Claim: Global Warming will Cause Extreme Tropical Population Shifts

Cocktails mit Schirmchen
Cocktails mit Schirmchen. By Alpha du centaure (originally posted to Flickr as Tenue de soirée…) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

A new study has just been published which claims a few degrees global warming will cause extreme population migrations in the tropics. But their model makes a rather questionable assumption about tropical climates.

Evidence increasingly suggests that as climate warms, some plant, animal, and human populations may move to preserve their environmental temperature. The distances they must travel to do this depends on how much cooler nearby surfaces temperatures are. Because large-scale atmospheric dynamics constrain surface temperatures to be nearly uniform near the equator, these displacements can grow to extreme distances in the tropics, even under relatively mild warming scenarios. Here we show that in order to preserve their annual mean temperatures, tropical populations would have to travel distances greater than 1000 km over less than a century if global mean temperature rises by 2 °C over the same period. The disproportionately rapid evacuation of the tropics under such a scenario would cause migrants to concentrate in tropical margins and the subtropics, where population densities would increase 300% or more. These results may have critical consequences for ecosystem and human wellbeing in tropical contexts where alternatives to geographic displacement are limited.

Read more: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep25697

The reasoning is, since the tropics has a very mild temperature gradient, if global warming causes tropical temperatures to rise slightly, people will have to migrate long distances to find their old temperature range.

From the study;

… Near the equator, the horizontal component of the Coriolis force becomes weak due to the small projection of the earth’s rotation vector on the local vertical. As a consequence tropical pressure and temperature gradients are much smaller than extratropical ones. Perusal of global maps of temperature on a surface of constant altitude show much larger variations at high latitudes than low, no matter what season, year, or time-averaging period is chosen. Because of this, the displacement distance L is necessarily larger in the tropics than in the extratropics, sometimes dramatically so. …

Read more: Same link as above

The flawed reasoning behind this assumption is people in the tropics are already on the brink of unsurvivable heat, that a small shift in average temperatures would push people over the edge. This is simply not true. In the tropics we have a technological innovation which allows us to mitigate the distress we would otherwise experience on hot days, called air conditioning. Or cheap ceiling fans, if you can’t afford air conditioning. When we have to go out in the blazing sun, we wear hats and dark glasses. Sometimes we even plant trees to provide more shade. On really hot days we sit in the swimming pool, drink beer and consume charred animal flesh.

People who choose to live in the tropics don’t mind when the thermometer soars above 90F – thats why we moved here, we enjoy that kind of weather.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
134 Comments
June 10, 2016 6:55 am

Interesting in light of the fact that according to NOAA in the last 40 years there has been NO global warming in the tropics according to the satellite record.
see: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/msu/time-series/tropics/lt/dec/ann

Mickey Reno
June 10, 2016 7:50 am

There are only two sites of the many I visit, that have comment sections I can read without going crazy. WUWT is one, and Steve McIntyre’s Climate Audit is the other. Jo Nova’s blog is not horrible, but Judy Curry’s site has lots of high frequency dogmatists that always appear, always bring up the same crap, and make reading the comments repetitive, boring and frustrating. Just think of how this site would be if Seth and his detractors appeared and battled on every thread. I occasionally read RealClimate or DeSmog or Guardian comments, or particular Hufflepuff, NPR or Slate, too. But this is just to get a better understanding of what my political opponents are saying, to know their talking points. Commenters on those blogs give me the impression of being brainwashed cultists, generally speaking. Reading the Bore Hole comments, and seeing how reasonable and thought provoking they can be, and yet be censored out of the context in which they were made, gives a true sense of how oppressive and scared and stupid and ideological are the operators of RealClimate.
If you really want to understand how comment sections are going south, go peruse a political topic on Yahoo news. Some articles get twenty thousand comments with the collective wisdom near zero (this is based on my brief, non-scientific sample) and wherein reasonable, measured comments are buried amid the thunderous cacophony.

Reply to  Mickey Reno
June 10, 2016 7:55 am

The trolls in some cases have effectively shut down the comments sections. Our buddy Seth is a classic example of an immature ego gone amok. The kind of persistence that causes some to wonder if he’s being paid to do it. I doubt it, he has nothing better to do.

Reg Nelson
Reply to  Mike Bromley the Kurd
June 10, 2016 8:23 am

One of Hilary’s Super PAC’s raise over a million dollars to pay people like Seth to troll social media against her critics.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.html
This has been a tactic of the Left for sometime now.

emsnews
Reply to  Mickey Reno
June 10, 2016 11:26 am

The people commenting at the RealClimate (sic) website are scary. They really believe we are at the End of Times and are going to roast to death! Very sad. And they think that those of us who fear a looming Ice Age are ‘deniers’ who don’t believe in climate change.
And the Big Change is another Ice Age which we should fear greatly.

June 10, 2016 8:08 am

Still waiting to hear from the UN on my climate refugee status. I need money and a nice place in Hawaii. As rich as the UN is, I’m sure they can afford to send me and a few million other people looking to escape winter. Think of all the carbon it will save! We won’t be running the heaters in winter! It’s a win win!

TonyL
June 10, 2016 8:14 am

Scene: The swim-up bar and poolside, Barbados.
Me: KER-SPLASH!
Roxy: EEEK! Who did that!
Me: Roxanne, My favorite barmaid in the whole West Indies.
Roxy: TonyL, You one crazy tourist, now I am soaking wet. You come in from Boston?
Me: Yes, it’s cold now, up there.
Roxy: I visited Boston, once. Stayed all winter.
Me: What did you think of the snow?
Roxy: I never seen snow before. You got lots and lots of snow.
Me: Next time you come up, you must visit.
Roxy: No, I’m good. I seen snow now, once was good.
Contrary to expectations, people who live down in the islands do not really seem that interested in moving to colder climates.

bill johnston
Reply to  TonyL
June 10, 2016 8:42 am

It used to be that -43 degrees kept out the riff-raff. It now appears they are adapting to colder climes

LarryD
June 10, 2016 8:40 am

I just did a little research into paleoclimatology. During several of the “Hot House” eras of the distant past, the equator was still only “tropical”, the poles were usually “cool temperate”, occasionally “warm temperate”.
During “Hot House” eras, the tropical zone extends further north and south, and there are no “arctic” zones.

Mark Luhman
Reply to  LarryD
June 10, 2016 9:37 am

LarryD, you first mistake is you did a little research. To be a scientist today research is not required, only repeating the dogma allows you to be a “scientist” any research found that conflict with the dogma and God forbid you publish it, if you publish facts from research and those facts conflict from the dogma you will rapidity find yourself without a job. So why do any research at all just publish made up facts that agree with the dogma and you have a job for life.Larry you just don’t understand what required today to be a “scientist”‘

emsnews
Reply to  Mark Luhman
June 10, 2016 11:28 am

You have to study at the Chicken Little School Of Catastrophe first, then you can be a ‘scientist’.

tadchem
June 10, 2016 9:36 am

This totally ignores the fact that non-tropical populations got established by migration of populations to cooler areas long before climate change became an issue. People are adaptable, and some are willing to migrate to climes with temperatures they are NOT accustomed to in order to gain other advantages.
Annual average humidity (especially the lack thereof) is a far stronger driver of population migration than temperature.
Compare these two tropical countries:
Singapore (daily mean temp 27°, mean annual rainfall ~2300 mm) has 7700 people per sq km.
Libya (daily mean temp 20.3°, mean annual rainfall ~59 mm) has 3.55 people per sq km.

Svend Ferdinandsen
June 10, 2016 10:38 am

And God forbid it, but think what a catastrofy it would be if the temperature became a bit lower. There would be no place to migrate to, so perhaps they will all die.

MarkW
Reply to  Svend Ferdinandsen
June 10, 2016 12:51 pm

The collisions as the northern refugees meet the southern refugees at the equator, could kill millions.

Brian H
June 10, 2016 11:13 am

The sub-tropics experience temperature swings and highs; the tropics are about 80° year-round. Climate change is a feature of high latitudes.

emsnews
June 10, 2016 11:30 am

We denizens of the far north have yearly climate change that goes from way below freezing to above freezing and even sometimes, hot! A swing of 75 degrees or more!!! And plants and animals have adapted to this and thrive.

Aphan
Reply to  emsnews
June 10, 2016 6:02 pm

emsnews-the local weather where I live (Mountain West USA) changes by 50F in one day all the time! Everyone expects it, and we even joke about it “If you don’t like the weather, just wait 15 minutes”. And all people, animals and plants seem to be perfectly happy. Climate scientists should study us. Learn our ways. Except ewwww….not sure I want them coming here. Never mind. 🙂

Michael Carter
June 10, 2016 12:43 pm

A greater influence over temperature in the tropics (or anywhere) is altitude, not latitude. The most livable locations in the world are in the tropics at around 2000 m a.s.l. I lived on the Ethiopian Highlands for 12 months. Wow, what a climate – the best coffee in the world too. Within 3 hours drive one could be below s.l. in the East African Rift Valley. Now, that was hot! People lived there too. I could name many other locations but would suggest to Nth Americans that there should be equivalents in Mexico
The Kenyan Highlands is one of the great suppliers of cut flowers and fresh vegetables for Europe. If temps increased they would move up-slope, not latitude. Even 500 m makes a significant difference
Over and again I find that common sense and general knowledge is sadly lacking in many of the articles published here. So many researchers need to get off their backsides and go see the world. My own field, Earth Science, is described as a field discipline. Long may that continue

MarkW
Reply to  Michael Carter
June 10, 2016 12:53 pm

I thought the key thing was attitude. At least that’s what Jimmy Buffet taught me.

Clyde Spencer
Reply to  Michael Carter
June 10, 2016 2:28 pm

Michael,
You touch on something that doesn’t seem to get much attention. With the lapse rate being between about 1.5 deg C and 3.0 deg C per 1,000 ft, the claimed global temperature change of approximately 1.0 deg C in the last 100 years can be negated locally by an increase of a little over 400 feet of elevation. An implication of that, is that if the terminus of a glacier has receded upslope more than about that amount, then something other than average air temperatures are impacting the glaciers.

Aphan
Reply to  Clyde Spencer
June 10, 2016 6:05 pm

Clyde,
Is it a “female” glacier? We’d have to ask a female glacier scientist to find out. 🙂

Michael Carter
Reply to  Clyde Spencer
June 10, 2016 8:52 pm

Clyde – Yes, I would really like to know more about trends within glaciers on a global scale – not just those that alarmists find convenient to study and report on

n.n
June 10, 2016 2:47 pm

The cause of mass population shifts is Catastrophic Anthropogenic Government Whoring observed in progressive wars, opportunistic regimes changes, social justice-inspired humanitarian disasters, and mass exodus to effect demographic change. As well as compensating for reactive parenthood, planned parenthood, and other dysfunctional orientations and behaviors.

Reply to  n.n
June 11, 2016 6:44 am

+ a bizzillion.

simple-touriste
June 10, 2016 2:55 pm

“above 90F”
And here in the sane hemisphere we use the metric system and °C. 😉

1sky1
June 10, 2016 3:39 pm

One thing for sure: as climate warms, there’s an increase in demand for mai tais.

Aphan
Reply to  1sky1
June 10, 2016 6:08 pm

1sky1-
Wait a minute….you just uncovered another, almost perfect, correlation….maybe an increase in the consumption of mai tais is causing global warming! It could be that demand for mai tais lags the warming, but I suggest MUCH research is needed to establish that mai tais do not, in fact, precede….and thus cause….warming. 🙂

Reply to  Aphan
June 11, 2016 6:47 am

I’m ready to start the research but, isn’t the plural for mai tai mais tai.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  1sky1
June 11, 2016 12:50 pm

Only when attorneys general drink them.

Alan McIntire
June 10, 2016 4:42 pm

Right now, there’s a species gradient. The largest number of mammal species and lowest rate of extenction is in the tropics. Why should the results for humans be opposite to the results for all other mammal species?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24492316
“Overall, speciation rates are higher, and extinction rates lower, in the tropics than in temperate regions. The diversity of the eight most species-rich mammalian orders (covering 92% of all mammals) peaks in the tropics, …… Latitudinal patterns in diversification rates are strikingly consistent with these diversity patterns, with peaks in species richness associated with low extinction rates …”

Aphan
June 10, 2016 6:15 pm

Alan,
Let me respond for them-
“Well DUH dude! The reason there are more species and less extinction in the tropics is because the temperatures don’t fluctuate much. It’s like they are completely static, so nothing that lives there ever has to adjust or adapt to anything. If the temperatures rise like even 1 C, even if it’s over the course of 100 years, all those fragile, weak, completely unsuspecting species (and people) will be forced to migrate or die!”
Hey, maybe that’s what happened to the Mayans! The temps rose 2 C and they all had to migrate! They just moved a little more North…built a city….waited for global warming to reach them again….abandoned the place…moved a little more North…built a city…:) Canadians are modern day Mayans!

Reply to  Aphan
June 11, 2016 6:49 am

Maybe the LIA started to destroy the Mayans and white men showed up to finish them off.

South River Independent
June 10, 2016 11:11 pm

Imagine! Air conditioning in the tropics! What will they think of next?

Chris
June 10, 2016 11:56 pm

“In the tropics we have a technological innovation which allows us to mitigate the distress we would otherwise experience on hot days, called air conditioning/”
Yes, but unfortunately in the tropics, like everywhere else, electricity is not free. Someone in the Philippines making $250/month is not going to be able to afford a $1000 AC unit, nor the $50-75/month to run it. Fans are fine at up to 33, but don’t do a lot of good at 37. Blowing 37 degree air past your skin at 37 doesn’t help at all. .
“People who choose to live in the tropics don’t mind when the thermometer soars above 90F – thats why we moved here, we enjoy that kind of weather.”
98% of the people living in the tropics didn’t “choose” to live there, they were born there.

co2islife
June 11, 2016 2:45 am

“Global Warming will Cause Extreme Tropical Population Shifts,” that is 100% accurate. The next ice age will almost certainly result in the US taking over Mexico as people flee the ice for the warm beaches of Mexico. The next ice age will almost certainly trigger a global war. What is the political left preparing for? The exact opposite.

June 13, 2016 12:52 am

Really? And all this time I thought people moved for economic reasons or for retirement. Now I find out people move because average temperature rises by 2 degrees. Of course people who live in air-conditioned homes will likely need to be told that they should to move .

Reply to  qbagwell
June 13, 2016 4:25 am

Widespread use of air conditioning has lowered our ability to accommodate heat. Before air conditioning, there was the shore or a trip to the White Mountains in New Hampshire in July.