A copy of the Pope’s expected “climate encyclical” (in Italian) was leaked to the Italian press today.
Our friend Maurizio Morabito (who speaks Italian) translates and advises via email that his impression is that this is going to be seen as a “damp squib”.
He points to this paragraph in particular (translated mostly by Google Translate so there may be inaccuracy):
For poor countries, the priority should be the eradication of poverty and social development of their inhabitants; at the same time the scandalous level of consumption of certain privileged sectors of their population must be considered and better counter corruption. Of course, they must also develop less polluting forms energy production, but for this they have need to rely on help from countries that are grown much at the expense of pollution today the planet. The direct exploitation of abundant solar energy requires that you establish mechanisms and subsidies so that developing countries can have access to technology transfer, for technical assistance and financial resources, but always paying attention to concrete conditions, since the compatibility of the systems with the context for which they are proposed is not always properly assessed. The costs would be low when compared to risk of climate change. In any case, it is above all an ethical choice, based on solidarity of all peoples.
E. Calvin Beisner sends this translation of some other sections:
Here is a rough translation of the climate change portion of the Pope’s encyclical, Laudato Si, based on the L’Espresso published leak this morning in Rome (numbers followed by periods are presumably section numbers; other numbers are presumably page numbers):
The climate as a common good
- The climate is a common good of all and for all. It, globally, is a complex system in relation to many conditions essential for human life. Scientific consensus exists that indicates that we are very firm in
20
presence of a worrisome warming of the climate system. In recent decades, that the heating was accompanied by the constant rise in the sea level, and is also hard not to relate it to the increase in extreme weather events, regardless of the fact that we can not attribute a cause scientifically determined at each particular phenomenon. Humanity is called to become aware of the need to change lifestyles, production and consumption, to combat this heating or, at least, the human causes that produce or accentuate. It is true that there are other factors (such as volcanism, and the variations of the orbit of the Earth, the solar cycle), but numerous scientific studies indicate that most of the global warming of recent decades is due to the large concentration of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other) issued mainly because of human activity. Their concentrations in the atmosphere prevents the heat of sunlight reflected by the earth being dispersed in space. This is especially enhanced by the development model based on the intensive use of fossil fuels, which is at the center of the world energy system. It has also affected the increase in the practice of land-use change, mainly deforestation for agricultural purposes.
- In turn, the heating has effects on the carbon cycle. It creates a vicious cycle that exacerbates the situation even more and that will affect
21
on the availability of essential resources such as drinking water, energy and agricultural production of the hottest areas, and will result in the extinction of the planet’s biodiversity. The melting of polar ice and high altitude threat of those escaping at high risk of methane gas, and the decomposition of organic matter frozen could further accentuate the emission of carbon dioxide. In turn, the loss of tropical forests makes things worse, since they help to mitigate climate change. The pollution produced by carbon dioxide increase the acidity of the oceans and impairs the marine food chain. If the current trend continues, this century could be witnessed climate change inau- fingers and unprecedented destruction of ecosystems, with serious consequences for all of us. Rising sea levels, for example, can create situations of extreme gravity when we consider that a quarter of the world population lives by the sea or very close to it, and most of the megacities are located in coastal areas.
- Climate change is a global problem with serious environmental implications, social, economic, and political distribution, area and are one of the main current challenges for humanity. Impacts heavier probably will fall in the coming decades on developing countries. Many poor people living in particularly
22
affected by phenomena related to heating, and their livelihoods depend heavily from nature reserves and by so-called ecosystem services, such as agriculture, fisheries and forestry. They have no other financial resources and other resources that enable them to adapt to climate impacts or deal with catastrophic situations, and have little access to social services and protection. For example, climate change give rise to migration of animals and plants that can not always adapt themselves, and this in turn affects the productive resources of the poor, and they also see ob- bligati to migrate great uncertainty about the future of their lives and their children. Tragically, the increase of migrants fleeing poverty exacerbated by environmental degradation, which are not recognized as refugees will in international conventions and carry the burden of their lives abandoned without any protection legislation. Unfortunately there is a general indifference to these tragedies, which still occur in different parts of the world. The lack of responses to these dramaturgical me of our brothers and sisters is a sign of the loss of the sense of responsibility for our fellow men that underpin any civilized society.
- Many of those who hold more resources and economic or political power seem to concentrate mainly in the mask problems and hide the symptoms, just trying to reduce some of the negative impacts of climate change.
23
But many signs indicate that these effects Po- tranno always be worse if we continue with current patterns of production and consumption. Therefore it has become urgent and compelling policy development in the coming years so that the emission of carbon dioxide and other heavily polluting gas is reduced drastically, for example, by replacing fossil fuels and by developing renewable energy sources. In the world there is a small level of access to clean and renewable energy. There is still a need to develop appropriate technologies for accumulation. However, in some countries there have been advances that are beginning to be significant, although they are far from reaching a significant proportion. There were also some investments in modali- ty of production and transportation that use less energy and require fewer raw materials, as well as mode of construction or renovation of buildings which do best- no energy efficiency. But these good practices are far from becoming general.
A full copy of the “climate encyclical” (in Italian) can be seen here (PDF)
Well, now we know that catastrophic climate change is real and certain, the Pope says so and like all of the Pope’s before him he is a great scientist. /sarc/
The pope is known to have marxist views, and CAGW ideology pushes the idea of a transfer of wealth from richer to poorer countries as well as from the rich to poor overall. It is, at its core, anti-capitalist and anti-democratic, and uses a de fact world government via the UNIPCC to accomplish its goals. So, the whole climate thing is just a means to an end. The pope may be a puppet, but he’s a willing one. As a participant, and especially one with such great influence, if satan exists, he sits at the right hand of satan himself.
How many have looked to see how many of the world’s richest people are behind this climate change fraud? And furnishing money for this cause.
Reblogged this on gottadobetterthanthis and commented:
–
I am disappointed in the Pope.
Not being Catholic, I find no compulsion to worry about what he says personally, but traditionally, Catholics see encyclicals as binding. It is a farce to consider fossil fuel use and resultant CO2 as alarming and catastrophic.
So far, it seems the encyclical is an embarrassment, and it will remain so as climate continues to do anything but what the computer gamers (modelers) say it will.
The model predictions have failed for over 30 years now. When is enough?
If your job depends on it, enough is after you retire and no longer are coming back on contracts.
Maybe the Parable of the Talents no longer applies?
Traditionally, the parable of the talents has been seen as an exhortation to Jesus’ disciples to use their God-given gifts in the service of God, and to take risks for the sake of the Kingdom of God.
What happens when his holiness discovers that his God doesn’t agree with his appreciation of His creation? An interesting theological cunundrum.
An old guy, in a funny hat, sure has a lot of people worked up!
Correction. An old guy in a funny hat and a dress, surrounded by choir-boys, getting himself worked up. “Is that a crosier on your cassock or are you pleased to see them…..”
There’s a transcription error.
Francis actually declared ‘Climate Cyclical’.
Good one!!
It used to be a truism that one should avoid talking about politics or religion, and stick to the safe topic of the weather. Now all three have blended together, and are all the same thing.
In other words, with certain people there is no longer such a thing as “a safe topic”. Even if you talk about the price of eggs in Africa, they will start whining and nagging in a voice designed to shatter glass, and will embroil you in the stupidest wastes of time, arguing about stuff which you likely don’t have the slightest desire to debate.
I’ve concluded some people are simply insane. A clear sign of it is that, when they ask you for proof, they won’t listen to your points, and rather seem to consider shrillness is a valid counter-point, talking-over you even as you speak. Only at their most polite do they say, “La-la-la; I’m not listening.” Usually they are worse, and you can see them on TV quite often these days, talking-over other people.
In such a situation I suppose one could appeal to the moderator, if one exists, however they talk over moderators as well. They have no interest in civil procedure or its benefits. Rather they seem to have chosen insanity and to be its followers.
In the end their uproar boils down to a big zero. Rather than debate, it often is better to politely ask that they leave, or be escorted from the room, or, when they have seized power, to politely leave the room yourself. Argument it futile, and silence is golden, for golden is the Truth.
But this is no new thing. In 1529 Martin Luther wrote “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God,” and in the third verse are hints at the end of the argument: “The Prince of Darkness grim, we tremble not for him; his rage we can endure, for lo, his doom is sure; one little word shall fell him.”
It is a mass delusion, bordering on and including hysteria, so yes, a type of insanity. It rejects logic and reason, in favor of emotionalism.
His temporal omnipotence isn’t looking too sharp.
It seems Papal Power is on the move.
History repeats?……………………..
Temporal Omnipotence, or How Even the Pope Can …
themonkeycage.org/…/temporal-omnipotence-or-how-even-the-pope-ca…
Temporal Omnipotence, or How Even the Pope Can Strategically Call New Elections. By Joshua Tucker on February 11, 2013. Wondering why we’ve just …
The power of the Pope during the Middle Ages, or, An …
https://books.google.com/books?id=O_5PAAAAYAAJ
Gosselin (M.) – 1853 – Church history
with an introduction, on the honours and temporal privileges conferred on … delusion of the temporal omnipotence of the popes inundated Europe during four or …
Italians are generally very religious, are members of the Mafia good Catholics? Do they just need to say a few hail Marys and pay a penance?
There is a silver lining of course. Imagine the outcry hoots from the Warmatards if the reverse were true; the pope comes out against climate change Belief, saying (correctly) that it actually hurts the poor, and that it, and environmentalism itself are being used by those who have turned against religion as a substitute religion.
To their small-minded and misguided way of thinking, those they like to call the D-word are overwhelmingly Conservative and Christian, a double-smear tactic which allows them to automatically dismiss whatever skeptics/climate realists say.
“To their small-minded and misguided way of thinking, those they like to call the D-word are overwhelmingly Conservative and Christian, a double-smear tactic which allows them to automatically dismiss whatever skeptics/climate realists say.”
This is true. Any attempt by a man of the cloth, or someone steeped in faith, to attempt to rebut global warming, will be dismissed as ‘anti-science’ and it’s easier to fit the trope of ‘anti-science’ with a religiously motivated believer.
There was an awkward moment in a Senate hearing on climate where Dr Spencer got grilled by Sen Whitehouse who in effect was asking “Are you now or have you ever been a creationist?” Basically an attempt to denigrate Spencer’s science cred. They’d love to make global warming ‘denier’ be cast into the terms of young earth creationist etc.
But once the shoe is on the other foot, we get “moral authority figure” who spouts the Church of Global Warming shibboleths. Leftists are eager to be inconsistent. It’s a one way street.
I am praying to the Pope for a giant snowstorm closing down the Paris airports for the duration of the climate meetings…
Climate change is most likely to bring them frost-killed grapes. Will the pope declare that as divine intervention?
(The pun on ‘vine’ was unintentional…)
Traditional/historical religion = anti-science
global warming alarmism = anti-science
GW alarmism = religion
Honestly, why should I give a rats-arse about an institution that believes in ancient superstitions and has a wretched history when it comes to science and tolerance? Next
It sounds like trade was an evil contributor to this wealth concentration scheme also. Overall, it sounds like the only way forward is for a centralized NGO to manage the world and its inequality and poverty from a central command enclave of mostly old men with access to lots of money to make it work. The Vatican bank, run mostly by Italians, will handle the finance. Claims of sex crimes will be dealt with decades later and science claims will be dealt with centuries later.
Skeptics have such a wide range of talent from philosophy to theology to nouvel experts on Catholicism. Proud to be a skeptic myself.
Even blind Freddie can see the Pope’s position on climate is in total accord with the current mainstream science. Surely this should not be a surprise.
His views on the science are in line with virtually every Govt and Head of State in the world. That too can’t be a surprise.
Not to accept that this is true would be a denial of facts.
His position on the disadvantaged, on the poor is not a secret either.
The encyclical covers both those positions. So why the faux outrage? Why the end of the world? Does Pope Francis Pope Francis have that much power?
Why the straw men? Why the faux concern?
Perhaps you should read some of these comments. They are reminiscent of the cheer leaders that I would expect to find on the warmer side as they pat each other on the back. Check out Skeptical Science sometime and you may see what I mean.
tonyM,
I agree with your statement of the obvious ambiguity. I think that the UN will take whatever borrowed credibility the can steal from Francis…. and then stick it to him later.
He who wears the funniest hat controls the masses and redirects wealth from involuntary edicts. It works.
There will be a papal christening at the windmill farm next week. Bring lots of funny hats for the bird killing ceremony. Next month is a pilgrimage to the holy site of Ivanpah and the ceremonial burning bird in mid flight.
.
Quote: “Who will rid me of this troublesome priest?”
And so the Church proves that it is irrelevant once again. The current Pope showed left tendencies early in his tenure. Now, there is no room for doubt.
The Church of Global Warming is now allied with the Church of the Inquisition. All deniers are to be referred to has heretics henceforth. All persons living in developed countries are to be considered sinners and required to purchase absolution by making payments to third world dictators and despots via tithe to the IPCC. Dear Leader has been entrusted with the responsibility to make it so.
Catholic doctrine holds the pope infallible only on matters of morals. Climate change as science is clearly outside that realm. Pope Francis’ fallibility as an untrained layperson is patently evident in his ill-founded encyclical.
It’s the north-south, rich-poor, first world-third world, divide and conquer by NGO decree.
Just to clarify, Protestants for centuries have considered popes to be anti-christs.
Pray you do not have to find out why.
Do not underestimate the will of Jesuits to bring back all land and temporal power to the pope.
The Church, whose Pope this is, has faith based dogma as its raison d’être.
The IPCC centric climate change consensus, whose science the this Pope cites, is subjectivity created to serve a socio-economic-political ideology.
Both are completely irrelevant to valid fundamental science which is logically applied reasoning confirmed by objectively corroborated observations of reality.
John
Perhaps we could hope for the FINAL version and not this “leaked” UNOFFICIAL one(which is not good but it is not entirely one sided). WW2 showed that you do not provoke a lion in the face(from behind a fence) to feel good and let others face the repost. Acts not words saved people from fascists, words and not acts, saved no one ever. Well funded and connected watermelons won´t accept a straight “no” to their demands; let´s hope for the best and prepare for the rest, life will be somewhere in between. His Holliness is not one to be bullied around, neither is he a confrontational one (his own personal history in Argentina and his difficult relation with the left-wing government has shown that it is by acts and not words that you show your stance about something). His very appointment was a TOTAL surprise for EVERY single “expert” on Vatican affairs. We are not alone, the world does not abide to their models, and for every advance in green lunacy there is a monumental scandal, people see it, but they are afraid to say it, that is the whole idea with political correctness maniqueism, but it is also its fatal undoing.