing demand… Like the past couple of years.

Technology improves economics. Smaller and smaller oil accumulations can be found and economically recovered even in an environment of stable inflation-adjusted prices because technology is continuously improving… And large discoveries continue to be made in plays that weren’t envisioned just a few years ago. Eventually, we will reach a point where the diminishing returns of technology can’t keep up with oil-related energy demand. But a properly functioning free market will already be delivering economical alternatives as oil begins to price itself out of the market.

Going back to the Gulf of Mexico, two of the eleven largest oil fields in the Gulf’s history (since 1947) were discovered in the late 1980’s and brought on production in the mid-1990’s.  There have been several potentially huge discoveries made in the last 5-10 years in the ultra-deepwater Lower Tertiary play. These are currently being brought on to production.

The largest field in the Gulf, Shell’s Mars Field, was discovered in 1989. Prior to the Mars discovery, no one seriously believed that Miocene-aged and older reservoirs existed that far away from the established Miocene plays on the shelf.  Since, the Mars discovery, many very large Miocene discoveries have been made in deepwater. The recent discoveries of even older, Lower Tertiary reservoirs in even deeper water was a huge surprise. These reservoirs were thought to have “petered out” even closer to shore than the Miocene reservoirs.

If we’re still finding “giant” fields in the Gulf of Mexico now, in plays that we couldn’t even imagine 30 years ago… What will we find in the 85% of the US Outer Continental Shelf that has never been explored? The handful of discoveries offshore California were made long before modern technology was available. The very few exploratory wells that were allowed in the 1970’s in the Atlantic’s Baltimore Canyon were drilled long before 3d seismic reflection data were available.

Technology also enables us to steadily improve the efficiency of oil recovery from reservoirs. The Bakken formation is thought to have over 40 billion barrels of oil in place. The trick is in recovery techniques. The USGS assumes that 10% is the maximum recovery factor. Twenty years ago, few people thought that Bakken recovery factors could exceed 1%.

figure-3
Over the past twenty years, drilling, completion and enhanced recovery methods have led to nearly a ten-fold improvement in Bakken oil recovery. There’s no reason to doubt that those recoveries will continue to improve… It’s just a matter of technology and economics. http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3868

Hubbert’s Peak Oil Theory is mathematically sound; however it is dependent upon the total recoverable resource potential. Hubbert’s “Peak Oil” prediction was based on the assumption that the total recoverable reserves in the US and our OCS (offshore) were only 150-200 billion barrels. The current DOE estimate is 400 billion barrels – And that estimate was before 2006 and the shale boom and it didn’t include unconventional resource potential (which dwarfs the conventional potential). Shale oil like the Bakken and Eagle Ford is not unconventional oil. It is plain old crude oil. The recovery is unconventional because it’s different than the prior norm; hence they are described as unconventional resources. Oil shale (Green River Formation) and tar sands (Athabasca oil sands) are unconventional oils because they are respectively bituminous kerogen and bitumen  – essentially incompletely formed and degraded crude oil .

The Malthusian record of failed predictions is perfect. Every single Malthusian prediction in recorded history has turned out to be wrong…

Great moments in failed predictions

Posted on January 19, 2013 by Anthony Watts

While searching for something else, I came across this entertaining collection of grand predictive failures related to resources and climate change, along with some of the biggest predictive failures of Paul Ehrlich. I thought it worth sharing.

Exhaustion of Resources

“Indeed it is certain, it is clear to see, that the earth itself is currently more cultivated and developed than in earlier times. Now all places are accessible, all are documented, all are full of business. The most charming farms obliterate empty places, ploughed fields vanquish forests, herds drive out wild beasts, sandy places are planted with crops, stones are fixed, swamps drained, and there are such great cities where formerly hardly a hut… everywhere there is a dwelling, everywhere a multitude, everywhere a government, everywhere there is life. The greatest evidence of the large number of people: we are burdensome to the world, the resources are scarcely adequate to us; and our needs straiten us and complaints are everywhere while already nature does not sustain us.”

■In 1865, Stanley Jevons (one of the most recognized 19th century economists) predicted that England would run out of coal by 1900, and that England’s factories would grind to a standstill.

■In 1885, the US Geological Survey announced that there was “little or no chance” of oil being discovered in California.

■In 1891, it said the same thing about Kansas and Texas. (See Osterfeld, David. Prosperity Versus Planning : How Government Stifles Economic Growth. New York : Oxford University Press, 1992.)

■In 1939 the US Department of the Interior said that American oil supplies would last only another 13 years.

■1944 federal government review predicted that by now the US would have exhausted its reserves of 21 of 41 commodities it examined. Among them were tin, nickel, zinc, lead and manganese.

■In 1949 the Secretary of the Interior announced that the end of US oil was in sight.

[…]

UPDATE: reader Dennis Wingo writes in with this table:

Great article. I went into this myself in my book “Moonrush“, I took all of the predictions for the depletion of resources from the book and marked in red the deadlines that had already passed. All of the predictions failed.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

346 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert W Turner
November 16, 2016 9:48 pm

Okay I read to wear the USGS claims it made a discovery of oil and had to stop because that is the type of nonsensical bureaucratic BS press release that needs to be cleared up immediately. The USGS did not discovery jack squat, several midmajor oil companies did.

Robert W Turner
Reply to  Robert W Turner
November 16, 2016 10:21 pm

Glad it’s the first thing you pointed out.
It’s really hard to say when oil will price itself out. There are places all over the world on passive margins in stable countries that have hardly even been explored, including Florida and the East Coast in the US. You can never say it’s definitely not there until you truly test it with a drill bit.

Geoff Derrick
November 16, 2016 11:31 pm

from Geoff the Geo
Whilst the Permian era (300 to 250 million years old) has been extremely productive both in the USA for oil and gas, and in Queensland’s Bowen Basin in Queensland for coal, the Century zinc deposit noted above with hydrocarbon affinity has host rocks dated at 1595 million years old, and mineralisation age of 1575 million years. This shows the laminated zinc ores were formed long after the basin was formed, and that Precambrian oil will always remain somewhat of a novelty, but an important one in the case of Century.

Jørgen F.
November 16, 2016 11:53 pm

…happy days are here again

Khwarizmi
November 17, 2016 2:21 am

David,
Your fossil fable violates thermodynamic law, as explained in the pnas paper you fastidiously ignored.
The unreproducible Australian propaganda you cited has no chemical equation in it.

November 17, 2016 3:21 am

“… stone age didn’t end because we ran out of stones …”.
Currently, we use more of flint on toolmaking?
Certainly not.
This ancient method of use flint (existing today) I like the most: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-jgdhefeYSbI/USOqZUj019I/AAAAAAAAAMU/iN1LCdASB48/s1600/DSC01777.JPG.
In many regions the Stone Age ended abruptly. The proof are warehouses full of semi-finished stone for making tools … comment image)
And so, whether it is proof of “the foresight”, or (rather) alarmists thoughtlessness – folly?

Khwarizmi
November 17, 2016 3:55 am

David,
The C.S.I.R.O. extract does not specify the conditions required for me or you to produce crude oil from:
(i) carbohydrates
(ii) lipids
(iii) triglycerides, and
(iv) proteins
* There is no mention of a pressure regime in the abstract.
* There is no mention of Gibbs free energy available in the products or the reactants, thus no measure of the discrepancy between the two, as is required to calculate if the reaction can occur spontaneously.
* There is no balanced chemical equation that explains where all the oxygen, nitrogen and trace elements went.
They can’t even be bothered specifying what “potential source material” they heated in unspecified conditions. It’s pathetic, to say the least. I’m surprised that you cited it.
Did you bother to read the PNAS paper?
I ask because you didn’t address a single point in it.
You also ignored the logistical problem of accumulation presented by hydrocarbon-guzzling microbes infesting the planet since the dawn of life.

November 17, 2016 4:35 am

David: your excellent lead article and subsequent patient and very enlightening replies to so many comments have been exceptional and a perfect example for other essayists.
Thank you for such committed work. You deserve a medal!

November 17, 2016 4:55 am

I like to use the refinery run. Call it 16 million BOPD in November. Here’s a government source:
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pnp_wiup_dcu_nus_w.htm
Here’s their crude oil and condensate data (it’s not accurate for recent months, subject to fine tuning)
http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/production/
This is more detail. The USA exports products and light crudes, so it’s complicated to get everything to square
http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/supply/monthly/

Ron in Austin
November 17, 2016 8:23 am

Rats! The field does not include my 10-acre interest in the panhandle!

MarkW
Reply to  Ron in Austin
November 17, 2016 8:39 am

Life just isn’t fair.

brianjohn
November 17, 2016 10:11 am

Although coming late to the party here, I couldn’t resist making a few comments.
USGS press release is crap. Just viewed it on one of the business channels; these guys should get a retired oil industry professional to fact check their BS.
– oil in place can be determined by a combination of seismic, well bore logs, and well testing results (note that we gotta have wells in place to do this. I’ll give USGS the benefit here in that there is certainly a significant number of wells penetrating the Wolfcamp and it sounds like there has been recorded production. USGS should have stayed away from reporting the oil as “recoverable oil”
– the conversion to recoverable oil is the big issue. There has to be evidence that the shale can be drilled horizontally and hydraulically fractured successfully and economically. There has to be production testing to prove sustained economical rates. The nature of determining recoverable oil from original oil in place for a shale resource is iffy from a technical standpoint for a large area as referenced in the article. And lastly, to define recoverable oil, one must be aware of the economics of recovery, dependent on the development and operating costs in relation to a specified oil price.
AND,
Ristvan sez: “Aramco estimated remaining recoverable Ghawar reserves at 65Bbbl”. That is not a lot of oil. Someone should point this out to Aramco and suggest that they shut in the field. Maybe the post-er missed an M or two. (I’m an old hand and still refer to a million bbls as MMBbl.)
Sorry, Ristvan – couldn’t help myself.

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
November 17, 2016 12:38 pm

I too would like to thank David for this post and hope the blood pressure has dropped. Having read the Gold book I found the idea of “inexhaustible” non-biological oil appealing but the explanation and diagrams David has shown seem to me to have disproved the notion.
Has anyone actually tried the slow-cooked moose? Probably can’t be much worse than the meal I’ve just made myself. On the other hand I do have this theory that there’s a lot of oil to be discovered by horizontally fracking gas stations…

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
November 17, 2016 1:40 pm

Understood…I did actually hesitate about “disproved” but found your explanations convincing to the point that the onus of proof is clearly and heavily with those who claim Gold’s ideas are correct.
The maps and diagrams you used are particularly interesting and the figures on depths of sedimentary material awesome – in the proper sense of the word.
Thank you David

Dav09
November 17, 2016 5:32 pm

Lake Tahoe is 191 square miles in area and averages 1000 feet deep. The volume of water it contains is roughly equivalent to the total volume of oil which has been extracted in all human history. An interesting exercise: Superimpose it on the Texas oil basin map in the OP. Visualization hint – the ‘square’ counties are about 900 square miles (each side 30 miles long) in area.

tony mcleod
November 17, 2016 5:38 pm

David, is there a accepted definition of “recoverable”?

Chimp
Reply to  tony mcleod
November 17, 2016 5:51 pm

It can be recovered and still make money selling it.

tony mcleod
Reply to  David Middleton
November 17, 2016 8:40 pm

Thanks for the reply. Supplementary question. Is there much of a difference between peak “technically recoverable” and peak “economically recoverable”?

Khwarizmi
November 19, 2016 2:47 pm

“The PNAS paper fundamentally misstates the conventional theory of hydrocarbon formation”
===========
No it doesn’t.
* * * * *
“In the geologic past, conditions have periodically recurred
in which vast amounts of organic matter
were preserved within the sediment of shallow, inland seas
.”
U.S. Department of Energy
* * * * *
“Owing to most oil fields being associated with limestone, many theorists conclude that petroleum is the result of animal fats of pre-historic animals” [!]
http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/123538155?searchTerm=petroleum%2C%20oil&searchLimits=
* * * * *
Even asphalt is food, David:

Part of the western culture of corruption involves fastidiously ignoring any facts that undermine socially constructed myths. Where did the oil shale on Comet Haley come from, for example?
Let’s just pretend it doesn’t exist!

B Miller
November 20, 2016 3:10 pm

from the USGS announcement:
“This estimate is for continuous (unconventional) oil, and consists of undiscovered, technically recoverable resources.”
So it’s a crapshoot as to how much can be recovered at a viable price.