Note to KXL protestors and Lord Deben, just substitute a couple of K's and 'your journey towards the dark side will be complete'

Motormouth, you need to read the thread again. It’s still there, if you read things without shooting from the hip you would have seen it. When asked earlier in the evening if your claim was true, I responded to another poster thus:
The poster asked this:
I was wondering why you are so present, polite, and well, professional (if vague) in your replies. I didn’t take you for a loony (though I’ve run across a few rational seeming ones). I figured you for a paid troll, and I think I’m right on that. But, you are in “The industry”, a lot of what you say makes more sense now.
I responded with this
Thanks Randle, not one of my papers or comments. You are correct, I do have a few papers to my name, but that is someone different. I’m not a paid lobbyist in this area, but I do lobby on a political basis in other areas. I try an remain polite because I believe that civil discussion brings out the best in people and is the most productive approach. It also drives the trolls crazy which is a bonus.
As you now may have realised I lobby on health issues, specifically Cancer and Mental health. But you seemed to be determined to conflate me with another chap. One of the things I learned over many years in Psychiatry is that if delusions are challenged they can be re-enforced, so once I had pointed out I was not this man I refrained on debating the issue with you. You can be somewhat brittle to be diplomatic, and I did not wish to undermine and interesting date by giving you an excuse to explode was it were. Hopefully you are now convinced that i am someone completely different?

Debden is not worth getting excited about. He is universally despised in the Uk by left and right. If he sides with the “Ecoloons”, that’s great; a bit like having Hitler on your PR team!

Nice try at being fair, reasonable & equitable, Mr Watts.
Expect tumbleweed to blow across your pc……

Deben’s comments apply first and foremost to alarmists, not skeptics – and to himself. Skeptics offer facts and physical proof, alarmists offer ad hominem, invective, abuse and threats. What a lying sniveling hypocrite the man is.
@ferdberple – well said.

richardscourtney says:
February 9, 2014 at 1:05 pm
Mods:
I would be grateful if my post in moderat1on were recovered as a matter of urgency.
Sorry about this but I think you will understand why when you see its content.
Richard
Richard, don’t worry about it, it was an easy mistake to make and understandable in the circumstance. In reality, it was quite funny so don’t be over concerned about your posts. Cheers G

It is easy to think that someone using inexact terminology like “climate naysayers” is scientifically illiterate. However, this would be underestimating what they are doing, this is clever spin or more correctly, propaganda. By using these terms they move away from the positions that have become indefensible such as ‘children not knowing what snow is’ – olive groves in UK – no skiing possible in Scotland – all due to the warmth that was forecast but which has not come. Therefore, use ‘climate’ alone as if ‘climate’ is a threat. This not only moves them away from the indefensible but makes arguing with someone with such inexact terminology close to impossible. The same goes for the move to ‘carbon’ as in ‘carbon footprint’ or ‘carbon pollution’ – they cannot use the ‘carbon dioxide green house gas’ arguments now as 17 years have gone by with no warming and as Viscount Monckton is now repeatedly pointing out there is a considerable gap between projections of warming and actual temperatures. Lord Deben (John Gummer) needs the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming scare to continue as he makes money and has authority because of it. But he is far to clever to talk about ‘catastrophic warming’ when it isn’t happening, so he talks about ‘climate’ as a threat – not even climate change and projects onto the scientists ‘climate (change) denial’ which of course is what every CAGW proponent does when they postulate their scare stories.
It seems the only way to get across to the people being taken in by Lord Deben’s propaganda is to go back to first principles. Lord Deben et al predicted that carbon dioxide emissions by human industry (which are only ~5% of natural emissions) would lead to runaway warming. There is no proof that carbon dioxide actually affects the temperature of the actual atmosphere, it has been rising rapidly over the last 17 years and temperatures have remained more or less constant. They had been rising after the Little Ice Age but now they have stopped rising for more than 17 years. The AGW hypothesis does NOT say that Carbon Dioxide warming was dangerous, the hypothesis was that the very small warming from Carbon Dioxide was meant to increase the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere and it was that rise in water vapor a far more powerful ‘green house gas’ that was going to lead to runaway warming. The models all show a tropical tropospheric hot spot caused by the water vapor – the problem is that the real atmosphere has not got a tropical tropospheric hotspot nor has there been any warming for 17 years. So the ‘Global Warming Hypothesis’ has failed it has been falsified. Lord Deben et al are left with throwing insults and using meaningless terms to try to continue the confidence trick being played on the world to enrich a few while causing deaths from cold in energy poverty.
Meanwhile, while you have been reading this about the enrichment of a few based on flawed hypotheses and precautionary principles for unlikely events, around 20 children have died. They are dying of hunger and related causes at the rate of one every 5 seconds. A REAL tragedy and a REAL death rate. They could be saved by a single $1 a day while $billions are poured into ‘climate’ for no reason but the enrichment of a few Malthusians.

Indeed, it is clear that others did not recognise your post as being a rebuttal of the revelation of your identity by Randle Dewees because people continued to mention your being a shill after that on the thread where you posted it.
That is true Richard, you were not the only one not have read the posts, seen my reassurance that it was not me and continued to post this exciting news. I think you highlighted the issue much more than anyone else, and as I had already denied that identity I felt it would be better to just leave you to it. I was surprised when you introduced it to a new thread though, at that point it became worthy of a Brian Rix farce. But there we are, hopefully you are now convinced and I hope you do not take your mistake in my identity too seriously. Nice photo by the way, I wish I did look like that!