Confirmed: 800 meters beneath Antarctic ice sheet, subglacial lake holds viable microbial ecosystems
![]()
Cutting-edge technology and science of the NSF-funded WISSARD project make discovery possible
In a finding that has implications for life in other extreme environments, both on Earth and elsewhere in the solar system, researchers funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) this week published a paper confirming that the waters and sediments of a lake that lies 800 meters (2,600 feet) beneath the surface of the West Antarctic ice sheet support “viable microbial ecosystems.”
Given that more than 400 subglacial lakes and numerous rivers and streams are thought to exist beneath the Antarctic ice sheet, such ecosystems may be widespread and may influence the chemical and biological composition of the Southern Ocean, the vast and biologically productive sea that encircles the continent.
According to Brent C. Christner, the paper’s lead author and a researcher with the NSF-funded Whillans Ice Stream Subglacial Access Research Drilling (WISSARD) project, “Hidden beneath a half-mile of ice in Antarctica is an unexplored part of our biosphere. WISSARD has provided a glimpse of the nature of microbial life that may lurk under more than 5 million square miles of ice sheet.”
Analysis of the samples taken from subglacial Lake Whillans, the researchers indicate, show that the water contains a diverse microbial community, many members of which can mine rocks for energy and use carbon dioxide as their source of carbon.
Added John Priscu, a WISSARD scientist at Montana State University, Bozeman and a co-author on the paper, the Antarctic subglacial environment is our planet’s largest wetland, one dominated completely by microorganisms.
The WISSARD findings are published in the Aug. 21 issue of the journal Nature by scientists and students affiliated with WISSARD, which is a collaboration involving researchers at numerous institutions across the United States.
Christner is a professor of biology at Louisiana State University (LSU). Other co-authors on the paper include students and researchers from LSU; the University of Venice in Italy; New York University; the Scripps Institution of Oceanography; St. Olaf College in Minnesota; the University of Tennessee; and Aberystwyth University in the United Kingdom.
NSF, which manages the U.S. Antarctic Program through its Division of Polar Programs, provided more than $10 million in grants as part of NSF’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 portfolio to support the WISSARD science and development of related technologies.
NASA’s Cryospheric Sciences Program, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the private Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation also provided support for the project.
The WISSARD team made scientific and engineering history in late January of 2013 when they used clean hot-water drilling technology to access subglacial Lake Whillans. This permitted the retrieval of pristine water and sediment samples that had been isolated from direct contact with the atmosphere for many thousands of years.
The interdisciplinary WISSARD research team included groups of experts in the following areas of science: life in icy environments, led by Priscu; glacial geology, led by Ross Powell, of Northern Illinois University; and glacial hydrology, led by Slawek Tulaczyk, of the University of California, Santa Cruz.
Definitive evidence of life in subglacial lakes
The realization that a vast aquatic system of rivers and lakes exists beneath the ice in Antarctica has spurred investigations to examine the effect on ice-sheet stability and the habitability of environments at the bed. The latest WISSARD announcement is the first to provide definitive evidence that a functional microbial ecosystem exists beneath the Antarctic ice sheet, confirming more than a decade of speculation about life in this environment.
Using various methods, including airborne radar surveys, scientists have built a knowledge base about Antarctica’s subglacial hydrological system over the past 40 years. The largest of the subglacial lakes, subglacial Lake Vostok in East Antarctica, is one of the largest lakes on our planet in terms of volume and depth and has been isolated beneath the ice sheet for more than 10 million years.
Samples of microbes from Lake Vostok have been collected indirectly by examining ice collected above the liquid part of the Lake- ice that refroze–accreted–on the bottom of the ice sheet.
These samples, which were described in 1999 by Priscu, the chief scientist of the WISSARD project, and David Karl of the University of Hawaii, presented the first evidence for life beneath the huge Antarctic ice sheet.
However, the drilling techniques used to retrieve the Vostok samples and the low amount of microbial biomass present in the samples had called into question previous studies that concluded the lake supports a living ecosystem.
The WISSARD team drilled into subglacial Lake Whillans using a clean hot-water drill and incorporated rigorous measures to avoid the introduction of foreign material into the lake.
The approach to drilling was guided by recommendations in the 2007 National Research Council-sponsored report, “Exploration of Antarctic Subglacial Aquatic Environments: Environmental and Scientific Stewardship,” aimed to protect these unique environments from contamination.
A team of engineers and technicians directed by Frank Rack of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, designed and fabricated the specialized hot-water drill that was fitted with a filtration and germicidal UV system to prevent contamination of the subglacial environment and to recover clean samples for microbial analyses. In addition, the numerous customized scientific samplers and instruments used for this project were also carefully cleaned before being lowered into the borehole through the ice and into the lake.
A major concern that drove the clean-drilling techniques and protocols is that it is still unclear how interconnected the subglacial aquatic system is. Researchers did not want to risk contaminating the entire system through their sampling of one body of water.
The newly published paper also raises a separate issue of the connectivity of Lake Whillans to the wider global ecosystem, noting that the lake is part of network of three major reservoirs beneath the Whillans Ice Stream that regulate the transportation of water to a subglacial estuary–an area where fresh and salt water mix–which links the subglacial aquatic system to the ocean beneath the Ross Ice Shelf.
“Given the prevalence of subglacial water in Antarctica,” the researchers write, “our data…lead us to contend that aquatic microbial systems are common features of the subsurface environment that exists beneath the … Antarctic ice sheet.”
-NSF-
Lewis P Buckingham says:
August 22, 2014 at 5:05 am
There is no sign of a benign environment for life to develop and spread to the hostile cold waterless places we actually see.
__________________________________
Europa. Liquid water (LOTS of it) + volcanism (energy) + organic molecules.
Mars ain’t the only place in the Solar System.
On the ISS plankton thread. [url=http://www.space.com/26888-sea-plankton-space-station-russian-claim.html]From Nasa:[/url
NASA spokesman Dan Huot: “As far as we’re concerned, we haven’t heard any official reports from our Roscosmos colleagues that they’ve found sea plankton. The Russians did take samples from one of the windows on the Russian segment, and what they’re actually looking for is residues that can build up on the visually sensitive elements, like windows, as well as just the hull of the ship itself that will build up whenever they do thruster firings for things like re-boosts. That’s what they were taking samples for. I don’t know where all the sea plankton talk is coming from.”
These microbes are eating up the Earth! We’re doomed.
Burgess Shale rocks !!!!
http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/unidentified-species-unearthed-at-marble-canyon-burgess-shale-site-1.1970364
I don’t get the statement that the lake is “dominated completely by microorganisms”. If I took a water and sediment sample from any lake in the world I would conclude the same thing. They haven’t looked for anything larger. Every place on Earth is dominated completely by microorganisms, even my kitchen sink. So when do they drop a camera to look for what else might be there?
I also don’t get the linkage to possible life on Titan. It isn’t as if life evolved in this lake ex nihilo. It was teeming with life before it froze over and life has adapted to the environment over the 10 million years.
Bacterial communities in these anoxic, dark and very saline waters are documented in several studies. Not surprisingly, the deep water under thick ice cover can be warm and this is almost certainly caused by diverse microbes with exothermic energy processes like methanogenesis. Sulphate reducing microbes will produce sulphides etc. The water will be very saline, high in H2S and compositionally very stratified with different microbial communities favouring water depths which reflect their optimal environment.
Note that lake Vostok is covered by several kilometres of ice for millions of years. The water is very deep and it is one of the world’s largest lakes. Clearly, the microbe communities in Vostok and many of the hundreds of ice covered lakes in Antarctica will be unusual and these will become a new frontier for scientific study.
Clay Marley says:
August 22, 2014 at 7:08 am
I also don’t get the linkage to possible life on Titan.
Well, the study shows that “viable microbial ecosystems” can exist in a “Titan-like” environment.
M Courtney,
Thanks for the NOAA link – very cool.
You evidently see that there is a huge difference between the geochemical reducing conditions that produce hot/warm/cold seeps, and the mechanical condition that grinds rock under a mass of ice. Most of the metals we mine are in oxidized format, and must be reduced to the elemental form with a great deal of energy input. But elemental metals, from rock, is a reasonable hypothetical candidate, I suppose. It’s a vast improvement on “they eat rocks.”
Be funny if they found the bug that wiped us all out down there
Khwarizmi says at August 22, 2014 at 7:48 am..
Glad to help.
I know it’s not a perfect fit but there aren’t any papers on these Antarctic bugs yet.
I was just trying to find something close. Metal ion oxidation seems probable.
It would be nice if it was abiotic oil but I guess we’ll have to keep hoping to see if that’s ever found.
Ric Werme says:
August 22, 2014 at 5:21 am
Maybe, but there’s one little catch. From the spacedaily article (much better than the Telegraphs’s), the plankton was found on the Russian side – there’s no plankton at Baikonur:
Well I did say there was a possibly more likely source.
nargun says:
August 22, 2014 at 7:50 am
Be funny if they found the bug that wiped us all out down there
_________________________________________________
I’m just worried we might wake up some Shoggoths.
Midichlorians?
Lewis P Buckingham says:
“Just because life is found in the cooling towers of nuclear reactors or an orbiting platform does not mean that it originated in such hostile environments.”
Just what is “hostile” in a cooling tower of a nuclear reactor? I should think a constantly warm
and wet (and incidentally non-radioactive) environment is about as un-hostile as any bacterium might want.
Of course there are also organisms living on the surface of the ice like algae and fungus. Kind of invalidates the utility of ice core samples as a record of historic atmospheric CO2 levels.
DesertYote:
At August 22, 2014 at 9:59 am you say
Yes, and “high” CO2 values are deleted from ice core data on the assumption that the “high” values are “contamination” by such organisms. Of course, one could also assume that such organisms scavenge CO2 with the result that all not-deleted CO2 values are too low. And one could assume …
In short, yes, you are right.
Richard
Probably means they’re tasty when curried, and very harvestable. How long before a GM version is created in the lab that can survive at room temperature so they can be converted to biofuel? Someone should check first though to see if these critters carry a strain of ebola or are a kind of intestinal parasite looking for a host.
ohhh…”NSF”…the National Science Foundation. Dang, I only clicked on this link because I thought it was “NSFW”… :O
rip
Sooo what I have ask. Now that man has been on the ice for decade’s now, what about the resulting contaminates, body waste for one example, reaching these lakes from the surface.
Any sign of the “missing heat” down that hole?
No biggie – you can find dumb, primitive life forms just about anywhere you look. I dare anyone to find any intelligent life in Columbus, Ohio.
Football (real football – not what they call football everywhere else on this infinitely fine-tuned planet, including Antarctica – but Murica) ready to start. More primitive life everywhere, on the field, in the stands, in various vegetative states before TV screens (seemingly trapped there for long periods, just like heat in the deep ocean) . Why does anyone need to go all the way to Antarctica? Hard to understand.
Re: Life outside the ISS. That’s awfully close to earth, with frequent chances for contamination from shuttles. What we need is to test those microbes on the moon. See how long they last out there.
Well it is certainly interesting for future exploration of some of the more ‘earth like’ Moons. Europa for example.
I do feel that we should send our probes to such places rather than the Planets. We know for sure that there is no life on Jupiter or Saturn (Mercury / Venus). There may be good information to be obtained from a Jupiter probe but none of it will concern life.
Finding some self replicating chemical on one of Jupiter’s moons would be as bigger discovery as we have ever made. It would prove beyond doubt that, given the right environment, ‘life’ could be present pretty much everywhere in our known universe.
Don’t get me wrong here. I’m not talking about little men with big black eyes here just a chemical chain that can replicate on some scale. It might be ‘pants’ life in that it will never develop HD TV but it would surely be a huge discovery all the same.
Methane rain, Methane rain…. (apologies to the individual formally known as Prince).
Funny that Titan is governed by methane but Earth is (allegedly) governed by (ppm) CO2 not (x%) H2O.
Lewis P Buckingham says:
August 22, 2014 at 5:05 am
While moons of Saturn and Jupiter might be more likely to harbor life than Mars now, that was not always true in the past. It appears that Mars once had a thicker atmosphere and an ocean and was warmer than now. If life developed there in its first billion years, it could still be hiding out beneath the surface.