Guardian: The “Planetary Guardians” Warn our Global Life Support Boundaries have been Breached

Essay by Eric Worrall

The climate movement just got weirder.

‘Planetary boundaries’ necessary for flourishing of life have been massively breached, scientists warn

New report shows key indicators of Earth’s health are ‘outside the safe operating space’ as climate disaster looms

The planetary life support systems relied upon by humans have deteriorated to their worst levels ever recorded amid ongoing pollution and habitat destruction, according to a key yet grim annual update by scientists.

Of the nine “planetary boundaries” that help determine whether life can flourish on Earth, seven are being breached at their highest ever levels of transgression, according to the latest planetary health check, a process that was established in 2009.

The seven key indicators in the danger zone include climate change, change in biosphere integrity, land system change, freshwater change, modification of biogeochemical flows, introduction of novel entities and, for the first time last year, ocean acidification.

…

“The diagnosis is unambiguous – pressure is rising across every planetary boundary already outside the safe operating space,” said Boris Sakschewski, lead author of the report. “It means that the risk of large-scale, persistent and potentially irreversible change is increasing, while our margin for error in tackling these problems is shrinking.”

…

“These are not separate emergencies; the planet is telling us, in every region at once, that it is out of balance,” said Hindou Oumarou Ibrahim, chair of Planetary Guardians, a coalition of scientists, business leaders and activists.

…

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/sep/21/planetary-boundaries-breached-scientists-warn-climate-crisis

Back in reality the world is flourishing, with greening deserts and soaring crop yields.

I’m struggling to get past the “Planetary Guardians” reference. Could you imagine introducing yourself to someone as a member of the “Planetary Guardians” with a straight face?

Are they required at all times to carry a spandex suit with underwear on the outside? Or is it more of a Men in Green thing? Dark sunglasses, very dark green suits, and serious expressions?

Just imagine – there was a time voters took these people seriously.

I only have one message for the Planetary Guardians. I refuse to take the Planetary Guardians seriously unless they can produce authentic accreditation from the United Federation of Planets.

Live long and prosper.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 21 votes
Article Rating
63 Comments
Edward Katz
September 22, 2026 6:07 pm

I’m glad The Guardian hasn’t forgotten to publish its latest doomsday report. I’ll make a down payment on my headstone first thing tomorrow.

CD in Wisconsin
Reply to  Edward Katz
September 22, 2026 6:42 pm

We are all doomed I tell you, doomed. We have to start asking ourselves if there is any reason for us all to go on living. ROTFLMAO.

Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
September 22, 2026 8:10 pm

Reminds me of the old joke:

Our household was poor.
The maid was poor
The chauffeur was poor
The chef was poor
We were all frightfully poor.

Laws of Nature
September 22, 2026 6:38 pm

Uhm.. her are the seven of nine “Boundaries” (according to Gemini):

  1. Climate change
  2. Biosphere integrity (biodiversity loss)
  3. Land system change (deforestation/land use)
  4. Freshwater change
  5. Biogeochemical flows (fertilizer overuse)
  6. Introduction of novel entities (plastics, chemical pollution)
  7. Ocean acidification (the latest boundary to breach)

The only two boundaries currently remaining within safe limits are stratospheric ozone depletion and atmospheric aerosol loading (air pollution).

but it seems unclear for each of them what “breached” means.
The first and last point of these seven have been discussed numerous times on this webpage,

  • the uncertainty of a human influence to global warming by anthropogenic CO2 is basically the same as 50 years ago pointing to an utter failure by climate scientists to make any significant progress in that field.
  • Ocean acidification: The total amount of anthropogenic CO2 produced over the last 200 years is about 2000 GTC. The oceans collectively hold roughly 38,000–40,000 GtC (mostly stored as bicarbonate and carbonate ions in the deep ocean – acting as an acid buffer system) and millions of GTC in the ocean floor sediments, the anthropogenic amount is too small to cause anything but a temporary sea surface effect!
gyan1
Reply to  Laws of Nature
September 22, 2026 6:45 pm

Ocean acidification: The average PH of the oceans currently at 8.1 is significantly more alkaline than the geologic average of 7.8 which all species evolved from. There is no basis for any of their lies.

Reply to  gyan1
September 22, 2026 9:04 pm

They don’t care about reality. The only thing that is important to them is the accumulation and maintenance of political power. They will not be satisfied until they have total authoritarian control of everyone on Earth. They will continue to use fear based propaganda to gain further control, because it is very effective.

Gregory Woods
Reply to  MarkH
September 23, 2026 2:59 am

& $$$

Reply to  Gregory Woods
September 23, 2026 3:01 pm

Money is a proxy for power in that it allows you to buy the support and obedience of others. These people will happily spend vast sums of money in order to consolidate power, so it’s clear what is more important to them.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkH
September 24, 2026 9:54 am

Control the money = control.
Control the energy = control the money.

Reply to  Laws of Nature
September 22, 2026 9:31 pm
  1. Land System Change (deforestation / land use) must be exacerbated by clear-cutting land to put up wind-turbines and solar panels.
Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
September 23, 2026 2:25 am

Don’t forget the environmental damage caused by the mining necessary to obtain copper and other elements in wind turbines and solar cells.

Gregory Woods
Reply to  Graemethecat
September 23, 2026 3:01 am

and end-of-life waste disposal

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  Gregory Woods
September 23, 2026 12:48 pm

Soylent Green.

MarkW
Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
September 23, 2026 9:13 am

Here in the US, the forested area is much larger than it was 150 years ago. Advanced agricultural techniques and improved plants allows farmers to grow more crops on much less land and as a result millions of acres have been allowed to go fallow.

Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
September 23, 2026 3:23 pm

Really ironic is that the picture of devastated Brazilian rain forest in the Guardian’s Planetary Guardian story shows the trees destroyed to make a road to the 2025 COP30 Conference site.

1saveenergy
Reply to  Pat Frank
September 24, 2026 12:24 am

Well spotted.

SxyxS
Reply to  Laws of Nature
September 23, 2026 1:01 am

Funny thing is that during the 2 most “fertile” periods for life on earth,
The co2 levels were 10*+ higher than they are today.
That’s when all the fishy sea life occured.

I wonder where the boundaries were back then?
Probably not there as there were no scientists around.

Another interesting thing is that those remaining 2 safe boundaries happen to be the ones that came under threat right after the Club of Rome was founded and were ” successfully ” defended.
The Air Pollution -whose end was also the end to the Ice Age Scare.
And the non-existing man made ozone depletion,where less than a handful years of Ozone hole data was enough to determine a catastrophy caused by molecules released thousands miles away.

Reply to  Laws of Nature
September 25, 2026 7:08 am

Notice that

The planetary life support systems relied upon by humans have deteriorated to their worst levels ever recorded

Once again, they have played the ever recorded card.

That simple phrase buys unlimited amounts of meaningless BS which may be used anywhere for anything. Sort of like the federal debt which is also based on meaningless fiat currency which may also conjure up just about anything right now, not so much in the future.

gyan1
September 22, 2026 6:40 pm

Just when you thought they couldn’t get loonier! Psychotic delusion being presented as unquestionable “science” is psyops on steroids.

Curious George
Reply to  gyan1
September 22, 2026 6:46 pm

You are taking them too seriously.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Curious George
September 22, 2026 7:56 pm

Well, runaway climate change could be causing psychotic delusions. But to state it more directly in agenda climate science terms “climate change is causing it.”

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Curious George
September 23, 2026 9:32 am

Perhaps, but how many of the masses will believe them on their appeal to authority?

gyan1
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
September 23, 2026 2:19 pm

“how many of the masses will believe them on their appeal to authority?”

Sadly, a majority won’t question the blatant lies presented as fact.

gyan1
Reply to  Curious George
September 23, 2026 2:25 pm

“You are taking them too seriously.”

A significant percentage of the population will take them seriously so they are a real threat to common sense and empirical science. Apathy gives them power.

Reply to  gyan1
September 23, 2026 4:22 pm

Overheard in a bar:

First American, “Would you say ignorance and apathy are our two biggest problems?”

Second American, “I don’t know, and I don’t care.”

And the education system isn’t helping…..

September 22, 2026 6:44 pm

It seems like every few months we get a new group of self-appointed custodians of the Earth declaring that human civilization is on the brink of collapse because we have breached some arbitrary environmental threshold. The latest installment comes from the Planetary Guardians, who are warning that our global life-support boundaries are falling like dominoes. Reading through these alarmist press releases, you would think we were living on a dying, desolate planet. Yet, if you actually step outside and look at the real-world data, the reality on the ground tells a completely different, remarkably hopeful story.
Take the claim that our planet is being degraded beyond recovery. Satellite data from NASA tells us precisely the opposite: the Earth is literally greener today than it was forty years ago. Higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, combined with modest warming, have acted as a massive natural fertilizer. Millions of square miles of extra vegetation have spread across the globe, from the semi-arid regions of Africa to northern latitudes that were previously too harsh to support robust plant life. Far from suffocating the biosphere, increased carbon availability is supercharging photosynthesis, helping forests, grasslands, and ecosystems thrive in ways that doom-and-gloom models simply failed to predict.
This greening effect is not just a nice win for wild nature; it has had a profound impact on human well-being. Global crop yields for staple foods like wheat, corn, and rice have reached record highs in recent decades. Modern farming technology plays a huge role, of course, but higher CO2 concentration also allows plants to use water more efficiently, making crops more resilient against droughts. Rather than facing the runaway mass starvation that early environmentalists spent decades predicting, humanity is feeding billions more people on less land per capita than ever before. If our life-support systems were truly failing, you would expect agricultural productivity to be collapsing, not setting new records.
The narrative surrounding temperature extremes is equally disconnected from everyday facts. We are constantly told that a slightly warmer world is an inherently deadlier world, but demographic and public health data show a very different picture. Cold weather kills far more people than heat—by a factor of eight to ten globally. A modest warming trend, particularly one that manifests mostly as milder winter nights in higher latitudes, actually saves lives on balance by reducing cold-related mortality. Moreover, thanks to economic growth, modern infrastructure, and better emergency warnings, global deaths from climate and weather-related disasters have plummeted by around ninety percent over the last century. We are vastly safer today from extreme weather than our ancestors were.
When you weigh the apocalyptic declarations against measurable human progress and ecological resilience, the disconnect becomes impossible to ignore. The planet is greening, food production is flourishing, and human life expectancy continues to climb despite the incessant warnings of imminent doom. Humanity certainly faces real environmental challenges that warrant sensible management, but treating our modern atmosphere as a planetary catastrophe ignores the tangible, beneficial reality unfolding all around us.

Reply to  idbodbi
September 23, 2026 4:02 am

Send that essay to the Guardian and the NYT.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  idbodbi
September 23, 2026 9:34 am

Grass and flowers and, argh, weeds growing at unprecedented rates over the past 4 decades.

John Hultquist
September 22, 2026 7:33 pm

 How many and who are the “Planetary Guardians” and, most importantly, tell me about the money.
I find Mary Robinson, the former Irish president; Juan Manuel Santos, the Nobel laureate and ex-president of Colombia; and oceanographer Sylvia Earle. The last has been a long time”protect the oceans” person. I can remember when she was relevant, but now seems to have aged out.  

SxyxS
Reply to  John Hultquist
September 23, 2026 1:11 am

The Planetary Guardians are The Watchmen.
5 Comic heroes who created a fake global threat to usher in a global government.

Reply to  John Hultquist
September 23, 2026 8:02 am

“How many and who are the ‘Planetary Guardians’ . . .?

Please direct that question to Nick Fury, former Director of S.H.I.E.L.D. 

He knows.

John Hultquist
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 23, 2026 8:39 am

 Unfortunately Stan Lee died in November, 2018.

Bob
September 22, 2026 7:33 pm

Holy cow am I ever glad I am not on the other side. These guys have past their tipping point.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bob
September 23, 2026 9:36 am

Are you suggesting they are unstable or that they have transitioned from a normal stable state to a lower stable state?

Either way, you seem to have applied a hammer correctly to the nail.

ResourceGuy
September 22, 2026 8:00 pm

In the old days Charles Manson ran the family and the highly publicized memes. I guess The Guardian has grabbed the torch now.

September 22, 2026 8:06 pm

“… refuse to take the Planetary Guardians seriously unless they can produce authentic accreditation from the United Federation of Planets. …”

But I did detect a Warp(ed mind) signature

Scissor
Reply to  Fraizer
September 23, 2026 3:38 am

Plenty of candidates for the Uranus Guardians.

Reply to  Fraizer
September 23, 2026 7:36 am

You should require Seven of Nine (Voyager) to present that accreditation!

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  Tony_G
September 23, 2026 12:52 pm

That woman gave us Obama. E am not forgiving her.

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  Walter Sobchak
September 23, 2026 1:34 pm
September 22, 2026 9:04 pm

One more “scientific assessment” that has been generated by AI. And the authors admit that at p.120: “Portions of this work were facilitated by the use of AI-based tools”. As UNFCCC COP31 is approaching we should anticipate an avalanche of such kind of publications within the next few weeks.

Mr.
Reply to  Citizen Scientist
September 23, 2026 3:34 am

2 can play at that AI game.

AI can do debunking of propaganda as well as creating it.

Bill Toland
September 23, 2026 1:01 am

Climate alarmists sound more deranged with every day that passes. What will the next loony organisation be called? Scientists Hating Independent Thought?

Scissor
Reply to  Bill Toland
September 23, 2026 3:40 am

Fonzie jumped the shark.

Junkgirl
Reply to  Bill Toland
September 23, 2026 5:30 am

I see what you did there. LOL.

Reply to  Bill Toland
September 23, 2026 10:30 am

I have it on good authority that Donald Trump will soon be releasing an EO that renames Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Trump Intelligence (TI).

It fits . . . more than he knows.

Bruce Cobb
September 23, 2026 3:14 am

According to the latest psychological health check, these “scientists” have breached all sanity boundaries at their highest levels of transgression, and are now in the “certifiable” zone.

Scissor
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
September 23, 2026 3:45 am

Donations to Psychedelics for Climate Action were huge.

https://www.psyca.org/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

September 23, 2026 3:57 am

“The diagnosis is unambiguous – pressure is rising across every planetary boundary already outside the safe operating space,”

Wow, looks like the Earth will blow up any day now! 🙂

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 23, 2026 10:51 am

Blow up, or implode? Boris Sakschewski, lead author of the report cited by the Guardian in the above article did not clarify if the rising pressuere was directed outward or inward.

This word-salad imbecile also stated: “It means that the risk of large-scale, persistent and potentially irreversible change is increasing, while our margin for error in tackling these problems is shrinking” while never defining:
— (a) “the safe operting space”
— (b) how “we” are “tackling” these problems,
— (c) what are the specific “problems” he asserts we are currently tackling, and
— (d) what “margin of error” means when speaking of subjective terms like “fighting climate change” or “controlling global warming”.

1saveenergy
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 23, 2026 3:37 pm

[“Blow up, or implode?“]

If it does both simultaneously … nothing will happen !! (:-))

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 24, 2026 9:59 am

As a rocket scientist, am I permitted to do the countdown? 🙂

September 23, 2026 6:15 am

I really like the pre-Jan 6th attack on the Capitol.

September 23, 2026 7:57 am

“Our Global Life Support Boundaries have been Breached”, not only that but “massively breached.

To which I say: laissez les bons temps rouler

MarkW
September 23, 2026 9:10 am

Can anyone name these 9 “boundaries”, I did a quick perusal of the links, but didn’t see a list.

I can’t think of a single measure that is outside the bounds seen by the planet, many times before.
Temperature? For most of the planet’s history, it’s been warmer than it is today.

CO2 levels? The pre-industrial level was the lowest in this planet’s history. We would have to get back over 5000ppm to get back the average of the last 100 million years.

Acidic oceans? What were the levels back when CO2 levels were over 5000 ppm.

What else?

Sparta Nova 4
September 23, 2026 9:29 am

“scientists warn”
Time to ignore it.

“Of all things the measure is Man, of the things that are, that they are, and of the things that are not, that they are not”
— Protagoras, ca 453 b.c.

In this same way, Plato would argue, if ten people have different interpretations of what Truth is, there can be no truth, there can only be opinion.

Sparta Nova 4
September 23, 2026 9:40 am

You all missed an obvious point.

The idea is to scare the shit out of people so they will not have babies.
The goal is to eradicate the planet of “white” “western” people to make room for the One World Government takeover.

1saveenergy
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
September 24, 2026 12:18 am

Well, I suppose shitting is a reasonably effective form of contraception. (:-))

Sparta Nova 4
September 23, 2026 9:47 am

So fresh water lakes are ocean acidification on steroids?

Living in the Artic versus the Amazon or in the Sahara or on top of the Andes demonstrates a lack of adaptability and acclimation to local climates?

Sheesh.

Walter Sobchak
September 23, 2026 12:46 pm

Are they going to fight the Cylons?

September 24, 2026 9:47 am

Don’t they know that “Captain Planet and the Planeteers” was a cartoon show?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_Planet_and_the_Planeteers