Economies collapsing, Middle East imploding – and Obama & Pals obsess over … the climate!
Guest essay by Paul Driessen
The Middle East is imploding. Islamic State butchers are annihilating Christian and other communities. Putin is sending arms to Assad. Under the Obama-Iran nuclear deal, the mullahs will get $100+ billion to expand their proxy terror war on Israel and the West. Saudi Arabia has 100,000 empty air-conditioned tents but won’t take any of the millions who’ve been driven from their homes. Neither will most of the other 22 Arab League nations or 57 Organization of Islamic Cooperation member countries.
Instead, millions of mostly Muslim migrants, militants and refugees are heading to Europe – with limited money, education, job skills, or desire to assimilate. They demand entry into EU countries whose energy, economic, employment and welfare systems are already foundering or nearing collapse.
EU nations have hobbled their nuclear and carbon-based energy systems so completely that unsubsidized German and Danish electricity prices are almost ten times higher than in US states that still rely on coal-fired generation. Industrial giant Siemens is cutting 1,600 jobs in its power and gas division, companies are hard-pressed to compete internationally, and 0.5% annual economic growth is deemed “robust.”
So naturally, President Obama, Pope Francis, the European Commission, United Nations, and many poor countries are obsessed with – climate change! It’s insanity on steroids. The alarmist assertions are absurd.
“Climate change is already disrupting our agriculture and ecosystems, our water and food supplies,” Obama recently inveighed. “If we do nothing, Alaskan temperatures are projected to rise between six and twelve degrees by the end of the century.”
Projected by whom? Who concocts these fables? Nature-driven climate change has disrupted lives throughout human history. Seas have risen 400 feet since the last mile-thick glaciers melted off the northern half of Asia, Europe and North America. How did “imperiled” Pacific islands survive that?
Some Alaskan glaciers have been retreating for decades, but Hubbard is growing and Glacier Bay’s ice retreat began around 1750. Arctic sea ice has increased some 26% (400,000 square miles) since 2012, in a cycle that’s continued for millennia. The sea ice “was thick in the 1920s, thin in the 1930s and 1940s, thick again in the 1960s and 1970s, and thinner in recent decades,” oceanographer Igor Polyakov noted in 2004.
“Not only in the summer, but in the winter the [Bering Sea region] was free of ice, sometimes with a wide strip of water up to at least 200 miles away from the shore,” Swedish explorer Oscar Nordkvist reported in 1822. “We were astonished by the total absence of ice in the Barrow Strait,” Francis McClintock, captain of the Fox, wrote in 1860. “I was here at this time in 1854 – still frozen up – and doubts were entertained as to the possibility of escape.” How did cars and power plants cause all that?
Meanwhile Greenland’s ice mass has grown by some 200 cubic kilometers (48 cubic miles) just since 2014. Vikings built homes, grew crops and raised cattle in Greenland between 950 and 1300, before they were frozen out by the Little Ice Age and encroaching pack ice and glaciers. Antarctic sea ice set another record in May, the US National Snow and Ice Data Center reports, climbing 12% above the long-term 1981-2010 average, to reach 12.1 million square kilometers (800,000 square miles) – almost as much as Alaska and Texas combined!
If it’s global warming and climate change, shouldn’t melting phenomena be constant and global?
Pope Francis nevertheless plans to meet with President Obama September 23, to discuss “dangerous manmade climate change” and how to ensure “preferential treatment of the poor,” by building “clean” energy economies and stopping “carbon pollution.” Their concerns and solutions are illusory.
They disdain fossil fuels and capitalism – though they have brought greater health and well-being to more people than any other systems in history. They prefer the socialism, centralized government control, higher energy prices, fundamental economic transformations and wealth redistribution schemes advanced by the UN and Climate Crisis, Inc. By denying the world’s poorest people energy, jobs and economic growth, this agenda will sentence them to perpetual poverty, disease and early death. By mandating the use of biofuels, wind turbines and solar panels, it will turn food into fuel, increase malnutrition, convert wildlife habitats into enormous inefficient energy facilities, and kill countless millions of birds and bats.
The pope and president dismiss these impacts. They insist that climate change is a far worse problem, and that modern energy, housing and living standards for the world’s poor would not be “sustainable.” They believe “morality,” “climate justice” and “preferential treatment” mean protecting people from hypothesized, exaggerated and fabricated climate disasters 25, 50 or 100 years from now – by destroying millions of jobs and keeping the world’s poor energy-deprived and impoverished now and in perpetuity.
The pope and president denigrate plant-fertilizing carbon dioxide as “carbon pollution” and say this 0.04% of Earth’s atmosphere has replaced the powerful natural forces that have always driven climate and weather fluctuations and events. They disregard satellite and weather balloon data and records from East Anglia University, which show there has been no planetary warming since at least late 1997, if not 1995.
They studiously ignore the fact that even full implementation of EPA’s fraudulent and destructive Clean Power Plan would at best prevent a global temperature increase of only 0.03 degrees F and a sea-level rise of barely 0.01 inches by 2100. And those “benefits” assume CO2 is the culprit in climate change.
Like other climate alarmists, they refuse to recognize that some 2,300 coal-fired power plants are already operating worldwide, and almost 2,200 more are being proposed, developed or built. Nearly 900 are planned for China and India alone. In barely ten years, Asia’s energy consumption will increase 31% and some two-thirds of that demand will be oil, natural gas and coal. So a US shutdown would do nothing.
Developed countries have dug a tiger trap – and walked into it. Their constant rants about “catastrophic manmade climate change” are driving policies that shut down carbon-based energy, economic growth and job creation in Formerly Rich Countries, while telling developing nations to hold us for climate ransom.
Following Obama’s recent GLACIER conference in Anchorage, China, India and Russia (three of the four biggest CO2-emitting nations) refused to sign a nonbinding declaration seeking greater international action to combat Arctic melting and climate change. Nearly all developing countries oppose agreements calling for binding emission targets or even “obligatory review mechanisms” of their voluntary efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Meanwhile, they now insist on $100 billion to $400 billion per year in climate change “mitigation, adaptation and compensation,” plus free energy technology transfers.
Denmark is dropping plans to phase out coal-fired power plants and be fossil-fuel-free by 2050. Britain is junking its wind energy subsidies and pushing ahead with fracking for gas to fuel more power plants. But meanwhile, Mr. Obama is thumbing his nose at Congress and American voters and unemployed workers – and imposing ever more restrictions on coal and natural gas use, and more taxpayer subsidies for wind, solar and biofuel programs, on top of water, ozone and other regulations. This will cost trillions of dollars, inflict heavy costs on poor and middle class families, and bring few or no health or ecological benefits.
The agenda being driven by President Obama, Pope Francis, the UN and Climate Crisis, Inc. means our huddled masses will be forced to share ever-greater scarcity, ever-lower living standards, ever-fewer jobs and opportunities. But of course it all will be apportioned “fairly and equitably” – by ruling elites and their cronies, whose desk jobs, six-figure salaries and upper crust life styles will be protected by the same executive powers they employ to protect the planet from climate raptors and hobgoblins.
It’s time for Congress to pass bills dismantling and defunding Obama’s energy and climate dictates – and dare Democrats to vote against them and in favor of this destructive Executive Branch power grab.
Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow, author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death, and coauthor of Cracking Big Green: Saving the world from the Save-the-Earth money machine.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
In politics, there’s always a risk when an identifiable group is blamed as an excuse to push forward a political agenda to solve whatever problem they were accused of causing. The people of the group might object. Other people might sympathize. But invent a problem and then blame an inanimate molecule and by extension all who produce it? Convince the masses (no pun intended) “it” needs to be controlled? You’re home free to enforce your agenda.
Palestine 1896 – before Herzl wrote Der Judenstaat:
(Lumier Brothers)
quote:
===================
With the best possible intentions, it may be doubted whether the Jews could possibly seem to either Christians or Moslems proper guardians of the holy places, or custodians of the Holy Land as a whole.
The reason is this: The places which are most sacred to Christians-those having to do with Jesus-and which are also sacred to Moslems, are not only
not sacred to Jews, but abhorrent to them.
–U.S. President Woodrow Wilson;s 1919 King Crane Commission Report
====================
How many Christian churches were attacked by Jewish fanatics this year?
http://images.christianpost.com/full/84578/church-of-loaves-and-fishes.jpg
Supporters of Israel have no capacity for shame, and they never let the truth to get in the way of their deranged, supremacist religious fantasy.
Judaism is racist to the core.
One wonders why that sequence of verses presented starts with 7:2, Khwarizmi
Let me fix that for you;
7:1 When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou.
A bit less worrisome, huh?
And therein lies the problem, that pesky 7.1, at least according to Neturei Karta International, You see, people were still there.
That’s exactly what makes it more worrisome.
A bit less worrisome, huh?
==============
I fail to understand your point.
Why is a deity with a fetish for ethnic cleansing less worrisome?
Kwahrizmi:
+ 1O
Khwarizmi
“I fail to understand your point.
Why is a deity with a fetish for ethnic cleansing less worrisome?”
That wasn’t what you were railing against, sir, it was “Judaism”. And in the religion those words you quoted came from (which was not Judaism, since Judah was but one of twelve tribes being addressed), there is no “permission” granted by God to apply those instructions to anyone but the seven specifically named tribes. It was not any sort of ongoing license to kill, which was quite clearly indicated as a surefire way to catch Hell from Him, so to speak ; )
Presenting those verses without the preceding verse, can (as you apparently interned) give the impression that such an ongoing license was/is thought to be granted to the “tribe” of Judah, by those who take that Book seriously, which is patently and demonstrably absurd.
And to the “fetish for ethnic cleansing” charge, it seems rather obvious to me that a reason for what He instructed are sitting right there in the verses you yourself presented;
“For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.”
On what logical grounds can you deny such an Entity the right to cleanse anything He feels is disruptive to what He intends? Why in the world would the Creator of humans be under any obligation whatsoever to tolerate humans doing things He disapproves of? It’s like someone saying that a scientist who cultures some bacteria, has a moral obligation to preserve forever any and all strains that arise in his experiment . . and that he has a fetish for “ethnic cleansing” if he kills off some that he feels threaten to corrupt it.
Of course the Book’s passages/instructions can be distorted to high heaven, so to speak, if one simply assumes a God of the sort it presents did not generate it, and us, and treats it like a random collection of sentences. But that is just circular reasoning, not extra special logical brilliance, as I see logic anyway. I wasn’t a “believer” till I was in my forties, but I never saw such reasoning as sound, I saw it as presumptive self-righteousness, which is to say close-minded.
It was science that actually kept my mind open to the possibility that God exists, it seems to me, such as the “consensus” that the universe had a beginning, life is vastly more complex (even in it’s simplest theoretically possible forms; i.e. billions of highly organized molecules) than what could have just self assembled spontaneously by any stretch of a rational imagination, the utterly bizarre (to the best human minds on the planet) yet thoroughly demonstrable “rules” governing events on the quantum level (which is to say the level upon which all events must necessarily rest), etc, etc.
These were not insignificant details, these were/are glaring reasons for not closing one’s mind to the potential existence of something like the God of the Book, to me. People often speak of there being no ’empirical’ evidence in favor of the God hypothesis, but that to me is just wishful thinking, not scientific reasoning.
The Hebrew graffiti is written by Moslems, to incriminate the Jews. Modern Jews have no problem with Israeli Christians, because they all know they are in the same boat.
R
As a Christian married into a Jewish family once, I was treated like a leper. I was a third class citizen. I was never invited to the top of the table and didn’t receive gifts when these were handed out and was treated like dirt.
Divorce was a relief.
ralfellis :what planet are you living on? Even a very brief youtube search would provide enough graphic evidence to refute your statement. Besides , like virtually every other group, Jewish people as an “ethnic” entity have belief systems ranging from purely secular atheism to ultra Talmudic orthodoxy.
How prophetic from 50 years ago!
The current Pope will live in infancy. It may well be his legacy. Silly Poope.
Maybe I should have written that the current Pope will live in infamy. Either way, childish or a bad reputation is not far apart. Well, …. actually it is, give the Pope a break, call him childish even though the infamy may be a better term.
Not to forget that the European Union is in disintegration mode as boarders are being closed and member states are re-purchasing and building machinery to mint national coins and notes again.
And all this is not from Carbon Credits or Climate Change for even AWG. No. Migrants!
I expect open conflict by the European Union’s national armies Germany and Hungary within 48 months. Austria will be drawn in in 50 months, then comes the real kick-starter … France declares war on Germany in 51 months.
So much for “European Brotherly ‘Love’.”
With Europe in open conflagration (cluster bombs and sarin gas munitions from WWI expertise being used against civilian population centers) who needs a United Nations? Who needs an IFCCC? Who needs an IPCC? Who needs a Theory of Climate?
End Game already started. And Emperor Bon Ki Moon and his Generals were completely blindsided, like der Archduke of Austria-Este, Austro-Hungarian and Royal Prince, Franz Ferdinand of Austria.
Ha ha
Why 48 months? Answer: Industrial production capacity.
The decline and fall of Rome correlates with the rise of the intolerant cult of Christianity, declared the exclusive religion of the empire on 27th of February, 380.
========
“The Roman Empire at this time was still in the midst of religious conflict between pagans and Christians.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Rome_(410)
========
It had nothing to do with Roman immigration policy. Christianity was the culprit:
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/winter.html
That basically was the conclusion Gibbon reached in his revered study of the subject.
Khwarizmi says:
The decline and fall of Rome… had nothing to do with Roman immigration policy.
I’ve read Gibbon, all of it, and his conclusion wasn’t that Christianity caused the fall of the Roman empire. Yes, it was the state religion (just like Islam is the state religion in various countries today). But saying that the barbarian immigration across the empire’s borders had “nothing to do” with the downfall is simply untrue. One of those tribes, the Ostrogoths, eventually sacked Rome itself. It seems that had something to do with the fall of the Roman empire, no?
Also, I wouldn’t put much credence in the second link. That guy is a total extremist. Thus, not credible. I am not arguing religion here, but rather history — which can be corrupted just like science.
Finally, I never said that immigration was the sole cause of the fall of the Roman empire. Once you get into the history, you see plenty of reasons. I quoted the Durants, who are internationally recognized historians. The reason I quoted them was because the unrestricted invasion by dozens of barbarian tribes contributed heavily to Rome’s demise. The parallels with our current crisis are very clear.
The Germanic barbarians were actually Christians, just not Catholics. They adhered to the Arian heresy.
Lady G,
True, which falsifies the notion that religion caused the fall of the Roman empire.
Although still an open question is whether Catholicism caused the fall. It was after all the established religion of the Roman Empire, which fell to Aryan Arian barbarians.
It was after all the established religion of the Roman Empire, which fell to Aryan barbarians…
…who were illegal aliens.
The Ostrogoths, Picts, Jutes, Alemanni, Visigoths, Franks, Angles, Alans, Vandals, Saxons, and dozens of other tribes all flooded across the empire’s borders because there was no political will to stop them. They came because life was better in the West than in the places they left. Just like the current mass illegal migrations here and in the EU. And today’s illegal immigration is ramping up exponentially.
History is studied for a reason. Those who ignore it fall into the same traps.
I agree emphatically about the study of history, but IMO not all those barbarians were created equally.
IMO the best match with today’s situation is the Goths. They were driven across the Danube into the Empire by the pressure of non-Christian barbarians. They felt ill-used by the Romans, who gave them dog meat in exchange for their children. This did not end well for the by then decadent Romans.
The Picts and Irish invaded formerly Roman southern Britain after the legions left. This indeed should be a warning for us to keep out border defenses strong instead of open.
Lady G,
Now we’re talkin’.
The Goths …felt ill-used by the Romans, who gave them dog meat in exchange for their children. This did not end well for the by then decadent Romans.
There were a lot of reasons for the fall of Rome, and I’m aware of that one, and that the Huns were pushing from the East. Trading your children for dog meat to survive is a pretty good reason to want revenge. Religion doesn’t come close, IMHO.
Two of my favorite politicians, Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, had this to say about International Agreements on Climate Change and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion:
Thatcher:
“I see the adoption of these policies as a sort of premium on insurance against fire, flood or other disaster,” she said. “It may be cheaper or more cost-effective to take action now [on AGW] than to wait and find we have to pay much more later.” , And
“the need for more research should not be an excuse for delaying much needed action now … there is already a clear case for precautionary action at an international level.”, And
“The evidence is there. The damage is being done. What do we, the international community, do about it? … It is no good squabbling over who is responsible or who should pay. We have to look forward not backward, and we shall only succeed in dealing with the problems through a vast international, co-operative effort.”
Reagan:
“The Montreal protocol is a model of cooperation. It is a product of the recognition and international consensus that ozone depletion is a global problem, both in terms of its causes and its effects. The protocol is the result of an extraordinary process of scientific study, negotiations among representatives of the business and environmental communities, and international diplomacy. It is a monumental achievement.”
My only question is ” Lord Monckton claims to have been Thatcher’s chief Climate Change advisor. Could he be a closet Warmist?
Your trying to enlist RR into the ranks of the Warmunistas is laughable. Clearly you are lying when you claim him as one of your favorites.
This is the politician who rightly observed that trees contribute to pollution.
warrenlb occasionally professes to be a ‘conservative Republican’, if you can imagine that.
Lady Gaiagaia:
You don’t know your history very well.
Reagan embraced a Global solution to Stratospheric Ozone Depletion– that is, the Montreal Protocol — which led to amendments to the US Clean Air Act — which formed the basis for current EPA regulation of CO2 emissions.
Your denial of both Reagan’s environmental chops, and his quote, seems to align quite well with your denial of Science. In contrast, Reagan accepted the findings of Science and of Nobel Prize winners Molina and Rowland who determined CFCs were depleting Stratospheric Ozone.
Indeed I do admire both Reagan and Thatcher for their rational approach to the environment, their belief in the importance of Science, and of course, their politics.
This Pope is playing a global poker game with Papal statements of opinion. It’s the bitcoin modernization of indulgences at the sovereign level. The working class is underwriting all of the table stakes.
I guess the blessing of the VW Bug is now off. Move along to the overpriced rooftop solar panel funded by heavy subsidies for the rich.
At first I thought “for the rich” was a typo. Then I remembered Solyndra.
Rich still applies to the rooftop application of solar because they are 4-5x more costly per watt than competitive utility scale solar. (The lack of public discourse on this cost variance is another national policy failure abetted by high cost interests and ignorance.) Competitive in this case means lowest bidder on large scale projects and not counting the fake bids from entities not planning to ever complete the project. Such sham bids do exist from shell entities lacking the financial capacity to deliver. The use of leased rooftops by rooftop installer companies is really just farming tax credits in a warped energy policy framework. That may include middle class households in California, but on behalf of the rich in the overall scheme.
Hey, Mods – don’t you think this comments section is getting a little divorced from the climate issue? If people want to argue about Israel, there are lots of alternative web sites available for them.
Here’s the opening line of the article, Bart:
=========
“The Middle East is imploding. Islamic State butchers are annihilating Christian and other communities.”
=========
No climate issue there at all.
Jewish State (Der Judenstaat) butchers are are annihilating Christian and other communities in the middle east, but NeoCon Crusaders don’t want the lowly “goyim” exposed to that fact.
https://www.google.com/search?q=church+vandalized,+israel
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=how+jews+treat+christians
That’s why Ralf Ellis tried to blame Muslims for the Jewish attack onthe Church of :Loaves and Fishes.
=============
Members of Extremist Jewish Group Charged for Arson Attack on Church of Loaves and Fishes
Police Arrest Two Israeli Men Allegedly Involved in Torching Historical Church in the Holy Land
-Christian Post, July 30, 2015
=============
Suspects from extremist Jewish group indicted for arson of Church of Loaves and Fishes
-Jewish Post, July 27, 2015
=============
Remember, Ralph blamed Muslims for that attack on the Christian church, and you didn’t object.
Instead, you complain that a few brave souls dared to tell the truth about the Jewish cult and its codified hatred of goyim, including Christians.
http://www.smh.com.au/national/australian-is-jihadist-is-actually-an-jewish-american-troll-20150911-gjk852.html
That’s my take on the article too, Khwarizmi–bigoted and inflammatory hype at the beginning that is demonizing one group and sanctifying another as a perpetual “victim”.
Both groups have their really nasty extremist rotten apples operating not only in their respective countries, but around the world.. I encourage everyone to investigate the situation first hand after first removing their own ideological blinders.
However no one is allowed to criticize the “saints” group or country (although criticizing any other country or group on the planet is fair game) at the risk of being labeled with a “hate speech” crime or as something else. Hmmmm-sounds exactly like the climatology crowd.
This is one way to fix the Vatican bank. Kowtow on climate change messaging and wait for the huge electronic transfer of funds through the banking system. They already got to the IMF, World Bank, and others.
Follow the money.
One pope was already whacked over the financial scam. Now we have a responsible pope forced into “retirement”, to be replaced by a Commie.
Go figure.
I think the Pope got into pushing the science because he knows it is crap and could seriously damage scientific credibility… the flip side is he get some religious credibility back in return… he can act all shocked and surprised when it falls apart and then push the “can’t trust science” angle.
I guess one’s point of view can come from what one thinks is really happening. Regarding the Arctic ice sheet, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (on Sept 11) ‘The minimum ice extent was the fourth lowest in the satellite record, and reinforces the long-term downward trend in Arctic ice extent’ (http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/). According to NASA on Feb 25th ‘this year’s maximum extent was the smallest on the satellite record and also one of the earliest’ (https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/2015-arctic-sea-ice-maximum-annual-extent-is-lowest-on-record). Regarding Greenland’s ice sheet ‘Although 2015 is not at satellite-era record levels (set in 2012), there was a large rate of loss overall’ (http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/). I trust the data from these scientific organizations. And regarding the immediacy of climate change, there has been drought and massive wildfires from California up into Alaska due to a persistent high which resulted in low snow and higher temperatures – which is a pattern that scientist Jenifer Francis attributes to lower Arctic sea ice. In fact the Arctic has been having higher average temperatures overall. If one accepts the above as indicating what is happening, then one would seriously regard what the Pope has to say. If you accept the premise of the article above, then one may look for ulterior motives. But the data is from mainstream scientific organizations. I accept that.
MarkW
September 21, 2015 at 7:12 am
“Leftists have made an art form out of finding ways around clearly written rules, when they don’t ignore them altogether.”
Do you mean like this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair (1986/87)
Please note the role that Israel played.
Or maybe this?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1413.htm
(The Teicher Affidavit, in which he reports on the USA’s clandestine provision of cluster bombs and other weapons, etc. to S. Hussein/Iraq 1/3/95)
Or maybe this? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/west_asia/37021.stm (reporting on the UNOCAL Oil meeting in Texas with Taliban reps to discuss the proposed trans-afghanistan gas pipeline) 1997
This? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century (1998) please make note of the principal members as many will appear in the last link..
Or this? https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it
-describes the vast over representation /participation of *dual* citizenship holding Israeli- American Zionists, including those holding high political offices, in the entire affair, and their backgrounds. This one goes hand in hand with the quote from The Jerusalem Post re events from 1947 (bombing of the King David Hotel, the first act of “terrorism” in the middle east/ Israel, that was perpetrated by the literal forerunners of today’s Mossad), that I posted upthread several days ago.
Most of these folks are hard-core rightists.
Who was it that challenged the law that stated one had to relinquish their citizenship/loyalty to a foreign government before holding US citizenship (and public office)?
Several people made negative mention upthread of the “immigrants” , (and subsequently being on the dole) mentioned in Dreissen’s post , but their comments only seem to apply to “Arabs” or “Mexicans”, etc. What about the Israelis? Why are US taxpayers spending upwards of over $8 Billion a year, $4000+ apiece for every man, woman, and child in Israel, as “welfare payments” to the 28th strongest economy in the world? This amount doesn’t include technology transfers or military equipment., or private funding.
Here’s an article by Newt Gingrich , no less, (whom I otherwise think is a patsy) laying it out for you all on the website of the Center For Immigration Studies (CIS): http://cis.org/DualAllegiance-Assimilation. Does one honestly believe that people who fervently believe they have been “chosen by god” are going to relinquish their adherence to their own agenda for any other country than their own??? You think the “muslims” invented that perspective? Gullibility plays no favorites.
In this light, we are ALL expendable to their cause. The tail is wagging the dog.
I’m amazed that for a group of people who routinely use their faculty of critical thinking skill to great success when it is applied to climate politics, that you don’t expand that skill to politics in general, and realize that you are being led to support 100%BS by your own blind ideology and heavily propagandized /perceived “cause”.
Mr. Dreissen is correct that we are being politically misdirected from some very important issues, but apparently even he doesn’t fathom the true extent of the political misdirection for which we are all paying the bill.
Oops- Correction: The article above at CIS was written by John Fonte, but the lengthy introduction was written by Newt Gingrich