Bionic leaf turns sunlight into liquid fuel

New system surpasses efficiency of photosynthesis

Blog-naea[1]

The days of drilling into the ground in the search for fuel may be numbered, because if Daniel Nocera has his way, it’ll just be a matter of looking for sunny skies.

Nocera, the Patterson Rockwood Professor of Energy at Harvard University, and Pamela Silver, the Elliott T. and Onie H. Adams Professor of Biochemistry and Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School, have co-created a system that uses solar energy to split water molecules and hydrogen-eating bacteria to produce liquid fuels.

The paper, whose lead authors include post-doctoral fellow Chong Liu and graduate student Brendan Colón, is described in a June 3 paper published in Science.

“This is a true artificial photosynthesis system,” Nocera said. “Before, people were using artificial photosynthesis for water-splitting, but this is a true A-to-Z system, and we’ve gone well over the efficiency of photosynthesis in nature.”

While the study shows the system can be used to generate usable fuels, its potential doesn’t end there, said Silver, who is also a Founding Core Member of the Wyss Institute at Harvard University.

“The beauty of biology is it’s the world’s greatest chemist – biology can do chemistry we can’t do easily,” she said. “In principle, we have a platform that can make any downstream carbon-based molecule. So this has the potential to be incredibly versatile.”

Dubbed “bionic leaf 2.0,” the new system builds on previous work by Nocera, Silver and others, which – though it was capable of using solar energy to make isopropanol – faced a number of challenges.

Chief among those challenges, Nocera said, was the fact that the catalyst used to produce hydrogen – a nickel-molybdenum-zinc alloy – also created reactive oxygen species, molecules that attacked and destroyed the bacteria’s DNA. To avoid that problem, researchers were forced to run the system at abnormally high voltages, resulting in reduced efficiency.

“For this paper, we designed a new cobalt-phosphorous alloy catalyst, which we showed does not make reactive oxygen species,” Nocera said. “That allowed us to lower the voltage, and that led to a dramatic increase in efficiency.”

The system can now convert solar energy to biomass with 10 percent efficiency, Nocera said, far above the one percent seen in the fastest growing plants.

In addition to increasing the efficiency, Nocera and colleagues were able to expand the portfolio of the system to include isobutanol and isopentanol. Researchers also used the system to create PHB, a bio-plastic precursor, a process first demonstrated by MIT professor Anthony Sinskey.

The new catalyst also came with another advantage – its chemical design allows it to “self-heal” – meaning it wouldn’t leech material into solution.

“This is the genius of Dan,” Silver said. “These catalysts are totally biologically compatible.”

Though there may yet be room for additional increases in efficiency, Nocera said the system is already effective enough to consider possible commercial applications but within a different model for technology translation.

“It’s an important discovery–it says we can do better than photosynthesis,” Nocera said. “But I also want to bring this technology to the developing world as well.”

Working in conjunction with the First 100 Watts program at Harvard, which helped fund the research, Nocera hopes to continue developing the technology and its applications in nations like India with the help of their scientists.

In many ways, Nocera said, the new system marks the fulfillment of the promise of his “artificial leaf” – which used solar power to split water and make hydrogen fuel.

“If you think about it, photosynthesis is amazing,” he said. “It takes sunlight, water and air–and then look at a tree. That’s exactly what we did, but we do it significantly better, because we turn all that energy into a fuel.”

###

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
78 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ed Zuiderwijk
June 3, 2016 1:25 am

Oh no! Even more money for Middle East potentates!

lee
June 3, 2016 6:18 am

What was that about a global CO2 scare.

June 3, 2016 1:31 pm

Interesting abstract, it sounds as if it’s worth taking to the pilot plant stage. If it turns out to be cost effective and doesn’t pollute too much, it could end up coming to the market.
I can’t quite understand the rather negative tone of most of the comments here. The concept of producing renewable liquid fuel without wasting what would otherwise be food, and without turning forests into monocultures, seems like a worthwhile objective that is independent of what you might think about CO2 and global warming. If it ends up not being practical at commercial scales, it will fade away, without the need for scorn from the sceptical side of the fence.
Unless of course it turns out to be uneconomical at the commercial scale but still gets enough press coverage that it’s foisted on the world by those who would tell us how to live, Save your venom for that day, please.
Meanwhile, I think I’ll get on to reading more posts for my amusement and/or education. Nothing more to learn here.

Chuck Bradley
June 3, 2016 9:52 pm

I hope this works. The comments could have been much better if we were given more numbers. For this area of light collecting surface and this much catalyst (currently costing x) we obtained so-much this, this-much that, etc per day at where. Many readers suspect the lack of numbers means the numbers are not good, for surely those good scientists record the numbers.

Ford Prefect
June 4, 2016 7:13 am

Nocera said the system is already effective enough to consider possible commercial applications but within a different model for technology translation. Does this make sense to anyone?

Kitefreak
Reply to  Ford Prefect
June 5, 2016 6:30 am

It was lost on me also.