Japan Plans to meet Paris Commitments, by Building Coal Plants

energy-plugged-in-coal

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Japan, which hilariously defined investment in high efficiency coal plants as “climate finance“, now plans to meet Paris commitments, by building even more coal plants.

In the wake of the 2011 Fukushima disaster Japan mothballed its fleet of nuclear reactors, relying on fossil fuel imports to meet energy demand.

But last week prime minister Shinzo Abe said these would need to be switched back on to meet energy demand.

“Our resource-poor country cannot do without nuclear power to secure the stability of energy supply while considering what makes economic sense and the issue of climate change,” he said.

Around 40 new coal power plants are planned up to 2030, according to the Global Coal Plant Tracker.

“The main concern is measures on emissions from coal power plants,” Yukari Takamura, a climate policy expert who helped draft the climate plans told Carbon Pulse.

Since construction of many new coal plants are planned, the government will put in place some regulatory measures but, I suppose, with quite weak enforcement.”

Read more: http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/03/15/japan-fleshes-out-climate-change-plan/

Let us hope more governments follow the inspirational Japanese approach to reducing CO2 emissions.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

106 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 15, 2016 3:46 pm

Excellent. We should all build more high efficiency coal plants with climate finance. Sounds a sensible plan.

Marcus
March 15, 2016 3:49 pm

I guess everybody should follow China’s lead… BUILD MORE COAL PLANTS !

March 15, 2016 3:49 pm

I attended the international conference about Fukishima in 2011, Washington DC. There was a lot of hand ringing at the time.
Like Germany, Japan has now entered into a building coal burning power plants phase. The new plants are state of the art, which likely means they reduce GHS compared to their old power plants.
“Reality is the leading cause of stress among those in touch with it.”
Lily Tomlin

Gentle Tramp
Reply to  Stephen Heins
March 15, 2016 4:07 pm

Sorry for Germany but that is not quite correct. There is only one new coal power plant under construction and it is not sure whether it will get finished soon because of legal reasons. The Germans are still much too stupid and brain-washed by their super-green and 150%-biased MSM to realize the complete failure of their so-called “Energie-Wende”…

Reply to  Gentle Tramp
March 15, 2016 4:14 pm

Don’t forget Germany imports a significant of electricity from French nuclear power plant,

Editor
Reply to  Gentle Tramp
March 15, 2016 5:39 pm

only one new coal power plant under construction“. Please can you provide more information with link(s). Reports from a few years ago were of lots of coal-fired power stations being proposed in Germany (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Coal_power_plant_proposals_in_Germany) so it would be interesting to know what has actually happened.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Gentle Tramp
March 16, 2016 2:47 am

try being Tasmania down under..their hydros low.and?…
back to generators and old gas turbines
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2016/03/tasmania-is-cut-off-from-the-world/

michael hart
Reply to  Gentle Tramp
March 16, 2016 4:55 am

Gentle Tramp, I can find at least seven very real projects in Germany at this site listing power-technology projects:
http://www.power-technology.com/projects/region/europe/#G
Some of these may be upgrades. Whether you count that as “new” is moot, since we can expect them to be there for many years to come.
One of them is so big (Lippendorf Power Plant) I actually wondered if they had made a typographical error and multiplied its capacity by 10. And in order to supply it with domestic lignite:

Heuersdorf, a village of 320 people, has been relocated, as it was on the proposed site for the opencast brown coal mine that was to supply the new power station.

It seems coal-fired power generation is alive and well in Germany, and will be for many years to come.

Gentle Tramp
Reply to  Gentle Tramp
March 16, 2016 2:23 pm

@MikeJonas & MichaelHart:
Please see here:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_geplanter_Kohlekraftwerke_in_Deutschland
This information should be current, so far I know. Thus “Block 4 in Datteln” is the only coal power plant under construction in Germany at the moment, but completion is stopped now, because of legal opposition by “green” fanatics, who don’t know that in reality more atmospheric CO2 is the best thing you can produce for a better and greener Earth…
See e.g. the following or the next link:
https://youtu.be/d0Z5FdwWw_c
http://www.nature.com/articles/srep20716
Of course, there are still some more coal power plants in Germany at the planning stage, but it is very uncertain if the building of these plants will start in the near future, because the gigantic and insane subsidies for wind and solar power in Germany (paid by all German consumers with brutal additional charges on the electricity bill) do destroy the prices for electricity at the free market and make new large conventional power plants uneconomic under the current conditions.

Reply to  Stephen Heins
March 16, 2016 4:47 am

Except that in Japan, there are no coal plants to replace, or in China either, or in Germany.
This is all new coal to replace in Germany and Japan’s case, nuclear, for political reasons, and in Chinas case, nothing, because its a developing country.

rogerknights
Reply to  Leo Smith
March 16, 2016 7:25 am

“Except that in Japan, there are no coal plants to replace, or in China either,”
China has hundreds of coal plants. Many of its new coal plants are actually upgrades of its old ones.

Reply to  Stephen Heins
March 19, 2016 10:56 am

wringing

March 15, 2016 3:51 pm

The Japanese actually care they maintain an economy, which allows their society the opportunity to prosper.
Not so the UK, which last night committed itself to a ‘zero emissions economy’. Even ecoloon supremo Obama has not committed himself to the same level sort of stupidity.

crystalofjedh
Reply to  Peter Miller
March 15, 2016 5:35 pm

He’s wants to.

Janice Moore
Reply to  Peter Miller
March 15, 2016 5:53 pm

Indeed, Mr. Miller, Japan is following the rational path, the path which will keep them free. Truth, i.e., what is real, sets free. Truth about science facts. Truth about economics (which is, at bottom, the truth about human nature):

…what makes economic sense ….

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe
and…
GO, NUCLEAR POWER!

John Law
Reply to  Peter Miller
March 15, 2016 11:23 pm

Comrade Cameron’s energy minister has fired the starting gun in the UK’s
Mission to match North Korean prosperity!

Gentle Tramp
March 15, 2016 3:52 pm

Great news! As the first member of the “Friends of CO2 Movement” and “The Carbonist Party” I simply love lots of new coal power plants… 😉

Reply to  Gentle Tramp
March 16, 2016 4:48 am

ITYM Corbynist party.
Probably bring back UK coal mines so as to have a miners union again.

Robert
March 15, 2016 3:56 pm

Go green! Terraform the planet with more CO2 ‘fertilizer’!
Better living through (photosynthetic) chemistry.

March 15, 2016 4:02 pm

Proof the green blob does not really believe in global warming is their attitude towards nuclear power. If they were actually concerned about CO2 emissions, nuclear is the only real choice. Given their advocacy for wind and solar, which are not really useful without real utility-scale energy storage, they have other goals. One can speculate indefinitely on what their real goals are. Paul Ehrlich anyone?

Analitik
Reply to  Tom Halla
March 15, 2016 4:14 pm

Agenda 21 has always been the long term goal. CAGW is just a tool

Bob Burban
March 15, 2016 4:29 pm

Have VW-inspired emission compliance algorithms come to the rescue?

Bob Burban
March 15, 2016 4:32 pm

TonyL
Reply to  Bob Burban
March 15, 2016 5:14 pm

Kewl! They bought cheap coal based power from the mainland, and sold pricey hydro power back to the mainland. This sounds absurd, but it made sense in terms of carbon credits and clean power rules. Unfortunately, dollar signs got in their eyes, and they pulled their hydro water levels down to dangerous levels without any thought to reserve capacity in case of need.
When things were going well, they must have made a fortune. I wonder where all the money went?

Analitik
Reply to  TonyL
March 15, 2016 7:41 pm

They may have brought the whole problem on to themselves by frying the BassLink cable while profiteering from the Carbon Tax – yet another side-effect of that market distortion brought in by our first female Prime Minister (against her explicit election promise)
http://www.themercury.com.au/news/tasmania/hydro-tasmania-exceeded-safe-power-transmission-levels-basslink-says/news-story/604185bf8d24057f82bbf56f94a0db93

Patrick MJD
Reply to  TonyL
March 15, 2016 10:21 pm

Hydro-Tasmania, one of the top 250 to carbon polluters, made an extra ~AU$52mil profit…in the first year of the price on carbon.

Aynsley Kellow
Reply to  TonyL
March 16, 2016 2:26 am

The problem here is Tasmania has (like most SNAFUs) multiple causes. The cable has only been in place a decade, and its installation changed the economics of the system. There are a couple of major hydro storages (Great Lake and Lake Gordon), but the water they contained had lower value in providing long-term security once the system could be backed up by importing coal-fired power form the National Electricity Market. It also made more sense to use the hydro stations more to provide peak power when the price in the market was highest and import off-peak coal power when prices were low.
The carbon tax raised prices. Once they know it was to be abolished after the change of (Commonwealth) government in late 2013, again, it made sense to maximise revenue while the tax was inflating prices. So storages were low – and then we were hit with a dry year and low inflows, followed by the cable failing.
The response has pretty much followed the principle of Least-cost Utility Planning. LCUP says to cover risk, not by over-investing in capacity, but by fast-tracking additional generation (gas turbine or – as in Tasmania – diesel) and adopting policies like ‘purchased conservation’ – including paying heavy industrial consumers not to consume.
The industrial users (an aluminium smelter, zinc smelter, paper mill, electrometallurgical plant, etc) account for 60% of consumption and have voluntarily reduced consumption.
So – the lights have not gone out yet, but we are praying for good rains! We actually had summer flood in the east and the north in late January, but little on the west coast, where most of the hydro catchments are.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  TonyL
March 16, 2016 2:49 am

Tassie has the highest pop of greentards and govvy workers per capita
they all want “clean green” and are willing to ruin the economy to have it.
the built a dam on what got called Lake pedder
the bobbrownnosers protested and got it dismantled
about now…it would have been a useful butt saver.
and no ones saying a word about it…funny that!

Michael Jankowski
Reply to  Bob Burban
March 15, 2016 6:43 pm

Wow…no redundancy and no contingency plan?

Krudd Gillard of the Commondebt of Australia
Reply to  Bob Burban
March 15, 2016 7:20 pm

Tassie’s power vulnerability is the major reason why it has been such a focus for the Greens.

Analitik
Reply to  Eric Worrall
March 15, 2016 9:06 pm

Robert O on the Jo Nova site is the man to provide extensive details on this mess

Steve
March 15, 2016 4:37 pm

Coal is a reliable means for generating electricity. Cheap, too. The real pollutants are an issue but technology has evolved to remove most.

TYoke
Reply to  Steve
March 15, 2016 10:05 pm

“Technology has evolved to remove most pollutants”
Not if CO2 is defined as pollutant. There is no way to burn the coal to extract the Gibbs Free energy without creating one whacking heck of a lot of CO2. Since the Paris agenda was about reducing CO2 emissions, building coal burners to meet the mandates is hilarious.

AndyG55
March 15, 2016 5:02 pm

And down here in the Hunter valley, we have heaps of high quality thermal coal.
Thank you Japan 🙂

NW sage
Reply to  AndyG55
March 15, 2016 5:08 pm

But you won’t be able to ship the coal to them because the feds HATE coal and will NOT issue the necessary permit (until you pay $100,000,000.00 to the Clinton Foundation).

Peterg
Reply to  NW sage
March 15, 2016 5:21 pm

Last time I checked, we still drove on the left.

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  AndyG55
March 15, 2016 7:22 pm

Peterg March 15, 2016 at 5:21 pm
Last time I checked, we still drove on the left.

Hunter Valley wine will do that to you.

NW sage
March 15, 2016 5:05 pm

Please don’t tell Obama this (that Japan is building coal plants while we are closing them) it might cause him to miss a putt!

601nan
March 15, 2016 5:13 pm

KOL, an ETF. Today it was down 3.29 % at $7.36. KOL turned the bottom on 23 Jan. 2016 at about $5.25: an increase of about 40.2%.
Jeeze Louize! Time to Buy Buy Buy baby!
Thank you Japan, Germany and Obama-baby (no drilling or development on the US East-Southeast coast means that the over-supply of oil will be drawn down by a year from now, when the next President opens the whole shebang).
Ha ha

Reply to  601nan
March 15, 2016 7:57 pm

I agree. This whole thing is political. You can see that much higher than normal volume is occurring on these up days. Investors are smelling low risk at this price … high reward.
Disclaimer .. I own me some bought at beginning of the year. My monthly cash flow tracker does has not created a clear buy signal, but she trades well. Typically the monthly signal misses the first move.
The US currently exports a nice amount of coal to the Netherlands who then sell it to the rest of Europe.
I do have to chuckle at the thought of that. It’s certainly an Alice in Wonderlandia moment.
Dig it out of the ground here and move it by train over yonder to ship it to foreigners when of course they have their own coal that they evidently can’t get out of the ground there.

Ron Van Wegen
March 15, 2016 5:14 pm

“Fleets of Nuclear Reactors.” Heh!

clipe
March 15, 2016 5:15 pm

“The introduction of (planned) new coal plants after 2016 will represent a more than 65% increase in coal capacity, compared to Korea’s current levels,” Joo-jin Kim, a lawyer with consultancy ELPS, told Carbon Pulse.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2016/03/14/south-korea-abandons-2020-ghg-target/

March 15, 2016 5:41 pm

In the US there is a renewed propaganda campaign targeting peoples fear of minute metals pollution, everything from lead, arsenic and cadmium to trace contamination of tritium inside nuclear facilities. Sometimes the alarm is being raised about the discovery of these contaminates in less than dangerous amounts or, in the case of the tritium in trenches dug specifically for the purpose of detecting this form of “leakage” as part of the containment design. A lot of sound and fury though!

Janice Moore
Reply to  fossilsage
March 15, 2016 7:45 pm

lol, good old capitalists (best thing going — I’m just citing a necessary ev1l of the best system we can devise, given human nature is what it is and always will be):
Big Coal: Nuclear waste will poison you!!! Fukashima was a disaster!!! Chernobyl!!!
Buy coal.

Big Nuclear: CO2 IS KILLING THE PLANET!!!
Buy nuclear.
**********************************
Well, I still say, GO, NUCLEAR POWER! #(:))
And, where nuclear power cannot (in U.S., need the regulatory chains hindering it removed) yet power a thriving economy, go, Big Coal.

Reply to  Janice Moore
March 16, 2016 2:45 pm

I’m with you Janice…I’m just pointing out that the propaganda against miniscule “contamination” is ramping up. The point is the contamination falls below thresholds for any kind of danger to humans or the environment. GO NUCLEAR!

Reply to  fossilsage
March 19, 2016 11:06 am

WUWT ran an analysis of concentration patterns and health effects. They are all downwind of natural sources like the ocean and exposed natural deposits.

Gary Hladik
March 15, 2016 5:52 pm

Dear Japan,
Thank you for the food.
Sincerely,
The Plants

Peter
March 15, 2016 6:41 pm

Korea seems to move in similar direction. It wants to abandon the GHG tartgets for 2020 and the ETS will move from the Min. of Environment to the “business friendly” Ministry of Finance. It was already planning more coal power plants: 65% more than current levels.
Source: http://carbon-pulse.com/16177/

Reply to  Peter
March 15, 2016 7:59 pm

+1

March 15, 2016 7:19 pm

Another nuclear disaster in Japan and we could have nuclear migration. That’d be mighty green of them.

Janice Moore
Reply to  rishrac
March 15, 2016 7:38 pm

rishrac: There was, for the, what, 59th? 70th? 800th?? time, no “nuclear disaster” in Japan. None.
I’m not going to quote from this article, for you need to READ THE WHOLE THING:
http://www.cfact.org/2013/10/12/physicist-there-was-no-fukushima-nuclear-disaster/
And there are many other reports which you can easily find if you want to, to know the facts about nuclear power generally and Fukashima specifically.
What in the world are you afraid of?
Knowledge will remove your fears.
You like being afraid?
Oh, brother.
And why do you never use your real name on WUWT if you are so certain of your unsupported assertions? Hm?

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Janice Moore
March 16, 2016 2:55 am

well
somethings frying the robots:-)
and theyre admitting reactor cores are missing

Reply to  Janice Moore
March 16, 2016 7:36 am

Do you watch NHK world? Assertions? Ohio ga nis a wa

Analitik
Reply to  rishrac
March 15, 2016 7:43 pm

They can join all the climate change refugees

Stan
Reply to  rishrac
March 16, 2016 9:40 pm

There was no nuclear disaster – not one person died from radiation. Many people died from the completely unjustified panic-mongering.

Reply to  Stan
March 17, 2016 3:14 am

I can live in the the exclusion zone and not die either. … for awhile. I wouldn’t want to have children after living there. I don’t guess, I know my life expectancy will be severely shortened. And as a group all that are or were exposed can also expect to face a shortened life span as well.
Stan, do you know the difference between ignorance and stupidity? The pay is pretty good if you want to work at the nuclear site. Somebody has to clean up that mess. Too bad I can’t MAKE you go since you are all so fired certain that there aren’t major health risks. Worse, you’re telling or implying the that the risks are minimal. Thankfully the Japanese government isn’t listening to people like you.
And since you seem to know a great deal more about nuclear science than I, perhaps you can give me a solution to the missing reactor cores? 1st, where are they? and 2nd, how to recover them? Or even what to do with them? Maybe you can stay up nights worrying about whether they hit a water table, convert it to super hot steam and explode all over the place, or put high concentrations of radioactive material in the water. Some people who are simple like to claim there is no danger, but are the first to blame people who have the responsibility when things go wrong. You have no idea what a nightmare this is. None.

Reply to  Stan
March 19, 2016 11:13 am

Read up on the Hormesis Effect. Likely consequences are lengthened lifespan, drastically reduced cancer incidence, etc.

March 15, 2016 7:36 pm

Japan is capable of burning coal with advanced combustion techniques. We can sell them large amounts of coal, shipped from our northern West Coast terminals.

pat
March 15, 2016 7:40 pm

15 Mar: Thomson Reuters Foundation: Philippines should walk away from coal plant expansion, Gore says
Climate change activist and former U.S. Vice President Al Gore has urged the Philippines government to end its dependence to polluting coal-fired power stations, particularly given the rapidly dropping prices of renewable energy.
Gore, founder of the non-profit Climate Reality Project, said in a speech to more than 700 climate action leaders being trained in Manila that while the Philippines is making significant efforts to deal with climate impacts it also needs to build a new energy infrastructure.
“We have the solutions at hand to address climate change. Shift to renewable energy,” Gore urged Monday. “The age of renewable energy is beginning.”…
While many countries are adopting more clean energy, the Philippines government last year approved the construction of 25 new coal-fired power plants, said Philippines Senator Loren Legarda…
According to Legarda, the Philippines needs another 13,000 megawatts of power generating capacity by 2030, with about 8,500 of those expected to come from coal…
http://uk.reuters.com/article/philippines-gore-coal-idUKL5N16N2YK
leftwing Qld govt:
15 Mar: Reuters: India’s Adani gets Queensland backing for Australian coal project
Parliament in the Australian state of Queensland agreed on Tuesday that India’s Adani Enterprises Ltd should be granted “all state government approvals” to build one of the world’s biggest coal mines, state mining minister Anthony Lynham said…
Lynham said the development could create thousands of jobs. Adani has estimated it will generate A$22 billion in state taxes and royalties…
http://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/idAFL3N16N5AN

pat
March 15, 2016 7:48 pm

15 Mar: Examiner: Thomas Richard: Al Gore flip-flops on end-of-world tipping points ahead of elections
Speaking in Manila yesterday during a Climate Reality training event, Al Gore said we only have two years left to save the planet and to convince people of global warming’s imminent threat. But in 2014, former VP-turned-green-activist Gore told Rolling Stones that we have reached a turning point, have seen “the worst effects of climate change and have saved civilization as we know it.” Al “sees the future and it is good,” wrote the Daily Kos in 2014…
Since 2006, when his movie ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ hit the film circuit, Al Gore has been making these end-is-nigh proclamations. He said the Arctic would be ice free by 2014. He got that wrong. He had so many scientific errors in his documentary, a UK judge forbade it from being shown in British schools without “guidance notes to prevent political indoctrination.”
***That may be why in Manila he showed an “updated version” of his film…
Gore also railed against carbon, calling it the number one threat to the global economy…
The Philippine’s largest sources of energy come from coal (29 percent) and oil (23 percent). Because coal is so cheap and abundant, “Philippine consumption of coal has … increased by 27% between 2012 and 2014.”…READ ON FOR MORE CONTRADICTIONS/HYPOCRISY ETC
http://www.examiner.com/article/al-gore-flip-flops-on-end-of-world-tipping-points-ahead-of-elections

March 15, 2016 7:49 pm

Good for them. The USA should do the same…

March 15, 2016 7:54 pm

Nice work. They ought to find out if by building high-efficiency coal plants they might not qualify for CDM as defined by the Kyoto protocol and thereby earn them carbon credits too.

pat
March 15, 2016 7:59 pm

15 Mar: Voice of America: Simone Orendain: Philippines Starts Task of Meeting Climate Change Commitments
Gore’s presentation in Manila made the connection between rising earth temperatures, powerful storms, extreme heat, more prolonged drought and their impact on food supplies, public health and political stability.
“I am constantly challenged in my own heart to realize the magnitude of these biblical changes that are going on right now,” he said.“ And we are the people alive in this day and time that have a responsibility to recognize it and then to act.”
Gore spoke Monday to the crowd of about 700 people in Manila, made up of public and private sector environmentalists, climate justice advocates and local media representatives.
Climate Reality CEO Ken Berlin said the goal is to get the Philippines started on its stated intention, made during the U.N. Conference of Parties summit (COP21) in December, to reduce 70 percent of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
“And we’ll be working to make sure that commitment is implemented, to build public support for the implementation of it.If there are new laws needed, we’ll work to get those laws through and build public support for that,” said Berlin…
***On its website, the Philippine Energy Department promotes the country as having “vast potential for coal resources just awaiting full exploration and development to contribute to the attainment of the country’s energy self- sufficiency program.”…
http://www.voanews.com/content/philippines-starts-task-of-meeting-climate-change-commitments/3237081.html