Links to documents follow.
Not so much fanfare now, since leaks pretty much revealed earlier that it’s alarmism on steroids. The always dependably worrisome Seth Borenstein, AP’s science reporter, sums up the alarmism quite well with this tweet:
IPCC report: Warming harms dialed up to new level as world in for wild climate ride, 'we're sitting ducks'; http://t.co/KRIgBFqRGT
— @borenbears (@borenbears) March 31, 2014
I note Dr. Richard Tol’s name is not on it, as he said it was too alarmist.
The Working Group II contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report considers the vulnerability and exposure of human and natural systems, the observed impacts and future risks of climate change, and the potential for and limits to adaptation. The chapters of the report assess risks and opportunities for societies, economies, and ecosystems around the world.
=============================================================
Headline Statements from the Summary for Policymakers *
Observed Changes in the Climate System
Each of the last three decades has been successively warmer at the Earth’s surface than any preceding decade since 1850. In the Northern Hemisphere, 1983–2012 was likely the warmest 30-year period of the last 1400 years (medium confidence).
Ocean warming dominates the increase in energy stored in the climate system, accounting for more than 90% of the energy accumulated between 1971 and 2010 (high confidence). It is virtually certain that the upper ocean (0–700 m) warmed from 1971 to 2010, and it likely warmed between the 1870s and 1971.
Over the last two decades, the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have been losing mass, glaciers have continued to shrink almost worldwide, and Arctic sea ice and Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover have continued to decrease in extent (high confidence).
The rate of sea level rise since the mid-19th century has been larger than the mean rate during the previous two millennia
(high confidence). Over the period 1901 to 2010, global mean sea level rose by 0.19 [0.17 to 0.21] m.
The atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years. Carbon dioxide concentrations have increased by 40% since pre-industrial times, primarily from fossil fuel emissions and secondarily from net land use change emissions. The ocean has absorbed about 30% of the emitted anthropogenic carbon dioxide, causing ocean acidification.
Drivers of Climate Change
Understanding the Climate System and its Recent Changes
Climate models have improved since the AR4. Models reproduce observed continental-scale surface temperature patterns and trends over many decades, including the more rapid warming since the mid-20th century and the cooling immediately following large volcanic eruptions (very high confidence).
Observational and model studies of temperature change, climate feedbacks and changes in the Earth’s energy budget together provide confidence in the magnitude of global warming in response to past and future forcing.
Human influence has been detected in warming of the atmosphere and the ocean, in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes. This evidence for human influence has grown since AR4. It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
Future Global and Regional Climate Change
Global surface temperature change for the end of the 21st century is likely to exceed 1.5°C relative to 1850 to 1900 for all RCP scenarios except RCP2.6. It is likely to exceed 2°C for RCP6.0 and RCP8.5, and more likely than not to exceed 2°C for RCP4.5. Warming will continue beyond 2100 under all RCP scenarios except RCP2.6. Warming will continue to exhibit interannual-to-decadal variability and will not be regionally uniform.
Changes in the global water cycle in response to the warming over the 21st century will not be uniform. The contrast in precipitation between wet and dry regions and between wet and dry seasons will increase, although there may be regional exceptions.
The global ocean will continue to warm during the 21st century. Heat will penetrate from the surface to the deep ocean and affect ocean circulation.
It is very likely that the Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin and that Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover will decrease during the 21st century as global mean surface temperature rises. Global glacier volume will further decrease.
Global mean sea level will continue to rise during the 21st century. Under all RCP scenarios, the rate of sea level rise will very likely exceed that observed during 1971 to 2010 due to increased ocean warming and increased loss of mass from glaciers and ice sheets.
Climate change will affect carbon cycle processes in a way that will exacerbate the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere (high confidence). Further uptake of carbon by the ocean will increase ocean acidification.
Cumulative emissions of CO2 largely determine global mean surface warming by the late 21st century and beyond. Most aspects of climate change will persist for many centuries even if emissions of CO2 are stopped. This represents a substantial multi-century climate change commitment created by past, present and future emissions of CO2.
* Headline statements are the overarching highlighted conclusions of the approved Summary for Policymakers which, taken together, provide a concise narrative. The four statements in boxes here are those summarizing the assessment in the Summary for Policymakers, sections B-E.
=============================================================
The Summary for Policymakers is available here and the unedited accepted Final Draft Report is available here.
31 March: Conversation: IPCC expert wrap: costs of climate change mounting, time to adapt
(EXPERTS INCLUDE)
Jonathan Overpeck, University of Arizona; author, “Terrestrial and inland water systems”
Building on the previous IPCC reports, the new IPCC assessment report makes it clear that continued climate change will indeed create an increased extinction risk for a large fraction of terrestrial and freshwater species during and beyond the 21st century, especially as climate change interacts with other pressures on species, such as habitat modification, over-exploitation, pollution and invasive species. Although it is not possible to define the exact number of species at risk, we do know that this number could be large, and that it will increase with both the magnitude and rate of climate change.
Global species extinctions, many of them caused by human activities, are already occurring at rates that approach or exceed the upper limits of observed natural rates of extinction in the fossil record. Continued climate change will accelerate this rate of global extinction, perhaps dramatically…
Rachel Warren, University of East Anglia; author, “Emergent risks and key vulnerabilities”
We have already observed impacts of climate change on agriculture. We have assessed the amount of climate change we can adapt to. There’s a lot we can’t adapt to even at 2C. At 4C the impacts are very high and we cannot adapt to them.
Reducing emissions reduces global temperature rise, and also the rate of temperature rise. This makes it easier to the adapt to the remaining impacts. We’ve left it too late to reduce emissions enough to avoid all of the impacts of climate change, but we could still avoid a large proportion of them by reducing emissions soon, and fast…
http://theconversation.com/ipcc-expert-wrap-costs-of-climate-change-mounting-time-to-adapt-24939
Report following the advice given by Sir John Houghton, 1st chairman of IPCC and lead author on first 3 reports. “Unless we announce disasters, no one will listen”
Perhaps he forgot to add – and if there aren’t any, we can always make them up.
Noticed it’ no longer IPCC but the UN World Climate Council….
Nice career possibilities for derailed politicians and action scientists for a life of lying.
Nor close down the UN and get rid of the source of 80% of all the corruption in the world, wars, conflicts and mass murders.
The usual nonsense
The Sydney Moaning ( sorry Morning) Herald has the front page story headed ” Time Bomb ticks as the Earth heats,” and inside the story is headed ,” Climate could make Humans extinct,warns Health Expert.”
Meanwhile over on the Sports page…….
Nature,” as the saying goes, “abhors a vacuum.”
Naturally, Nature also abhors a bore, and the IPCC is a crashing bore.
Seriously, the IPCC should ask John Carmack to rewrite their virtual reality game.
C’mon, who wouldn’t want to have a go at IPCCDOOM3D, “knee deep in the carbon anomaly”, eh?
The editorial in today’s Daily Telegraph is surprisingly sceptical.
Chris
In german news, only hysterical one-liners from the IPCC along the line of: “Worse than ever!” – “We’re all doomed!” – “We will fry!” – are being aired and are in the press today. Some people seem to take the final chance to cover their sorry a**es by the indiscriminate IPCC-alarmism. I truly hope that this AR-5 assessment will be the final straw to break the camel’s back.
is this a smoking gun?
IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri knew what the 2014 report was going to say back in 2009
“Which brings us to yet another concern. Let us travel back to 2009. The individuals who would write the about-to-be-released climate report hadn’t yet been selected (that didn’t happen until the following year). They hadn’t yet attended any IPCC meetings. Much of the research it would be their duty to evaluate hadn’t yet been published.
Nevertheless, the IPCC chairman knew – all those years in advance – what their conclusions would be. In September 2009, he told religious leaders in New York: “When the IPCC’s fifth assessment comes out in 2013 or 2014, there will be a major revival of interest in action that has to be taken. People are going to say, ‘My God, we are going to have to take action much faster than we had planned.'”
Not only did Pachauri know the nature and direction of the IPCC report’s conclusions, he knew these conclusions would be alarming and dramatic.”
http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_uns_climate_change_chief_puts_politics_first#sthash.pHLZwryM.dpuf
And don’t forget the movie, folks. It was rolled out even before the flurry of tweets of Press Releases, SPM and “headline” statements (for lazy journos)
WG II’s sequel to AR5 “The Movie”: More tick-tick, boom-boom, doom-doom
The IPCC has scribbled more graffiti on the walls of science.
Even the BBC ventured to raise the points with a scaremongering IPCC spokesman this morning that moderate warming benefited people, and CO2 increase benefited plants (and therefore people). Scientific sense seems to be emerging even in the most unlikely places!
A fellow on Twitter told me that you can not observe nature without a model and that the models are superior to observations of reality. I was astonished to read someone say it so plainly.
I wonder if these “great” computer games/modelers can tell me why the Little Ice Age ended two and a half centuries ago and why the earth has been steadily warming ever since. They could not even predict the piddly little 17+ year “pause” much less the larger turns in climate and yet they are supremely confident they can tell us the earth’s temperature 100 years from now to a tenth of a degree.
Climate science is pure quackery.
If IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri knew what this report was going to say back in 2009 and that it would be a call to action that would be both alarming and dramatic then the whole IPCC and their reports is just a show trial of co2 who stands convicted without any evidence and used to promote social ecology
Social ecology calls anyone who likes advanced society such as clean water, medicine as ego centric’. So what does their new man who is eco centric look like and what will be the new social ecology?
Pachauri has been calling on people to be vegetarians.
professor Kevin Anderson ‘cuts back on washing and showering’ to fight climate change’ and wants planned recession
http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/11/19/global-warming-professor-kevin-anderson-cuts-back-on-washing-and-showering-to-fight-climate-change-admits-at-un-climate-summit-that-is-why-i-smell/
The authors had the chance to do the right thing and they blew it.
All the main TV and radio channels in the UK have gone over the top on this, this morning. The UK Government has already announced that the UK will lead the way on fighting Climate Change:
“It’ll be expensive but worth it”,
but “fighting Climate change will not cost individuals that much, a slight increase in fuel costs …..”,
“… something has to be done, we must change our ways …”,
and so on.
Just heard on the radio this comment: “by the end of the Century the world will have warmed by 4 degrees – not a lot you might think, no more than a warm summers day, but that’s as much as the world has warmed since the last ice age!”
(as I was only half listening I missed who it was who said it – sorry!)
Is Dr. Tol an economist or a climate scientist?
It looks like total desperation to me. Their last throw of the dice.
Britain’s secret bid to ‘fix’ UN climate report:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2592992/Britains-secret-bid-fix-UN-climate-report-Impact-economy-ramped-up.html
The extraordinarily dangerous language that ties into the global ed reforms and Metropolitanism and that FuturICT vision I have been writing about recently are the last two paragraphs on page 23.
Coming in through the false perceptions and altered values and beliefs being deliberately cultivated via what I call obuchenie education. Nicely tucked into the middle of that report. Adaptation is a term that goes to using conscious cultural evolution. I explain it in detail in my book. It has been a hope of political radicals even before Marx. The ability of computers to grasp and manipulate unconscious mental processes based on Soviet research that UNESCO is very much aware of is precisely what those 2 paragraphs are getting at.
Magma says:
March 30, 2014 at 6:56 pm
My, what fast readers commenters here are. I’d be impressed, if I actually thought many of you had bothered read a single page…
________________
Well, aren’t you just the smartest little thing.
I’d be impressed if you ever showed up here and had something non-disparaging to say about the readership.
“Impacts assessed in this report are based on climate model projections…”
(Final Draft ch1,p2)
Donna Laframboise sums it up: “What happened to the scientific body delivering a scientific report based on scientific research?”
http://nofrakkingconsensus.blogspot.com.au/
I have just watched the BBC News on this ‘apocalypse’, I’m now feeling a bit nauseas. I wonder if some vulnerable members of the public will actually decide it is so bad that life is not worth living and commit suicide rather than look forward to being drowned, frozen, blown to ‘Munchkinland’ or slowly cooked to death.
Is it wrong to hope for a massive volcano to go off this year, in the middle of no where, just so that the temperatures start dropping significantly ?
Its like listening to a bloody end of the world, 4 horseman of the apocalypse scenario.
Its beginning to seriously sound like religion. The “predictions” are so wide ranging as to be meaningless. Expect more droughts AND flooding ? How the hell is that comparable.
Utter drivel. Absolute and utter drivel.
I notice the wide ranging caveats in all the statements such as “likely” “possibly” “might” “could”
Which is the IPCC’s back out if things start getting cooler…..
Its drivel of the worst kind.