Guest essay by Tony Brown
The sun was warm and the wind a friendly zephyr as we enjoyed coffee and a cake on Dawlish sea front. A place known to millions of British holidaymakers as a pretty, if rather faded, seaside resort
Black swans –a symbol of the town-and perhaps a metaphor of this time and place*- glided serenely by, whilst the first daffodils showed their faces to the sun.
Just across the road, Brunel’s railway from Paddington to the far west of Britain at Penzance hugs the coast of scenic South Devon. At Dawlish it picturesquely threads it way through a series of tunnels along the amber coast of red sandstone in one of the most spectacular train rides in Britain.
Here the sea is a constant companion, sometimes washing the sea wall with a frivolous salty spray that glistens in the sun, and at other times is a treacherous and dangerous companion that threatens to overwhelm trains that edge circumspectly along the track. This is perhaps the only main line railway in the world where it useful to consult a tide table in conjunction with the railway time table.
But on Tuesday, three days before our morning coffee, Dawlish had become known worldwide when a giant storm hit the area. As luck would have it this storm- unlike many others-arrived during a Spring tide-when tides are extra high-and the winds came howling in from a direction-roughly from the south-which causes most damage to this part of the coast. From another direction, or at a lower state of tides, the storm would probably have passed unremarked except for a paragraph in the local newspaper. But this one… This one smashed a large hole in the sea wall which carries and protects the main railway line to the South West of England, causing a gaping chasm to open up under the railway, leaving a 30 metre length of track hanging in the air.
Several of the houses directly behind the sea wall and the railway hang precariously close to the void, exposed to the elements and which caused evacuation of the residents. Fortunately no one was hurt-although many were traumatised- and tribute must be paid to the community spirit of this town and the efforts of the council, the emergency services and those involved in the railway in a textbook response showing a high degree of compassion and professionalism.
This line is of prime importance to the economy of the West country. There has however been talk of rerouting it for decades as its tourism value and scenic beauty is precisely because of its vulnerability as trains scurry along just yards from the ocean. Talk has been renewed as obviously the initial reactions to this disaster are that this was due to climate change and with rising sea levels it would be foolish to invest too much money in reinstating the old, when a new inland solution is surely needed.
The history of Brunel’s Great Western railway is well documented and is entirely relevant in examining whether the events of Tuesday-and indeed this winter as a merciless conveyor belt of Atlantic storms have marched in to Britain- are a harbinger of climate change. These few references below are taken as the most relevant for our story, but readers will find the entire history, linked below, to be fascinating.
http://www.greatcliff.co.uk/pages/railway_history.php
Firstly, Brunel never wanted to run the line along a sea wall as he foresaw problems with the sea. He wanted to run it inland, but due to environmental reasons-including protests from landowners- and no doubt cost concerns, he had to defer in agreeing to a new route next to the sea and through tunnels.
It is highly ironic that the first year of operation in 1846 also saw the first breach in the line. In that year Brunel personally inspected 8 breaches in the line, The original newspaper report from 1846 is here.
https://twitter.com/LeoHickman/status/431559126838030336/photo/1
In a space of 15 years from 1853 the line was breached continually, with many other breaches since. Just prior to the history linked above, I note that there were great storms locally in 1817 and 1824, the latter described as an ‘extreme hurricane’.
Perhaps the most significant event in the lines history was 1901 when part of the sea wall was rebuilt 5 metres further out into the sea. It was noted this had a dramatic effect on lowering the beach levels. Sand is an extremely good ‘soft defence’ and we mess with levels at our peril. The groynes along the beach that gather sand around them have been left to decay all along this part of the coast as more fashionable –but less effective- methods of coastal defence are implemented.
A local resident next to the breach tells me of large heavy objects sucked off the ground before hurtling sideways as the storms fury vented itself against the sea wall, the railway line, and the houses that huddle alongside it. A curious echo of the 1824 reference.
The 1901 reference is especially interesting as the remainder of the wall –badly constructed of stone backfilled with rubble-was scheduled to be re-built at that time, but never was. It was that old part that collapsed . This can be clearly seen in the picture below where the sea wall drops to just above sea level (where us locals scurry quickly past at anything other than low tide)
(Full story and many pictures are partway down this article here)
No doubt other breaches would have occurred in this papier mache thin wall if, over the years, the storms had coincided with spring tides and the winds came from the ‘wrong’ direction. One can only imagine the hammering it has taken over the many years of its existence. That a key section of the country’s only main line railway to the South West should be of such flimsy construction will be a surprise to many, and I suspect will be the main cause of delays in the line reopening, as clearly it does not begin to meet modern standards of construction.
So, has modern climate change caused the damage? The historic record shows numerous breaches and damage from severe storms in the past. This link shows the breach in the line in 1855; London Illustrated news
http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/victorian_periodicals_review/v046/46.1.fyfe_fig02.html
This next more modern photo shows a train stranded in Dawlish station with mountainous waves crashing over it and is often touted as proof of climate change. 
Those able to visit Teignmouth Museum –just along the coast from Dawlish- will see a lithograph there from around 1850 showing an identical scene.
In 1846, Brunel went to inspect sea damage to the railway at Dawlish, as reported in The Standard. Brunel personally inspected 8 breaches in the line in 1846, the first year of the railways operation!
It seems that storms are no different now to those over the last couple of centuries. The real story is that an already inadequate sea wall structure which carries the main line railway, has taken numerous hits from waves and storms since its inception and has become steadily weakened. Sand levels have been allowed to drop, thereby reducing soft protection to the base of the wall.
The line was clearly built to a budget in the 1840’s and the measures needed to compensate for its problematic location have only sporadically been implemented ever since. Decaying infrastructure-from sewers to roads to sea walls- is the plague of this country, with its make do and mend philosophy in sharp contrast to the high profile expensive grand follies beloved by our Politicians. The latest planned is a £50 billion project for a new rail line from London to Birmingham to shave 20 minutes off the journey. As Dawlish residents bitterly note, a tiny fraction of that budget would enable a proper sea wall built to modern standards to be built here, that would provide protection to the railway for a century.
That modern climate conditions seem no different to the past may be of no concern to those deciding the future of our railway. A new inland route may ultimately be more appealing than properly repairing and maintaining what we have already got, as the siren voices of climate change are loud and strident and emanate from influential people.
=================================================================
*black swans. The black swan theory or theory of black swan events is a metaphor that describes an event that comes as a surprise, has a major effect, and is often inappropriately rationalized after the fact with the benefit of hindsight
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_swan_theory
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I would remind all that “being railroaded” (by the likes of apparent carbon-trading promoters like Gareth Philips) is a far different thing than “building railroads” (which ARE a productive and fruitful thing for the world’s poor, hungry, and thirsty needy beings).
I defy any promoting Gareth’s CAGW religious dogma to show they are in favor of better shelter and highways, more bridges and sewers and roads and food storage, and better food, clothing and shelter, and more economical energy for all.
For Richard S. Courtney, isolated in Cornwall: Owing to the unfortunate absence of the best engineer for repairing the railway, that being Isambard Kingdom Brunel, we will instead happily loan you Asa G. Sheldon, who built parts of the supporting roadbed for the Boston to Haverhill railway in Massachusetts. You can find a copy of his self-promoting autobiography online at http://www.ponyspot.com/asa/asa-sheldon.html .
Sheldon was fond of using oxen rather than horses for his construction projects. I would imagine that with 12 pair and a good supply of proper stone and some strong helpers he should have your railway back in order within two months.
Oh dear, Mr. Sheldon passed away in 1870, a mere 11 years after Brunel. You will have to find someone else, or take on the work yourself.
until alarmists define the difference between weather expected from a cooling planet, compared with weather from a warming planet, then their claims are always pseudoscience. The observed scientific facts partly from history and the Earths weather/climate mechanisms are as follows.
A warming planet causes smaller temperature difference between the pole and tropics, leading to a jet stream further north in the northern hemisphere. This causes less severe weather especially with the jet stream covering smaller surface area of the planet. This leads to more cyclonic systems further north with less north/south flows.
A cooling planet causes larger temperature difference between the pole and tropics, leading to a jet stream further south in the northern hemisphere. This cause more severe weather especially with the jet stream covering larger surface area of the planet. This leads to more cyclonic systems further south with more north/south flows.
Allan M.R. MacRae says: @ur momisugly February 9, 2014 at 8:04 am
…And these imbecilic enviro-loon policies are causing human suffering, wasting scarce global resources and costing lives.
….I was involved in the early days of the environmental movement, but today’s environmental movement has been taken over by politically motivated extremists. It now takes longer to approve a major project than to build it, which is ridiculous. We need to set a reasonable limit on the time it takes to for environmental approvals. I suggest 6 to 12 months would be appropriate.
We should also hold the environmental extremists legally responsible for the damage they have caused society. I have made specific proposals to my USA friends that may bear fruit – watch this space…..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
All that bears repeating.
Like you I was involved in the early days of the environmental movement and like you my main worry is cooling. We are so unprepared for that possibility it is mind boggling not to mention lethal.
Just one example is the fact that the USA did away with it’s strategic grain reserve in 1996 and we are now burning any excess grain as biofuel. A comment I ran across mentioned the grain silos have since been destroyed but I have not been able to verify. (After 20 years I doubt it matters)
China, India, and the United States alone account for 46 percent of global grain production; Europe, including the former Soviet states, grows another 21%. “….China produced an estimated 479 million tons of grain in 2012—its largest harvest ever—compared with 354 million tons in the United States. India harvested 230 million tons. The countries in the European Union together produced 274 million tons. The 2012 U.S. grain harvest was 8 percent smaller than the year before….” – Global Grain Stocks Drop Dangerously Low as 2012 Consumption Exceeded Production
Not a good situation.
Pamela Gray says: @ur momisugly February 9, 2014 at 8:24 am
ROTFLMAO, That is SOOooo True!
Make a good tee shirt, or across a bikini bottom. (snicker) Then you KNOW it would be read.
JackW says:
February 9, 2014 at 10:31 am
It is a post. Lacking substance or contribution to the thread, but it is a post. 8^D
Some technology is too good and too durable to be merely “green” or “sustainable”. Railways are like that. Aqueducts also.
Nice piece, Tonyb.
As a resident of Exeter and frequent user of the railway to Dawlish. I am surprised why the sea defence along this exposed stretch has not got a deflecting lip on top of the wall so that waves get deflected away from the trains or why the large boulders installed at Dawlish warren were not carried on to the exposed Dawlish stretch?? . And as Tony states the groynes have been aloud to corrode away??the truth of it is that years of under funding on the railway with patchwork repairs and neglect of the South West by all political party’s is most of the reason,and a matter of when and not if as far as the storm is concerned.
Gail Combs says:
February 9, 2014 at 12:22 pm
Just one example is the fact that the USA did away with it’s strategic grain reserve in 1996 and we are now burning any excess grain as biofuel. A comment I ran across mentioned the grain silos have since been destroyed but I have not been able to verify. (After 20 years I doubt it matters)
___________________
All you said is true. Come out here to the great wheat and corn growing regions of the US and see for yourself. Silos that stood row upon row and which dotted the horizon are now few and far between. Even the most marginal soils are being put to the plow and I’ve driven down country roads onto which farmers ran their seed drills a foot or so into the road and are farming the road. The vast majority of shelter belts planted across Kansas and the great plains in response to the Dust Bowl conditions have been ripped out to make room for a few more acres of corn. The topsoil has no protection at all from the winds and rain, but modern agricultural techniques are unconcerned with such trivialities, as the soil is seen as nothing more than an anchor for plant roots and is made sterile for all life except the desired planted crop.
listening to: Bob Dylan- “A Hard Rain’s A Gonna Fall”
“Gareth Phillips says:
February 9, 2014 at 8:14 am
…Try it on one of the opposing sites, challenge yourself, be brave, if you really believe what you say is correct it can be a very sobering experience. Posting here for a skeptic is easy.”
In case you haven’t noticed Gareth (I am sure you have, but choose to deny), it is the people on the CAGW side that are continually trying to silence all discussion. Want some examples? Mike Mann won’t debate, a couple newspapers and a magazine recently made news by changing their policy to disallow anyone writing any anti-CAGW comments. Many of us are banned at warmist sites. I can give easily give several more examples but I think you get the point.
Here at WUWT, on the side bar is a prominent list of all the warmist sites readers here are invited to go visit at their leisure. You find NO SUCH list available at warmist sites… they absolutely do NOT want visitors to come here to WUWT, especially people who have not yet become addicted to the koolaid. Wonder why that is? What type of people try to do that?
Excellent article. One point that needs to be brought out is that the issue is one of geology. The red sandstone is a softer rock, and thus vulnerable to erosion.
Gareth, some reading for you to do.
http://drtimball.com/2012/claims-global-warming-increases-severe-weather-are-scientifically-incorrect/
http://drtimball.com/2012/current-climate-changes-are-normal-its-time-the-media-got-the-story-correct/
M Courtney says:
February 9, 2014 at 1:01 am
Very good post. There’s a reason why no other line anywhere has been built to be so picturesque.
Here’s another: ever tried washing your car with sea water every day to see how long it lasts?
Mycroft
Just round the corner in teignmouth the sea wall built in 1990 starts just as the railway pulls away from the sea, so the sea wall is protecting the esplanade rather than the railway. It has the curved base so waves crash into it, get rebuffed and roll straight into the next incoming wave thereby causing it to break up before it reaches the beach. It works very well and teignmouth saw little more than superficial damage.
I don’t think any of the railway sea wall has this feature and I suspect all of it is of an ancient vintage. I am surprised as well that the giant boulders seen at the Warren were not continued.
Mind you the groynes here in teignmouth are in a poor state as well and need replacing. All our sand is in constant transit to Exmouth.
Tonyb
David Ball says:
February 9, 2014 at 1:05 pm
Gareth, some reading for you to do.
Thanks David, I’ll try and read them on the plane before Tuesdays meetings
The use of “Black Swan” to explain any event is in my book tantamount to saying “My predictive model vastly underestimated the event. — My model is worthless.”
RACookPE1978 says:
February 9, 2014 at 11:54 am
Heh. That is a critical difference.
Your note on semantics also reminds me that watermelons—at least our American variety—suffer from cognitive dissonance about railroads. They hate the original 18th century railroad builders but love their creation today and promote the new builders.
Oh ye of little experience. I have been banned by the Guardian over 12 times. Commenting at the Guardian was easy and I suspect I turned quite a few CAGW believers by pointing them to inconvenient research. To be banned over 12 times shows commitment. In case you were wondering I don’t have shares in fossil fuel companies, I am not a lobbyist, I am not paid by any fossil fuel company. My only interest in fossil fuels is that I use them just like you. They help hospitals treating cancer patients with electricity for example. Surely you would approve? No?
great article. thanks
Gareth Phillips thinks we should “accept the science.” He does not seem to have figured out that “Climate Scientists” are nothing more than advocates who got into grad school. Gareth, I worked in the oncology business for a while, what is the best selling brand of couchtop used in the vaults? Everyone in the business knows this, do you? Do you even know what a couchtop is? This is your shibboleth, are you an oncology guy or are you in fact a Carbon Credits wonk?
I have to share this one….
http://www.thegwpf.org/uk-environment-minister-warns-climate-change-threatens-dry-winters/
“Thanks Randle, not one of my papers or comments. You are correct, I do have a few papers to my name, but that is someone different. I’m not a paid lobbyist in this area, but I do lobby on a political basis in other areas. I try an remain polite because I believe that civil discussion brings out the best in people and is the most productive approach. It also drives the trolls crazy which is a bonus.”
Shoot, it seemed so close, even your writing style was close.
Anyway, I guess I have to take you as one of those rational seeming loons. My education includes geology – you don’t study that without gaining an appreciation for long time spans and radically changing conditions. I’ve also been around for a while and can remember lots of out of the norm cold winters and hot summers. And I know something about atmospheric science. So I do think you are wrong. I think you are one of those mud wrestlers that struggles just for the struggle.
Gareth Phillips says:
February 9, 2014 at 8:54 am
“. . . but it’s amusing to make one when commenting on another posters intelligence I think.”
At this point it appears I am the only one still reading Gareth’s comments.
Gareth claims he has been reading and posting for a long time and then asks Tonyb “which country are you in?
So in return, I ask Gareth: Which planet are you on?
Gail Combs says on February 9, 2014 at 12:22 pm
Like you I was involved in the early days of the environmental movement and like you my main worry is cooling. We are so unprepared for that possibility it is mind boggling not to mention lethal.
Just one example is the fact that the USA did away with it’s strategic grain reserve in 1996 and we are now burning any excess grain as biofuel. A comment I ran across mentioned the grain silos have since been destroyed but I have not been able to verify. (After 20 years I doubt it matters)
China, India, and the United States alone account for 46 percent of global grain production; Europe, including the former Soviet states, grows another 21%. “….China produced an estimated 479 million tons of grain in 2012—its largest harvest ever—compared with 354 million tons in the United States. India harvested 230 million tons. The countries in the European Union together produced 274 million tons. The 2012 U.S. grain harvest was 8 percent smaller than the year before….” – Global Grain Stocks Drop Dangerously Low as 2012 Consumption Exceeded Production
Not a good situation.
___________
Thank you for your comments Gail.
I offer one suggestion for a quick fix – at least for North America.
I understand that “More than 40% of U.S. corn is now consumed in the production of ethanol.”
http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/wp/12-01WiseBiofuels.pdf
I suggest that this offers an immediate opportunity to quickly rebuild the strategic grain reserve by ceasing corn ethanol subsidies and instead using the money to grow grain for storage. I have not run the numbers but they should work over a few years, assuming we start ASAP.
Your thoughts?
Best, Allan