Dismal ratings for DiCaprio's Global Warming Epic 'Before the Flood' – beaten by 'Bubble Guppies'

before-the-flood-cover

The weekend ratings are out, and they aren’t good news for Leonardo DiCaprio’s Global Warming Epic ‘Before the Flood‘, which we reviewed yesterday on WUWT. Showbuzz Daily has listed the top 150 TV and Cable programs for the weekend, and in ‘the hottest year ever’, discussing the ‘most important topic ever’, Before the Flood came in at #61 for the weekend.

before-the-flood-ratings

Ironically, the kids show “Bubble Guppies” beat it at #53. Ouch.

Perhaps this snoozer didn’t do so well because of the stellar cast of characters?

before-the-flood-cast

I mean, who wouldn’t want to tune in and have a jet-setting actor-millionaire, a government handout beneficiary, a Pope, the globe-trotting Secretary of State, the lame-duck president, the ‘Horndog-in-Chief” and the leader of the U.N. come on for 96 minutes and berate you for doing things like driving your car, eating hamburgers, and just not caring enough about the planet like they do while looking down on us from their private planes?

This review on IMDB, says it all:

Al Gore says it’s so and therefore it is?

30 October 2016 | by pete-801-834182 (United States) – See all my reviews
Basically DeCaprio was told by Al Gore (who has made a hundred millions of dollars by preaching global warming after he retired from political life, gained a bunch of weight and had nothing to do) that anthropological global warming is real, and from that point onward DeCaprio was convinced. LOL! Then DeCaprio presents the ole “97% of scientists” lie that has traveled around the world. In reality 66% of scientists have no opinion about AGW — Those opinions were conveniently thrown out of the messaged John Cook study. Then DeCaprio presents cherry picked anecdotal evidence, without ever questioning whether it’s a case of Texas Sharpshooting. Why didn’t he present the Vostok Station / Greenland ice core data to put the last 100 years IN PERSPECTIVE versus the last 5,000 years, 11,000 years and 420,000 years? And if he’s such a big fan of anecdotal evidence over temperature data then why didn’t he mention that Greenland used to be green? That 20,000 years ago New York was covered by a mile thick glacier? Why didn’t DeCaprio interview Patrick Moore, the co-founder of Greenpeace, who is not part of “Big Oil” and doesn’t buy into AGW? Because DeCaprio suffers from confirmation bias. The rest of this propaganda piece (I mean movie) continues under the ASSUMPTION that humans are causing the planet to warm and we all need to agree to tax ourselves more. No thanks.
Here’s the trailer, you can count how many times smokestacks (venting steam), gas flaring, and other images of petro-doom are presented.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

383 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg Flis
November 7, 2016 7:08 am

Here in Canada the Federal Government has imposed a carbon tax, at the same time our Federal Government wants to bring in nearly 1,000,000 immigrants over the next three years. If they believe CO2 is a climate changer what will be the carbon footprint of this increase in population. Doesn’t anyone see the irony in this ? What it really points out is that CO2 as a climate changer is a farce.
As for Leo Di Caprio he doesn’t know the difference between global warming and a chinook.

David Wishengrad
November 9, 2016 5:35 am

Andrea,
If you happen to come back to this article and read this, could you please answer me as to why you mentioned my name at the end of your comment?
I make no secret of the fact that I do have my own personal view that certain things need to happen in order for the needless destruction of life to stop and that if we don’t see everyone, choosing of our own free will, on our knees crying tears of happiness before our true living master, truth and life, that things that need to happen have not happened yet and the destruction will continue. It is about the first self-evident truth; life. It always has been. Interestingly enough though, the truth always hold innocence and can never be the cause. The causes of needless destruction are choices. Choices that must exist. For without choice there is no true glory. Being as there is true glory, there is choice. The truth is not anymore responsible for the problems of life than a baby is for being born.
Time to get some work done somewhere else.
Thank you

1 7 8 9