“Hockey stick” conjurer Michael Mann’s recent article bemoaned how, even on vacation, he couldn’t get away from his work. He traveled to Glacier National Park and was confronted with the “spectre of climate change” in the form of melting glaciers.
Climatologist David Legates, on the other hand, points out that those glaciers have been melting since around 1860! Instead of crying about Earth’s climate, he spent his vacation much more productively: celebrating the wondrous contributions that hydrocarbon energy has made in our lives and living standards over the last 150 years. He shares his experiences in this informative commentary.
What I did on my summer vacation – another climatologist’s perspective
by Dr. David R. Legates
I recently read an article in which “hockey stick” creator and climatologist Michael Mann discussed his summer vacation. Reporting on his travels to Montana, Dr. Mann lamented the fact that glaciers in Glacier National Park are receding. He blamed this on human-caused climate change. He said he tried to get away from work but just couldn’t, because the “spectre of climate change stares you in the face as you tour the park.”
I likewise did my level best to get away from life, but was no more successful. You see, I’m a not just a climatologist. I am also a human being, and am acutely aware of the life-long struggle for survival experienced by billions of destitute, desperate people on our planet – and of the innovative, determined human spirit that stares you in the face as you peruse the daily news and tour our nation’s museums.
Dr. Mann was viewing glaciers that have actually been receding since the end of the Little Ice Age, back around 1860. He got upset because he thinks (and wants us to believe) that they have been losing ice only since 1975 or so – and it’s our fault, because carbon dioxide emissions from our cars, factories, electricity generating plants, home heating units and other sources are causing “unprecedented” global warming.
I instead visited three museums that are within a one-hour drive from my home: the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania in Strasbourg, PA, the Air Mobility Command Museum at Dover Air Force Base in Dover, Delaware, and the Chesapeake-Delaware Canal Museum in Chesapeake City, Maryland.
What I saw underscored how far we Americans have come since the Civil War and Industrial Revolution, in large part because of fossil fuel-driven technology – and how far billions of less fortunate people worldwide still have to go, to achieve a standard of living, health and welfare close to what we enjoy. Unfortunately, and unforgivably, they are being held back by policies that elevate misplaced concern about hydrocarbon energy and “dangerous manmade climate change” above the needs of people.
At the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania you see the impacts the railway had on building this great nation. From simple steam engines that could carry just two people, to huge steam locomotives that connected our country’s two far-flung shores, to the diesel and electric locomotives that built the industrial backbone of this country, the ingenuity of the last 150-plus years sits quietly on display as an historical reminder of our legacy.
The Air Mobility Command Museum is a testimony not just to aviation, but to air cargo transportation. The amazing machines, and the intrepid men and women who flew them, helped us move equipment and supplies to support troops, provide assistance in areas ravaged by natural disasters or human catastrophes, and keep freedom alive in places like West Berlin during the 1948-49 airlift.
They also stand as marvelous monuments to human innovation – and a testament to our ability and determination to support freedom and democracy, and lend assistance when needed to the plight of those less fortunate, even when located in the far reaches of our planet.
Connecting two important waterways, the Chesapeake-Delaware Canal is truly a miracle of human entrepreneurship. Originally dug by hand, the fourteen-mile-long canal connects the Chesapeake and Delaware Bays, reducing the shipping distance from Baltimore to Philadelphia by nearly 300 miles.
Eventually, the canal was deepened and its locks removed, to allow goods to be shipped directly by ocean-going vessels without having to offload them to a turnpike, or later the railway. This greatly increased the region’s economic viability and encouraged development of the mid-Atlantic area.
But as I looked these monuments, I did so with sadness. This ingenuity was brought about by forward-looking men and women who used their energies to develop machines and enhance their efficiency, with the ultimate goal of helping humankind.
Today, however, there are those who see this effort as wrong and (dare I say it?) even evil. They want to restrict energy and its availability, and thereby limit our ingenuity, innovation and progress by draining the very lifeblood that made these earlier developments possible. Without coal and oil, there would have been no railroads and no cargo transportation, either by air or by sea.
Democracy would likely have been but a distant memory in most of Europe and Southeast Asia – or maybe not even a memory at all. The United States would not have developed as it did, and it certainly would not be the world’s leader in innovative thinking that it is today. It is quite likely that we would not be far removed from the conditions in which Africa currently finds itself.
These three museums only offer a small glimpse at the myriad of marvels produced by human ingenuity, and the role that hydrocarbon energy has played in them since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. The development of inexpensive energy led to phenomenal, previously unheard of increases in industrial output and worker efficiency, in wages and free time, in living standards and human health and welfare.
They also provided us with the weekend and vacation time, and the physical wherewithal, to experience the wonders of God’s creation — as well as the ability to attend to environmental stewardship.
It is all these opportunities that people in undeveloped and under-developed countries wish to emulate. But for that to happen, we must help keep the cost of energy low and shun policies and practices that make it expensive and unreliable. If we make energy so expensive that only the rich can afford it, the poor and the vulnerable will be denied access, and will be condemned to nasty, brutal and short lives marked by squalor, deprivation, starvation and disease.
I find it immoral to suggest that the abject poverty, disease and malnutrition that still afflict much of the world must be ignored, while we concern ourselves with “saving the planet from global warming.”
Are national park glaciers – whose existence and demise are affected primarily by the same natural forces that repeatedly spawned and melted mile-high, continent-wide Pleistocene ice fields – more important than the more unfortunate inhabitants of our planet? Assuming, of course, that by addressing greenhouse gas emissions we can positively alter the planet’s climate, or that we can know what climate is optimal.
It is ironic that it is our affluence – created by our technological innovations and use of hydrocarbons – which has allowed us to become environmentally conscious. When people are in dire need of food, clothing, shelter and other basic necessities of life, they cannot be concerned with environmental issues. To cite just one example of thousands, because the people of India and Bangladesh are so poor, the Ganges River serves as both their source of drinking water and their cesspool for untreated sewage. Their poverty prevents them from focusing on even the most basic environmental concerns.
Moreover, freedom and energy availability go hand-in-hand. Oppression thrives when subjects are kept poor and deprived of technological advancements. When people have the time and ability to travel and communicate, to be innovative, and to organize to produce a better way of life or fight a common enemy – freedom grows. Inexpensive energy is the key to ending both poverty and oppression.
More than two million people will visit Glacier National Park this year, to marvel at nature. I wonder how they would have gotten there … or whether they would have had the time to do so … if it were not for the transportation innovations that resulted from hydrocarbon fuels.
I would encourage them to visit these museums – or museums like them – to see what humans have built, and ponder what our future will likely be if backward-thinking policies cause their legacy to vanish. May they marvel at the wonders of nature, and perhaps lament the loss of glaciers. But may they also lament the loss of life caused by too little use of fossil fuels, not by too much of such life-enhancing fuels.
__________
David R. Legates, PhD, CCM, is a Professor of Climatology at the University of Delaware in Newark, Delaware, USA.
h/t to Paul Driessen
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Isn’t it true that glaciers tend to melt in the summer? Maybe Mann should go there in the winter so he would not be bothered by melting ice.
I have come up with a new term that I think beautifully sums up the sub set of humanity that are true believers in CAGW (among other airheaded things).
They are a “drivelisation”, a post rational degeneration of civilisation which evolved in a pseudo scientific/academic Tower of Babel (which explains the gibberish).
Sounds good. ‘Climate driveler’ sounds like a good retort to ‘Climate denier’. Although I’m still most favoring ‘Climate delusionist’ at the moment.
Dr.Legates wrote;
“Today, however, there are those who see this effort as wrong and (dare I say it?) even evil. They want to restrict energy and its availability, and thereby limit our ingenuity, innovation and progress by draining the very lifeblood that made these earlier developments possible.”
Indeed, and every one of them is all too willing to jump on a Boeing 747 (or an Airbus, “bus” is an appropriate choice of words IMHO) to fly off to Tahiti and “con-fab” about how “All the rest of us” are ruining the Earth and only with their wisdom might we survive.
As soon as Michael Mann stops consuming “evil fossil fuels” to fly out to Glacier National Park and “weep” about our future might I even consider taking him seriously. If “global warming” is a awful as he suggests why the h–l is he consuming fossil fuels to observe it’s effects ???? Can’t he call a buddy (OK it’s probably a given that a nerd like him has few “buddies” to call) and ask them to “take a peek at the glacier for me so I don’t have to fly out here and consume all that evil fossil fuel ????
What a soap opera….
Cheers, Kevin.
Perhaps Mr. Mann could have a quick read at the “whacky” page on the Columbia ice field before Mr. Connolly decides to change things. Did they really start to melt in 1844???
Work???. You wouldnt last a year as an private sector meteorologist who’s livelihood depends on actually being right
(y)
Ha ha
Seems Mann is at the center of his universe for sure and even without an Obama bong.
His brain is just “wired all wrong.”
Ditto
I just want to put a good word in for GG-1, now at home in the Pa. State RR Museum in Straussburg. All electric and very efficient is GG-1, just the machinery to soothe the green soul. Although it is in black, not Pennsy green.
The GG-1, truly an iconic engine of the 20th century
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRR_GG1
>>To cite just one example of thousands, because the people of India and Bangladesh are so poor, the Ganges River serves as both their source of drinking water and their cesspool for untreated sewage. Their poverty prevents them from focusing on even the most basic environmental concerns.<<
Absolutely right.
As Bert Brecht said eight decades ago: Grub first, then ethics
Overpopulation can only be reduces by improving the standard of living. That requires cheap energy. Only then the scales will come into balance.
>>I find it immoral to suggest that the abject poverty, disease and malnutrition that still afflict much of the world must be ignored, while we concern ourselves with “saving the planet from global warming.”<<
Couldn't agree more. And that abominable Mann still lives in the era of Bến Tre: 'It became necessary to destroy the town to save it'. But the difference is that Mann is trying to persuade the world to destroy itself by means of fighting a non-existent "AGW".
It is truly unfortunate that many among us do not realize and appreciate what the alternative to melting ice land-based masses really means.
Dr. David R. Legates,
Excellent, Sir! Simply excellent!
Mac
The last sentence doesn’t seem to make sense – should the second “few” be “many?”
If the learned boy scientist would but check the age of snout ice of the world’s glaciers he would discover an amazing fact – it’s been a while since the global climate was glacier-building friendly. Note to the boy wonder – the LIA is over. Most new glacier building ended when it ended. What we have are the eroded remains of a time long gone. Fear not for glaciers – when nature chooses they will return. There is nothing in the kit we humans have that can stop it. Your models are wrong and are junk. The hockey stick is junk. Climate science practiced by the 97% is junk. Nature decides which is right and which is an illusion. American climate science is a global embarrassment. Stop it, now. Just admit and accept you are too stupid to work in this area.
dp
September 5, 2014 at 11:34 pm
…
Stop it, now. Just admit and accept you are too stupid to work in this area.
_________________________
May be some are Kerry-like loonies, but none of them is *that* stupid to give away such a lucrative sinecure just because he is incompetent.
Oh, Mann. No way increasing energy price to cool the planet is winning you friends. Even the green politicians have figured it out now.
Spectres are ghosts…ghosts are not ‘real’.
Having lived in Montana, where there are plenty of eco-loons (especially around the U of M in Missoula), any mention of Glacier NP is always immediately followed up with a sad look of resignation and, “…yeah, gotta go before they’re all gone.”
It’s not enough that I hate Mann on his own, but the fact that he went acting as if he had no idea of what he’d “find”, makes me loathe him even more. He went there for that purpose alone, just like all the other bits of hikertrash who either inhabit Montana or visit.
And before you wonder what I’m talking about, unlike Wyoming, Idaho, and the Dakotas, Montana is very close to being a ‘blue’ state. If it wasn’t for Billings – their largest city and a major livestock, mining, and refinery hub – it would be a lock for the Libs.
If you enjoyed Lake McDonald at the west side of the park, then you need to be thankful for glaciers melting. Since the glaciers are below the freeze line they were going to melt over time any way.
If Mann is that worried about the melting glaciers all he had to do was get his buddy St Gore there and thanks to the Gore affect those glaciers would be rolling down the hills before they knew it.
One amazing point about railroads — private industry w/o government help spanned a continent w/tracks in the 1860s. No other country ever accomplished that so early, and then not without “government” help (trans-Siberian railroad).
Even in the 60s growing up there were still local railroad spurs reaching almost any point even in small towns w/industries lined-up along them. All privately funded and built. Nowadays, even simple state and federal highway “projects” drag on for yrs that private industries would have finished in a tiny fraction of the time.
Yes, up until the mid 50s or so, the train station was one of the central locations in any city or town, some of which were “just a whistle stop.”
The move to the suburbs in the 50s was accompanied by promotion of motor vehicles with a reduced role for rail. In my opinion, the railroads fell victim to the typical greed & corruption fed by success, which ultimately invokes public outcry, and government involvement.
It’s much less expensive to haul freight by rail, than over the road by truck, but we clever humans have figured out a way to use the less efficient means of transport.
Did Dr Mann walk/bike from his residence to Glacier National Park? Because if he didn’t, he most certainly got there using a fossil fuel transportation, which is creating the very climate change he is worried about.
So why, if Dr Mann is so concerned, why does he continue to make the problem worse? No one forced him to travel. Dr Mann, if you are so concerned, take a Stay-Cation. Please stop polluting planet earth with your fossil fuel travel so those of us that care can enjoy the carbon free environment.
We seem to have given up and let self-appointed busybodies govern our progress and way of life.
==================
it started small. it started in the early 80’s with the word chairman. the day free speech ended and was replaced by politically correct speech. it was OK to say fzck, but heaven help you if you said chairman.
Once the rules of free speech went out the window, the seeds were sown. politics were shown to be superior to personal freedoms. the tyranny of the group was superior to the personal rights and freedoms earned through the struggle and deaths of thousands over centuries.
Personal freedom is the basis of western society. Yet we gave it up without a single shot being fired and replaced it with politics, in the believe that political correctness was more important than freedom. but no one stopped to ask. if we need to say chairperson instead of chairman, why don’t we say wo-person instead of woman?
AGW is simply an extensions of political correctness. It survives because so many are afraid to speak out. They fear for their jobs and their social standing, over a matter of belief. This intolerance of ideas survives only because we have placed free speech second to politics.
Yeah, yeah, but what about the “son” part in “person”?
I suggest “perundefinedoffspring”. It has the advantage of including heteros, gays, trannies, LSMFTs, and to whom it may concern.
Mann might want to read the national park’s own web page which clearly states (paraphrasing) that the park is so named for the features left by glaciation rather than the glaciers themselves.
I have color slide images taken by my father of Glacier Park 62 years ago, and, guess what, it looked pretty much the same then as it does now.
As long as I’m pontificating on this subject, I would also like to add how tired I have grown of going to national parks and while attending a lecture or tour having to listen to the incessant mantra about how humans are destroying the environment and how the national parks are suffering because of it. Hence, I rarely attend these lectures now.
Climate change’s newest threat: The Gulf of Mexico is devouring Southeastern Louisiana
http://www.salon.com/2014/09/05/climate_changes_newest_threat_the_gulf_of_mexico_is_devouring_southeastern_louisiana_partner/