As US’ first offshore wind farm takes root, study indicates wind may be more powerful, turbulent than expected

University of Delaware researchers report in a new study that offshore wind may be more powerful, yet more turbulent than expected in the North Eastern United States.
The findings, published in a paper in theJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, could have important implications for the future development of offshore wind farms in the U.S., including the assessment of how much wind power can be produced, what type of turbines should be used, how many turbines should be installed and the spacing between each.
The study, led by Cristina Archer at UD and Brian Colle at Stony Brook University, analyzed historical data from 2003-2011 at the Cape Wind tower located near the center of Nantucket Sound off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, and collected complementary data at the same location in 2013-2014.
Co-authors on the paper, titled “On the predominance of unstable atmospheric conditions in the marine boundary layer offshore of the U.S. northeastern coast,” include UD professors Dana Veron and Fabrice Veron, and Matthew Sienkiewicz from Stony Brook.
The paper’s main finding is that atmospheric conditions around Cape Wind are predominantly turbulent, or unstable, which is in stark contrast to prevailing data from European offshore wind farms in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea. European studies of offshore wind document that atmospheric conditions there are predominantly neutral– meaning neither too windy nor too still, but somewhere in the middle, with unstable wind conditions occurring only 20 percent of the time.
“By contrast, our study found that wind conditions at Cape Wind are unstable between 40 and 80 percent of the time, depending on season and time of day,” explains Archer, an associate professor in the College of Earth, Ocean, and Environment’s School of Marine Science and Policy and Department of Geography and a governing member of the Center for Carbon-free Power Integration.
Stable, unstable and neutral
Explaining how wind can be stable, unstable or neutral is a tricky business, Archer says. When the atmosphere is stable, winds are smooth and consistent (think of when a pilot tells airline passengers to sit back and enjoy the ride because the weather is clear all the way to their destination).
When the atmosphere is unstable, it is similar to turbulence experienced by airline passengers during a flight — the wind is choppy and causes high winds from above and slow winds from below to crash into each other and mix together, causing a bumpy and unpredictable ride for the air current.
Neutral conditions hover in the middle, with an average amount of turbulence and wind speed variation.
“The advantage of these turbulent conditions is that, at the level of the turbines, these bumps bring high wind down from the upper atmosphere where it is typically windier. This means extra wind power, but that extra power comes at a cost: the cost of more stress on the turbine’s blades,” explains Archer.
An expert in designing offshore wind farms, Archer says the findings may have implication on how future offshore wind farms in the region are designed.
“If you have increased turbulence, you’re going to design a different farm, especially with regard to turbine selection and spacing. And guess what? Even the wind turbine manufacturing standards are based on the assumption of neutral stability,” Archer says.
Is something special going on in the North East?
No measurements exist of wind and turbulence around an offshore wind turbine’s rotor blades in the ocean in the U.S., because until now, none have existed. The first U.S. offshore wind farm is currently under construction at Block Island, off the coast of Rhode Island.
Instead, this type of data has been estimated based on either numerical simulations or using available buoy data to infer what the conditions would be at the height of the wind turbine’s rotor blades. But wind data measurements from 2003-2009 at the Cape Wind Tower, a multi-level tower with sensors positioned approximately 65 feet, 131 feet and 196 feet in height, have shown that the Cape Cod region’s atmospheric conditions are generally unstable. Neutral conditions only occur approximately 20 percent of the time.
In 2013 and 2014, with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, the UD-led research team launched a campaign they coined IMPOWR, Improving the Modeling and Prediction of Offshore Wind Power Resources, to validate the Cape Wind tower findings with additional measurements.
The IMPOWR researchers flew a plane around Cape Wind 19 times over two summers, above and around the tower, and measured wind, temperature and humidity during various weather conditions. They also installed new wind and wave sensors on the Cape Wind platform.
Combined with buoy data from just above the water’s surface and with the historical data from Cape Wind, the IMPOWR field data painted a surprising and yet consistent picture of the area’s wind resources.
“We get the same message whether we look at the turbulence from the flights or from the sonic anemometers on the tower, or whether we consider the wind speed data alone. The marine atmosphere is more likely to be unstable than neutral. Having three separate pieces of evidence that support the same finding allows us to be confident that there is something special going on,” she says.
Wind direction also plays a role in whether the wind is smooth or turbulent. When the wind comes from the southwest, the data show that wind tends to be more stable and to increase in speed from the bottom to the top of the rotor blades. But when the wind comes from the north, northwest or offshore, it is more likely to be unstable and to have a relatively uniform speed across the turbine rotor, Archer says.
Further study is needed to understand whether this phenomenon is localized in the Cape Cod area, along the East Coast in general, or present throughout the U.S., since other offshore wind installations on the East Coast are planned for Maryland, New Jersey and Massachusetts.
“It’s important to ensure that science doesn’t underestimate the possible wind resources,” Archer says. “Now that we know what is happening in Cape Cod, we have more work to do to determine whether it exists anywhere else or whether it is unique to this region.”
###
It’s unclear to me why models didn’t predict these results?
“… we have more work to do to determine whether it exists anywhere else or whether it is unique to this region.”
IOW, ‘give us more money’.
http://blog.cleanenergy.org/files/2014/08/political-cart-before-the-horse.jpg
1. Flight data must be able to give important information about regional differences in (in)stability of the air.
2. The nearby Warm Gulfstream and the cold waters from the north must create a lot of local rising and descending air spots and so instability. Have a look at the Gulf Stream pattern and at the corresponding temperature differences of the ocean: https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/ocean/surface/currents/overlay=sea_surface_temp/orthographic=-67.36,40.75,2629/loc=-69.715,41.413
Windmills kill millions of birds and bats annually. News Windmills should be banned and those in service should be torn down. There are much better ways to generate electricity than windmills. We should stop going down this “windmill” road now.
Does anyone ever protest locating windmills in their area? Never hear of much. Maybe most folks don’t know about the massive deaths inflicted by windmills. I think massive protests are in order.
Where are the environmetalists. Where’s PETA? How do you live with yourselves remaining silent on this subject?
Where’s a Green or an Alarmist defending this slaughter of birds? Feel free to defend this practice right here.
I’m betting there will be no effort to defend this practice because there is no defense. Most normal people would be aghast if they knew the truth about windmills.
With wind power varying as the cube of the wind velocity, there must be a lot of stress on the blades when the wind spikes. Can the blades be feathered that quickly?
Is the fishing under a wind tower better? Have the mackerel and sardines learned to school there so the propellers can wack the heck out of predatory birds and provide chum and crap bait?
crab! crab crab
So one upshot is that Cape Wind (if built) will endure more wind stress and rapid fluctuations than previously anticipated. This study seems to be a welcome “look before you leap” type of exercise.
Cape Wind seems to be a classic contest between two opposing groups of environmental activists battling it out. The outcome will not be decided by either group, but instead by whether enough taxpayer/ratepayer monies can be funneled to politically connected insider investors.
Physical data bearing on the viability of the project, like this study, is interesting but will play no role in the outcome.
“the cost of more stress on the turbine’s blades”
Not to mention more stress on the bearings and gearboxes, which are already pretty much at the absolute limit of engineering knowledge – or, if a friend of mine who specialises in rebuilding the gearboxes is to be believed – somewhat beyond.
I’d be very surprised that companies like Dong Energy that are working on projects to build and operate wind farms in the study area have not surveyed the areas of their leases, and found the winds suitable. They are poised to invest many millions. Without verifying the wind environment? I assume they have, and don’t share Dr Archer’s concerns.
More evidence of the useless task of trying to harness and unharnessable, unpredictavle and unreliable power source. Reminds me of Don Quixote and so do wind enthusiasts, who are full of hot air and are mostly bags of wind.
I’ve said this before and will say it again….
Some years ago, travelling across the high Moors of Lancashire/Yorkshire on a windy day, a very high proportion of the innumerable (unsightly!) windmills were standing idle (‘feathered-out’??). We stopped at a village pub and asked the Landlord why they weren’t all producing to the max.
“Nay! wind’s too strong. They ‘ave to feather ’em out lest they blow themselves up!”
Yes, it was windy, and yes, we had stopped for a refreshing hike, but no, it wasn’t *that* windy….. certainly not a gale. What a farce!
Offshore wind is a total joke. The sea is an incredibly hostile environment for machinery – corrosive, buffeting, a biological soup, each of which works to rapidly break down and destroy artificial structures.
If this here to unknown “turbulence” was not in these models is it in the Global Warming prediction models? If not, what does this do to these models? Seems to me the science is far from settled.
So, some coastal wind farms are in better places than others? Those “best” locations can change too, over time. Until we understand the whole system, we won’t know where the stable and reliable wind is. Still, what about the seabirds?
Yet more evidence that bird choppers are not a simple panacea. Perhaps pulling subsides from them is overdue.
Here’s an article, okay, propaganda piece, designed to make coastal Mainers proud that their state is being used to power southern New England. It also goes off on a tangent to praise the state AGs who are protecting us from big, mean Big Oil.
It’s relevant here because it has a photo of the Deepwater wind project.
http://freepressonline.com/Images/Images/145537.jpg
http://freepressonline.com/Content/Download-the-current-issue-as-a-pdf/Features/Article/Wind-Power-Taking-Off-in-New-England/93/78/47196
We have been missing out on hurricanes in the south and nor’easters in the north — but Boreas will return and he will huff and puff and blow their windmills down.
Eugene WR Gallun
Oh what the heck. This is a good excuse to rerun what I think is the most informative wind turbine photo ever. It’s even offshore, I think in the North Sea.
http://wermenh.com/wind/images/vattenfall-image_300.jpg
I am quite skeptical of this claim there is anything “special” about the turbulence in Cape near-shore marine wind flows. Probably more like “unexpected” (because we’ve never studied it with this much measurement detail), but likely the rule rather than the exception. At least where there have been noted near-shore wind fields economically worth harvesting for electrical generation.
So an associate professor of environment and prof of geography are designing wind farms! In Canada that would be against the law. I thought engineers must be distancing themselves from much of the foolishness in this activist domain. Just as there is no such animal as a rocket scientist, there are no windfall designer scientists. Or perhaps in postnormal science engineers are no longer relevant. How hard can it be? I can here them say.
So these “Experts” can’t figure out why it is called Cape Wind? The nuts/kooks have taken over the asylum!
The wind around a relatively open region, like Cape Wind, is much more turbulent than around a relatively enclosed region, like the Baltic Sea.
Gee – who da thunk?
I always thought the song “Ripple” was about the cheap wine I drank once or twice while in the Navy, but it’s about ripple in still water (no wind to blow). I’m sure they weren’t thinking about windmills then with “nor wind to blow”, but who knows:
It’s not about Ripple Wine (as I stupidly thought) – some quotes from the song:
[Chorus]
Ripple in still water
When there is no pebble tossed
Nor wind to blow
“Let it be known there is a fountain
That was not made by the hands of men”
“You who choose to lead must follow
But if you fall, you fall alone”
……………………………………………………………………
Ripple Lyrics – you can follow along:
If my words did glow with the gold of sunshine
And my tunes were played on the harp unstrung
Would you hear my voice come through the music
Would you hold it near as it were your own?
It’s a hand-me-down, the thoughts are broken
Perhaps they’re better left unsung
I don’t know, don’t really care
Let there be songs to fill the air
[Chorus]
Ripple in still water
When there is no pebble tossed
Nor wind to blow
Reach out your hand if your cup be empty
If your cup is full may it be again
Let it be known there is a fountain
That was not made by the hands of men
There is a road, no simple highway
Between the dawn and the dark of night
And if you go no one may follow
That path is for your steps alone
[Chorus]
Ripple in still water
When there is no pebble tossed
Nor wind to blow
You who choose to lead must follow
But if you fall, you fall alone
If you should stand then who’s to guide you?
If I knew the way I would take you home
La da da da … la da da da da ……
……………………………….
Just for a musical interlude…