A copy of the Pope’s expected “climate encyclical” (in Italian) was leaked to the Italian press today.
Our friend Maurizio Morabito (who speaks Italian) translates and advises via email that his impression is that this is going to be seen as a “damp squib”.
He points to this paragraph in particular (translated mostly by Google Translate so there may be inaccuracy):
For poor countries, the priority should be the eradication of poverty and social development of their inhabitants; at the same time the scandalous level of consumption of certain privileged sectors of their population must be considered and better counter corruption. Of course, they must also develop less polluting forms energy production, but for this they have need to rely on help from countries that are grown much at the expense of pollution today the planet. The direct exploitation of abundant solar energy requires that you establish mechanisms and subsidies so that developing countries can have access to technology transfer, for technical assistance and financial resources, but always paying attention to concrete conditions, since the compatibility of the systems with the context for which they are proposed is not always properly assessed. The costs would be low when compared to risk of climate change. In any case, it is above all an ethical choice, based on solidarity of all peoples.
E. Calvin Beisner sends this translation of some other sections:
Here is a rough translation of the climate change portion of the Pope’s encyclical, Laudato Si, based on the L’Espresso published leak this morning in Rome (numbers followed by periods are presumably section numbers; other numbers are presumably page numbers):
The climate as a common good
- The climate is a common good of all and for all. It, globally, is a complex system in relation to many conditions essential for human life. Scientific consensus exists that indicates that we are very firm in
20
presence of a worrisome warming of the climate system. In recent decades, that the heating was accompanied by the constant rise in the sea level, and is also hard not to relate it to the increase in extreme weather events, regardless of the fact that we can not attribute a cause scientifically determined at each particular phenomenon. Humanity is called to become aware of the need to change lifestyles, production and consumption, to combat this heating or, at least, the human causes that produce or accentuate. It is true that there are other factors (such as volcanism, and the variations of the orbit of the Earth, the solar cycle), but numerous scientific studies indicate that most of the global warming of recent decades is due to the large concentration of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other) issued mainly because of human activity. Their concentrations in the atmosphere prevents the heat of sunlight reflected by the earth being dispersed in space. This is especially enhanced by the development model based on the intensive use of fossil fuels, which is at the center of the world energy system. It has also affected the increase in the practice of land-use change, mainly deforestation for agricultural purposes.
- In turn, the heating has effects on the carbon cycle. It creates a vicious cycle that exacerbates the situation even more and that will affect
21
on the availability of essential resources such as drinking water, energy and agricultural production of the hottest areas, and will result in the extinction of the planet’s biodiversity. The melting of polar ice and high altitude threat of those escaping at high risk of methane gas, and the decomposition of organic matter frozen could further accentuate the emission of carbon dioxide. In turn, the loss of tropical forests makes things worse, since they help to mitigate climate change. The pollution produced by carbon dioxide increase the acidity of the oceans and impairs the marine food chain. If the current trend continues, this century could be witnessed climate change inau- fingers and unprecedented destruction of ecosystems, with serious consequences for all of us. Rising sea levels, for example, can create situations of extreme gravity when we consider that a quarter of the world population lives by the sea or very close to it, and most of the megacities are located in coastal areas.
- Climate change is a global problem with serious environmental implications, social, economic, and political distribution, area and are one of the main current challenges for humanity. Impacts heavier probably will fall in the coming decades on developing countries. Many poor people living in particularly
22
affected by phenomena related to heating, and their livelihoods depend heavily from nature reserves and by so-called ecosystem services, such as agriculture, fisheries and forestry. They have no other financial resources and other resources that enable them to adapt to climate impacts or deal with catastrophic situations, and have little access to social services and protection. For example, climate change give rise to migration of animals and plants that can not always adapt themselves, and this in turn affects the productive resources of the poor, and they also see ob- bligati to migrate great uncertainty about the future of their lives and their children. Tragically, the increase of migrants fleeing poverty exacerbated by environmental degradation, which are not recognized as refugees will in international conventions and carry the burden of their lives abandoned without any protection legislation. Unfortunately there is a general indifference to these tragedies, which still occur in different parts of the world. The lack of responses to these dramaturgical me of our brothers and sisters is a sign of the loss of the sense of responsibility for our fellow men that underpin any civilized society.
- Many of those who hold more resources and economic or political power seem to concentrate mainly in the mask problems and hide the symptoms, just trying to reduce some of the negative impacts of climate change.
23
But many signs indicate that these effects Po- tranno always be worse if we continue with current patterns of production and consumption. Therefore it has become urgent and compelling policy development in the coming years so that the emission of carbon dioxide and other heavily polluting gas is reduced drastically, for example, by replacing fossil fuels and by developing renewable energy sources. In the world there is a small level of access to clean and renewable energy. There is still a need to develop appropriate technologies for accumulation. However, in some countries there have been advances that are beginning to be significant, although they are far from reaching a significant proportion. There were also some investments in modali- ty of production and transportation that use less energy and require fewer raw materials, as well as mode of construction or renovation of buildings which do best- no energy efficiency. But these good practices are far from becoming general.
A full copy of the “climate encyclical” (in Italian) can be seen here (PDF)
[snip inappropriate comment -mod]
The man and his religion are proving categorically their irrelevance..
This is a DRAFT. It looks like it was written by the IPCC with the Pontifical Academy providing markups. I would bet this draft arises from the April 28 meeting, yet to be edited by you know Who. Let’s wait until Thursday.
I’m waiting to see what the Pope actually says too.
Of course we should care for Creation. Of course we should care for the poor.
That doesn’t mean we should adopt any particular policy.
We could use the cheapest energy sources to develop and help the poor..
We could use more expensive energy to try to make a colder future.
I suspect both sides will be disappointed and then try to spin what he actually says.
In fact, I’m sure this leak is the beginning of the spinning.
The communist/marxist in white has no meaning in my life whatsoever. I detest him and his child molesting ilk. Was raised catholic, saw the fakeness of it all and escaped quickly as I became an adult. No thank you. And this commie Pappy disgusts me. I apologize to my catholic friends but I have no time for fake prophets….religion to me is personal…I am a good upstanding citizen and perhaps will be rewarded for being so when I die…, but I like all of you have no-idea-what happens to our consciousness after we pass….no one knows and don’t think that you do. I’ll continue to be a kind, helpful and honest person but I have no faith in any religious leaders other than them being fellow human beings, nothing more. I’ve seen enough fakery. I have no idea if there is a god or not…nor do you but I am open to the possibility and I believe in being, honest, good, happy, helpful and hardworking and love my life and family but religion makes me nervous and uncomfortable….very.
I’ll second that.
“and his child molesting ilk” . I’m not so sure that you have got the hang of being a good person all by yourself.
If God were like Elvis Presley then all religious leaders are like Elvis impersonators. They look and act like the real Elvis in public. In private, who knows.
They have never met the real Elvis.
The real Elvis does not know them nor does he care to.
Religion is a construct of Man. God is what he is. God is not religion.
Personally I believe the same thing happens to my consciousness as any other animal on this earth(We die and it stops). What makes us any different except a little smarter than the other animals….I was raised Anglican for whats its worth, similar to RC except no pope and divorces allowed….I respect the position of Pope if its supposed to do what I think it is, and most religious people are happy. At a young age I learned about dinosaurs and wondered where they fit in with the bible, I stopped believing and when I wasnt struck dead I figured religious is just bunch of BS to make people feel good. I have always pretended I believe, I figure why not, but about 3 months ago I came out publicly with friends that I dont, after 40+ years of thinking its all smoke and mirrors…..Ive always thought religion was a net positive, but I dont think so with Islam, and to a lesser degree RC, I look around the world and the colonies that were settle RC are mostly a mess, the British and Dutch ones, pretty darn good.
I am going to send a copy of Climate Change the Facts to His Holiness, Pope Francis Apostolic Palace 00120 Vatican City. If all of the readers of this blog were to send a copy, it could make an impact when Pope Francis’ mail box gets jammed by some climate change facts. This in turn could boost the sales of this important book to the top of the sales charts.
You think he’ll actually get to see that book? More likely it will be waylaid by his staff in the mail room and diverted to the recycle bin.
Yes, but think of the complications if 1,000s of books show up in the mail room and the press are alerted to this event.
Press? What is this ‘press’ thing of which you speak?
Russ, I would say that your suggestion is the most productive and helpful comment here. Let us send the book!
Better yet, nail it to the door of St. Peter’s Basilica.
funny… but not a bad idea!
Anybody knows his mailadresse ?
Papal infallibility is limited to matters of faith and morals. I think His Holiness has been led astray.
yes.
Do you believe in papal infallibility in any sense?
It is the poor that suffer the most from the energy poverty foisted upon the world by carbon alarmists.
Progressive is the new regressive.
And from the quoted leaked document:
Let’s wait and see what the Vatican actually does say.
I did expect a slight bend to the Global Warming religion from the Pope, but not the ‘Full Monty’ as provided. It appears to have been written by IPCC emissaries and then edited by ‘the church’ to add some religious flair.
How low can corruption go.
Certainly to the highest places – at the moment 🙂
A billion people at his command (it’s called Human capital), and this is all he (the pope) can generate… it’s just like Obama, at the beginning of his presidency, basically dumping $ 1 Trillion into the sand… neither of these guys have any idea how to build individuals (people), communities, or nations. If you can’t do it with $1,000,000,000,000 or 1 Billion people, you’re not the go-to person for how to create opportunity or grow solutions. Both of these guys like utilizing the media to move agendas – they don’t know how to build people or nations. John Klug, THE GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT ENGINE, LLC (FB – John Klug 7796)
I am stunned you feel it was fine to publish this in the light of the request from the Vatican not to do so..
“”We ask journalists to respect professional standards, which call for the official publication of the final text,” the Vatican said.”
This within a day of people crying foul here about the publication of Anthony Watts email to Tom Peterson.
Some don’t bow to the Vatican.
It’s about respecting a request to allow the people who have done the work to release it as they see best. It’s nothing to do with bowing to anyone.
You don’t “bow” to people by treating them with consideration and respect. The Pop has not made a fool of himself yet. Maybe it will be more rational than this.
I’m Stunned that your stuned. The Pope is proving to be as dishonest or stupid (take your pick) as the rest of the Climate fraud industry!
Mmmm…. I think you will find this Pope is neither dishonest or stupid. Irrespective of the climate change thing he has done some wholly (holy) brave and remarkable things to make the church a better organisation. The work he has done on weeding out pedophiles is just an example.
Simon June 15, 2015 at 9:07 pm
Maybe the 265 Popes before him should not have let the Paedophiles in in the first place?
Sorry Simon, you can’t stop it now… but you sure think you can. He’s playing politician… and he must play by those rules. I count on him manipulating words here (which he’s already done), not giving Godly advice. Using scripture for promoting ill-thought out platitudes… is not a God thing, it’s a very human endeavor.
It’s all politics. Pretending it’s science is just another political ploy. If temperatures plummet in a few years, the Church will wither and die.
All I am saying is this Pope is probably more widely respect than most world leaders at this point in time.
He has been Time and Advocate magazine Person of the Year.
And…The magazine Fortune also ranked Pope Francis as number No. 1 in their list of 50 greatest leaders.
And….On 5 November 2014, he was listed among the top 5 of Forbes most powerful people and was ranked at number 4 as the only non-political figure in the top ranking…..
It’s clear he holds a lot of sway round the place. I think anyone who dismisses him does so at their peril.
The Pope has put the final nail in the phony climate change pushing industry, he’s a shill, a useful tool his encyclical won’t and cannot stand up to the glare of scientific discovery. As for the spiritual part that won’t stand beyond the next Pope. The Pope has helped cast doubts on the churches ability to be honest, he’s a lame duck.
Simon link to some of this Pope achievements is of course the perfect play. Who would oppose that line of work from pope Francis? No one, hence not a coincidence but a PR strategy soon on gender and now on climate.
I’m thinking we’re going there…
🙂
The whole thing sounded like maybe he was running for office somewhere…
So much for Papal wisdom…
People produce CO2. That is how we are designed.
Human beings are beautiful creatures and this earth is her for us to use.
It is the worst lie that has been perpetrated that the fact that we breathe is harmful to this earth.
I resent being called a polluter because I exhale CO2.
Anyone who says that I am ,as such, a polluter, is just wrong.
It is natural to breathe.
Paul, it is all relative to how your breathing is linked to challenging or not their agenda…
Paul,
Take a breath!
Even the whackiest warmer isn’t saying that.
An awful lot of them think God is on their side, too.
Nope.. When the Club of Rome started the population control movement in 1968 intent on reducing the world population down to 1 billion, there was a deliberate effort to connect a tax to human life. A poll tax. It took them a while to figure out that energy consumption was the means of calculating tax and that energy = CO2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_of_Rome
The wacky warmers of the 1960-70 were only saying population control until they began hyping and faking the global warming issue. They had to do that because mass sterilization was unpopular, whereas driving up energy cost was more effective at reducing population and “greener”.
Now the wacky warmers are in fact proposing taxing breathing.
2007 in the NYT.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E05EEDE113EF936A15751C0A9619C8B63
mebbe. Do you think the majority of leftists believe in God?
Leonard Lane June 15, 2015 at 11:53 pm
Believe in God? As a useful tool. From time to time.
I would be interested to find out what the Australian Cardinal Pell, now in the Vatican,thinks about this. I have read that he is very skeptical of AGW etc.
I am waiting too. This is not the end of the issue, rather a very messy beginning.
Maybe this is why Pell was called to Rome. If left in Australia he could speak out?
“The direct exploitation of abundant solar energy requires that you establish mechanisms and subsidies so that developing countries can have access to technology transfer,”
Perhaps the Pope should lead the way and divest the Vatican of all worldly riches and give those monies to the developing countries.
I am a devout Catholic and will probably be one till the day I die. Does not mean I have to agree with everything that I hear from our leaders. And I certainly feel the pope is wrong on this account. My way of looking at fossil fuels is that they have been a blessing to mankind, placed here millions of years ago, to be unleashed at a time when population growth and the knowledge to use them would come together to improve the world when it was needed the most. Intelligent design? Could be.
I am with ya brother. The encyclical is an opinion letter. In this case, the wrong opinion.
Fossil fuels are a blessing that has lifted millions out of poverty. To not acknowledge this can consign many in the future to a dimmer life.
This is disgraceful abuse of his office by the Pope, to use the majesty of his office to tout a misleading and dishonest narrative about fossil fuels and the climate. Somone has noted that prior papal encyclicals have been fonts of wisdom, whereas the quotes here are embarrassing recitations of the phony Global Warming religion.
The Pope was sorely misled, but it seems he has a habit of letting himself ‘go left’ on the wrong issues. This degrades his moral authority. For this catholic, now everything he says about the world needs to be taken with a grain of salt.
The only people making more, and more frequent left turns than the current Pope, are NASCAR drivers.
Other than a specific collection of leadership, what separates Catholics from protestants?
This is a good start for explaining the differences…
http://www.gotquestions.org/difference-Catholic-Protestant.html
Perhaps released in time to influence COP 21 and the U.S. 2016 election which begins next January.
Not wise to mix science, religion and politics.
This Papal document could have some unfortunate political consequences in the U.S. during the next presidential election cycle.
Anyway money is greasing the wheels of this whole climate agenda.
There have been a number of popes over the past 25 years (even further back) who have written tremendously realistic, even cutting-edge thoughts on humanity’s development – it’s problems and it’s possibilities, in realistic, even cutting-edge verse – this, however, is not one of them. POLITICAL is right, with a knack for utilizing media. As types, I see him and Obama the same. Not utilizing knowledge to advance humanity and the planet – USING POWER. You don’t have to be smart, creative, innovative or excellent if you have the power. It’s REALLY old school, and everything they both tell us we need to get rid of – those who abuse power… especially for their own edification (whether they know it or not). Both men have all the world’s intelligence and resources at their beck & call – at their command – and choose to not use it…. or don’t know how. In a world like today, they are both the wrong people for the job (but can create stories to manipulate – not lead – people otherwise).
Anyone who believes that the previous pope resigned voluntarily should go and buy a lottery ticket.
This new pope is a tool.
You make a great deal of sense. Another take on it is that the current incumbents of the Vatican and the Whitehouse share a vision based on numbers rather than truth or morals. It will not go down well with their bosses in either case.
I guess what I was really getting at (in agreement w you), was that if you’re going to be political – then have you’re ducks in order / run with the truth – that way intelligent people can nod their heads. This whole age of manipulating the masses thru PR & Media (of all types) is really quite sickening. The Pope utilizing these petty mechanisms pretty much puts him into a scoundrel category like Obama – get “it” any way you want or can… because that’s “cool.” Ignorance is ignorance; manipulation remains manipulation, and politics is politics – very unsightly when any part of the Church is playing in a masquerade.
+1
“Not wise to mix science, religion and politics.”
It is impossible to separate the three. What we know about reality, as we learn via the scientific method, should inform our opinions about politics and religion. Unfortunately, men falsely use both science and religion to control other men. As was said of mankind’s eternal enemy, Satan, “the truth was not in him”.
Will all Catholics running for office in the U.S. have to pass the Papal carbon litmus test in the next election?
🙂
Hey, celebrate the good news. The CAGW religious fanatics have finally found their global warming pope.
+666
667, his neighbour!
“While the earth remains,
Seedtime and harvest,
Cold and heat,
Winter and summer,
And day and night
Shall not cease.”
Genesis 8:22
Glad to see a hint of literacy.
Appealing to religious powers in order to convince people of a scientific problem suggests the terminal failure of scientists working for the Cause and that those who push this agenda will stop at nothing to forced it upon populations. Expect the first climate realists trials to start at the Vatican soon…
All those pronouncements primarily relates to validation of “but numerous scientific studies indicate that most of the global warming of recent decades is due to the large concentration of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other) issued mainly because of human activity. Their concentrations in the atmosphere prevents the heat of sunlight reflected by the earth being dispersed in space. ” of the observations made in the report in quantitative terms and this has no meaning as long as they make qualitative inferences. Let them first come out from qualitative statements before anybody accepts their inferences based on such qualitative statements like those of IPCC and other warmist friends. Why I said this is that the greenhouse gases present in the atmosphere prior to 1951 are several times higher than the greenhouse gases released in to the atmosphere by the so called fossil fuels burning. Also, the relationship between the global warming and greenhouse gases is inverse exponential function, has effectively utilized the greenhouse gases to convert in to temperature and now it is in flat mode, means no change in temperature with the increased levels of greenhouse gases in to the atmosphere. Because of this the warmist groups are trying to manipulate met data. Because of this the model projects present high variations from one to another and yet our scientific group never thought of looking at this falacy in detail except denouncing others. We must stop the political and religous game in this vital subject of climate and weather.
Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy
When a church allows present-day scientific consensus to direct its affairs, it ceases to be a church of God and becomes a church of man. Like the climate, science is always changing. A religion that is in perfect harmony with the science of today will certainly be out of step with the science of tomorrow.
Well, the Church has a long history of folding in pagan practices in a symbolic fashion to ease the transition for the natives. I don’t see why this couldn’t be another case of the Church consuming a different religion.
maybe…it is part of a Machiavellian outreach effort. However, in doing so they are dropping whom they number as adherents. It is quite true that the green Religion is real. Likely everyone here would agree that the Green Gaia Religion is big and very popular albeit diffuse and uncoordinated. So it this is a duel between religions, then I am ok. Let them duke it out!
Why does the challenge to “love poor people” too often mean to make more people poor?
and… “the poor will always be with us”
And the church is working to INSURE that. Even the Sainted Mother Teresa said so. She said the poor were easier to convert. So she was against teaching them how to fish. She preferred giving them fish.
That is categorically false muck raking. It is an undignified insult on an off-topic notion. Plenty of though-full people here are capable of engaging on the Climate/religion/UN/fraud nature of this thread without lowering to transparent baseless BS. Mother Theresa did not see the value of money, rather she saw the value of human individuals regardless of wealth, physical competency, age or intellect.
and Sinabung erupts, and he promotes boomerang-depopulation, instead of averting volcanic disasters, that may lead to a new volcanic glacial and his extinction too
FATALIST DEPOPULATORS cannot even fix a Naples evacuation drill around Vesuvius, and they will survive a global revolt if we don’t avert the expected electro-volcanic glacials?
So it now seems that climate change is a religious belief.
nice.