Another green calls for "Deniers" to be jailed

RFK_jail

Climate Depot reports that another prominent green, Robert F. Kennedy Junior, has called for climate “deniers” to be jailed. Is it just me, or is there something very wrong with a political landscape in which people find it acceptable to demand their opponents be jailed for disagreeing with them? Watch the video.

RFK Jr wants to jail energy CEO’s for “Treason” Laments no current laws to punish climate skeptics:

RFK Jnr is not alone in demanding people who disagree with him do time – the Google search http://google.com/search?q=jail+climate+deniers returns over 200,000 hits.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
249 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
September 24, 2014 8:16 am

The fellow in the video still thinks he is 19.
Probably the last time he had an original thought.
Third generation of inherited wealth? Say no more.

janus
September 24, 2014 8:30 am

Those who are not old enough to remember the communistic (socialistic) block:
The Brezhnev Doctrine was a Soviet Union foreign policy, first and most clearly outlined by S. Kovalev in a September 26, 1968 Pravda article, entitled “Sovereignty and the International Obligations of Socialist Countries.” Leonid Brezhnev reiterated it in a speech at the Fifth Congress of the Polish United Workers’ Party on November 13, 1968, which stated:
Eastern Bloc
When forces that are hostile to socialism try to turn the development of some socialist country towards capitalism, it becomes not only a problem of the country concerned, but a common problem and concern of all socialist countries.
This doctrine was announced to retroactively justify the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in August 1968 that ended the Prague Spring, along with earlier Soviet military interventions, such as the invasion of Hungary in 1956

MarkW
September 24, 2014 8:32 am

A couple of weeks ago, almost every Democrat in congress voted in support of a proposed new amendment to the constitution that would pretty much eliminate free speech in the US.

MarkW
Reply to  MarkW
September 24, 2014 8:33 am

Democrats in the Senate. The House hasn’t voted on the amendment, though many in the House have been vocal in their support of it.

Ralph Kramden
September 24, 2014 8:39 am

called for climate deniers to be jailed
Statements like this are common among Alarmists. Alarmists are not really compatible with a democracy like America. They would prefer a totalitarian regime.

John Endicott
Reply to  Ralph Kramden
September 25, 2014 10:07 am

If they had their way America would be one such regime. Our current totalitarian in chief hsa been hard at work to make it happen.

richard
September 24, 2014 8:39 am

if i go to jail i hope it is in the same cell as Mr Watts and all, I would say Jo Nova but guess it is single sex cells. Wow, on this site I mentioned sex.

Reply to  richard
September 25, 2014 2:55 pm

You could claim you gender identity rights were being violated by sharing cells with other men. That works for bathrooms, at least in California schools. Just hope you don’t have to learn to walk in heels.

more soylent green!
September 24, 2014 8:41 am

This is how statists, communists, dictators, totalitarians, etc., deal with dissent. Free expression is forbidden. The thought police are out there. As climate change is a bigger threat than terrorism, I fully expect the NSA to start monitoring our calls and emails for hints of climate change denialism.

September 24, 2014 8:41 am

Robert F. Kennedy Junior obviously has lost the climate focused argument. So, he wants to jail his critics.
It is hard to continue to be benevolent toward hate speaking people like Robert F. Kennedy Junior.
John

Tucci78
Reply to  John Whitman
September 24, 2014 9:45 am

At 8:41 AM on 24 September, John Whitman had written:

It is hard to continue to be benevolent toward hate speaking people like Robert F. Kennedy Junior.

Among the other benefits of growing up in a Sicilian-American family, I am grateful to those who’d nurtured me to manhood for the fact that I feel in no way encumbered by the sort of charitable impulse which would give the average American even the urge to micturate upon someone like this Kennedy creature were he to present in the process of demonstrating spontaneous human combustion.
Managgia Irlandesi.

Here, for those who have forgotten or just love to hear it all again, is the fulsome scurvy truth: Old Joseph P. Kennedy was a liar and a greedy thief, an ignoramus, adulterer, vile anti-Semite, coward, and pompous ass. His wife, Rose, was a frigid martinet, unashamed to suckle at the teat of shabby lucre, awash in pietism and Tartuffery, filled with the letter of Catholicism and empty of its spirit. They raised their nine whelps in an atmosphere of brutal pride and stupid competition. When the hapless Rosemary turned out to be retarded, they had her lobotomized and parked her with the nuns. The remaining eight turned out foolhardy, arrogant, unprincipled, and wholly lacking in sense of consequences. This last trait caused Joe Jr. and Kathleen to die in airplane crashes and allowed Jack to get his PT boat T-boned by a Japanese destroyer. (A tale of heroism was manufactured from that incident. The family wasn’t so lucky with Teddy’s Chappaquiddick skin-diving efforts three decades later.) The Kennedys, however, continued to wax. Elections, intellectuals, and press adulation were purchased. One family member rose, briefly, to great political power and almost unlimited sexual excess. Some others nearly achieved the same results. Two were shot, but under the most romantic circumstances and not, as might have been hoped, after due process of law. A third remains a fat dog in a Senate manger that’s overdue for mucking out. Thus the Kennedys excelled in every Irish vice and learned others strange to the sons of Erin, such as simony and lust. Then comes the morally satisfying third act, when the last generation of Kennedys reaps the trust-fund dividends of sin. They wallow in drugs and indolence, perform wild acts of self-destruction and roll in social manure. At Studio 54, Xenon, and Danceteria, they fritter away the advantage and wealth gained by their loathsome ancestors. They overdose and get arrested and, best of all, disappear from the public eye. Just desserts! Just hors d’oeuvres! A just main course of crow!
— P.J. O’Rourke, Give War a Chance (1992)

Reply to  Tucci78
September 24, 2014 1:14 pm

Wow, P.J. Now tell us what you really think. LOL!
But he makes some good points…

Steve P
Reply to  Tucci78
September 24, 2014 2:44 pm

P.J. O’Rourke does not impress me in the least, save as an ill-informed loudmouth.
He blames Joe Kennedy Jr. for being killed while on a dangerous mission in WWII. Even when you’re a hero, you may be “…wholly lacking in sense of consequences… to this flame spewing dimwit.

hunter
September 24, 2014 9:40 am

Peter,
Your misantropic obsession regarding climate is putting my children and grandchildren at risk. And is costing the world the equivalent of a medium sized war daily already.
Take your faux concern and your apocalyptic claptrap and put it where the sun don’t shine.
Why won’t you kooks stick with UFO’s, past lives and Area 51?

dp
September 24, 2014 9:42 am

Does there exist any scientist who’s views you respect that has produced data that believably explains the observed record? The models don’t work and both sides agree, and the observed record does not abide the rhetoric that accompanies the modeled results. None of the scientists I read can reconcile the travesty that is the divergence between modeled climate and observed climate.

RockyRoad
Reply to  dp
September 24, 2014 10:10 pm

The non-reconciliation has reached criminal proportions, actually.
Steps have been taken recently to keep coal from being shipped to India, where fully a THIRD of their population has no electricity.
We can thank the alarmists for influencing Portland, OR for rejecting plans for a coal-loading facility.
Keeping the people of India in the dark by stopping fuel from reaching them should be a crime against humanity.

September 24, 2014 10:04 am

At the risk of offending any Americans with fond memories of a certain, fairly mediocre, deceased President, aren’t this mans family renowned for thinking with a part of their anatomy, that is located somewhat lower down than is the norm?

Dudley Horscroft
Reply to  krb981
September 24, 2014 10:55 am

Acting with it, perhaps. Thinking? No.

Andyj
Reply to  krb981
September 24, 2014 12:03 pm

Are you hinting the Kennedy’s are well endowed? I thought it was the little people who attempt to attain greatness.

Steve P
Reply to  krb981
September 24, 2014 2:46 pm

One is never offended by fools, only astonished.

Bitter&Twisted
September 24, 2014 10:40 am

The Kennedy curse strikes again.
RFK was born an imbecile.

Curious George
September 24, 2014 10:43 am

This guy does probably talk to his house plants like Prince Charles. Aristocracy.

The Definition Guy
September 24, 2014 11:07 am

“We have met the enemy and he is us.”- Pogo

Andyj
September 24, 2014 12:01 pm

To MOD’s.
RFK Jr’s six carbon burning children were listed by me and deleted by you. This was a straight copy/paste off wiki.
So, your morality is high but your action was moot. 😉

Patrick Lyons
September 24, 2014 12:28 pm

RFK, Jr. demands intolerance for anyone expressing an opinion contrary to our government’s climate dogma, reminding me of Orwell’s 1984. As Voltaire stated, “It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong”. No longer is there a search for truth since, as we are told, the science is settled. How long before our government takes seriously such a position as RFK, Jr. espouses?

September 24, 2014 12:53 pm

What a knob

Dav09
September 24, 2014 12:56 pm

“. . . take the posters at their word unless there is sufficient reason to believe otherwise.”
Admirable sentiment, but on past behaviour (incessant bald-faced lying by CAGW pushers) CAGW pushing in and of itself is more than sufficient reason to believe otherwise.

Ghandi
September 24, 2014 1:46 pm

Sig Heil, Herr Kennedy! I have read that the Nazis started with Robert Jr.’s type of thinking. So much for a legacy of liberty and freedom. This man is a fascist.

Dav09
September 24, 2014 1:56 pm

dbstealey says (September 24, 2014 at 1:14 pm)

Wow, P.J. Now tell us what you really think. LOL!
But he makes some good points . . . /blockquote>
A little further on in the same piece he makes some even better ones:

Collier and Horowitz also fail to explain how these sewer trout managed to swim upstream into our body politic. The authors, typical pundits, attribute the Kennedy rise to the family’s pet intellectuals. This is giving the American public too little credit. We may be dumb, but we’re not so dumb that we ever spent a minute listening to Theodore Sorensen. Neither were lickspittle journalists at fault (though not through lack of trying by the likes of Joe Alsop). We have no one to blame for the Kennedys but ourselves. We took the Kennedys to heart of our own accord. And it is my opinion that we did it, not because we respected them or thought what they proposed was good, but because they were pretty. We, the electorate, were smitten with this handsome, vivacious family.
We got a mad crush on the lot of them. They were so stylish, so charming, and – at least in their public moments – so gracefully behaved. We wanted to hug their golden tossled heads to our dumpy breasts.
This may be the stupidest thing that has ever happened in a democracy. And certainly it shows an emptiness at the center of our lives. A desire to adore a head of state is a grim transgression against republicanism. It is worse than having a head of state who demands to be adored. It is worse even than forced adoration of the state itself. And this puts the Collier/Horowitz book in another light. It’s ourselves we should be flailing. Trust hubris to bring such trash as Kennedys to their knees. They are but few and a passing evil. We are another matter. There are 230 some million of us, and we’d better start talking sense to ourselves soon. The President of the United States is our employee. The services he and his legislative cohorts contract for us are not gifts or benefices. We have to pay for every one of them, sometimes with our money, sometimes with our skins.
If we can remember this we’ll get a good, dull Cincinnatus like Eisenhower or Coolidge. Our governance will be managed with quiet and economy. We’ll have no need to go looking for Kennedys to love. And no need to boil over with hatred for them later.

Dav09
September 24, 2014 2:07 pm

dbstealey says (September 24, 2014 at 1:14 pm)

Wow, P.J. Now tell us what you really think. LOL!
But he makes some good points . . .

A little further on in the same piece he makes some even better ones:

Collier and Horowitz also fail to explain how these sewer trout managed to swim upstream into our body politic. The authors, typical pundits, attribute the Kennedy rise to the family’s pet intellectuals. This is giving the American public too little credit. We may be dumb, but we’re not so dumb that we ever spent a minute listening to Theodore Sorensen. Neither were lickspittle journalists at fault (though not through lack of trying by the likes of Joe Alsop). We have no one to blame for the Kennedys but ourselves. We took the Kennedys to heart of our own accord. And it is my opinion that we did it, not because we respected them or thought what they proposed was good, but because they were pretty. We, the electorate, were smitten with this handsome, vivacious family.
We got a mad crush on the lot of them. They were so stylish, so charming, and – at least in their public moments – so gracefully behaved. We wanted to hug their golden tossled heads to our dumpy breasts.
This may be the stupidest thing that has ever happened in a democracy. And certainly it shows an emptiness at the center of our lives. A desire to adore a head of state is a grim transgression against republicanism. It is worse than having a head of state who demands to be adored. It is worse even than forced adoration of the state itself. And this puts the Collier/Horowitz book in another light. It’s ourselves we should be flailing. Trust hubris to bring such trash as Kennedys to their knees. They are but few and a passing evil. We are another matter. There are 230 some million of us, and we’d better start talking sense to ourselves soon. The President of the United States is our employee. The services he and his legislative cohorts contract for us are not gifts or benefices. We have to pay for every one of them, sometimes with our money, sometimes with our skins.
If we can remember this we’ll get a good, dull Cincinnatus like Eisenhower or Coolidge. Our governance will be managed with quiet and economy. We’ll have no need to go looking for Kennedys to love. And no need to boil over with hatred for them later.

CarlF
September 24, 2014 2:20 pm

Expressing ones views on a subject is generally not a crime in the US. There are some exceptions these days (anything classified as hate speech for example). I suppose if they can get dissenting views on the weather classified as a hate crime, they could start jailing people. At that point, we will need to be careful about comments like “what a nice day it is today”.
What is a crime is to deprive others of their freedom of speech, which is clearly what Kennedy is advocating. I suggest it is Kennedy that needs to be jailed.

September 24, 2014 2:32 pm

People such as RFK jr. Are severely deficient in the area of imperical scientific study and, in the case of the U.S., Constitutional law regarding freedom of speech as well as a host of other federal and state laws. Our governments and the U.N. do not know what their talking about and most of the worlds population knows it. Going on fifteen years of NO AGW and they keep trying to feed us their line. Thanks, but no thanks.

Steve Allen
September 24, 2014 3:49 pm

RFK Jr. clearly reinforces the belief that talent typically skips a generation. What a jack hole.

September 24, 2014 7:05 pm

Mr. Kennedy sure is sounding like a Parkinson’s victim. While he is wishing ill upon his political opponents I wish him well with his health.
W^3

Nigel in Waterloo
September 24, 2014 7:54 pm

You can only be prosecuted for an actual crime that has been proven to have occurred. You can’t punish someone for a crime that you can’t prove even happened. Not believing in AGW is not a crime, unless your actions can be proven to have caused harm to someone. Good luck with that when it comes to the climate.
What ‘crime’ does he think skeptics will be prosecuted for? Making the Earth warmer? Is that a crime?

Reply to  Nigel in Waterloo
September 25, 2014 3:52 am

Certainly you can be punished for a non-crime. Happens all the time.
Are you a member of the Tea [Taxed Enough Already] Party? If you are audited by the IRS because of it, you’re being punished.
The NRA just had an article about banks and other financial instituions abruptly severing all credit lines from gun store owners. Businesses need credit to operate. They have committed no crimes. They are being punished for engaging in lawful business.
The list is getting longer. Kennedy is just a symptom.