From OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY comes this Emily Litella climate moment, we told you so…
![]()
Study: Future for charismatic pika not as daunting as once feared
CORVALLIS, Ore. – The American pika is thought by many biologists to be a prime candidate for extirpation as the planet continues to warm, done in by temperatures too severe for this small mammal native to cold climates.
But a new study, published this week in the journal Global Change Biology, paints a different, more complex future for this rock-dwelling little lagomorph – the same order that includes rabbits and hares. Pikas may survive, even thrive, in some areas, the researchers say, while facing extirpation in others.
The research is important because pikas are considered a sentinel species for climate change impacts.
Led by Oregon State University post-doctoral researcher Donelle Schwalm, the study delved into where pikas live and how they move among habitat patches. The team used that information to create species distribution models for eight National Park Service areas in the western United States and forecast pika distribution 30, 60 and 90 years into the future, based on expected climate change scenarios.
The Pikas in Peril research project, funded by the National Park Service, was launched in 2010 to determine how vulnerable the animals are to climate change in eight NPS units.
“If you look at the overall picture, the amount of suitable habitat will decline and temperatures will warm in most of these National Parks,” Schwalm said. “But many of these sites have areas that are colder, higher and sometimes wetter than other areas, and pikas should do quite well there.
“In some parks, risk of extinction will increase,” she added. “But in other parks, like Grand Teton and Lassen, their populations should remain stable.”
Pikas seek out icy pockets in rock fields or lava flows and live near other pikas in small patches of these cool habitats. One key to their survival appears to be maintaining connectivity among different pika patches, which keeps a satisfactory level of genetic diversity among the broader population and allows for the inevitable downturns in survival due to weather, predation, disease and other factors, noted Clinton Epps, an associate professor in the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, and co-author on the study.
“If you just have three or four pikas in a given area, that’s a pretty small group and at the patch level, they can wink out pretty quickly,” said Epps, who studies habitat connectivity for many animal species. “But if you can maintain good connectivity, pikas can disperse from other patches and the overall system remains strong as long as habitat remains generally suitable.”
The study found that connectivity influenced where pikas persist in most of the eight parks, and thus must be incorporated in forecasts of future pika populations, the researchers noted.
The ideal habitat for pikas is a high-elevation, cold boulder field with north- and east-facing slopes that is adjacent to similar boulder fields. The herbivorous pikas also need access to high-quality forage, including forbs, grasses, sedges, twigs, moss and lichen, said Thomas Rodhouse, a biologist with the National Park Service.
“The study is important because it suggests that some parks may be more appropriate areas to focus our resources than others,” Rodhouse said. “If we look at it on a system-wide basis, the pika should survive. But we can’t say that they will be thriving, or even present, at all eight parks down the road.”
“We potentially could move pikas from vulnerable areas to locations with suitable habitat,” Rodhouse added. “Or we could discuss enhancing habitat and creating more connectivity, though you have to examine whether that is something we should be doing in a National Park. But this study allows us to begin having these strategic discussions.”
Study results for the eight National Park Service units suggest that:
- Crater Lake National Park’s pikas already occupy the highest-elevation habitat, thus there is no refuge to which pikas may escape. Warming temperatures, particularly in winter, may reduce the insulating snow layer and decrease patch occupancy by 50 to 100 percent;
- Craters of the Moon National Monument is hotter and drier than the other parks and the best habitat is occupied. Although temperature and precipitation may change in this park, it appears that the pika will persist, although at lower numbers;
- Grand Teton National Park has exceptional connectivity among habitat patches, which likely will persist over time. Cool temperatures and increasing precipitation at high elevations make this park an important refuge for the species;
- Great Sand Dunes is a cool, dry park and pika populations may experience slight declines initially, but they also could increase over time as precipitation is projected to increase in the future;
- Lassen Volcanic National Park has pikas well-distributed through the talus boulder fields and lava flows. Strong connectivity suggests pikas will persist under most climate change scenarios;
- Lava Beds National Monument is unusually hot, dry and low in elevation, though the extensive lava flow is good habitat. Climate change modeling in this park was inconclusive, but low genetic diversity and warming suggests that this population is vulnerable;
- Rocky Mountain National Park’s low elevations and south-facing slopes are impediments to gene flow. Rising temperatures, especially during the winter, and changing connectivity result in increasing likelihood of pika extirpation by the end of the century;
- Yellowstone National Park also is predicted to see complete extirpation of pikas under most climate change scenarios because of warming and loss of connectivity.
As a sentinel species, pikas may provide a clue to how other animals react to climate change, the researchers note. “They can act as the proverbial canary in the coal mine, but they’re also just really cute, charismatic little animals,” Schwalm said. “There is a lot of public interest in preserving the pikas.”
###
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Or we could perhaps even do nothing.
It is well worth WUWT readers’ time to review the related posts linked to at the end of the article — the two by Jim Steele in particular. Jim’s most detailed post references a study by Dr. Andrew Smith. I am copying two links from that post for your convenience:
Crag Idso’s summary of Dr. Smith’s paper here
The actual paper here
The only thing more resilient than the American Pika is apparently the alarmist claim of its imminent demise.
As Jim Steele and others have said, certain populations may disappear and reappear, and perhaps sub-species might disappear. But overall, I don’t think Pikas are in danger since they have been around since before the last ice age:
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-277.1
I don’t fear for the Pika.
Small mammal populations seem to crash all the time. Life isn’t easy out there in the wilderness. (Suburban-based researchers may not realize this.)
We regularly discover extinct species. Only the dodo seems to be a lost cause.
We regularly discover extinct species.
Well, especially geologists are good at it.
…and the passenger pigeon.
“…wink out…” I learned a new scientific term.
Pikas are cool animals! I have a lot more confidence in them than the Schmidt, Trenberth, Karl and the other gangsters.
And in related news – the rare aye aye is seen as the sentinel species in Madagascar for climate change
http://www.critterbabies.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/aye.jpg
(I can’t see it happening)
Now that’s what I call a bad hair day.
Are you sure this isn’t a picture of a local researcher?
“The ideal habitat for pikas is a high-elevation …”
And the definition of “high-elevation” is — what?
They will live between 2,000 feet up to higher than I think I’ve been. Maybe lower than 2,000 feet but I cannot personally confirm that.
“ … boulder fields …” … and … “connectivity influenced where”
The cute little things seem to think the “cut & fill” method of modern highway construction was designed just for them. “Fill” means larger areas filled with rocks where there were none previously. Further, highway construction and replacement now includes assessment of the plants and animals and is designed and built accordingly, including crossing structures to divert wildlife over or under the roads.
Connecting habitat in the Cascades
And: Local newspaper explains
“The pika, a small mammal with round ears that makes a high-pitch squeak, is a major focus of Ernest’s research. Her team is working to determine how connected pika populations are now, and will continue to look at connectivity after the crossing structures are built.“
The picture of the pika looks exactly like the toy my daughter had. When you pull the string, it moved its arms and delivered punches all while singing “Kung Fu Fighting”.
…But, are they better roasted or fried ? With or without gravy ? LOL
Either, just don’t get them wet…
So Pika’s with fries and gravy ??…or mash??
Some think they make a good soup.
http://i54.tinypic.com/307s2z4.jpg
If I recall correctly, isn’t the main threat to pikas habitat loss? I see a real risk that people will say “species X is at risk THEREFORE let us put all our effort into trying to change the climate” instead of doing effective things like setting aside habitat, ensuring that habitat patches are connected to allow gene flow, controlling introduced predators, …, all the boring old stuff that has actually worked pretty well. I mean, fighting windmills in mistake for giants is silly enough, but it’s lethally stupid when there are real giants to fight.
+1
What I want to know is “what global warming”?????
We are at nearly 20 years of no upward trend in temperatures — and some say the unadjusted (not faked) temps show a decline. So how come we are whining about what might happen with a warming globe when we don’t have a warming globe?
I’d be worried about them being accidentally exterminated by all the researchers going out to study them.
Sort of like those frogs were.
This seems to be yet another demonstration of how to backpedal earnestly. I’m sure we’ll see more of that in the future.
Item 1 on their list:
“Crater Lake National Park’s pikas already occupy the highest-elevation habitat, thus there is no refuge to which pikas may escape. Warming temperatures, particularly in winter, may reduce the insulating snow layer and decrease patch occupancy by 50 to 100 percent;”
Well, it’s winter and here is today’s snow cover at Crater lake – not too shabby.
http://www.nps.gov/crla/learn/photosmultimedia/webcams.htm
Winter, heck. Have you ever been to Crater Lake in early July and still have 20 feet of snow on the ground and several roads closed ?
Yes.
“controlling introduced predators,”, those bat chomping, bird slicing, eco-crucifixes are already ensuring there will be no bats or birds left with in the near future while ALL those “species hyperventilates” sit on their hands and say absolutely NOTHING..