Black Swans? Dispatches from the front line of climate change.

Guest essay by Tony Brown

The sun was warm and the wind a friendly zephyr as we enjoyed coffee and a cake on Dawlish sea front. A place known to millions of British holidaymakers as a pretty, if rather faded, seaside resort

Black swans –a symbol of the town-and perhaps a metaphor of this time and place*- glided serenely by, whilst the first daffodils showed their faces to the sun.

Just across the road, Brunel’s railway from Paddington to the far west of Britain at Penzance hugs the coast of scenic South Devon. At Dawlish it picturesquely threads it way through a series of tunnels along the amber coast of red sandstone in one of the most spectacular train rides in Britain. 

Here the sea is a constant companion, sometimes washing the sea wall with a frivolous salty spray that glistens in the sun, and at other times is a treacherous and dangerous companion that threatens to overwhelm trains that edge circumspectly along the track. This is perhaps the only main line railway in the world where it useful to consult a tide table in conjunction with the railway time table.

But on Tuesday, three days before our morning coffee, Dawlish had become known worldwide when a giant storm hit the area. As luck would have it this storm- unlike many others-arrived during a Spring tide-when tides are extra high-and the winds came howling in from a direction-roughly from the south-which causes most damage to this part of the coast. From another direction, or at a lower state of tides, the storm would probably have passed unremarked except for a paragraph in the local newspaper. But this one… This one smashed a large hole in the sea wall which carries and protects the main railway line to the South West of England, causing a gaping chasm to open up under the railway, leaving a 30 metre length of track hanging in the air.

clip_image001

http://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/update/2014-02-05/rail-line-damaged-after-seawall-collapses-at-dawlish/

Several of the houses directly behind the sea wall and the railway hang precariously close to the void, exposed to the elements and which caused evacuation of the residents. Fortunately no one was hurt-although many were traumatised- and tribute must be paid to the community spirit of this town and the efforts of the council, the emergency services and those involved in the railway in a textbook response showing a high degree of compassion and professionalism.

This line is of prime importance to the economy of the West country. There has however been talk of rerouting it for decades as its tourism value and scenic beauty is precisely because of its vulnerability as trains scurry along just yards from the ocean. Talk has been renewed as obviously the initial reactions to this disaster are that this was due to climate change and with rising sea levels it would be foolish to invest too much money in reinstating the old, when a new inland solution is surely needed.

The history of Brunel’s Great Western railway is well documented and is entirely relevant in examining whether the events of Tuesday-and indeed this winter as a merciless conveyor belt of Atlantic storms have marched in to Britain- are a harbinger of climate change. These few references below are taken as the most relevant for our story, but readers will find the entire history, linked below, to be fascinating.

http://www.greatcliff.co.uk/pages/railway_history.php

Firstly, Brunel never wanted to run the line along a sea wall as he foresaw problems with the sea. He wanted to run it inland, but due to environmental reasons-including protests from landowners- and no doubt cost concerns, he had to defer in agreeing to a new route next to the sea and through tunnels.

It is highly ironic that the first year of operation in 1846 also saw the first breach in the line. In that year Brunel personally inspected 8 breaches in the line, The original newspaper report from 1846 is here.

https://twitter.com/LeoHickman/status/431559126838030336/photo/1

In a space of 15 years from 1853 the line was breached continually, with many other breaches since. Just prior to the history linked above, I note that there were great storms locally in 1817 and 1824, the latter described as an ‘extreme hurricane’.

Perhaps the most significant event in the lines history was 1901 when part of the sea wall was rebuilt 5 metres further out into the sea. It was noted this had a dramatic effect on lowering the beach levels. Sand is an extremely good ‘soft defence’ and we mess with levels at our peril. The groynes along the beach that gather sand around them have been left to decay all along this part of the coast as more fashionable –but less effective- methods of coastal defence are implemented.

A local resident next to the breach tells me of large heavy objects sucked off the ground before hurtling sideways as the storms fury vented itself against the sea wall, the railway line, and the houses that huddle alongside it. A curious echo of the 1824 reference.

The 1901 reference is especially interesting as the remainder of the wall –badly constructed of stone backfilled with rubble-was scheduled to be re-built at that time, but never was. It was that old part that collapsed . This can be clearly seen in the picture below where the sea wall drops to just above sea level (where us locals scurry quickly past at anything other than low tide)

clip_image003

(Full story and many pictures are partway down this article here)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2552027/Britains-coastline-battered-storms-hurricane-force-winds-sweep-Atlantic.html

No doubt other breaches would have occurred in this papier mache thin wall if, over the years, the storms had coincided with spring tides and the winds came from the ‘wrong’ direction. One can only imagine the hammering it has taken over the many years of its existence. That a key section of the country’s only main line railway to the South West should be of such flimsy construction will be a surprise to many, and I suspect will be the main cause of delays in the line reopening, as clearly it does not begin to meet modern standards of construction.

So, has modern climate change caused the damage? The historic record shows numerous breaches and damage from severe storms in the past. This link shows the breach in the line in 1855; London Illustrated news

clip_image005

http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/victorian_periodicals_review/v046/46.1.fyfe_fig02.html

This next more modern photo shows a train stranded in Dawlish station with mountainous waves crashing over it and is often touted as proof of climate change. clip_image006

Those able to visit Teignmouth Museum –just along the coast from Dawlish- will see a lithograph there from around 1850 showing an identical scene.

In 1846, Brunel went to inspect sea damage to the railway at Dawlish, as reported in The Standard. Brunel personally inspected 8 breaches in the line in 1846, the first year of the railways operation!

dawlish_rail_1846

It seems that storms are no different now to those over the last couple of centuries. The real story is that an already inadequate sea wall structure which carries the main line railway, has taken numerous hits from waves and storms since its inception and has become steadily weakened. Sand levels have been allowed to drop, thereby reducing soft protection to the base of the wall.

The line was clearly built to a budget in the 1840’s and the measures needed to compensate for its problematic location have only sporadically been implemented ever since. Decaying infrastructure-from sewers to roads to sea walls- is the plague of this country, with its make do and mend philosophy in sharp contrast to the high profile expensive grand follies beloved by our Politicians. The latest planned is a £50 billion project for a new rail line from London to Birmingham to shave 20 minutes off the journey. As Dawlish residents bitterly note, a tiny fraction of that budget would enable a proper sea wall built to modern standards to be built here, that would provide protection to the railway for a century.

That modern climate conditions seem no different to the past may be of no concern to those deciding the future of our railway. A new inland route may ultimately be more appealing than properly repairing and maintaining what we have already got, as the siren voices of climate change are loud and strident and emanate from influential people.

=================================================================

*black swans. The black swan theory or theory of black swan events is a metaphor that describes an event that comes as a surprise, has a major effect, and is often inappropriately rationalized after the fact with the benefit of hindsight

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_swan_theory

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
190 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 9, 2014 9:40 am

Thanks Ric, ever helpful as usual, cheers G

daddylonglegs
February 9, 2014 9:45 am

Gareth Phillips
Thanks for your reply. In terms of defense against weather extremes there is less at issue between climate camps than the heated rhetoric would suggest. Does one believe in anthropogenic global warming? Or is recent warming natural in a chaotic oscillating climate? In either case the conclusion is the same – more defense needed.
France are looking ominous again this year.

February 9, 2014 9:46 am

Live by the sea, live on the sea’s terms.
If you do not want the truth of the stroms known, turn the cameras off when the strom comes.
The fishing is easy most of the time but when the stroms come and throw the fish in your face so hard the scales cut your eyes you come to tears.
Little does time know of your tears.

February 9, 2014 9:46 am

ferd berple
You are very much on form today 🙂
And thanks tonyb for some more fascinating history. You’re a champ.

Gail Combs
February 9, 2014 9:50 am

DaveF says: February 9, 2014 at 1:14 am
All three main political parties in the UK seem to have decided that the rural vote does not count and it is more profitable to court the tree-huggers that live in cities.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Same here in the USA and a lot of other countries.
Beside the rural people know what reality is while the city types are wrapped in cotton batting from birth and protected from reality. That makes the city types much easier to sway using emotion and propaganda. Reality is a foreign concept to them.

February 9, 2014 9:58 am

climatereason says:
February 9, 2014 at 9:04 am
Randle
You could be right. I have no problems with Gareth other than I wish he would actually read the things we bother to post and comment on them, rather than continually opening up new subjects.
I am looking forward to his comments on the rapid acceleration of sea level rise he seems to be expecting.
If it IS him he seems to be involved in clean energy. Well Gareth, we could do with a parallel sea wall next to the existing one in which are mounted turbines to capture the energy from the waves and tides. Our MP is interested. Green energy AND a protective sea wall would mean we keep our railway. Can you oblige? 🙂
Hi Tony, I’ll do my best, not my specific area, but which country are you in? Is this the Swansea proposal, Lyme Regis? ? I’ll also try and avoid opening up new subjects, I think it was the Met office report that referred to rising sea levels and the ever reliable motormouth who dived in on the subject with all guns blazing. Happy to discuss rising sea levels, though I’m reluctant to divert from the primary theme here of weather events becoming more frequent. I did include a point in my post responding to DadyLongLegs, but I imagine you want references etc? With numerous people responding and many challenging my posts it’s sometimes difficult to keep to one theme, so please bear with me.

Aidan
February 9, 2014 10:09 am

From the Met Office:
‘There is also an increasing body of evidence that shows that extreme daily rainfall rates are becoming more intense, and that the rate of increase is consistent with what is expected from the fundamental physics of a warming world.’
This being the same Met office that predicted ever-increasing water-shortages in England and had ads on London buses carrying drought warnings, amusingly photographed sloshing through flooding roads and pouring rain during 2012?

richardscourtney
February 9, 2014 10:18 am

Gareth Phillips:
At February 9, 2014 at 9:58 am you say

I think it was the Met office report that referred to rising sea levels

NO! That is another of your lies!
YOU raised the issue and used a quotation from the Met Office to do it.
As your Nemesis, I used my “motormouth” to point out that sea level rise in the English South Coast is mostly isostatic rebound. You conveniently ‘forgot’ about the subject and ignored requests from others for you to address it.
I am surprised that an employed shill like you does not have a briefing note on how to reply to a factual scientific refutation of a false point you introduce. Changing the subject does not seem an adequate way for you to earn your pay.
Richard

Colorado Wellington
February 9, 2014 10:18 am

Gareth Phillips says:
February 9, 2014 at 6:38 am

… Once a problem is recognised, we are on the road to adaptation.

I agree. We need to stop speculating about “committed warming” and start with some committed railroad engineering.
Do you think this would be a good fit for Rajendra Pachauri? I know he was more into propulsion than railroad construction and it’s been a while since he switched to more profitable endeavors. On the other hand, he may still know some competent ex-colleagues in India who know how to build and maintain railroad beds. There is also a lot of excellent information on the internet. He is a crafty man and I think he could pull it off if he put his mind to it.

Gail Combs
February 9, 2014 10:18 am

Peter says: February 9, 2014 at 2:45 am
I suggest you read what Geologist William McClenney has to say:
Comment 1
Comment 2
He more fully explains what he is talking about in his guest posts:
wattsupwiththat(DOT)com/2011/01/05/on-“trap-speed-acc-and-the-snr/
wattsupwiththat(DOT)com/2010/12/30/the-antithesis/
wattsupwiththat(DOT)com/2012/10/02/can-we-predict-the-duration-of-an-interglacial/
Global Warming is not a real option but severe weather is. (Severe weather is a sign of cooling not warming BTW)

Mac the Knife
February 9, 2014 10:34 am

Tony,
Thanks for that historical perspective,coupled with the endemic political malfeasance that seems prolific in any level of government above the local volunteers. You have an enjoyable writing style, providing snippets of local detail that paints a vivid picture for your readers. “Climate Change” has become the excuse and refuge of every lazy intellectual and politician, to the detriment of all.
I’ll refrain from offering any further opinion about the situation y’all face in the United Kingdom, as I do not have sufficient knowledge of your social, economic, and political nuanced detail.
Keep up the good work – more please!
Mac

February 9, 2014 11:09 am

Gareth Phillips says:
February 9, 2014 at 8:04 am
Climatereason. Thanks for that, I agree, these things have previously occurred. The difference is that the world then was a very different place , much lower populations and less crowding. The recording of those times is also not as accurate as currently available, so I agree, these things also happened in the deep time scale, but would you be reassured when Vesuvius rumbles that it was not too much to worry about as it had happened before?.Or if the Ice caps advanced, would we also say, don’t worry, it’s happened before?”
The problem with you Gareth, is that you are prescribing solutions which will have the OPPOSITE effect of solving the problems we may face. If you accept that all of these things happened before in the not so distant past, then it is NOT CO2 that is to blame. Driving up the cost of energy immensely and putting people on energy starvation will worsen the ability of people to adapt to weather as is changes thru natural phenomena. People of your ilk think the solution is to control CO2 emissions and that will solve most of the problems with respect to climate change.
I say BS to that. Much better to have a vibrant economy and a plentiful and inexpensive energy source. If we have that, then building infrastructure to meet the challenges nature throws our way will be much easier to meet.

dc
February 9, 2014 11:11 am

Excellent work, tb. Whilst I doubt you’re unaware of it, Doc Alastair Dawson has similarly compiled an historical perspective on Scottish ‘climate’. Oh, those rough times ca. 1790’s.
http://www.birlinn.co.uk/So-Foul-and-Fair-a-Day-9781841585673.html

Gail Combs
February 9, 2014 11:13 am

johnmarshall says: February 9, 2014 at 3:27 am
…. The climate change idea seems to insist that any change will be warming rather than cooling. Julia Sligo, senior scientist for the UKMO, has just claimed that recent poor weather is due to climate change….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Mother Nature is thumbing her nose at Julia again.
7 February 2014 Record snowfall in the north of Italy has left some people trapped in their homes
Residents woke up on Friday to find their homes buried beneath several meters of snow. (Doesn’t say how much looks like 2 meters) The snowfall follows similar scenes in neighboring Slovenia and Austria over the last few days and Rare snow blankets Iran’s capital. (Links at same BBC website)
And on the other side of the world:

11 dead, 1,200 injured as Japan hit by heaviest snow in decades
The heaviest snow in decades in Tokyo and other areas of Japan has left at least 11 dead and more than 1,200 injured across the country, reports said Sunday.
As much as 27 centimeters (10.6 inches) of snow was recorded in Tokyo by late Saturday, the heaviest fall in the capital for 45 years, according to meteorologists…..

February 9, 2014 11:14 am

daddylonglegs says:
February 9, 2014 at 9:45 am
Gareth Phillips
Thanks for your reply. In terms of defense against weather extremes there is less at issue between climate camps than the heated rhetoric would suggest. Does one believe in anthropogenic global warming? Or is recent warming natural in a chaotic oscillating climate? In either case the conclusion is the same – more defense needed.
France are looking ominous again this year.
@Garethman
Well said that man! Whether an individual believes things are happening due to cooling or, as I believe, warming, the end result is the same. The greatest disservice we can do for the people of the UK and abroad is to ignore the obvious and pretend all is well. To disbelieve the mainstream science of climate change is an individuals right, but to ignore increasing threats to our people from severe weather is unforgivable.
I suspect you are also spot on with reference to France, their tries against Italy were sublime..

Gail Combs
February 9, 2014 11:17 am

I forgot to add: So now you can ski from the capitol of Japan to the capital of Iran…

Mac the Knife
February 9, 2014 11:28 am

alcheson says:
February 9, 2014 at 11:09 am
alcheson,
Well said!
Mac

Gail Combs
February 9, 2014 11:34 am

James Schrumpf says: February 9, 2014 at 5:42 am
I’m starting to get annoyed with the “climate change causes extreme weather”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As usual the lying politicians changed the definition of the word in order to confuse people.
The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (USA ratified 21/03/94) gives the NEW definition of “Climate Change”

“Climate change” means a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods.
http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/background/items/2536.php

Sneaky money grubbers aren’t they?

Matt G
February 9, 2014 11:34 am

For weeks very cold air has been moving south from Canada and western Greenland causing major instability over the North Atlantic ocean. This is has been strengthening the jet stream moving East towards the UK.
http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn001.gif
http://squall.sfsu.edu/gif/jetstream_atl_init_00.gif
This has been the main reason for lows frequently moving towards the UK and at times have been stationary while a big anticyclone system over Europe was reluctant to move. The top link above shows this has now moved into the far right hand side of the chart now.
Therefore very cold air across the ocean has caused the frequent windy and heavy rain leading to damage and flooding over the UK, especially in the SW. Yet they want to blame climate change on something that shouldn’t be as cold if we had global warming. Sorry but global warming is not causing this and climate change has always been natural. If you keep saying stupid terms that don’t represent the proper meaning, then you deserve stupid responses. No weather events over one season will ever be climate and there is so much variation yearly that people with memories of a gold fish forget what weather was like in the past.

John F. Hultquist
February 9, 2014 11:34 am

Thanks Tony B.,
I’ve been wondering how you were doing as I read about these storms. Seems you are fine. It is always a pleasure to read your essays.
I’ll point out that Paul Homewood at ‘Not A Lot of People ….’ has been doing an almost daily post on the weather related problems and, also, the role of the political class. I second what Mac the Knife says at 10:34 but also encourage readers to check out Paul’s site.

February 9, 2014 11:37 am

alcheson says:
February 9, 2014 at 11:09 am
“…Much better to have a vibrant economy and a plentiful and inexpensive energy source. If we have that, then building infrastructure to meet the challenges nature throws our way will be much easier to meet.”
Well said alcheson.
If the politicians of the world would realize this, a lot of these problems could be resolved. Forget the (it’s CO2 only) climate scientists, they left the reservation long ago.

Gail Combs
February 9, 2014 11:43 am

richardscourtney says: February 9, 2014 at 6:03 am
Remember what I suggest about the last guy? same goes.

clipe
February 9, 2014 11:46 am

Gareth Phillips says:
February 9, 2014 at 8:59 am

Thanks Randle, not one of my papers or comments. You are correct, I do have a few papers to my name

And they are available?

February 9, 2014 11:53 am

“No amount of observations of white swans can allow the inference that all swans are white, but the observation of a single black swan is sufficient to refute that conclusion.” ~ David Hume