Meet the Mutants – the latest Government effort to defeat Climate Change

"Dromaeosaurid parade by durbed" by Durbed - http://durbed.deviantart.com/art/Dromaeosaur-parade-300881541. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dromaeosaurid_parade_by_durbed.jpg#/media/File:Dromaeosaurid_parade_by_durbed.jpg
“Dromaeosaurid parade by durbed” by Durbed – http://durbed.deviantart.com/art/Dromaeosaur-parade-300881541. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons – https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dromaeosaurid_parade_by_durbed.jpg#/media/File:Dromaeosaurid_parade_by_durbed.jpg

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

It would be wrong to think that the governments of the world are solely focussed on reducing CO2. Just in case the Paris conference fails to deliver, our selfless government scientists are spending your money, exploring a diverse range of strange mutant varieties of every day farm animals, to ensure world stays fed in the midst of soaring temperatures.

The latest focus is the Dwarf Cow.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald;

… the solution to the problem is simple and small, livestock experts argue: heat-tolerant dwarf cows.

A team of researchers from Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University and the state government’s Animal Husbandry Department are now promoting a switch to Vechur and Kasargod cattle, two local varieties known for being easy to raise, resistant to diseases and – most important – better at tolerating high temperatures than the more popular crossbred cattle.

“High-yielding crossbreed varieties of cattle can faint or even die during hot and humid summer days,” said E.M. Muhammed, an expert on animal breeding and genetics at the university. “Our natural breeds can better withstand the effects of climate change.”

Dwarf cows, on the other hand, appeared to carry a “thermometer gene” that allowed them to better tolerate high temperatures, researchers said.

Dwarf cows were already gaining popularity among some farmers because they consumed less food and water than conventional cattle varieties, the experts said. Small-scale farmers needed only one or two dwarf cows to meet the milk needs of their households, they said.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/the-heattolerant-dwarf-cow-may-help-india-adjust-to-climate-change-20150630-gi103g.html

The Dwarf cow will no doubt find a place in the cattle yard, next to the Featherless Chicken, another government science favourite.

According to New Scientist;

Featherless chickens could be the future of mass poultry farming in warmer countries, says an Israeli geneticist who has created a bare-skinned “prototype”.

The new chicken would be lower in calories, faster-growing, environmentally friendly, and more likely to survive in warmer conditions, claims Avigdor Cahaner of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He created his red-skinned chicken by selectively crossing a breed with a naturally bare neck with a regular broiler chicken.

But critics say past experience with feather-free chickens resulting from random genetic mutation shows they suffer more than normal birds. Males have been unable to mate, because they cannot flap their wings, and “naked” chickens of both sexes are more susceptible to parasites, mosquito attacks and sunburn.

“Featherless birds would also be very susceptible to any temperature variations – especially as young birds,” says Tom Acamovic, of the Scottish Agricultural College in Ayr.

The chicken is “disgusting”, says Joyce D’Silva of Compassion in World Farming. “It’s a prime example of sick science and the suggestion that it would be an improvement for developing countries is obscene.”

Read more: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2307-featherless-chicken-creates-a-flap.html

These tentative steps are nothing compared to the efforts of Palaeontologist Jack Horner, to do a full conversion on modern Chicken breeds, to revert them back to ancient forms.

A genome does not evolve in a tidy fashion. Old genes are not always discarded when they fall out of use. For example, there may be a whole host of genes that direct the growth and movement of a dinosaur’s arm and fingers. If another gene evolved to fuse some of those bones into a wing during embryonic development, many of those arm-and-finger genes would be pushed to the sidelines. But the potential for a dinosaur arm could still be there. If you can identify the newer gene that causes bone fusion and disrupt its expression, those sidelined genes may suddenly start producing arms.

Horner posits that three primary engineering tasks will lead him from a conventional chicken to something resembling a miniature velociraptor (a small predator that became famous in “Jurassic Park”): creation of a long tail; the development of a toothed, beakless head; and the fashioning of arms with fingers and claws instead of wings.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/paleontologist-jack-horner-is-hard-at-work-trying-to-turn-a-chicken-into-a-dinosaur/2014/11/10/cb35e46e-4e59-11e4-babe-e91da079cb8a_story.html

Perhaps Horner has missed a bet – if he had framed his grant application as an effort to produce heat tolerant chickens, chickens fully adapted to +4c Cretaceous conditions, we’d probably all have little pet dinosaurs by now.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
130 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alan Robertson
July 1, 2015 5:42 pm

… a pet Velociraptor…

Tom J
Reply to  Alan Robertson
July 1, 2015 5:56 pm

I wouldn’t recommend it. My older sister bought one for me. I lost two legs and an arm. Nasty.

Alan Robertson
Reply to  Tom J
July 1, 2015 6:27 pm

Clever girl…

Mike McMillan
Reply to  Tom J
July 2, 2015 12:41 am

I thought maybe you were going to say it cost her an arm and a leg.

Alan McIntire
Reply to  Tom J
July 2, 2015 11:02 am

Pet veloceraptors shouldn’t be any more dangereous than the pet wolves, a.k.a. dogs, we keep.
True , a few people get killed by them each year, (42 in 2014) but most of us are willing to put up with that small risk.

ralfellis
Reply to  Alan Robertson
July 2, 2015 3:44 am

>>… a pet Velociraptor…
There was a sci-fi story about breeding small dinosaurs, because they were much more tasty than chicken. It was predictably called the dino-chicken.

papiertigre
July 1, 2015 5:46 pm

The weather girl blew the forecast again. They called for between 105-109 for today in Sacramento. Here it is 5:42 and the thermometer hasn’t reached 100 yet.
A piddling 98 degrees. Day after day it’s the same thing. Make a forecast, predicting doom as per the prevailing political position, spectacularly fail, but never revisit the blown call.

Tom J
July 1, 2015 5:49 pm

I understand that they’re cross breeding normal chickens with chickens that suffer from androgenic alopecia. There’s been some problems since many of the offspring of the androgenic alopecia chicken breeds have been either known to get very depressed or to acquire tattoos and goatees or van dykes. Moreover, diners have been a little put off when served drumsticks where tattooed skulls and ‘f..k you for eating me’ were still visible. And it’s been reported that agents of PETA have invaded these chicken centers with the intent to deliver substantial quantities of Minoxidil which screws up the androgenic alopecia chicken breeding programs.
In other news, hunger experts (a discipline that most definitely does not include Michelle Obama) have opined that drawf cows will be insufficient to feed people unless we simultaneously breed drawf people for whom the caloric intake of the drawf burgers and drawf steaks and drawf filet mignons produced by drawf cows will be adequate. The drawf calories from the drawf steaks from the drawf cows are otherwise inadequate for larger than drawf people.

SMC
Reply to  Tom J
July 1, 2015 5:54 pm

Hey! A solution to the obesity epidemic!

Bruce
July 1, 2015 6:02 pm

I saw Heat-tolerant Dwarf Cows open for Buffalo Springfield in 67.

Gregory
Reply to  Bruce
July 1, 2015 7:41 pm

I saw Blue Oyster Cult with ZZ Top and Johnny and Edgar Winter all on the same bill in early 70’s.
I’m not sure if Blue Oysters are natural but I’m fairly sure Johnny and Edgar Winter are the result of an experiment gone horribly wrong.

PiperPaul
Reply to  Gregory
July 1, 2015 8:29 pm

I assume that Frankenstein and Godzilla were there? Dunno about any ZZ Top freaks of nature, though.

Crispin in Waterloo but really in Yantai
Reply to  Gregory
July 3, 2015 2:20 am

I saw the Johnny half of the Winter twins in Toronto, dressed in tight leather top to bottom. He looked the part of a speed freak in both senses of the term. If his music was an experiment, it went horribly right.

BFL
July 1, 2015 6:06 pm

Aren’t the chicken and pig farms combating climate change with the modern way of raising them in confined quarters:
http://www.mspca.org/programs/animal-protection-legislation/animal-welfare/farm-animal-welfare/factory-farming/pigs/pigs-on-a-factory-farm.html
The animals sure put out a lot less CO2 that way.

Philip A
July 1, 2015 6:11 pm

Its already been done in Australia as a result of a breeding experiment by NSW Agriculture in the 1990s where they tried to grow the largest cattle by natural selection, they also as a side experiment bred the smallest ones and came up with the “Square Meater”
They are very popular with the Chinese , I guess because smaller people can handle the cattle easier and they give better meat yield than larger breeds.
http://squaremeaters.com.au

Louis Hooffstetter
Reply to  Philip A
July 1, 2015 7:09 pm

And now for something completely different…
http://feeder-leader.com/worlds-largest-cow/

u.k.(us)
July 1, 2015 6:47 pm

Eric Worrall says:
“It would be wrong to think that the governments of the world are solely focussed on reducing CO2.”…………
==============
Wrong is the wrong word, it doesn’t capture the extent of the assumed gullibility of the unwashed masses.

Tom Harley
July 1, 2015 7:24 pm

Paris-itics, just in time for Paris!

Another Ian
Reply to  Tom Harley
July 2, 2015 1:48 am

Tom
How about “Climate Parisitis” for before, during and after?

July 1, 2015 7:43 pm

Dwarf cows to handle the futures theorized higher heat?
In the Old West didn’t they raise longhorns to do that?

Reply to  Gunga Din
July 1, 2015 7:49 pm

Couple that with velocichickens and then we’ll really be going back for the future!

MattS
July 1, 2015 8:03 pm

“Dwarf cows, on the other hand, appeared to carry a “thermometer gene” that allowed them to better tolerate high temperatures”
What grotesque nonsense.
It’s actually fairly simple. If you reduce the volume of an object without changing the basic topology of the object you also increase the ratio of surface area to volume. By increasing surface area relative to volume you make it easier for the object to radiate/conduct away internal heat.
Smaller mammals do better in hot climates than large mammals. Duh!

mebbe
Reply to  MattS
July 1, 2015 9:05 pm

Elephants, hippos and rhinos seem to do fine in hot climates. Along with others.

MattS
Reply to  mebbe
July 2, 2015 7:01 am

Elephants developed large thin ears to create enough surface area to radiate away heat. Hippo’s spend most of their time in water, which is a more efficient thermal conductor than air.

Juan Slayton
July 1, 2015 8:23 pm

Unconfirmed reports that researchers at UC Santa Barbara recently crossed an abalone and a crocodile. Hoping to produce and abadile, they were disappointed to discover they could only come up with a crockabaloney.

MattS
Reply to  Juan Slayton
July 1, 2015 8:28 pm

What do you get when you cross Batman with an Elephant?
.
.
.
Flatman!
What do you get when you cross an Elephant with the Alps?
.
.
.
You get a dead elephant and get whacked over the head with a clue stick. You are supposed do it the other way around dummy!

Harrowsceptic
Reply to  Juan Slayton
July 2, 2015 1:51 am

crockabaloney – like it

johnrmcd
Reply to  Juan Slayton
July 2, 2015 4:18 am

Magic! The perfect comment on this whole crock of merde.

July 1, 2015 9:24 pm

We’ve heard it before, let’s hear it again.’These Guys are Totally Nuts’. The proposal for Dwarf Cows and Featherless Chickens makes the six-legged Chicken proposal look sensible..

Pete of Perth
July 1, 2015 9:27 pm

Who ever successfully crosses a dwarf cow with a featherless chicken will rule the universe.

H.R.
Reply to  Pete of Perth
July 2, 2015 2:13 am

Only if the cow gives barbeque sauce instead of milk, Peter.

Captn' Carl
July 1, 2015 9:48 pm

I just had some 4 inch long ‘chicken fingers’ at my local Asian restaurant. I really want to see these chickens. They are so meaty. yumm!

July 1, 2015 9:55 pm

In the Kurt Vonnegut story Slapstick, the Chinese figure out how to miniaturise themselves, but people start getting sick from inhaling them.

July 1, 2015 10:13 pm

A way to save the world at last,
I’m so thankful for that;
But what about the Easter Bunny,
And why not mention of the Cheshire Cat?
http://rhymeafterrhyme.net/climate-compensation-and-cop19-its-alice-in-wonderland-revisted/

July 1, 2015 10:24 pm

So….the natural breeds better tolerate heat. Hmmmm.

dp
July 1, 2015 10:43 pm

I wonder how many mutant micro-bovines and featherless creatures evolved since the end of the most recent glaciation. Allow me this fanciful flight of imagination – the number shall be none. In the greatest and most recent event of substantial global warming not a single canary shed so much as a feather-creating genome. Cattle are the size they are today because that is the size the provides the greatest return. If a different size is deemed economical that shall drive the size. Such is the fate on bovines who have no say in their genetics because the are not allow to breed at random.
I’d appreciate it if someone can provide the name of a climate scientist known to have a functional brain. There is little to suggest such a thing exists.

Crikey Mikey
July 1, 2015 11:14 pm

Marvelous mirth … thanks to all for the hilarious lineup of witticisms, especial Juan Slayton and Matts. Laugh! I haven’t laughed so hard since Aunt Mable got her left tit caught in the mangle.

4TimesAYear
July 1, 2015 11:20 pm

Can somebody please give thes “scientists” a real job…like in the real world?

4TimesAYear
July 1, 2015 11:20 pm

*these*

rah
July 2, 2015 12:24 am

HA! According to National Cattlemen’s Beef Assoc. http://www.beefusa.org/beefindustrystatistics.aspx
“Top 5 states for all cattle and calves (2015):
1. Texas – 11.8 million
2. Nebraska – 6.30 million
3. Kansas – 6 million
4. California – 5.2 million
5. Oklahoma – 4.6 million”
Oh, and BTW Florida is 12th.

July 2, 2015 12:41 am

Smaller cows that need less food to produce the same amount of milk… that seems like a good idea to me.

rah
Reply to  M Courtney
July 2, 2015 6:41 am

If that were correct then today the diary cows would probably be the size of a dog!

hunter
July 2, 2015 2:23 am

Cattle ranchers worldwide are laughing at the climate kooks.

Ed Zuiderwijk
July 2, 2015 2:34 am

Model-averse dwarf climatologists is what we need.