Closing on a quarter billion

250,000,866Guest essay by Ric Werme

As we close into the 250 millionth page view at WUWT (likely to happen in a few hours done), I’ve been thinking both back to the early days and and wondering what today would be like if WUWT never existed.

Before the impending catastrophe of global warming was introduced to the world, I recall two things that got my attention.  The first was the initial release of the Keeling curve.  That pretty much silenced the impending Ice Age crowd, which I had mostly given up on anyway.  After Keeling, I started pointing out that nuclear power plants didn’t release CO2.  A decade or two later, I heard what was probably a short news note on the Hockey Stick, and figured that CO2 must actually be doing us in.  I started souring on that when I realized later it also got rid of the Little Ice Age.  How could that be?  I had heard too much about the LIA to think it could be wiped away with a wave of a hockey wand.

Various tidbits made me think solar activity was a significant driver, and when I learned about the PDO (Pacific Decadal Oscillation) and began to meet people like Joe D’Aleo I decided to bide my time for a bit longer and start getting active when the PDO next flipped negative and SC23 (Solar Cycle #23) reached its end.  At another talk by Joe, he said both of those had essentially happened.  That was February 2008.  SC23 hung on for another year or two before it finally got an updated tombstone, but it was pretty much moribund during that period.

By then I had found Anthony Watt’s Surface Stations project and discovered that the surface record was worse than I could have ever imagined.  I found RealClimate, but found WUWT made more sense.  I found videos from Bob Carter about the scientific method, something I have deep respect for, and that led me to write my first real climate web page, http://wermenh.com/climate/science.html – Science, Method, Climatology, and Forgetting the Basics.  It’s now somewhat dated, but not bad.  I found that the science behind the Hockey Stick was worse than I could have imagined.

I settled in at WUWT becoming a daily reader.  My main two regrets then were first, wishing I had started reading WUWT when it started late in 2006, and when I learned about John Daly, one of the first serious skeptics, I wished I had been able to see him in action before his death in 2004.  The former seems a bit silly now, the latter I’m glad I’m helping preserve http://john-daly.com

The most momentous event in WUWT’s existence was the release of the Climategate Emails in 2009.  Now we had proof that much of the manipulation we suspected was going on behind the scenes really was.  I stayed up until 3 AM unable to pull myself away from the Harry README file.  As a software engineer, I related very well to what that poor guy had to deal with.  More science, worse than I could have imagined.

Climategate changed WUWT forever.  Whereas before the posters generally had a lot of technical background, a flood of new readers came in (I expected for a short while), some with a technical background, but a lot more just plain folks goaded into looking into the global warming claims they now had reason to question.  This new cohort is still here, having found that WUWT is the best source of information within the climate community.  Very little escapes WUWT, in part because its reach encourages people to submit stories here than try to start their own blog.  (A couple have been successful – especially https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/ and https://chiefio.wordpress.com/)

All in all, WUWT has “won” a battle for readers it never tried to win.  Anthony has managed to find an almost perfect level of moderation where things are kept under control, but people given enough slack to prove their character warrants banishment.  He and the moderation team do an incredibly good job of handling an impossible task.  Anthony credits his years as a TV meteorologist in helping understand audiences, that makes a lot of sense to me.

Anthony could have thrown in the towel at many points along the way, and shutdown or radically changed the blog to give him more time for his professional and personal lives.  I know the impact on me and my “obsession,” I can imagine WUWT feels like a heavy burden at times for Anthony.  After all, he once said way back in 2007:

I don’t want fame, fame is painful. A complete and thorough accounting of the surface temperature record is all I want.

Forecasting the future is difficult….

I’ve also been wondering what would the climate scene be if WUWT had never been created?  Some of the “specialty” blogs would certainly be around and thriving.  Other “generalist” blogs likely would have appeared, but unless they were run by someone who understood his audience I doubt they’d be as successful as WUWT.

I’d bet there would be blogs as tightly controlled as RealClimate and Skeptical Science.  They would fade from lack of reader support.  There would be blogs that are a total free for all to “do things right,” but they would collapse under battles between competing trolls, forcing people with a genuine curiosity out to look for someplace else or just give up.

Ten or twenty years or so from now people will try to analyze the history of the climate debates, I think WUWT will come out both as important and influential.  Maybe we can find Anthony some relatively painless fame then.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
201 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 2, 2015 6:39 pm

A chap above mentioned the “screaming jumping monkeys” post – or something similar. That was around the time I found WUWT as well. I think that it was a post by the incomparable Willis Eschenbach I seem to recall that the number of views by then had not yet reached the million mark.

F. Ross
November 2, 2015 8:43 pm

My sincere thanks to Anthony and his support crew for the absolute best blog of this type. A daily read for me… and twice on Sunday
🙂

matt
November 2, 2015 9:26 pm

Hi Ric,
First, congratulations on being part of a successful Blog. I was perusing your articles and really enjoyed hearing about snow in February. Living just north of the border, almost a straight shot up the latitude line, i can relate but then again, February is usually pretty chilly with a lot of snow.
I was just curious, how does the profession of software engineer qualify you to be a climate scientist?

richardscourtney
Reply to  matt
November 3, 2015 12:42 am

matt:
You asked Ric Werme

I was just curious, how does the profession of software engineer qualify you to be a climate scientist?

It seems that Ric Werme is too modest to provide a direct answer to that, so I will enlighten you.
Knowledge and understanding of climate science provides competence as a climate scientist.
For example, it is very clear that the software engineer of the harry read me files is a much, much better climate scientist than those who claim to be the climate scientists at the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia.
Richard

Patrick
Reply to  matt
November 3, 2015 12:50 am

It matters not. Was Darwin a “scientist”? What about Faraday? No “peers” in their time. Anyone and everyone can be a scientist. It’s real easy. One just needs to open ones eyes…

Reply to  matt
November 3, 2015 7:33 am

matt November 2, 2015 at 9:26 pm
Hi Ric,
First, congratulations on being part of a successful Blog. I was perusing your articles and really enjoyed hearing about snow in February. Living just north of the border, almost a straight shot up the latitude line, i can relate but then again, February is usually pretty chilly with a lot of snow.
I was just curious, how does the profession of software engineer qualify you to be a climate scientist?

matt,
Science is applied reasoning.
Pretty universal potential in humans to use that capacity.
John

Rascal
Reply to  John Whitman
November 3, 2015 10:27 pm

Software engineer (a good one) is just one of the qualifications of a “Climate Scientist”.
Think of all of the disciplines involved in climate: meteorology, physics, chemistry, fluid dynamics, geology, botany…even history.
As someone noted above: anyone can express an opinion, but be prepared to defend it.

November 2, 2015 11:31 pm

Thank you one and all … to Anthony, contributors, moderators, volunteers, and commenters. But, especially to Anthony. I don’t think you realized how this website was going to take off, and become such a huge part of your life, when you first began this website. Thanks for your perseverance, honesty, civility, and your sense of humor.
Congratulations on another major milestone.

November 2, 2015 11:37 pm

I don’t understand why it took me so long to become a regular reader of this site, maybe it’s because participating here made me feel a bit like I was preaching to the choir at first, then there was the fear of cocooning myself in an echo chamber. After spending some time here though, I realized this isn’t an echo chamber, there are lots of diverse views, not everyone agrees on the problems or the solutions, some folks have very different views from mine and present them convincingly. In the short time I’ve been reading the transactions here I’ve learned more about the subject than I had in the previous 20 years reading all the others.
I admit to being a little scarred by my experiences with other topical climate science blogs and mass media outlets and I’m certain it will take time for me to adapt to an environment open to real argument, investigation and dissent. After years of being called names and ridiculed for daring to even question the party line, banned from sites like Ars Technica for nothing more than accurately quoting the error bars in 14C dating, I’m a bit gun shy and more than a little defensive. I expect it may take a long time to get over, but I think WUWT is just the therapy I need. With any luck my pent up anger and frustration won’t cause me to alienate everyone here before my recovery is complete 🙂
I’m very concerned by the open hostility towards skeptics and “deniers” that’s developed over the past year, especially recent threats by political leaders and so called climate “scientists” to suppress debate with death or imprisonment. At first I thought it was just a few radical wingnuts, but when Joe Biden went public last month with his opinion that climate skeptics should be prosecuted for “crimes against humanity” I began to realize this might be a real problem. I feel like our society is slipping back into the dark ages while I watch. WUWT is a light in that dark so keep up the good work, thanks for being brave and above all thanks for providing this forum. Still, I don’t imagine I’ll be publishing my full name, social security number and a list of publications any time soon…

Reply to  majpita
November 3, 2015 6:52 am

Still, I don’t imagine I’ll be publishing my full name, social security number and a list of publications any time soon…

Understandable, if like so many your job would be on the line if you did. But sadly, that is a symptom of the problem. Nothing is going to change until skeptics stand up en masse and defy the priesthood that threatens to punish all dissenters and heretics.
/Mr Lynn

Rascal
Reply to  majpita
November 3, 2015 10:35 pm

Joe Biden? That should definitely make you realize you’re on the right track!

George McFly......I'm your density
November 2, 2015 11:42 pm

Congratulations and well done Anthony and please keep the good work up

Patrick
November 3, 2015 12:20 am

My posts seem to be going in to the bit bucket. I was asking about “Andy” the moderator/poster who is someone I knew and worked with. Not seen any posts from him lately (Busy with my own carp).

Patrick
Reply to  Ric Werme
November 3, 2015 8:58 pm

Thanks Ric, it certainly seems that way. Reminds me of MS Systems Management Server (SMS or “Slow Moving Software” now called SCCM).

Patrick
Reply to  Ric Werme
November 3, 2015 9:33 pm

Actually, his WUWT handle I think was “AndiC”?

November 3, 2015 12:33 am

Tip jar hit. Have a beer on me mate.

Robin.W.
November 3, 2015 3:49 am

Thank you Anthony for your wonderful work, you have given me hope.
Best wishes from an Australian dailly reader.

ozspeaksup
November 3, 2015 5:04 am

Im not sure if I found Booker or WUWT first, but boy am I glad I did.;-)
and Kens kingdom from there and onwards to jo Nova
daily reader since early 09 at least later joiner.
blessings on Anthony and ALL contributors and the mods
not a day goes by I dont sharemail at least one subject:-)

TimC
November 3, 2015 5:10 am

Anthony: congratulations (to you and the mods) from a regular reader, like many others above.
You provide an essential resource here, when the “science” seems to have been corrupted by the consensus du jour – and the Telegraph today reports that Antarctica is now gaining more ice than it is losing …!
Small tip-jar contribution on the way (to Willard, I think)!

November 3, 2015 5:56 am

WUWT has given me a new perspective on Global Warming. It’s all politics and the Earth is fine.
The AGW cabal that has been exposed here is nothing short of scary.
WUWT shows me that there are many others like myself who, once enlightened, will push back against this cabal.
WUWT has given me hope. Thanks Mr. Watts and everyone else who posts or comments here.

Rex H Knight
Reply to  RobRoy
November 3, 2015 6:11 am

+1

EJ
November 3, 2015 6:04 am

WUWT, you have certainly done justice to the subjects you so steadily report on.
I have directed many, many, laypeople to this site and will continue to do so.
Thank You !!!

November 3, 2015 6:14 am

The best thing readers here can do is to give some ‘push-back’ on general media sites, commenting under any “climate change” articles.
The public responds to peer pressure. People act in groups, and most of them don’t want to be different. So just a short comment like, “Global warming stopped many years ago,” or “CO2 is greening the planet” will go a long way in changing public perceptions.
It’s not to convince the climate alarmist crowd. That’s not possible in most cases. Rather, it is a battle for the hearts and minds of the undecided middle.
Skeptics of the ‘dangerous AGW’ scare are definitely making an impact, and WUWT readers are leading the way. A comment or two in the right places will help to crush the DAGW narrative.It’s already happening, we just need to give it a little help.

Reply to  dbstealey
November 3, 2015 8:14 am

I read Yahoo News. They’re very inclined to toe the AGW line. I check the comments on the alarmist stories and I’m happy to see that most of the comments, by far, are written by well-versed skeptics. This is very encouraging.

u.k.(us)
Reply to  dbstealey
November 3, 2015 8:12 pm

Or just occasionally link to an article, don’t want to preach too hard to the ill-informed, it just turns them off.
Don’t it ?

Phil's Dad
November 3, 2015 10:12 am

Keep on keeping on…

Theo Goodwin
November 3, 2015 10:19 pm

Anthony has been heroic and saintly in his pursuit of good science and good public policy. He deserves at least a presidential medal of freedom.
The best of the blog was when Anthony was doing most of the posting and “directing the fight” in real time. Anthony’s personality is perfect for this kind of blog, which includes a good bit of natural history, along with the science.
My hat is off to you, Anthony.
Theo Goodwin

Rascal
Reply to  Theo Goodwin
November 4, 2015 8:25 pm

Theo, while I, and probably everyone else who reads this blog might agree on Anthony deserving a medal of freedom, as the saying goes “It ain’t gonna happen” with the people currently in office.

David
November 4, 2015 1:07 am

Can you recommend resources for year 8 science. 14 year olds.

Steamboat Jon
November 4, 2015 2:50 am

300 million visits by November 15, 2016 (it was not even 14 months ago that the count was 200 million).

Janice Moore
November 5, 2015 9:27 am

And, here’s post #201 on this thread:
HURRAH FOR WUWT!
Great work, Ric Werme, the well-informed, amateur**, climate scientist.
**amateur — refers only to whether one is paid, i.e., pro-fess{ional}, or “for money” or not. It says nothing about the actor’s abilities. MANY amateurs in every field of endeavor are FAR more knowledgeable or talented or skilled than those who do it for money.
Thank you, Mr. Werme, for your excellent support — how many blogs have a professional (and well-qualified) software engineer for the “IT person”!