Here is an entertaining and well researched video documentary from my friend John Coleman at KUSI-TV about the history of the Keeling Curve and its founder.
Watch:
From the YouTube description:
A great scientist named Roger Revelle had Al Gore in his class at Harvard and the Global Warming campaign was born. Revelle tried to calm things down years later, but Gore said Revelle was Senile and refused to debate. John Coleman documents the entire story and shows how our tax dollars are perpetuating the Global Warming alarmist campaign even though temperatures have not risen in years.
Well, I should have said the winter of 2012 2013.
dbstealey says:
That’s because Coleman is preaching to the choir here. It is kind of sad that you guys have no ability whatsoever to be skeptical of nonsense that happens to dovetail with your belief system.
Enter your comment here… Not being a trained Scientist, I’m still very interested in the LFTR debate.
It seems to me that the LFTR is still an improvement on safety over the current system of nuclear fission reactors.
I’m glad to see the subject under discussion.
G.S. Williams
joelshore says:
That’s because Coleman is preaching to the choir here. It is kind of sad that you guys have no ability whatsoever to be skeptical of nonsense that happens to dovetail with your belief system.
No, that’s because you are the ‘odd man out’. Emphasis on “odd”.
Very odd.
Joel Shore is like the kid with his mother, watching the military parade where his dad is marching: “Mommy, why is everyone else out of step?”
In fact, Joel is out of step with everyone else, as we can see in all the comments. Earth to joel: it isn’t everyone else who is wrong. Look in the mirror…
…so go peddle your runaway global warming nonsense elsewhere. There are plenty of fools who will eat up that pseudo-science. But folks here know better: catastrophic AGW has zero scientific evidence to support it.
Now, I challenge YOU to post verifiable, testable scientific evidence that supports your crazy belief system. Understand that neither papers, nor computer models fit the definition of ‘evidence’. Rather, they are assertions.
So go ahead. Post your evidence. Show verifiable evidence that X amount of CO2 causes Y degrees of global temperature rise.
Take your time, we can wait…
dbstealey says:
March 14, 2014 at 9:11 pm
++++++++
Thank you dbstealey… I needed to read something where someone sets things straight, Basically tell them to go ahead find evidence, present it, and then put the so called evidence under scrutiny…
Now look in the mirror. Have you seen your side’s nonsense?
Thanks again for the information everyone. Today I’m travelling from LAX to Managua. I’ll let you know if the climate changes between here and there.
To mod: I do indeed see the site’s value. Thinking of asking the same questions at one of the gaia sites. 🙂
There are three components to the global warming fraud; political motivation well expressed in Tim Ball’s new book “The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science, how Climate Science was corrupted as brilliantly portrayed by John Coleman in this masterful video, and the actual scientific fraud that has yet to be made public.
In Hansen et al 1981 Hansen states that
“The most sophisticated models suggest a mean warming of 2° to 3.5°C for doubling
of the CO2 concentration from 300 to 600 ppm (6-8).” (SCIENCE, VOL. 213, 28 AUGUST 1981)
This is an outright lie because General Circulation Models are essentially weather models and are completely incapable of “suggesting” global temperature with the sort of accuracy claimed and predictions are limited to periods of weeks not years.
What Hansen did was to project a CO2 increase into the future and then convert this projected CO2 increase to temperature projection using a fabricated CO2 forcing parameter and contrived climate sensitivity factor to do so.
In Hansen’s June 23, 1988 presentation to Senator Wirth’s Committee scenario “A” is a projection of atmospheric CO2 concentration based on a 1.5%/year increase.
To hide the smooth curve created from this Hansen superimposes jitter created by his climate model projections.
If you remove the smooth CO2 curve all that is left is jitter centred around a zero value.
So in fact climate models never predicted global warming from CO2 emissions it was just a Hansen fabricated warming curve modified artificially by climate model to give the false impression of scientific validity.