CBS turns cute story of toddler's first spring rain into dishonest climate alarm propaganda

Drudge: some CA toddlers have never seen rainGuest post by Alec Rawls

Salient firsts in a child’s discovery of the world are often treasured moments for doting parents: a toddler’s first encounter with a friendly dog, his first go on the ice, his first hard spring rain…

Neither is it wrong for a father, steeped in the constant drumbeat of global-warming scare stories, to magnify the special moment with his worries about the future:

“When he opened his mouth to taste the rain,” said father Jason Spates, ”I was thinking, some day we may tell stories about green lawns, water in fountains and pools in residential backyards.”

DroughtSpatesJasonGrayson

But when CBS spins this adorable human interest anecdote with the headline: “Drought So Bad This California Kid Has Never Seen Rain,” and introduces it as a “sign of the times” over an image of a cracked lake-bed labeled DROUGHT EMERGENCY, they really need to do some fact checking.

Drought_(CBS5)150%

The May 15th news story references a rain the day before in Dana Point, on the southern edge of Los Angeles, where according to Weather Underground there was an accumulation of .26 inches of rain on the 14th.

How far back do we have to go to find a date in Dana Point when it rained more than on May 14th? How about less than a week, when it rained .42 inches on the 8th? Or we can go back six months to December 2014 when the rain totals in Dana Point were: .39 inches on December 2nd, .53 inches on the 3rd, .71 inches on the 12th, and .48 inches on the 30th.

It may well be that young Mr. Spates was never alert to the rain before. It is obviously not unusual for a toddler to at some point have his first conscious awareness of a sudden rain, and of course it is lovely for his parents to grab the camera and share some pictures. (They’re even flying an American flag. Nice.) And how would daddy Spates know that the world has not warmed (according to the more reliable satellite temperature record) since before the last big rain-bringing El Nino in 1998?

It’s pretty hard to blame the switch from wet to dry on an increase in global temperature that has not occurred, but no mainstream anti-denial “believer” news source like CNN or CBS will ever let their readers see this information, so just a reminder from Christopher Monckton’s latest update on “the pause”:

PauseWUWT-Mar2015

Of course a lack of warming is not necessarily good news on the drought front. Warming means a faster hydrological cycle which means more total rain. If the Pacific Decadal Oscillation turns to an extended cold phase (as past patterns predict) and if the sun stays quiet (as solar scientists expect), then we could easily be in for a long dry cold spell. Now that is something worth worrying about.

If only the greens didn’t control the state government then California could prepare for this likelihood by building a fleet of thorium powered desalinization plants, providing water and power in abundance. Makes a lot more sense than Jerry Brown’s current plan to unplug 40% of our existing energy infrastructure within 15 years and 80% of our existing energy infrastructure by 2050 while sacrificing the state’s water and farming to the Delta Smelt.

Will “the children” (when they are no longer children, and have to worry about children of their own) really thank us for leaving them in the dark with unreliable water supplies? “Thanks dad” is susceptible to multiple intonations.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
80 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Parsons
May 20, 2015 11:00 am

A former Bureau of Reclamation Chief, Dan Beard, makes the case that the federal dam-building programs his agency oversaw for decades spawned massive “entitlement” expectations among farmers, ranchers, and cities including Los Vegas and Los Angeles. Such groups, he claims would now be more efficiently and cheaply served by state level water programs. It’s an interesting perspective from the one I always heard growing up. I always thought big dams were a boon to mankind.
He apparently includes hydro power among the “benefits” of dams which should be locally created and delivered.

We heavily subsidize the delivery of water to agricultural interests in the West from federal facilities. What do I mean by that? I mean it costs us $100 to deliver an acre foot of water and we charge the farmers $2. Who picks up the other $98? And the answer is, it’s you and me. Generally, the water that is delivered to communities throughout the West, throughout the nation is not subsidized to the extent that it is for agriculture… Every study that’s undertaken shows that there is enough water. Problem is that it’s just distributed incorrectly. And once you start pricing it, you will stop wasting it.

Beard’s book is called “Deadbeat Dams: Why We Should Abolish the Bureau of Reclamation and Tear Down Glen Canyon Dam”
http://www.cpr.org/news/story/get-rid-us-bureau-reclamation-says-its-former-boss
I don’t know if I agree with Beard’s plan to tear down the existing dams. Rain and snow patterns do shift, making a means of large-scale storage and redistribution of water resources necessary. This may beg the question of the aesthetic pictured above… of an “underprivileged child”, face to the heavens, longing for a taste of rainwater to soothe his parched little throat. But Beard is right on when he says that water is not scarce. It’s just being mispriced, and, in my opinion, poorly allocated. If California is experiencing a dry decade, some other area – Colorado’s front range in this case – is getting inundated. Every river along Colorado’s front range has been on, or is currently on, flash flood watch, including Bear Creek, Clear Creek, Boulder Creek, Cache le Poudre, North Platte… That’s millions of acre-feet running east out onto the plains, ultimately to be dumped into the Gulf.
In any case, the taste of rainwater is overrated.

Leslie
May 20, 2015 11:35 am

Would cbs report on babies who haven’t seen a hurricane and imply they will never see one on their lifetime?

Bob Diaz
May 20, 2015 12:25 pm

What did you expect from the News Media (Propaganda Media), they never let facts get in the way of pushing their propaganda.

Dawtgtomis
May 20, 2015 1:54 pm

…and Jamaican toddlers will probably not see snow! (at least, that’s what we hope…)

Dawtgtomis
Reply to  Dawtgtomis
May 20, 2015 2:07 pm

But, it would be a boon for the bobsled team!

May 20, 2015 3:53 pm

Since there has never been drought before in California, I think their logic is sound.

May 20, 2015 8:55 pm

First rain drops … first kiss …
http://wfmu.org/Playlists/Ken/gfx/kiss_the_pig.jpeg

Patrick
Reply to  Max Photon
May 21, 2015 2:27 am

Maaate, you really do post some awesome pictures! Is there lipstick on that pig?

Merovign
May 20, 2015 9:11 pm

Sure, it makes perfect sense that excess heat in the *oceans* would cause drought. Wait, what?
Also, tearing down dams in CA makes sense if your plan is to force people to emigrate away from CA. By dehydrating them. I’m sure that is a compassionate policy from the point of view of the urban poor.