The Sun wakes up: highest values of Solar Cycle 24 observed in February 2014

The updates from NOAA’s SWPC are now available, and there are big jumps all around in February 2014.

Sunspot number reaches the highest ever for SC24:

Latest Sunspot number prediction

10.7cm radio flux reaches the highest ever for SC24:

Latest F10.7 cm flux number prediction

Ap magnetic index, while up, has not surpassed previously higher values in SC24

Latest Planetary A-index number prediction

In other news, Davis Archibald offers this update:

==============================================================

Solar Update March 2014

David Archibald

image

Figure 1: Oulu Neutron Count 1964 – 2014

With Solar Cycle 24 maximum in March 2013 (see the heliospheric current sheet tilt angle in Figure 5 below) and a one year lag between solar activity and neutron count, we have probably seen the minimum neutron count for this cycle. The minimum count is well above the minimum value for Solar Cycle 20.

clip_image004

Figure 2: Oulu Neutron Count for Solar Cycles 20 to 24 aligned on month of minimum

In terms of neutron count, Solar Cycle 24 isn’t much weaker than the previous four cycles at a similar stage of development.

image

Figure 3: Solar Wind Flow Pressure 1971 – 2014

What is really interesting is what has happened to the solar wind flow pressure. Despite a high sunspot number and F10.7 flux for this cycle, in January 2014 the solar wind flow pressure fell to a new low of 1.2 nPa for the instrumental record. With another 10 years of solar cycle fall time ahead of us, this suggests that the neutron count is going to be impressive by the end of the decade.

image

Figure 4: Ap Index 1932 – 2014

Similarly, despite high sunspot numbers and F10.7 flux values, the Ap Index appears to be in a new regime with current values around the previous apparent floor level of activity for the instrumental record.

image

Figure 5: Heliospheric Current Sheet Tilt Angle

Based on the heliospheric tilt angle, Solar Cycle 24 maximum was in Carrington rotation 2134, which is March 2013. With the Solar cycle 23/24 minimum in December 2008, Solar Cycle 24 rise time was 4 years and three months.

image

Figure 6: Monthly F10.7 Flux 1948 – 2014

The F10.7 flux is having a new peak of activity.

image

Figure 7: Interplanetary Magnetic Field 1966 – 2014

As with the solar wind flow pressure and Ap Index, the interplanetary magnetic field appears to be in a new regime in Solar Cycle 24 in which peak activity is at about the level of the previous floor of activity.

image

Figure 8: Solar Cycle 24 relative to the Dalton Minimum

Solar Cycle 24 had been tracking Solar Cycle 5, the first half of the Dalton Minimum, quite closely in terms of monthly sunspot number. It is now somewhat stronger at the same stage of the cycle.

clip_image018

Figure 9: Solar Cycles 1749 – 2040

Livingstone and Penn’s forecast of a Solar Cycle 25 maximum amplitude of 7 is still the only prediction of the size of that cycle from the solar physics community. We are still a few years out before solar poloidal field strength can be used to estimate the size of the next cycle.

clip_image020

Figure 10: Predicted Solar Cycle 24 peak sunspot number

Of 54 predictions of Solar Cycle 24 peak amplitude, the six at the bottom of the range could be considered to be in the ball park of the achieved result. This suggests that the solar physics community’s understanding of the Sun, and thus climate, has the potential to evolve further. From: Pesnell, W.D., Predictions of Solar Cycle 24, Solar Phys., 252, 209-220, 2008

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
183 Comments
Carla
March 8, 2014 5:06 pm

lsvalgaard says:
March 8, 2014 at 2:28 pm
Carla says:
March 8, 2014 at 12:13 pm
———————————–
Thank you Dr. S.
Fig. 4 page 9 of “Long Term Evolution of Solar Sector Structure”
http://www.leif.org/research/Long-term%20Evolution%20of%20Solar%20Sector%20Structure.pdf
Is showing pretty much what I was wondering. What is the overall drift I’m seeing there?
Anyone modeled that wrt to how that might appear moving across the solar surface in time..?

March 8, 2014 6:34 pm

Carla says:
March 8, 2014 at 5:06 pm
Anyone modeled that wrt to how that might appear moving across the solar surface in time..?
We can see the drift of the pattern at the surface. It is not understood why it lives so long [decades or centuries]

Sparks
March 8, 2014 7:57 pm

lsvalgaard says:
March 8, 2014 at 2:28 pm
“Part of the reason is that we are not done with SC24 yet. So far we have only seen three peaks, more to come.”
Leif, that’s fine call a spike a peak.

March 9, 2014 6:42 pm

Greg Goodman says: March 4, 2014 at 10:18 am
If SSN is taken to be a proxy of some kind of power output variation that may act as a “forcing” on climate. Then one would not expect it to correlate directly to temperature

I believe this part of your argument is sound.

March 9, 2014 10:31 pm

Poptech says:
March 9, 2014 at 6:42 pm
“If SSN is taken to be a proxy of some kind of power output variation that may act as a “forcing” on climate. Then one would not expect it to correlate directly to temperature”
I believe this part of your argument is sound.

so you would regard all reports that there is a direct correlation as spurious and invalid?

Sparks
March 10, 2014 3:06 pm

Greg Goodman says:
March 4, 2014 at 10:18 am
“If SSN is taken to be a proxy of some kind of power output variation that may act as a “forcing” on climate. Then one would not expect it to correlate directly to temperature”
Poptech says:
March 9, 2014 at 6:42 pm
“I believe this part of your argument is sound.”
lsvalgaard says: March 9, 2014 at 10:31 pm
“so you would regard all reports that there is a direct correlation as spurious and invalid?”
If the question is, if the sunspot proxy as a whole is an indicator of when the suns magnetic poles positive(+) and negative(-) are directly facing us? then yes, it does effect weather and there is direct effects which are very dangerous, the weather can effect regional temperature trends. Which are currently interpreted as anthropological driven climate.
The difference between the suns magnetic poles rotating while facing towards us and when they are rotating at right angles to the elliptic plane, produces a 100% increase in energy output. Peak intensity also has a slight variable known as TSI (Total Solar Irradiation).
The Sun drives it!

March 10, 2014 3:44 pm

Sparks says:
March 10, 2014 at 3:06 pm
The difference between the sun’s magnetic poles rotating while facing towards us and when they are rotating at right angles to the elliptic plane, produces a 100% increase in energy output.
No, that is just nonsense [as written – you may obscurely mean something else].

Sparks
March 10, 2014 4:08 pm

lsvalgaard says:
March 10, 2014 at 3:44 pm
So.. it’s not what you call nonsense then, just written differently from how you would put it. I don’t have a problem with making “one liners” and giving a link to some lengthy research! where would fun in that be? 🙂
You do know I’m correct tho, maybe a bit obscure, I’ll give you that one!

1 6 7 8