But the paper ignores land use and land cover change
From NOAA Headquarters and the “its the evil gases wot dun it and nothing else” department, comes more modeling madness via another poorly written press release by Monica Allen monica.allen@noaa.gov that doesn’t mention the name and/or DOI of the paper, making me hunt for it, but worries about useless details like telling me the image below is “embargoed until 1 p.m. ET, July 13, 2014 “. – as it that matters when the press release today included it anyway. To add insult to the injury, this paper funded by the taxpayers of the United States is paywalled.
New NOAA climate model zeroes in on regional climate trends
NOAA scientists have developed a new high-resolution climate model that shows southwestern Australia’s long-term decline in fall and winter rainfall is caused by increases in manmade greenhouse gas emissions and ozone depletion, according to research published today in Nature Geoscience.

“This new high-resolution climate model is able to simulate regional-scale precipitation with considerably improved accuracy compared to previous generation models,” said Tom Delworth, a research scientist at NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory in Princeton, N.J., who helped develop the new model and is co-author of the paper. “This model is a major step forward in our effort to improve the prediction of regional climate change, particularly involving water resources.”
NOAA researchers conducted several climate simulations using this global climate model to study long-term changes in rainfall in various regions across the globe. One of the most striking signals of change emerged over Australia, where a long-term decline in fall and winter rainfall has been observed over parts of southern Australia. Simulating natural and manmade climate drivers, scientists showed that the decline in rainfall is primarily a response to manmade increases in greenhouse gases as well as a thinning of the ozone caused by manmade aerosol emissions. Several natural causes were tested with the model, including volcano eruptions and changes in the sun’s radiation. But none of these natural climate drivers reproduced the long-term observed drying, indicating this trend is due to human activity.
Southern Australia’s decline in rainfall began around 1970 and has increased over the last four decades. The model projects a continued decline in winter rainfall throughout the rest of the 21st century, with significant implications for regional water resources. The drying is most severe over southwest Australia where the model forecasts a 40 percent decline in average rainfall by the late 21st century.
“Predicting potential future changes in water resources, including drought, are an immense societal challenge,” said Delworth. “This new climate model will help us more accurately and quickly provide resource planners with environmental intelligence at the regional level. The study of Australian drought helps to validate this new model, and thus builds confidence in this model for ongoing studies of North American drought.”
###
================================================================
Here is the paper I chased down:
Regional rainfall decline in Australia attributed to anthropogenic greenhouse gases and ozone levels
Thomas L. Delworth & Fanrong Zeng Nature Geoscience (2014) doi:10.1038/ngeo2201
Precipitation in austral autumn and winter has declined over parts of southern and especially southwestern Australia in the past few decades1, 2, 3, 4. According to observations and climate models, at least part of this decline is associated with changes in large-scale atmospheric circulation1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, including a poleward movement of the westerly winds and increasing atmospheric surface pressure over parts of southern Australia. Here we use a high-resolution global climate model to analyse the causes of this rainfall decline. In our simulations, many aspects of the observed regional rainfall decline over southern and southwest Australia are reproduced in response to anthropogenic changes in levels of greenhouse gases and ozone in the atmosphere, whereas anthropogenic aerosols do not contribute to the simulated precipitation decline. Simulations of future climate with this model suggest amplified winter drying over most parts of southern Australia in the coming decades in response to a high-end scenario of changes in radiative forcing. The drying is most pronounced over southwest Australia, with total reductions in austral autumn and winter precipitation of approximately 40% by the late twenty-first century.
Paywalled here at the expense of the public: http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo2201.html
This paywalling of publicly funded science, combined with the recent developments surrounding the failure of peer review, which seems to be little more than pal review in some cases, is why we need a sea-change in science review and publication.
Now while I can’t properly criticize what I can’t read, it seems to me that land use and land cover change might play a big role, if not bigger than GHG’s. But land use and land cover change isn’t mentioned in the abstract and press release, and so it seems to me that the paper is myopic in scope.
This paper (which isn’t paywalled) was discussed at Jo Nova’s forum last year:
The effect of land clearing on rainfall and fresh water resources in Western
Australia: A multi-functional sustainability analysis
Mark A. Andrich & Jörg Imberger DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2013.850752
Abstract (excerpt)
It is widely recognized that southwest Western Australia has experienced approximately a
30% decline in rainfall, in areas inland from the coastal margin, over the last forty years or
more. It is generally thought that this decline was due to changes induced by global warming, but recently evidence has emerged suggesting that a substantial part of the decline may be attributed to changes in land use. These changes involved extensive logging close to the coast and the clearing of native vegetation for wheat planting on the higher ground. We present a methodology that compares coastal and inland rainfall to show that 50 – 80% of the observed decline in rainfall is the result of land clearing.
Read it here: Andrich_and_Imberger_(2012a)
The following paper was delivered by Jennifer Marohasy at the Ninth International Conference on Climate Change in Las Vegas on Wednesday 9th July 2013 in Panel 13.
http://jennifermarohasy.com/2014/07/the-need-for-a-new-paradigm-including-for-rainfall-forecasting/
I wonder, did they include the figures from the Ibuku satellite?
Following Willis’ article on the Ibuku, I sent an email to the Australian Minister for the Environment. Still waiting for any form of response.
Australian Bureau of Meteorology rainfall trends from 1900 to present show most of Oz in positive territory.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/index.shtml#tabs=Tracker&tracker=trend-maps&tQ%5Bmap%5D=rain&tQ%5Barea%5D=aus&tQ%5Bseason%5D=0112&tQ%5Bperiod%5D=1900
Here’s a study highlighted on JoNova which suggests the decline is down to massive land use changes. http://joannenova.com.au/2013/12/land-clearing-responsible-for-most-of-rainfall-decline-in-south-west-western-australia/
At various times Australia has had insane land use policies. For example, when Australia hit on the idea of handing out farms to war veterans, as a reward for their service. The new farmers were encouraged to completely clear their land. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soldier_settlement_(Australia)
This mornings couriermail newspaper reports that farmers are giving up planting wheat, too dry. Our summer rains did not arrive 2013-2014.
We have had to remove all our cattle, and leave our property to itself, the creek is dry, it ran once this last summer and only for about 2 weeks, so even the kangaroos don’t have running water. We have left water troughs filling from our 25000 Gallon, household and vege garden tank water supply for the birds and kanga’s, and we have witnessed them using for bathing and drinking, but and until we get rain, even our tank water will not last forever, then we will have to buy water at $200.00+ for 5000 Gallons.
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/farmers-abandon-planting-as-drought-turns-wheat-fields-to-dust/story-fnihsrf2-1226987526832
Holy Globull Warming Batman! It is DEEPLY paywalled! I can usually find a preprint somewhere, even for these two guys, but not for this particular paper. However, it is interesting that in their other papers, both men see anthropogenic substances forcing large scale intrinsic oceanic-atmospheric systems to shift in such a way to bring AGW affects to bare on climate regions, either directly or indirectly in fuzzy amplified ways and by using pingpong fudge factors in new and improved super duper better than buttered bread futuristic supercalifragilistic-expialidocious regional scale climate models. Goodness gracious!
If I can’t read it, I get to pan it.
[The mods call first dibs on Pam’s pan of the hot buttered bread and amplified fudge factors! (Everybody else gets the fuzzy factors and the bare pingpong scaled models.) 8<) .mod]
Abject nonsense. Carbon dioxide has nothing to do with rainfall over Australia. It has nothing to do with rainfall anywhere else either because it is not the cause of global warming. Have these guys not heard that there has been no warming at all for the last 17 years while carbon dioxide at the same time kept increasing? The Arrhenius greenhouse theory predicts that the latter will cause warming but unfortunately nothing is happening. If your theory predicts warming and nothing happens for 17 years you know it is worthless and needs to be cast into the waste basket of history. There is a place for it there, right next to phlogiston of yore. The only theory that can accurately forecast the global temperature pause is MGT (Miskolczi greenhouse theory). It predicts exactly what we see: rising carbon dioxide does not cause greenhouse warming. Trying to prove that it does leads to the absurdity that we see in CMIP5 climate forecasts for the 21st century. The real temperature has been an unchanging horizontal straight line while all the CMIP5 threads, each from a supercomputer, turn up and predict warming. It is easy enough see where this stupidity comes from: built into their model code is the assumption that raising carbon dioxide level means rising global temperature. This has been untrue for the last 17 years but these modelers don’t seem to understand that nature, not their million line code, determines what happens in the world. We are dealing here with the laws of nature that cannot be changed at will. If rising carbon dioxide did not cause any warming for 17 years it never has caused any warming at all. Any claims that there was greenhouse warming before this hiatus/pause started are simply misinterpretations of natural warming that over-eager climate scientists indulged in to prove that their beloved greenhouse warming exists.
Admad says:July 13, 2014 at 3:01 pm
GIGO. Well it’s a model, so I suppose that’s all right then.
Speaking of models,I can’t remember who, but someone wrote; ‘a pretty face is forgiven anything’.
Good thing I’m a desert creature, adapted for long pauses and hiatus of rainfall. Sucks to be a mountain gorilla or a monkey, rather than hairless ape.
OZ dry! surely not!
I have been told XXXX has left our northern shores, but OZ?
It all depends. Right now we are probably facing less rainfall, but only because the amount of snow is increasing. It seems to be only a temporary Gore Effect, but it is quite marked. We’ve had snow in Eungella this weekend, and that is tropical rainforest.
Long-range weather forecaster Piers Corbyn explains that in order to predict world temperature we need to better understand solar activity, magnetic connections and lunar modulation of the same.
Interestingly, towards the end of this presentation Mr Corbyn, who has a first-class honours degree in physics from Imperial College, London, states that it was as hot in the 1930s and 1940s as it is now. Indeed, this is also what the unadjusted raw temperature data for many places in Australia shows.
http://jennifermarohasy.com/2014/05/lunar-modulation-of-weather-and-climate-piers-corbyn/
Computer models? Another paper with a pre-determined conclusion by the “researchers.” Pfft!
It’s déjà vu all over again. (Sorry Yogi.)
I wonder if their model also show that CO2 is the cause for no trend in precipitation across the ditch in NZ?
The decline in rainfall in South West Australia has more to do with the concentration in Perth of PBMCHO’s over the years than anything else.
That one factor alone gave rise to a proliferation of UTI’s whom have had a detrimental effect on the RDofEBC around the world and directly contributed to the rise of WWF.
Glossary:
PBMCHO : `Perth Based Mining COmpany Head Office;
UTI: University Trained Idiots;
RDofEBC: Rapid Deployment of Empty Brain Cells; and
WWF: Wild and Wooly Farts.
This opinion is peer reviewed by myself and I and we are currently seeking funding from a bloke that can write hot and racy novels while driving a train up a tunnel.
“in response to a high-end scenario of changes in radiative forcing”
Well, that will not happen and even if Obama forces all employees and contractors of NOAA to abstain from hard liqueur and illegal narcotics for at least 36 hours relative to the start of work-schift-schedule … it just will not happen.
Also very cold in most places in Aus. 10.30 AM in Sth Aust; 7.7 degrees C. AGW yeah, right.
Can’t hindcast, can’t forecast, but their GCM is good for a small region?
Give me strength.
Double irony. Bozos from the same US agencies published three papers since 2010 claiming that the perceived recent slowdown in SLR was due to Extraordinarily heavy Australian rainfall that had not yet had time to drain back to the sea. Hard to have it both ways at the same time. Except in climate science that seems to be the norm.
I think that the startling biodiversity of SW Australia gives a clue to long term rainfall and nutrientdeficiency. From Jo’s site
. The wildflowers are simply stunning when in flower.
This biodiversity is attractive to us but it indicates a long term struggle to adapt to minimal nutrition and rainfall.
Charles Darwin had this to say on the biota in February 1836 visiting Albany returning to England on the Beagle.
I think he just wanted to go home……..
“But the paper ignores land use and land cover change”
And ” what we don’t know” ? is it impossible thet we don’t just unknow?
Do these guys even bother to check the rainfall data ?
100 years of BoM rainfall data shows NO CHANGE :
Southern Australia :
http://www.bom.gov.au/tmp/cc/rain.saus.0112.31780.png
South Eastern Australia :
http://www.bom.gov.au/tmp/cc/rain.seaus.0112.26572.png
Murray Darling Basin :
http://www.bom.gov.au/tmp/cc/rain.mdb.0112.13853.png
Infact, in some of those areas, the data clearly shows a slight increase ??!!
The only area that shows a decline at all is South Western Australia :
http://www.bom.gov.au/tmp/cc/rain.swaus.0112.30961.png
This is nothing more than deliberate and pre-meditated fraud.
Sorry for my mistake:
And ” what we don’t know” ? is it impossible that we just don’t know?
Well well well – they must not have bothered to check the rainfall we have had since 2009. The dams in my state Victoria that Flannery said would never fill again when they were 20percent full are now 80% and rising and the desalination plant is the biggest white elephant legacy we could ever have hoped for. We had massive floods in 2010/11, and having moved back into the dividing range this year, we have had the coldest, wettest start to winter that I can remember. The snow we were never going to get are now at their best in the ski fields for many years. I dont know where these people get it from? probably some orifice or other.
Melbourne Resident