Today I begin a new feature, “Throwback Thursday” with the purpose of highlighting past claims of climate doom made by scientists, pundits, and alarmist activists…that have not come true. It’s a bit of a take off from the “Throwback Thursday” on Facebook, where people post old pictures from their past, except here, it’s not just the age, it’s the fact that these lousy predictions really do deserve to be “thrown back” into the faces of the people that made them.
We’ll examine each claim, show it exactly as it was made and the context, and then show why it failed in the present or near present.
If you have some you’d like to see covered, put them in WUWT Tips & Notes (see it on the menu bar above) and send it in with the [Throwback Thursday] tag on it.
THE CLAIM: Dust Storm Marks Beginning of Southwest’s “Permanent Drought”
Made: July 11th, 2011
WHAT WAS SAID:
A 2-mile high, 50-mile wide Dust Storm enveloped Phoenix yesterday. Tonight, on NBC (video here), Brian Williams called it “The Dust Storm that Swallowed Up an American City.”
Back in April, the USGS released a report on Dust-Bowlification that concluded drier conditions were projected to accelerate dust storms in the U.S. Southwest. In large parts of Texas and Oklahoma now, the drought is more intense than it was during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s.
In 2007, Science (subs. req’d) published research that “predicted a permanent drought by 2050 throughout the Southwest” — levels of aridity comparable to the 1930s Dust Bowl would stretch from Kansas to California. Last year, a comprehensive literature review, “Drought under global warming: a review,” by NCAR found that we risk multiple, devastating global droughts worse than the Dust Bowl even on moderate emissions path. Another study found the U.S. southwest could see a 60-year drought this century.
So the monster dust storm — a haboob — that hit Phoenix is just the shape of things to come for the entire Southwest.
Source: http://www.theenergycollective.com/josephromm/60839/nbc-dust-storm-swallowed-american-city
He’s referring to this video:
WHAT HAS HAPPENED SINCE:
Monsoon rains of August 19th, 2014 caused major flooding:
And as far as “permanent drought” goes, a year later in July 2012, It looked like Romm’s permanent drought prediction might come true, as much of the CONUS was under drought conditions, a whopping 79.98% was under some level of drought…
Source: http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/MapsAndData/WeeklyComparison.aspx
…but now that has dropped to less than half that value, and the southwest is recovering. There are values in Arizona that exceed 200% of normal precipitation for the region, and U.S looks quite wet this last month in many places.

Source: http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/maps/current/index.php?action=update_region®ion=WRCC
So much for Joe Romm’s prediction of “permanent drought”. Maybe he’d do better to study what happens to precipitation with ENSO patterns rather than wail about climate.
Let’s call it a “Romm Bomb”, shall we?
h/t to Tom Moran and to Chip Knappenberger for some ideas in this post.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

A question.
There was a recent story about the Sun’s internal circulation comprising two different types of flows, and when they are “in sync” the Sun has more output and when they are “out of sync” the Sun has less output. The models apparently correspond to actual data and suggest a Maunder Minimum type of event beginning in 2020-2030 and lasting for some period of time.
The US Southwest has had epic periods of drought lasting decades and even centuries in the first half of the 1000-2000 millenium.
Did those droughts take place during the actual Maunder Minimum?
You missed the weaselling of Rohm: he said it would happen until 2050…
Now prove him wrong!
Anth0ny:
I think reference to the Numberwatch Warmlist is required. It is here.
And it is very funny.
Richard
Meanwhile Down Under Tim Blair reminds the usual suspects of their failed predictions-
http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/timblair/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/winter_is_cold/
while the kiddies who would normally never experience snow in their lifetimes in most of the areas are out building snowmen and an experience to pass on to the next generation.
It’s called weather and it’s the extremes which go to make up those average calculations we’re so fond of comparing every day with although strange as it may seem we hardly ever experience the average weather day.
Can’t wait until you talk about all of the dire predictions concerning the Artic that never materialized. The list will be long.
Most of southern California is desert, it doesn’t take much real change in precipitation to create a large percentage change in a desert.
don’t confuse climate with weather. The weather may be very wet for SoCal into this winter, but that won’t change the climatic reality of the Mojave Desert.
There are land and marine based flora and fauna cycles that have adapted to and now likely depend on a drought cycle. Sudden interruptions that disrupt those long periods of sleep/plenty devastate these systems, starting the long road back to normal. Even sudden devastation are likely of benefit, just like coral bleaching, something that has occurred for eons, has undiscovered (or unmentioned) benefits to the overall long term health of a coral area. It has only been in the last part of the previous century that fire science has evolved to accept and understand, even use, the benefits of allowing natural fires to occur without undue interruptions.
Anthony say: “There are values in Arizona that exceed 200% of normal precipitation… “
Hmmm … the “200% above normal” area of AZ is near Winslow. Winslow averages ~ 0.3″ in June and 1.2″ in July. http://www.climate-zone.com/climate/united-states/arizona/winslow/ Since we have half of each month, that would be about (0.3+1.2)/2 = 0.75″ on average. So they got an extra ~ 0.75″ — eg one pretty decent 1.5″ rainstorm or a couple 0.75″ storms. And we see that that the drought map STILL shows drought in eastern AZ.
So, the headline could just as accurately have read “Extra 3/4″ Of Rain Not Enough To Break AZ Drought”. Yawn. We are talking about one or two *weather* events bringing an inch or so of rain to generate those impressive looking “200%” areas. And as we all know, “weather in not climate”.
Rain means no dustbowl.
End of (Romm’s) story.
I wonder if the money wasted on global warming prevention was spent on a national plumbing project that would move the excess water in people’s houses and city streets to reservoirs in drought stricken areas would work. If the money spent trying to find life on Mars were thrown in, it surely would go a long way to making the flooded areas dry and the dry areas wet.
I’m sure that in the future we will see these two:
Katharine Hayhoe
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/politicalscience/Faculty/Hayhoe_Katharine.php
http://www.depts.ttu.edu/politicalscience/Faculty/images/Hayhoe.jpg
and Andrew Dessler
http://atmo.tamu.edu/people/faculty/desslerandrew.html
make the list since they both predicted permanent drought for Texas due to human activity and then when the flooding rains came both said it was because of “Climate Change”. And a little check will prove they have been wrong about other things as well.
Flagtaff, Arizona is seeing precipitation rates rise. More and more, it looks like the draught is nearing an end.
http://stu-in-flag.net/blog/?p=3763
No, No No! It can’t be……… It was said to be permanent! But I guess we will have to wait and see because according to this http://wxmaps.org/pix/prec1.html towards the end of July and into the first of August it’s going to be pretty dry in some places in the SW that have been wetter than normal and going to wet for some other places in the SW that have been dryer than usual.
There is still a drought in California and dry and warm conditions exist all the way up into Alaska. It is nice that it is raining in the desert and I am glad the Colorado River Basin is getting more rain. Anyway I hear something over 12 million acres of forest have burned in Canada and Alaska due to low snow pack, and overall dry conditions (we are on pace for new records). Weather and climate is interesting and not always predictable. When these scientific papers were describing permanent drought, I think they were referring to longer time spans. I read scientific papers in 2011 predicting low or no CA snow pack – I was surprised to see it happen so fast (some also predicted more precip, but lower snow packs due to warmer temps). Don’t be so smug, the west is very dry and rain in the desert doesn’t really amount to much.
In case you were wondering where all the snow and cold temps nicked off to Bill-
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/technology/social-media-flooded-with-photos-as-freezing-temperatures-bring-widespread-snow/story-fnjww4qb-1227445313494
Surprise, surprise Melbourne Australia wakes up to its coldest winter morning temp in 18 years? It’s like this mate. Without the extremes we can’t work out those averages we so seldom experience 😉