Opinion by Dr. Tim Ball
History is the devil’s scripture. Lord Byron
The game of history is usually played by the best and the worst over the heads of the majority in the middle. Eric Hoffer
History is past politics; and politics present history. John Seeley
The historian looks backward. In the end he also believes backward.” Friedrich Nietzsche
Someone to Blame
The Great Irish Potato famine began in 1845 and had severe social impact for some six years. Historians tell the story in many ways, but most assign blame to a few humans, particularly for failure to deal with the great loss of life and hardships of mass migration. There was a proportionally worse famine in 1741, but that is virtually unknown. Did the 1845 event get more attention because it provided a point of attack for the social atmosphere of the time? Some attributed overall weather conditions and harvest failures for the social unrest that gave rise to Marxism: 1848 is known as the “Year of Revolutions”.
The years 1848 and 2011 both followed poor harvests, a spike in food prices and an industrial recession. What we remember as the Irish Potato Famine was in fact a blight that struck the whole of Western Europe between 1845 and 1846. This was compounded by a devastatingly bad harvest in the latter year. It was impossible to meet the demand of a vastly increased population.
The same environment engendered the ideas of Malthus (Six Essays on population published between 1798 and 1826) and Darwin (Origin of Species published 1859). The quote indicates that parallels are already being made between then (1848) and now (2011). David Archibald posed a similar question in his article, “Two years to a 1740-type event? Will those using global warming for a political agenda switch to the threat of famine due to drought? Will the blame shift from, the rich and powerful causing the event, to their failure to deal with the crisis?
History shows that leadership reaction to crisis is always inadequate. Any chance of a better reaction is in a better understanding of the cause of the crisis – in this case, weather mechanisms. Government’ preparing for warming when cooling is the trend, has already reduced the chances of proper reaction. There is good news; technology has vastly improved our ability to recover after the events.
What caused the failure of the potato crop in 1845? What were the weather conditions for both events? What weather and climate lessons are in the two events? Archibald references Briffa and Jones (2006) conclusion that “climate might vary more than is commonly accepted.” An interesting conclusion, considering they were very involved at the time in the “hockey stick” claim of very low variability for some 600 years.
Food Supply
Hunger is one word that can summarize human history. People were almost always hungry or starving. It is still true for too much of the world, but completely unnecessary. Malthus misdirected the focus with his claim that population growth would exceed increases in food production. The Club of Rome and its offspring, Agenda 21, perpetuate and expand the misdirection by claiming overpopulation is overusing, abusing and causing shortage of all resources.
The world is not overpopulated. There is no shortage of food. It’s estimated we produce enough every year to feed 26 billion people. However, thanks to Malthus and neo-Malthusians, we ignore the real problems that are adequate storage and effective distribution.
Storage
Once we switched from hunter/gatherer to sedentary agriculture, the ability to store food over the non-growing season became a force for invention and innovation. Just one example was the entire spice industry, primarily used to preserve and make food palatable. It drove commerce for buyer and seller across the world. As one person wrote,
In its day, the spice trade was the world’s biggest industry: it established and destroyed empires, led to the discovery of new continents, and in many ways helped lay the foundation for the modern world.
Estimates vary, but about 60-70 percent of the food grown in developing nations never makes it to the table. The figure is 30-40 percent for the developed world. Most of the difference is due to refrigeration. Maybe a measure of how little knowledge or importance is applied to these facts, is that few know the name Clarence Birdseye II. Refrigeration also helped the distribution problems, especially when it combined with containerization.
Modern container shipping celebrated its 50th anniversary in 2006. Almost from the first voyage, use of this method of transport for goods grew steadily and in just five decades, containerships would carry about 60% of the value of goods shipped via sea.
Some crops were adopted and adapted for their relative ease of production and storage. These characteristics were well known about the potato in South America and gave its appearance in Europe such an impact. It is likely that the cool damp conditions of the Little Ice Age (LIA) pushed grain prices up, providing an opportunity for rapid adoption of the potato. Libby’s study of grain prices for four European countries illustrates the jump.
Figure 1.
Source: H.H Lamb, Climate, Past, Present and future, Vol.2. 1977.
The peasants could achieve a great yield in poor soil and store them for the entire winter. Ireland adopted and became more dependent on the potato than most other countries. It likely caused the surge in population as the census figures show.
1821: 6,801,827
1831: 7,767,401
1841: 8,175,124
The population declined to 6.6 million by 1851. The pattern of population for the Republic is shown in Figure 2.
There were famines again in 1877-78, 1885 and 1889-90 that are reflected in the increased decline of population in Figure 2.
The famine of 1740-41 is described on the cover of the book Arctic Ireland as,
“…more intense, more bizarre and proportionately more deadly, yet most history books acknowledge it with no more than a line or two in passing.”
The book is subtitled, “The extraordinary story of the GREAT FROST and FORGOTTEN FAMINE of 1740-41”, which underscores the different weather conditions of the 1740 and 1845 famines. In 1845, the weather did not directly kill people; rather, the cool damp conditions were favorable for the potato blight. Overdependence on a single crop made the people vulnerable. Other countries, like Norway, also suffered the potato blight, but were not as dependent. The Irish Potato famine was coincident with poor crop conditions throughout Europe. The 1840s are called the “the Hungry Forties” as cool wet summers combined with moderate wet winters. The combination causes harvest failures and malnourished people who are vulnerable to diseases that survive and even flourish through the winter. These conditions are similar to those predominant in the 14th century that Barbara Tuchman documented so well in her book a Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century.
In 1740 the world was just emerging from the nadir of the Little Ice Age in the 1680s. As the author David Dickson notes,
On the eve of the crisis there had perhaps been some complacency as to the power of exceptional whether to upset normal life. Winters had been relatively benign over the previous thirty years. No one, not even those with distant memories of the terrible winters of the 1680s, was prepared for what became known as the Great Frost of 1740 or for “bliain an dir” the year of slaughter of 1741.
The 1740 weather illustrates what happens when events combine. We organized the conference on the impact of the Indonesian volcano Tambora[1] because John Eddy’s work on temperature sunspot relations and Hubert Lamb’s work on the Dust Veil Index were raising questions about cause and effect. Temperatures were already declining from the solar activity associated with the Dalton Minimum (1790-1830) when Tambora erupted.
It appears the cold trend of the Little Ice Age was turning. Volcanic activity, particular the eruption of Ichinsky in Kamchatka, triggered the Great Frost of 1741. Dickson claims,
Indeed, the time of the Great Frost remains to this day the longest period of extreme cold in modern European history.
This claim appears to depend on the definition of “modern European history”. The Central England Temperature (Figure 3) shows the cold of 1740 and a prolonged cold spell that exceeds anything after 1900. In the commentary to the Archibald article there is reference to blocking, the pattern that causes the normal west to east movement of the Rossby Waves to slow down and the Waves to deepen. This results in extreme, prolonged temperature or precipitation patterns that cause problems and is most likely the explanation as other similar events indicate.
Cynthia Wilson and I organized a workshop for the 1816 conference. We created very large global maps and asked people to indicate the temperature and precipitation patterns for their region. Using simple symbols for very high normal and very low, a distinctive map emerged that showed the extreme meridionality of the Circumpolar Vortex. (The maps are included in the published proceedings.) The pattern of wind was significantly different in direction and force. Similar changes in wind were noted in 1740. In Scotland the January wind was described as a piercing Nova Zembla (Novaya Zemlya) air” This means it was coming form the northeast, probably as part of the Polar Easterlies (Figure 4).
Figure 3
The pattern of deaths was different in 1741 than 1845. Most early deaths were due to the extreme cold, followed by a growing number due to starvation. Records are scarce but Dickson says,
How does 1740-41 measure up again later, more famous, Great Irish Famine? In terms of relative casualties, the older crisis was undoubtedly the more severe, even taking the lower bound estimate of 310,000 fatalities in 1740-41.
More important, these deaths occurred in a relatively short year and a half, while 1845 lasted some six years.
Discussion
Both time 1741 and 1845 experienced meridional conditions as the Rossby Waves deepened and slowed in their easterly migration. Generally, with zonal flow or even low amplitude meridional flow, mid-latitude weather patterns persist
Figure 4
approximately 4 to 6 weeks. As meridionality intensifies, Rossby Waves deepen and blocking occurs, causing weather patterns to persist for 8, 10 or even 12 weeks. This can cover entire growing seasons and result in excessive, damaging, hot, cold, wet or dry conditions.
Various permutations can occur. For example, in the 14th century there were long periods with cool and wet summers, with warm and wet winters – it was difficult to separate the seasons. Similar conditions occurred during the 17th century and again plagues devastated populations. During the period following Tambora, extreme meridionality caused prolonged conditions. A drought in central Canada, documented in detail by Peter Fidler, stressed the people with profound social and historical impact detailed in my 1992 paper, “Climatic Change, Droughts and Their Social Impact: Central Canada, 1811-20, a classic example”. It was also the theme of a public presentation at the Museum titled, “The Year without a Summer: Its Impact on the Fur Trade and History of Western Canada.” at the National Museum of Natural Sciences, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa. As usual, historians attributed the social impacts solely to colonial expansion.
It is the same pattern seen in reports of the 2011 uprising in Egypt that became “the Arab Spring”. The catalyst was dramatic increases in food prices. At best, these got secondary mention by a few reports.
Then, there is a secondary problem: a huge run-up in food costs in recent months. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the worldwide food price index is at an all-time high—surpassing its 2008 peak, when skyrocketing costs caused global rioting and pushed as many as 64 million people into poverty. The price of oils, sugar, and cereals have all recently hit new peaks—and those latter prices are especially troubling for Egypt, as the world’s biggest importer of wheat.
So the media, like historians, are telling stories, with bias, misinformation and the arrogant belief that humans are not environmentally or climatically determined. As Benjamin Bradlee said, ”News is the first rough draft of history.” Regardless, they are both driven by the need to blame someone, rather than something. Until we change that the chances of understanding and reacting properly to natural events is very unlikely.
[1] C.R.Harington (ed) The Year Without a Summer? World Climate in 1816. 1992, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa.
I see we have trolling behaviour from Skeptical_about_spuds.
As my ancestors include Irish from the Famine (great grand dad and mom) and English (mom) I think I can speak to this fairly.
Do not forget that there were many Irish “indentured Servants”. Nearly slaves. Do not forget New York with signs “No Irish Need Apply” for jobs. I am a product of that run from famine. It was caused in large part by English laws and greed. Those same Irish made a great deal of wealth and success in America, despite arriving in abject poverty and often as near slaves.
Vangel Vesovski says:
August 22, 2014 at 9:38 am
=============================================
I would agree with that sentiment.
@ur momisugly richard…I believe that the current government structure along with the mega corporations has become a factor in reducing the average person,s ability to release that little niche of creativity which may dwell in any person, and thus lead to the innovation necessary for the improvement of mankind as a whole. A nation needs strong corporations to maintain an even keel against the ebb and flow of shifts in business dynamics. That benefits all, but when government regulations and privilege marry in with these institutions, then this is a disadvantage for the individual and for the nation as a result. A good example is the current position of too big to fail. That is not a healthy policy.
I remember reading where some of the English masters disagreed with the policy of not aiding the Irish people at that time , but they were in the minority.
goldminor:
I am replying to your posts at August 22, 2014 at 4:14 pm and August 22, 2014 at 4:17 pm.
Taking the latter first, please be skeptical of historical accounts because they tend to be written by vested interests. The background reality to the Irish potato famine was that the UK was then governed according to laissez faire economic theory (what Americans would call ‘free market’ or ‘capitalist’ philosophy). Thus, ‘absentee landlords’ could do – and did do – whatever they wanted to do to maximise their personal profits. Hence, despite the growing movement for what today is ‘community care’ there was then no method for helping the famine sufferers except charity from Churches.
And that brings us to your former post which is addressed to me. All political systems have pros and cons.
We agree that as you say
That problem of concentrated power needs to be resolved. I suspect my British culture induces me to favour an evolutionary change while your American culture may induce you to prefer some kind of legal (written Constitution?) amendment.
But a variety of political systems provides the benefits and problems of all. Imposition of any one political system limits the available advantages while limiting the possible problems. Some problems – e.g. totalitarianism – need to be prevented in any system. I think it is good to maximise beneficial possibilities while preventing unacceptable possibilities.
And that opens an entire new subject for debate which is not the topic of this thread and would contravene the WUWT Rules. But I hope I have implied points of agreement and disagreement of you and I.
Richard
richardscourtney says: August 22, 2014 at 1:55 pm
Also, I point out that it is a complete rebuttal to the ridiculous nonsense from ralfellis at August 22, 2014 at 10:54 am.
______________________________
Do you deny that the Irish petri-dish population halved? Do you deny the facts?
Contrary to your ‘fingers-in-the-ear’ approach to history, I know a great deal about the famine. Indeed, my gr-gr-etc-grandmother was forced to leave Ireland because of that very Famine, and settled in Whitehaven of all places. She was forced to find another petri-dish, with more nutrients.
Malthus rules all organisms, be they plant, bacteria or humans. And I presume your rejection of this truism is based upon an illogical belief is some Flying Teapot or Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Ralph
ralfellis:
At August 23, 2014 at 9:12 am you ask me
Of course I “deny that the Irish petri-dish population halved” because I accept the facts.
Human ingenuity enabled the Irish to move to other ‘petri-dishes’. The Irish diaspora resulted in much larger Irish population: there are seven times as many people who claim to be Irish Americans than live in Ireland.
Ralph, abandon your irrational faith in disproved Malthusianism and try to think for your self.
Richard
“The English conquered Ireland, several times, and took ownership of vast agricultural territory. Large chunks of land were given to Englishmen.”
“John Lahey alleges that the Irish potato famine was caused by “British laissez-faire policies” (Letters, April 8). Not so. This calamity was caused by British prohibitions on land-ownership by the Catholic Irish, burdensome taxation, and public-works projects that built roads that were useless for carrying goods and foodstuffs from places where they were abundant to places where they were in short supply.
The great 19th-century French economist, Jean-Baptiste Say, writing in the early 1800s, harshly criticized these British interventions: “What is lacking in Ireland is not subsistence but the ability to pay for it. With landowners far away [in Britain], without capitalists who might introduce productive businesses, and with numerous government employees, ecclesiastics, and military personal to feed, heavy taxes to pay, and the ignorance resulting from so many evils, the Irish simply lack the means of improving their condition.”*
Doesn’t sound like laissez faire to me.
Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
Zeke:
re your post at August 23, 2014 at 9:49 am.
“What is lacking in Ireland is not subsistence but the ability to pay for it. With landowners far away [in Britain], without capitalists who might introduce productive businesses, and with numerous government employees, ecclesiastics, and military personal to feed, heavy taxes to pay, and the ignorance resulting from so many evils, the Irish simply lack the means of improving their condition.”*
Sounds exactly like laissez faire to me.
Please tell me why and in what way you don’t think it is.
My request is genuine and sincere
Richard
Here rsc,
How did the English gain the property in Ireland?
“The English conquered Ireland, several times, and took ownership of vast agricultural territory. Large chunks of land were given to Englishmen.”
Is forbidding land-ownership, price fixing, Corn Laws, and “make-work” public works projects supported by high taxation representative of “free market” policy?
“John Lahey alleges that the Irish potato famine was caused by “British laissez-faire policies” (Letters, April 8). Not so. This calamity was caused by British prohibitions on land-ownership by the Catholic Irish, burdensome taxation, and public-works projects that built roads that were useless for carrying goods…”
Folks, you can see that once the mandates, subsidies, and banning of effective inexpensive products has taken place, then the destructive results will be blamed on the free market, just as you see here in this Irish example. But it is never capitalism when a purchase is not voluntary. And it is not free market when people are forbidden to own property, or the use of their property is made void by environmental legislation, and it is certainly not free market when governments and NGOs tell businesses what to sell behind closed doors. There is another name for that. We hear this term, “environmental capitalism” and it simply refers to forced purchases, etc..
@Zeke – you are right on the money (August 23, 2014 at 10:42 am ).
It is not laissez faire, as that means NO Government intervention. Not perceived good, nor perceived bad intervention. if it is laissez faire, the government does not act. Yet the facts say they did. They can call it anything they want, and blame it on anything they want, but not laissez faire.
philjourdan
August 26, 2014 at 5:39 am “It is not laissez faire, as that means NO Government intervention.”
Without having an extensive understanding of the historical, contextual meanings of “laissez faire” English economic policies, and the many ways this term could be used, I can at least say that British policy at the time came under the criticism of Jean-Baptiste Say, who was an adherent of Adam Smith’s writings.
Protectionism, subsidies, and all other types of government intervention was also sharply criticized by Frederic Bastiat, the brilliant French writer and economist who brought the ideas of Adam Smith out of theory, and spoke of them in concrete terms in pamphlets which every one could understand. These would have been contemporaries of these policies, and they pointed out the dangers of them.
And so with Say and Bastiat as my authorities, I am confident that the term “laissez faire” as is being used here is not free market, and that these top-down market distortions by English and French governments were recognized by Bastiat and Say for the destructive actions they were.
ref: The Law, by Frederic Bastiat
http://zekeunlimited.wordpress.com/the-law-by-f-bestiat-1848/
Warning: “Cannot unsee” (:
Zeke:
True thanks for your reply to me at August 23, 2014 at 10:42 am.
Sorry, but all you have said strengthens my understanding that it was “British laissez-faire policies” at the time of the potato famine.
How the British had obtained the land of Ireland is not relevant to the fact that they did own it when the famine happened. Similarly, that native Americans once owned California and New York is not relevant to the system of economics now operated in those places.
Also, “British prohibitions on land-ownership by the Catholic Irish, burdensome taxation, and public-works projects that built roads that were useless for carrying goods” are strange assertions which do not refute the operation of laissez-faire policies at the time.
The “prohibitions” on land ownership were of no consequence because the existing land owners had no willingness to sell their land and the Irish had insufficient funds to buy it.
Taxation is always “burdensome” but fell almost entirely on the land owners because other people were too poor for them to be able to pay much.
The public works were minimal and the assertions about roads are very odd. If the roads were not adequate then intervention to provide an adequate road system would have helped – not hindered – the situation. But the the existing roads clearly were adequate for carrying goods because the land owners would have built additional roads if the existing roads were not adequate for conveying their goods including the agricultural production from their lands.
The assertions that the British official economic policy of laissez-faire was not being operated in Ireland do not concur with reality.
Richard
Re: The Great Irish Potato famine 1845 to 1850 — it is very important to highlight certain critical truths of this horrific event, both for the sake of a truthful understanding of history, and also for the implications for the present and future. I would like to point to the work of Professor Francis Boyle (Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois) on the Great Irish Potato famine as a case of “genocide” by the legal definition of that term defined by the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, an official treaty to which the United States is a signer. Professor Boyle has very serious credentials, and practiced law internationally on high levels (his C.V. is accessible here). He has shown that the British government committed willful actions which fit the strict definition of genocide outlined in the 1948 Genocide Treaty. He presents the evidence for this in a 2012 book “United Ireland, Human Rights and International Law,” and a short 2010 article, “Francis A. Boyle: The Irish Famine was Genocide” (and an interview on the subject here).
I think this is very important to the subject of the post, because this is an expression of a longer standing policy of the British Empire, including the British and Dutch royal families, up to this very moment. Most importantly, this has been their motivation in their creation of the environmentalist movement and the more recent AGW / “climate change” fraud.
In the past the British empire conducted a similar famine genocide policy in India, to unimaginable horrors (see, “Then and Now: British Imperial Policy Means Famine“). Their policies in Africa have been the same. These intentions and consequences continued after World War II, only under different names, and different policies. Sir Julian Huxley (in the 1946 founding document of UNESCO) wrote, regarding “the important science of Eugenics”, they must make the “unthinkable once again become thinkable” (referring to the public recognition of the horrors of Hitler’s eugenics program).
The point is this is the policy and intention behind the creation of the environmentalist movement, and the climate change fraud within that. It was the same Julian Huxley, along with Britain’s Prince Philip, the Netherlands’ Prince Bernhard, and their associates who created the “conservation” (aka “environmentalism”) movement from the top-down, starting in the 1950s and 1960s. The facts are all on the record.
The great invention of refrigeration was highlighted. When the hole in the ozone hoax was launched, one of the major points of attack was on refrigerants, ensuring exactly what was cited in the post, “about 60-70 percent of the food grown in developing nations never makes it to the table.” The consequences of this was know and covered in the early 1990’s,
“CFC ban will kill millions by starvation“.
rsc, we will let the many incredible people here decide on the merits characterizing the actions of the British Empire as free market. They are all big boys and girls.
As I said, I prefer to look at how Western Civilization has overcome the conditions which lead to the destruction of potato crops by late blight. This pathogen is extremely fast spreading and one infected plant can spread disease up to hundreds of miles away. The farmers who use pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides are now under siege by European Empire top-down economic dictats. I am just trying to point out something that may be useful to Europeans to know. Fungicides keep food from being wasted both while it is being grown and after it is harvested, shipped, and stored. Fungicides increase yield and reduce land needed for growing. And fungicides are what allow European countries to be exporters of crops which are profitable for them to grow. Take away fungicide and say hello to dearth.
Zeke:
I again owe you thanks, this time for the info. about fungicides in your post at August 23, 2014 at 1:40 pm. As I suspect you know, I have absolutely no knowledge of such matters.
I am not aware of EU plans to constrain use of fungicides but such plans would not surprise me: the recent vacuum cleaner decision shows how the unelected commissioners are out of control, and their tightening of the LCPD so as to close UK power stations demonstrates lunacy.
I stand by my view that the operative political system at the time of the Irish potato famine was not contributory to the famine but certainly was contributory to failure to alleviate the suffering caused by the famine. Of course, I completely reject the idiotic idea (introduced by Benjamin.Deniston) that the famine was a genocidal plot.
Richard
richardscourtney says:
August 23, 2014 at 12:16 am
But I hope I have implied points of agreement and disagreement of you and I.
===============================================================
Yes you have, and thank you. I certainly appreciate your well thought explanations on all matters.
I know rsc We should try to be a little more circumspect on the subject British history and the language we use, does every one hear that? (; . I think GB went to the dark side in its Empire days in many ways, but there is also good in the Commonwealth countries which share the English language, law, and traditions.
https://www.google.com/search?q=commonwealth+countries&client=firefox-a&hs=LcK&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=sb&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=2gb5U8zTCeq5iwKJu4G4Dw&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=911&bih=438
If the UK were to leave the EU, it seems one of the benefits would be open trade deals with these countries and the entire world, rather than just trading with Europe. Those countries would like to sell their food the the UK as well. Good for all. Fungicides and herbicides can help farmers in these countries clear the land without using women with hoes, and can make it possible for a farmer to even expand to more than one hectare.