From the “say your prayers, we’re gonna roast” department.
On January 25th, 2006, while at the Sundance film festival, screening “An Inconvenient Truth”, Al Gore said this as chronicled in an article by CBS News:
The former vice president came to town for the premiere of “An Inconvenient Truth,” a documentary chronicling what has become his crusade since losing the 2000 presidential election: Educating the masses that global warming is about to toast our ecology and our way of life.
Gore has been saying it for decades, since a college class in the 1960s convinced him that greenhouse gases from oil, coal and other carbon emissions were trapping the sun’s heat in the atmosphere, resulting in a glacial meltdown that could flood much of the planet.
Americans have been hearing it for decades, wavering between belief and skepticism that it all may just be a natural part of Earth’s cyclical warming and cooling phases.
And politicians and corporations have been ignoring the issue for decades, to the point that unless drastic measures to reduce greenhouse gases are taken within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return, Gore said.
He sees the situation as “a true planetary emergency.”
“If you accept the truth of that, then nothing else really matters that much,” Gore said in an interview with The Associated Press. “We have to organize quickly to come up with a coherent and really strong response, and that’s what I’m devoting myself to.”
Well, the 10 years are about up, by now, warming should have reached “planetary emergency levels” Let’s look at the data:
Satellite data since 1979:
As you can see, little has changed since 2006. Note the spike in 1998, in the 18 years since the great El Niño of 97/98, that hasn’t been matched, and the current one we are in isn’t stronger, and looks to be on the way to decaying. So much for the “monster” El Niño.
Dr. John Christy recently wrote of the satellite record since 1979:
While a 0.12 C trend isn’t exactly a sprint to climate catastrophe (the 1.2 C or 2.2 degrees F rise over 100 years would be roughly equal to the warming seen most spring days between 10 a.m. and noon), it nonetheless has been a steady trend for the past several years. Take away the random variations caused by warm and cold weather systems, and any long-term trend, no matter how small, will produce climate records on a regular basis. Add to that long-term warming the additional heat of a large El Niño, and record-setting monthly average temperatures should be both routine and expected.
Despite that, early indications are that 2015 will end as the third warmest year in the satellite temperature record, behind 1998 and 2010. That is the early indication. Typically, the warmest temperatures are seen in the second year of an El Niño warming event, although there have been exceptions. If the typical pattern holds true, the second year of the current El Niño would be expected to bring more record high temperatures in 2016, perhaps including a new record high temperature for the year.
The fastest warming place on Earth over the past 37 years has been in the Arctic Ocean north of the Svalbard archipelago, where temperatures have been rising 0.5 C (about 0.9 degrees F) per decade. The fastest cooling spot was over the eastern Antarctic near Dome C. Temperatures there have been falling at the rate of 0.41 C (about 0.74 degrees F) per decade.

The surface record for the last 10 years:

Source: http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2006/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2006/trend
Of course, proponents of climatic catastrophe will look at that and say “Gore was right!” …except there is this small niggling problem, a fairly large El Niño in 2015, which has nothing to do with CO2 induced warming as Gore claimed ten years ago. Note the spike in 2007, in the nine years since, that hasn’t been matched.
The real point here is to note that, no matter whether you are looking at the satellite record or the surface temperature record, is that the temperature hasn’t risen dramatically in the last 10 years, and the dramatic spikes we see in the surface and satellite temperature records correspond to a natural event that’s been going on for millennia; El Niño.
According to Gore, this map should have been all reds now.
In a recent post about why El Nino drive global temperatures, Dr. Roy Spencer wrote this: What Causes El Nino Warmth?
Dick Lindzen suggested to me recently that this might be a good time to address the general question, “what causes the global-average warmth during El Nino?”
Some of you might say, “the sun, of course”. Yes, the sun’s energy is the ultimate source of energy for the climate system, but it really doesn’t explain why El Nino years are unusually warm…or why La Nina years are unusually cool.
The answer lies in the circulation of the Pacific Ocean, more specifically the vertical circulation of that ocean basin.
The short answer is that, during El Nino, there is an average decrease in the vertical overturning and mixing of cold, deep ocean waters with solar-heated warm surface waters. The result is that the surface waters become warmer than average, and deeper waters become colder than average. The opposite situation occurs during La Nina.
Importantly, the change shows up in global average ocean computations, based upon ocean temperature data (see our Fig. 3, here); this means that the changes centered in the Pacific are not offset by changes of the opposite sign occurring in other ocean basins.
So, the big warming events of the last 10 years have been El Niño related, a natural event, and even they haven’t reached catastrophic levels of global temperature.
Al Gore’s posited “within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return” and “a true planetary emergency.” is proving to be nothing more than PR bullshit to push his movie, and won’t happen by the ten year countdown of January 25th 2016.

Gaia seems to be a “Gore denier”. How inconvenient.
[Moderator’s Note: Most replies on this thread will trip our WordPress’s “automatic audit/automatic moderator queue” trigger. Be patient, all replies will be read and checked in per the usual policies. You will not see your own reply until the checkoff is finished. .mod]
Note: within a few minutes of publication this post was updated to fix a formatting error, a source for the countdown graphic, and a repeated phrase on temperature, and fix of the date of the 10 year anniversary from 2015 to 2016
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



Well, facts have never gotten in the way of a devoted socialist- liberal’s desire for power & control over the people!
I understand that AlGore has a few of his Authentic Carbon Credit Credits available hurry and you may get some for yourself…give them too your kids
Al Gore learned from Bill and Hillary that if you tell a lie often enough people start to believe it’s true.
Both GISS and Hadcrut4 had that 2007 spike. And that spike was broken by GISS in both October and November. See:
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:2006
However Hadcrut4 is still not out for November, but WFT does not go past May anyway.
Al Gore plugged the ozone “hole”. Now all the “missing heat” has nowhere to go.
It’s all Al’s fault!
Beware of prophets making profits.
Energy is the time-integral of power (AKA forcing). It is disturbing that some who proclaim to know science do not attend to this fact, especially as it applies to average global temperature (AGT) change. Divide the energy change of a body by its effective thermal capacitance and you have calculated its temperature change.
If CO2 was a forcing on AGT, the time-integral of a math function of the CO2 level (divided by effective thermal capacitance) would equal the AGT change during the time interval.
Now look at the graph of AGT and CO2 level during past glaciations as so eloquently displayed in Al Gore’s infamous movie. If you truly understand this stuff, it should be apparent, contrary to showing that CO2 drives temperature as big Al erroneously proclaimed, the graph actually provides compelling evidence that CO2 has no significant effect on AGT.
This and similar discussions along with identification of the two factors that do explain AGT change for the last 300 years or so (97% match since before 1900) are at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com
Dan,
From your linked page,
“Average global temperature is very sensitive to cloud change as shown in Reference 5. An increase of approximately 186 meters in average cloud altitude or a decrease of average albedo from 0.3 to the very slightly reduced value of 0.2928 would account for all of the 20th century increase in AGT of 0.74 °C.”
A drop from 0.3 to 0.2928 albedo, would account for the entire 20th century warming . . It seems to me this degree of sensitivity to cloud change is not being adequately stressed, and I thank you for doing the work you’ve done to help remedy that. I had no idea that glaringly obvious candidate for “temperature control knob” is that finely tuned.
Yeah he said that like 20 years ago..
IN 24 days I can finally stop laughing. Stomach hurts.
The end colonal churning?
“since a college class in the 1960s convinced him that greenhouse gases from oil, coal and other carbon emissions were trapping the sun’s heat in the atmosphere, resulting in a glacial meltdown that could flood much of the planet.”
Only a politician like Mr Beachfront Gore could utter such a gravitationally-lensed statement.
The climate alarmist crowd always points to Arctic ice “disappearing” (actually, it is simply the ‘polar see-saw’, where polar ice increases in one hemisphere, and decreases in the other hemisphere):
http://www.climate4you.com/images/SeaIceNHandSHlastMonthSince1979.gif
The Antarctic contains 10X the volume of ice that the Arctic contains, so the rise in Antarctic ice offsets the decline in the Arctic.
Also, Arctic ice is only a few feet thick in most places, and the Arctic is often open water. By comparison, Antarctic ice is often a mile thick.
The “Arctic ice” alarmism exists for only one reason: the climate alarmists who made all sorts of predictions about disappearing polar bears, and Manhattan being submerged, and rapid, accelerating sea level rises, and runaway global warming, etc., have been 100% wrong.
Every scary prediction they’ve made has been flat wrong, but Arctic ice did decline somewhat. So they cling to that factoid like a drowning man clings to a stick.
But Arctic ice is rising again. Even if it wasn’t, the scare is about global warming. They just cherry-pick the Arctic because it suits their argument.
As others have noted here, money — and lots of it — is the only reason the “climate change” scare is still in the media. The gov’t spends more than one billion dollars annually promoting the ‘climate change’ scare. Why?
Because the government wants a ‘carbon tax’. That is their motive.
A carbon tax would raise the cost of all goods and services, without any offsetting raise in income. The difference would go to the government, but it would not change the planet’s temperature by 0.00001ºC.
And a carbon tax would be the ultimate wet dream of every government throughout history: a way to tax the air you breathe!
will sea levels rise more in la nina periods?
What does the heat energy go when warm water is circulated down deep in the seas?
The first question might be difficult to answer because the change is so small and the time period of a La Niña is short. The atmosphere is warmed as an El Niño progresses and fades. So, I’d say “no” is the answer.
Your second question contains the answer, but maybe you are thinking more about a sciency answer.
Try this: Heat a small metal coin until it is very hot. Next drop it into a bathtub full of very cold water (temperature just above freezing). Stir the water with your hand and then, with your fingers, take the coin out. The coin is now cold and the water has been warmed – just so little that you can’t tell. This dispersal is irreversible; you can’t get at that energy to re-heat the coin (in an everyday sort of way). See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics
Holy Moley I’d better get in the back yard and start burning stuff we don’t have long to pull this off! LOL
Maybe they can just falsify the ‘end of the world’ data, too?
Keep in mind that Al Gore is heavily financially invested in climate-friendly technologies and even owns a carbon credit company, an “inconvenient truth” he doesn’t talk about.
Whoa! “…resulting in a glacial meltdown that could flood much of the planet” by January 26th?
All is lost! Why even show up for work or school between now and then?!
Where is lard a$$ these days?
Hitting on masseuses.
Gore and the “Good Liberals” are just like the crooks in the movie Good Fellas.
Global Warming – “F*** You Pay Me.”
Global Cooling – “F*** You Pay Me.”
Climate Change – “F*** You Pay Me.”
Contrary to what the Al Gore ‘Chicken Little’, College Grantee, East Anglia U. scammer, Carbon Credit huckster, German influenced Pope and Obama Admin. “warmers” are preaching there isn’t a singular “world-wide” Climate. There are “regional” Climates.
These “Climates” are dependent on many factors, too many I’d say for the computer “Climate Modellers” to incorporate into their “doomsday” predicting data sets.
To get an idea of these factors: http://firstchurchofnaturaltheology.com/lets-talk-climate/
That linked site says Attitude instead of altitude. I’ll give that a ‘like’.
Suggested reading:
http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/
Considering that the content is from a 1893 A.D. source perhaps they knew something we didn’t …lol.
Climate change believers are a vision of human ignorance.
rvn70/71
Goofballs.
Unbelievable that people are so purposely blind and REFUSE to see or admit the truth, Al Gore flies around on Private Jets, has a cavelcade of full size SUV’s in tow, wastes more fuel and does more environmental damage in one day than most people do in a 5 year span, and yet the lemming Progressives believe every word he says, what a bunch of brainless nutbags.
Not only are the AGW fraudsters culpable but their fraud has diluted true science to the point that actual scientists with other theories have been ignored. There is a real chance that we may be headed for an actual mini ice age such as happened in the 16 & 1700’s. If true the dangers of this would dwarf warming. Warming and good counts of CO2 mean excellent farming and abundant food supply while cooling is the opposite. We may have wasted valuable time researching the real and much more dangerous threat of global cooling. If so remember who the people we’re that shouted you down when you challenged their global warming histeria.
Sorry but according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2015 was the hottest year on record EVER, with the average global surface temperature running 1.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.0 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 135-year average. Funny how that didn’t make it into your misleading article. Facts don’t lie. The icecaps are melting, temperatures getting hotter. Al Gore was at least partially correct.
want to buy some carbon coupons ??
A degree C is 1.8 degree F.
NOAA’s record is short but even so is fudged to exaggerate warming.
The Arctic is losing ice while the Antarctic is gaining.
“2015 was the hottest year on record EVER“, was that, like, EVER in the last 4.5 billion years, Hal? Or just EVER in the last 150 years? Is 150 years an EVER-so-large baseline? Or is it insufficient to exclude greater climate warmth in prior times? Such as during the Medieval Warm Period.
If prior times were even warmer, then why should anyone worry about now?
Does your baseline EVER acknowledge systematic measurement error? You know, the thermometer error limiting our knowledge of the global surface air temperature to no better than ±0.5 C? (869 kB pdf)
What’s the alarming significance of a change in air temperature of 0.8±0.5 C, stretching across 150 years? Does it matter to your thesis that recent climate warming is indistinguishable from zero C at the 95% confidence interval?
Well, look, that’s science for you. It’s our most efficient means of deflating even the most seductive and exciting of self-exalting moralisms.
And we should not lose track of the fact that whatever is happening – cooling, nothing, warming – we don’t know why. Al ‘the Goracle‘ Gore pushed hard on the carbon dioxide (now “carbon”) thing but that busted when hit by reality. So, I’m intending to keep driving my pickup truck.
135 years ago takes us back to 1880. The idea that we know the global temperature back then within 2C is, well, words fail me. Since 70% of the world’s surface is ocean, we really have very little idea what the global temperature was (to the extent that such a thing exists) before the satellite era. I mean, you have NO idea just how MIND-BOGGLINGLY BIG the oceans are, and how very little of it used to be measured. Since New Zealand is pretty small, and the South Pacific is pretty large, we can maybe use historic New Zealand data to get *some* idea of what was happening pre-satellite. De Freitas, Dedekind, & Brill, Environ Model Assess (2015) 20:399–410 DOI 10.1007/s10666-014-9429-z come up with a trend of “0.28±0.29 °C per century” “over the period 1909–2009”. Any time anyone gives you *one* number (like “1.0 degrees Celsius”) instead of a range (like “0.28±0.29 °C”) for something with as much uncertainty as this, you can safely ignore what they’re saying.
It was not the hottest ever. No humans were here at the beginning of earth time and what year was a thermometer even invented? And where are all the temperature records going back millions of years? Our temps were normal to below average in 2015. And last time I checked, Texas gulf coast is still part of the GLOBE!
Considering we are talking about ‘GLOBAL warming’, I must not live on THIS globe:
Summary for 2015
Temperature (°C):
Mean (1 minute) 18.9
Mean (min+max) 19.5
Mean Minimum 14.6
Mean Maximum 24.5
Minimum 3.5 day 04/07
Maximum 41.0 day 26/11
Highest Minimum 26.2 day 20/12
Lowest Maximum 13.1 day 12/07
Summary for 2014
Temperature (°C):
Mean (1 minute) 19.3
Mean (min+max) 20.3
Mean Minimum 14.4
Mean Maximum 26.1
Minimum 4.1 day 06/08
Maximum 41.7 day 14/11
Highest Minimum 22.4 day 19/02
Lowest Maximum 15.5 day 19/07
Disclaimer, these figures are from my own PWS (personal weather station) and have not been passed on to NOAA, NASA, CRU or Oz’s BoM for ‘verification’. /nudge, nudge – wink, wink
Exxon is being attacked for their research and understanding of this issue. Why isn’t Al Gore being sued? It is Al Gore, corrupt politicians, environmental groups, rent seeking NGOs and Crony Capitalists that are corrupting this “science” for their own personal gain and profit.
http://www.exxonmobilperspectives.com/2015/10/21/when-it-comes-to-climate-change-read-the-documents/
This clip highlights the corruption:
https://youtu.be/QowL2BiGK7o?t=20m37s