Tenth International Conference on Climate Change Offers ‘Fresh Start’ for Science-based Climate Policy June 11–12, 2015
The Tenth International Conference on Climate Change (#ICCC10) will take place on Thursday, June 11 and Friday, June 12, 2015 at the Washington Court Hotel in Washington, DC. The conference will explore the following important questions:
- Is climate science sufficiently advanced to allow accurate forecasts of future temperatures or weather?
- Are temperatures more likely to cool than warm in the next century?
- Should policies adopted at the height of the global warming scare be repealed and replaced with pro-environment, pro-energy, and pro-jobs policies?
- In short: Given the new science and economics of climate change, isn’t it time for a fresh start to the debate over what, if anything, to do about global warming.
Learn the answers to those questions by joining hundreds of scientists, economists, and policy experts for this conference just two blocks from the Capitol The schedule for the day-and-a-half event, hosted by The Heartland Institute, will feature five news-making keynote addresses, 12 panel discussions, and five award presentations for achievement in climate science and climate communications. (Click here to see a list of previous award winners.)
Some of the climate data the conference will present and discuss:
- Satellite data that show the global atmospheric temperature has not risen since the late 1990s – 18 years and four months, to be exact – while human carbon dioxide emissions in that time represent 25 percent of all emissions since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution 150 years ago.
- Sea-level rise that has not accelerated beyond the trend that began at the end of the last Ice Age.
- The total amount of polar ice at the two poles is almost unchanged since satellites first measured it in the early 1970s.
Some of the policy questions the conference will explore and discuss:
- Is the rising concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere a net positive or net negative for plant life, animals, and human prosperity?
- What is the cost of restrictions on energy generation and consumption imposed by the Obama administration and the United Nations?
- Is it moral to withhold affordable and reliable energy from poor people living in the U.S. and those in emerging countries?
This event is open to the public. Paid registration is required.
This event is open to all media: print, broadcast, and online. Apply for registration, and use the #ICCC10 hashtag in social media.
To see videos from The Heartland Institute’s nine previous International Conferences on Climate Change, click here.
For more information about The Heartland Institute, visit its website. For personal responses to inquiries, contact Director of Communications Jim Lakely at jlakely@heartland.org or 312/377-4000. You can also call or text Jim Lakely’s cell at 312/731-9364.
###
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Three months ago when I put my dog out to walk, the temp. she fluffed her coat up for was 0 degrees F. This morning she was panting at nearly 80 degrees. Proving, that even a shaggy dog can adapt effortlessly to an EIGHTY DEGREE “climate” shift and more, in 3 months’ time. Can anybody who isn’t educated beyond their intelligence then explain why I’m supposed to be losing my sh*t about 0.5 degrees C. over a hundred and fifty YEARS?! The lefties just can’t see the silly!
I hope this Tenth International Conference on Climate Change will offer a ‘Fresh Start’ for Science-based Climate Policy. But, how can there be a restart?
Who’s gonna stop?
OK, I’m gaining some serious understanding here thanks to many of the comments regarding GASTA.
It appears that in order to determine a “Global Average Surface Temperature” one must first find the “Global Average Surface”.
It’s easy after that.
/more grin
[and a global average atmosphere and global average humidity and global average temperature and global average cloud cover. .mod]
I posted this in the wrong place (darn threading):
“OK, I’m gaining some serious understanding here thanks to many of the comments regarding GASTA.
It appears that in order to determine a “Global Average Surface Temperature” one must first find the “Global Average Surface”.
It’s easy after that.”
How’s that EdA?
A pull from the post:
…..”A growing population and a rapidly growing middle class are increasing pressure on the traditional protein sources, beef and poultry meat, making it more difficult to meet demand. We cannot continue the way we are producing and consuming meat. Obviously, this should not go as far as governments telling people what to eat.”…../
————————
Read the opposite of the above……
Stable population, shrinking middle class, governments telling people what to eat, and you begin to understand the mind of these control freaks.
I don’t know what’s on the agenda, but maybe somebody could address when all the literature says PgC does C means carbon, when it means carbon dioxide, and when it means carbon dioxide equivalent. World Bank 4 C was kind of wishy washy about it and IPCC doesn’t really say.
If it’s CO2 then just say so, i.e. PgCO2 or Giga tonnes CO2 or million billion kg CO2 or… & ppm kg or ppm vol or ppm mole
Oh, make up your minds!