Surprise: Robot Sub Finds Much Thicker Than Expected Antarctic Sea Ice

From the British Antarctic Survey comes this press release which really isn’t a surprise to climate skeptics. In Antarctica, not only is the amount of sea ice increasing each year, but an underwater robot now shows the ice is also much thicker than was previously thought, a new study in Nature Geoscience reports.

Underwater robot sheds new light on Antarctic sea ice

The first detailed, high-resolution 3-D maps of Antarctic sea ice have been developed using an underwater robot.

Antarctic-robot
This is the AUV SeaBED robot under the Antarctic sea ice. Credit: WHOI

The first detailed, high-resolution 3-D maps of Antarctic sea ice have been developed using an underwater robot. Scientists from the UK, USA and Australia say the new technology provides accurate ice thickness measurements from areas that were previously too difficult to access.

The results, published this week in the journal Nature Geoscience (Monday 24 November 2014), step up the pace of research in the polar regions aimed at understanding the dramatic sea ice changes in the context of climate change.

Scientists use a range of technologies and techniques to measure sea ice thickness. Satellite observations can measure large-scale thickness from space, but interpreting the data accurately can be difficult due to snow cover on the ice. Measurements made on the sea ice by drilling holes, together with visual observations from ships are critical for building a more complete picture, but difficulties in getting access to thicker areas of sea ice leaves gaps in the data. Now, with the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) known as SeaBED, scientists have an invaluable new tool to fill this gap.

While most oceanographic survey instruments look down at the seafloor, SeaBED was fitted with an upward-looking sonar in order to measure and map the underside of sea ice floes. The AUV operated at a depth of 20 to 30 meters and was driven in a lawnmower pattern. These lines of data were merged to form high-resolution 3D bathymetric surveys of the underside of the ice.

The yellow SeaBED robot, which is approximately two meters long and weighs nearly 200 kilograms, has a twin-hull design that gives the robot enhanced stability for low-speed photographic surveys.

“Putting an AUV together to map the underside of sea ice is challenging from a software, navigation and acoustic communications standpoint,” says Hanumant Singh, an engineering scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) whose lab designed, built and operated the AUV.

“SeaBED’s maneuverability and stability made it ideal for this application where we were doing detailed floe-scale mapping and deploying, as well as recovering in close-packed ice conditions. It would have been tough to do many of the missions we did, especially under the conditions we encountered, with some of the larger vehicles.”

Co-author Dr Guy Williams from Institute of Antarctic and Marine Science adds:

“The full 3-D topography of the underside of the ice provides a richness of new information about the structure of sea ice and the processes that created it. This is key to advancing our models particularly in showing the differences between Arctic and Antarctic sea ice.”

The data from SeaBED, combined with airborne measurements of sea-ice surface elevation, ice coring surveys, and satellite observations, vastly improves scientists’ estimates of ice thickness and total sea ice volume.

Co-author Dr Jeremy Wilkinson from British Antarctic Survey (BAS) says, “The AUV missions have given us a real insight into the nature of Antarctic sea ice – like looking through a microscope. We can now measure ice in far greater detail and were excited to measure ice up to 17 metres thick.”

This is the AUV SeaBED being deployed from British Antarctic Survey’s RRS James Clark Ross.

The team deployed AUVs as part of two Antarctic cruises (IceBell and SIPEX-2) in 2010 and 2012 in the austral spring. First on the British Antarctic Survey’s RRS James Clark Ross and the second on the Australian icebreaker the RSV Aurora Australis. Three locations around the Antarctic Peninsula were mapped – the Weddell, Bellinghausen and Wilkes Land sectors covering an area of 500,000 square metres, the size of 100 football pitches.

The next steps are for the scientists to do large-scale surveys that can be compared to large-scale observations from aircraft and satellites.

“What this effort does is show that observations from AUVs under the ice are possible and there is a very rich data set that you can get from them,” says Ted Maksym, a WHOI scientist and co-author of the paper. “This work is an important step toward making the kinds of routine measurements we need in order to really monitor and understand what’s happening with the ice and the large scale changes that are occurring.”

###

The research was carried out by scientists at the Institute of Antarctic and Marine Science (Australia), Antarctic Climate and Ecosystem Cooperative Research Centre (Australia), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (USA) and British Antarctic Survey (UK).

Notes to Editors:

Still images and video of the SeaBED and Antarctica are available here: ftp://ftp.nerc-bas.ac.uk/pub/photo/Antarctic_sea_ice/ NB: to download do not use an FTP client, simply open in any web browser (firefox/IE etc) right click on the filename and select ‘save target/link/file as’ to begin the download or from the Press Offices listed above.

Thick and deformed Antarctic sea ice mapped with autonomous underwater vehicles by G. Williams, T. Maksym, J. Wilkinson, C. Kunz, C. Murphy, P. Kimball, H. Singh is published in Nature Geoscience on 24 November 2014.

The AUV captured extensive deformation, with the underside revealing large ‘rubble fields’ of sea ice, suggesting repeated, multi-directional collisions between ice floes through the winter period. This is in contrast to what scientists previously understood from the Arctic, where larger sections of sea ice, under constant pressure, produce longer linear ‘ridge’ features.

British Antarctic Survey (BAS), an institute of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), delivers and enables world-leading interdisciplinary research in the Polar Regions. Its skilled science and support staff based in Cambridge, Antarctica and the Arctic, work together to deliver research that uses the Polar Regions to advance our understanding of Earth as a sustainable planet. Through its extensive logistic capability and know-how BAS facilitates access for the British and international science community to the UK polar research operation. Numerous national and international collaborations, combined with an excellent infrastructure help sustain a world leading position for the UK in Antarctic affairs. For more information visit http://www.antarctica.ac.uk.

The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution is a private, non-profit organization on Cape Cod, Mass., dedicated to marine research, engineering, and higher education. Established in 1930 on a recommendation from the National Academy of Sciences, its primary mission is to understand the ocean and its interaction with the Earth as a whole, and to communicate a basic understanding of the ocean’s role in the changing global environment. For more information, please visit http://www.whoi.edu.

The Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre is a unique collaboration between the Australian Antarctic Division, CSIRO, the University of Tasmania, the Australian Government Department of the Environment, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, the Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (Germany), and the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (New Zealand) plus a consortium of 13 other international participants. The Centre’s mission is to understand the crucial role played by Antarctica and the Southern Ocean in global climate, and the impacts of climate change on Australia and the world, and to inform governments, industry, the community and scientists about climate change to guide our future.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

173 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 24, 2014 11:33 pm

We are living in yellow AUV… yellow AUV… yellow AUV…

AntonyIndia
November 25, 2014 1:00 am

So either the CAGW groupies where on thin ice before or they were thicker than Antarctic sea ice.

Editor
November 25, 2014 1:40 am

This post also open for discussion at More on Miriam O’Brien’s Hot Whopper:
http://moreonmiriamobrien.wordpress.com/2014/11/25/miriam-obrien-says-an-unsustainable-planet-and-yellow-submarines-in-antarctica/
Sou commented on comments.

Steve Oregon
November 25, 2014 7:59 am

…..”which means we were biased towards thinner ice.”
So now we now yet another way convenient presumption was used to invent and embellish evidence of the AGW theory.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/24/antarctic-ice-thicker-survey-finds
“Previously, measurements of Antarctic ice thickness were hindered by technological constraints. Ice breaking ships could only go so far into ice to measure depth, while no-one had drilled much more than 5.5m down into the ice to extract a core for analysis.
“Sea ice is an important indicator of the polar climate but measuring its thickness has been tricky,” said Williams, the report’s co-author.
“The key thing is that this is a game changer because it was previously very challenging to measure ice depth. We were limited to visual observation from the decks of ships or ice cores and take measures.
“It was a lot of hard work and quite crude, which means we were biased towards thinner ice. It was a bit like a doctor diagnosing a condition by prodding the skin.”

Sir Harry Flashman
Reply to  Steve Oregon
November 25, 2014 10:21 am

Are you saying that the discovery of thicker ice is not a function of better technology, but of a change in the ice itself? Is there something in the original paper which actually says that or are is it something invented to confirm your pre-existing belief??

Catherine Ronconi
Reply to  Sir Harry Flashman
November 25, 2014 10:52 am

The point is the pre-existing belief of the Team, ie that while Antarctic sea ice was growing, because it was less thick than Arctic ice, total global sea ice volume wasn’t growing.
Another fail for the Team.

Ed Zuiderwijk
November 25, 2014 10:39 am

“Thicker than thought”.
By who? The prince of Wales?

tty
November 25, 2014 10:48 am

I can’t see why anyone should be in the least surprised by these results. Whedrever there is moving sea-ice there will be pressure ridges, and wherever there is a pressure ridge there is a “keel” that is about 10 times deeper than the height of the ridge (the ice floats, remember?). 17 meter thick ice equals about a five feet high ridge which is not at all exceptional, I’ve seen higher ones both in the Baltic and the Arctic Ocean..

Robert W Turner
November 25, 2014 11:03 am

Isn’t one excuse for the thinner sea ice that winds have stretched it thin, covering a larger area?
I guess now it is that the ice is very thick in places due to winds compressing it and the total area of sea ice has increase despite the winds, not because of it.

Robert W Turner
Reply to  Robert W Turner
November 25, 2014 11:04 am

*Isn’t one excuse for the larger area of sea ice….*

November 25, 2014 11:32 am

The coffee at work really sucked this morning. Global Warming did that. I just know it.

John
November 25, 2014 12:12 pm

How long until NSIDC changes the information on their website concerning Antarctic vs Arctic sea ice thickness.
http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/seaice/characteristics/difference.html
Excerpt:
Thickness
Because sea ice does not stay in the Antarctic as long as it does in the Arctic, it does not have the opportunity to grow as thick as sea ice in the Arctic. While thickness varies significantly within both regions, Antarctic ice is typically 1 to 2 meters (3 to 6 feet) thick, while most of the Arctic is covered by sea ice 2 to 3 meters (6 to 9 feet) thick. Some Arctic regions are covered with ice that is 4 to 5 meters (12 to 15 feet) thick.

KNR
November 25, 2014 1:19 pm

Have we been told this does no matter , has its the wrong type of ice, yet ?

SpeedOfDark
November 25, 2014 1:47 pm

Inconvenient truth for the Guardian commenters today, they claim the story had nothing to do with Climate Change and that nobody said anything about thicker ice, this despite the article headline clearly stating that the ice was “thicker than we thought” and that ice being thicker was the main point of the article.
Of course, if it had found that the ice was thinner than we thought that would have had everything to do with Climate change.

RMF
November 25, 2014 2:20 pm

Did you all catch the other interesting finding by the BAS, on ocean acidification and impact on shells?
The paper and findings are noted on the homepage.
“Ocean acidification does not impact shell growth and repair in the Antarctic brachiopod Liothyrella uva.”
This is a very significant finding

phlogiston
November 25, 2014 8:24 pm

The anomalous cold SSTs all around the Antarctic sea ice boundary have been very persistent, they are almost a permanent feature.
And peri-Antarctic cold SSTs have now linked with those in the Nino 1-2 regions.
Look out for a fat La Nina next year.
Talking of fat – Hi Miriam howz it going?

sherlock1
November 26, 2014 5:53 am

NO, NO…!
ITS THINNING..!
ITS MELTING..!
All the models say so..!
There must be something wrong with the facts..!

November 26, 2014 6:59 am

Wouldn’t thicker sea ice cause the oceans to rise?