Claim: Rabbits will be impacted by climate change

Australian Rabbit
“Oryctolagus cuniculus Tasmania 2” by JJ Harrison (jjharrison89@facebook.com) – Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

PLOS ONE has published a study which suggests two thirds of rabbit species will be severely affected by climate change. The authors of the study think climate change will force rabbits to migrate towards the poles, or to higher altitudes, and that some species will suffer significant range declines.

The abstract of the study;

Climate change during the past five decades has impacted significantly on natural ecosystems, and the rate of current climate change is of great concern among conservation biologists. Species Distribution Models (SDMs) have been used widely to project changes in species’ bioclimatic envelopes under future climate scenarios. Here, we aimed to advance this technique by assessing future changes in the bioclimatic envelopes of an entire mammalian order, the Lagomorpha, using a novel framework for model validation based jointly on subjective expert evaluation and objective model evaluation statistics. SDMs were built using climatic, topographical, and habitat variables for all 87 lagomorph species under past and current climate scenarios. Expert evaluation and Kappa values were used to validate past and current models and only those deemed ‘modellable’ within our framework were projected under future climate scenarios (58 species).

Phylogenetically-controlled regressions were used to test whether species traits correlated with predicted responses to climate change. Climate change is likely to impact more than two-thirds of lagomorph species, with leporids (rabbits, hares, and jackrabbits) likely to undertake poleward shifts with little overall change in range extent, whilst pikas are likely to show extreme shifts to higher altitudes associated with marked range declines, including the likely extinction of Kozlov’s Pika (Ochotona koslowi). Smaller-bodied species were more likely to exhibit range contractions and elevational increases, but showing little poleward movement, and fecund species were more likely to shift latitudinally and elevationally. Our results suggest that species traits may be important indicators of future climate change and we believe multi-species approaches, as demonstrated here, are likely to lead to more effective mitigation measures and conservation management. We strongly advocate studies minimising data gaps in our knowledge of the Order, specifically collecting more specimens for biodiversity archives and targeting data deficient geographic regions.

More information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122267

The biggest issue I have with this study is, it doesn’t appear to make any serious allowance for adaption.

The main study includes an acknowledgement that adaptability might play a role – … If species can broaden their occupied bioclimatic niche through trait plasticity, for example, altering their diel patterns of activity, then they may be less susceptible to future change ….

However, it is futile, in my opinion, to attempt to draw conclusions about future range, from a model which appears to treat highly adaptable species as static entities. Even if the global climate changes as radically as alarmists predict, rabbits which are subject to environmental stress won’t stay within their current ecological niches, they will adapt to take advantage of new opportunities.

In less than a century, rabbits introduced from temperate England infested the blistering hot Australian outback, to the point that they became a major economic threat to Australian farmers.

The introduced rabbits, in just a few years, adapted from an average annual temperature of around 40F (10c), to an average annual temperature of around 70F+ (20c+).

Even biological warfare has failed to contain the rabbit plague. Australia runs one of the most advanced biological warfare laboratories in the world, dedicated to finding new rabbit specific plagues, to control numbers. The research is ongoing, because nothing works for long. When a virulent new disease, or a genetically modified version of an old disease is released, the rabbit population crashes, but within a few years it bounces back, as adaptions for resistance to the new disease spread rapidly through the population.

The reason for this adaptability is that rabbits breed like, er rabbits. Any advantageous mutation can reach the entire population within a few generations. Even when subject to extreme stress, such as artificially weaponised diseases, the entire population is reconstituted from a handful of survivors, faster than Australian scientists can find new ways to kill them. The suggestion that a few degrees of warming would have a significant impact on rabbit populations is ridiculous, in the face of the Australian experience.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
3.3 3 votes
Article Rating
179 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
smcg51
April 18, 2015 12:43 am

Rabbits around Canberra (Australia) seem to cope quite well through a seasonal temperature variation of perhaps 50 deg C (-10 in winter to +40 in summer). They are doing VERY well.

Mark Luhman
Reply to  smcg51
April 18, 2015 7:30 pm

Cottontails in Minnesota and North Dakota cope with temperatures from 105 to -50 so do the Jack Rabbits. Snowshoe hairs in Minnesota the high 90s to -57. All are doing fine.

JJM Gommers
April 18, 2015 12:53 am

If something adapt quickly it’s a rabbit, and with a more greening planet we can expect more of them.
Besides a rabbit is nice cuisine food.

April 18, 2015 1:18 am

The word “observation” seems to be missing from the abstract. Did I just miss it?

Adrian
April 18, 2015 1:20 am

Sadly for me and the rest of the UK taxpayers we have to fund this sh…
30 yrs ago now when I was undertaking research for a PhD it was a common joke that the only way to get funding from the NERC was to ensure the words ‘global warming’ was twisted into the project title somehow. Want to study bat reproductive ecology? No money not a chance. But ‘ Changes to bat mating success under global warming scenarios’ ? Loads of money.
Can we stop laughing now it’s making me cry.
Oh can I try a meme, can we call all these agw nutters ‘boilers’ please?

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  Adrian
April 18, 2015 3:40 am

I have been looking for a name a bit less pejorative than alarmist. I am having the Old One’s luck in this. All I have wound up with is “activist”, which isn’t much better. Is there a good, neutral term that won’t raise their hackles?
This is a partially serious question.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Evan Jones
April 18, 2015 5:20 am

Climate campaigners need a new icon, since the poly bear didn’t pan out. Cute, fluffy bunnies fills the bill nicely.

Jay Hope
April 18, 2015 1:31 am

Don’t these cretins know that the climate is cooling down???? The wee bunnies will be heading to the equator………

Dawtgtomis
Reply to  Jay Hope
April 18, 2015 8:17 am

…with hungry hordes of economic refugees chasing them.

indefatigablefrog
Reply to  Dawtgtomis
April 18, 2015 11:52 am

…followed by the growing population of polar bears, searching for tasty rabbit and refugee snacks.

old construction worker
April 18, 2015 1:33 am

Man I wish I could get a government grant why little boys gets dirtier than little girls do to Co2 dives the climate. If I write it do you think they will buy it?
“Given that rabbits are famous for breeding like … well, like rabbits,…”
Look at it this way. With the current rabbit population exhaling Co2……

hunter
Reply to  Robertvd
April 18, 2015 5:38 am

The climate kooks are now offering degrees in how to sell their bs. What a great world we live in.

Ivor Ward
April 18, 2015 1:37 am

The French have a solution…..See your local Intermarche meat counter. Delicious rabbit everywhere.

John West
Reply to  Ivor Ward
April 18, 2015 5:56 am

Germans too — Hasenpfeffer!

April 18, 2015 1:45 am

Dang you Roberttvd my screen nearly exploded and I sprayed some good beer when I got to the one minute mark, oh well Friday night

Darwin Wyatt
April 18, 2015 1:51 am

If only researchers faced the same survival of the fittest as the rabbit in watershi

Stephen Richards
April 18, 2015 1:52 am

Have these people no shame.? Rabbits breed every 5 mins how the hell can they find time to move north or south. We’ve been trying to wipe them out for centuries by eating them, giving them mixi and shooting them. I have to fight them every year along with the wild boar and several species of deer. I wish they would move north.

April 18, 2015 1:54 am

Reblogged this on paullitely and commented:
But will humans have any control? Not so far!

Robin Hewitt
April 18, 2015 1:55 am

Rabbits like it warm. At the start of this interglacial the snakes did not reach Ireland before it was cut off by rising seas. The rabbits did not even reach England, they had to be introduced by the Normans.

Paul Coppin
Reply to  Robin Hewitt
April 18, 2015 4:55 am

Our snowshoe hares are laughing at you….

Paul Coppin
Reply to  Paul Coppin
April 18, 2015 4:56 am

Yes, I know a hare is not a rabbit. Our cottontails chuckle along with the hares… 🙂

Reply to  Robin Hewitt
April 18, 2015 9:10 am

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-457OlrOlpj4/TwsU5OTsKcI/AAAAAAAAE-0/VpZegYQcr5E/s1600/arctic_hare_b3.jpg
As Paul points out, rabbits live on mountaintops and above are some from the arctic circle.
Rabbits easily adapt to most environments; if it wasn’t for dogs and cars, even cities would be full of them.
Still:


indefatigablefrog
April 18, 2015 2:18 am

The scientists here seem to believe that they are studying the response of rabbits to changes in their environment. But, for those with the eyes to see, what we can really learn from this, is how researchers respond to changes in the availability of funding:
“Politically motivated funding change is likely to impact more than two-thirds of grant applications, with environmental sciences likely to undertake an almost total shift towards an obsession with warmist alarmism, with very little elevation in grasp of reality. Independent thinkers or privately funded scientists are more likely to exhibit range contractions with a significant reduction in the number of things that they are allowed to say or think. Our results suggest that funding changes may lead to the emergence of an entirely new species of researcher, the ignoramus warmista alarmus. Whilst all non-alarmist researchers are destined for extinction.”

April 18, 2015 2:45 am

Yep, with too much grass around, due to warmer climate and the extra CO2, rabbits get fat, consequently losing desire and physical agility to mate so frequently.

AP
April 18, 2015 2:47 am

Studies like this just make the whole climate change industry stink worse than cat poo.

old44
April 18, 2015 3:07 am

When completed in 1907, the rabbit-proof fence (including all three fences) stretched 2,023 miles (3,256I’m)
Nice of the Australian government to be so concerned about the welfare of the rabbits that they built the fence to prevent the rabbits wandering North and dying of heat exhaustion.

Sam The First
April 18, 2015 3:32 am

Here in my rural corner of Eastern England, every year more and more pasture is lost to to the enormous rabbit warrens. There aren’t enough foxes to keep them under control and nobody seems to want to eat them (myself apart). The farmers seem oblivious, and this isn’t a ‘ferretting’ area, ie it’s too genteel. ANYTHING which might control their takeover would be welcome! Due the mild winter, there seem to be more than ever this year…

M Seward
April 18, 2015 3:36 am

Here in Oz we have tried shooting, riunning them over, fences across the continent, myxametosis, poisons and you name it. The little furry bastarrds just won’t die out.
Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Global Warming , go you good thing. Burn that coal!! Burn Baby, Burn!!!

cedarhill
April 18, 2015 3:38 am

One does love science fiction. Finally, the Inuit can be safely hunting rabbits as their primary food source instead of those seals out on the ocean. But they still will have to be watch out for the polar bears that de-evolve back into the brown bears from whence they originated. Oh, and rabbit pelts won’t require chewing the hide to make soft clothing. Perfect.

Reply to  cedarhill
April 18, 2015 10:55 am

It was native American practice to cut rabbit pelts into strips, twist the strips making a thick rabbit pelt yarn and then weaving the yarn into blankets. Warm and durable.

Patrick
April 18, 2015 3:47 am

>>However, it is futile, in my opinion, to attempt to draw conclusions about future range, from a model which appears to treat highly adaptable species as static entities. <<
How true! I am old enough to remember the bunkum that was paraded as science during the myxomatosis years. Odd that we are so overrun with rabbits now…

Patrick
Reply to  Patrick
April 19, 2015 3:55 am

I am another Patrick. In New Zealand in the 90’s there was a drive to eradicate rabbits as they are a pest. So local farmers literally blended up a bunch of rabbits infected with myxomatosis and spread it about on paddocks and the like. Worked for a while, but the rabbits came back, in vast numbers. It’s a numbers game! They’re simply too many of them now. Dropping 1080 poison, NZ I think is the only country still using it, which is indescriminate in what eats it and subsequently dies such as native animals.

Dodgy Geezer
April 18, 2015 4:00 am

..We strongly advocate studies minimising data gaps in our knowledge of the Order, specifically collecting more specimens for biodiversity archives and targeting data deficient geographic regions…..
WE WANT TO GO WABBIT HUNTING!!

richard
April 18, 2015 4:01 am

there are so many in my garden I have even thought of buying a gun. In Australia they are thought to be the NO1 reason for species loss. They are a plague and do vast damage , of course the Foxes need something to eat.

Hivemind
Reply to  richard
April 18, 2015 4:07 pm

Foxes are an introduced pest species, too.

mwhite
April 18, 2015 4:06 am

I can only assume Australia is not too hot

“Rabbits can be found in the dessert, in swamps and on the tundra”

Luke Warmist
April 18, 2015 4:08 am

 I live in a community in Phoenix surrounded by a golf course with a large bunny population. In the winter, the lows occasionally dip into the 20’s(F), and in July may touch the 120’s(F). Over the years the population appears to be fairly constant, so I’m having difficulty picturing a 1 or 2(C) change having any impact.