Is England’s Bad Weather A Sign Of Climate Change?

By Paul Homewood

Britain enduring the worst series of winter storms in more than 20 years, forecasters say, with 96 flood warnings issued throughout England and Wales

The December floods in England have been a big story recently, and, of course, still remain a problem. The term “extreme weather” has been bandied about, along with the inevitable connotation of “climate change”. ( I may be wrong, but years ago we rarely seemed to hear this term – it was usually just called “bad weather”, or simply referred to as “wet”, “stormy”, “cold” etc).

Nobody, of course, actually quantifies any of this, but the inference is made nevertheless. A good example came in the Telegraph, in an otherwise sensible article by William Langley:

Earlier this year, the Government agreed a deal with insurers that would nominally protect 500,000 households in areas deemed to be at such high risk their owners are unable to get cover. The £180 million raised each year — which would be managed by a not-for-profit fund known as Flood Re — ensures properties remain insurable through a £10.50-a-year levy on all residential premiums due to be introduced in 2015.

But critics say the scheme allows for no increase in the likely numbers of flood victims as weather patterns become increasingly severe and new homes are built in areas previously considered off limits because of flood risk.

So what exactly are the facts? How unusual has the recent rainfall been, and is there a trend to heavier rainfall?

December 2013 Rainfall 1981 - 2010 anomaly

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/anomacts

Scotland has certainly been very wet in December, but I want to concentrate on England, as this is where most of the media attention, and, it seems, damage has been.

First we’ll look at England as a whole, then concentrate on the South East, where the real problems have been.

England

image

Figure 1

Figure 1 shows December precipitation, using the Met Office data. For the country as a whole, last month was only the 20th wettest since 1910, certainly nothing out of the ordinary. The wettest month was in 1914, when 179mm fell, compared with 116mm this time. Bear in mind as well, that this is just one month of the year – there will be plenty of Januaries, Februaries and so on that were wetter.

Neither does there appear to be any evidence of wetter months becoming more common.

The flooding problems have been very much the result of a build up of water, rather than flash floods, with saturated ground and full rivers. So was December the culmination of months of wet weather. We can check this by going back to October. (November and September were both dry months, so we are taking the worst case scenario here).

image

Figure 2

For the three months as a whole, 2013 ranks as still only 14th wettest, again nothing remarkable, and 29% lower than the record total set in 1929.

Again, it must be borne in mind that there all sorts of other permutations of months, for instance November to January, that will give totals higher than this particular period.

South East

Now let’s focus on the South East. The Met Office keep regional data for “England South East & Central South”, which closely fits the area of heavy rainfall, on the map above.

image

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/datasets

Figures 3 and 4 show the precipitation for this region.

image

Figure 3

image

Figure 4

For December, 2013 ranks as 7th wettest on record, although it is notable that all the other wetter years were prior to 1959. For the three months total, the rank is 6th.

So, there is no indication, even in this part of the country, that rainfall last month, or since October, has been anything not experienced regularly in the past.

Winter Precipitation Trends

Is there any trend towards higher winter rainfall in England. To check this we have the benefit of the long term England & Wales Precipitation Series, held by the Met Office, which dates back to 1766.

There is clear evidence that winter precipitation was consistently lower in the first part of the record, up to about 1860. But since then, and certainly over the last century, the long term trend is pretty flat, with, if anything, a trend to less rain over the last decade or so.

image

Figure 5

The Met Office figures for England only, (a different dataset to the one above), show a similar picture.

imagehttp://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/actualmonthly

Figure 6

Final Thoughts

The wet weather has continued into January so far, and hopefully will abate soon. We will get a better picture when we can look at the full winter period.

Nevertheless, there is nothing in the data to provide the slightest bit of evidence that the floods have been the result of, or aggravated by, “climate change”. Nor is there any indication that such events are becoming more common, or more extreme.

Only today, Bishop Hill refers to two separate comments by Sirs John Beddington and David King, respectively current and former UK Govt Chief Scientists, both of which imply that recent events are examples of extreme weather, which is increasing because of “climate change”. Naturally, they offer not the slightest bit of evidence. This did not prevent the BBC and Guardian respectively from falling for it hook, line and sinker.

I will leave the last word to Mary Dhonau, of the Flood Protection Association, an industry body. In a another Telegraph article, she warns us that “flooding is being made worse by developers building on flood plains to cater for an expanding population. She says that more than 2,000 properties were approved on flood plains this year despite official objections, and added: “It is absolutely barking mad to build on a flood plain when there are so many other places that could be built on.”

 

Precisely!

References

1) Met Office regional data

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/summaries/datasets

2) England & Wales Precipitation series

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadukp/

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

116 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tonyb
Editor
January 8, 2014 5:12 am

john
You said;;
‘ As a historic note, the vole thrived when rivers were dredged but there were no released mink around then and for that we have to thank the so called animal liberationalists and their twisted thinking.’
Voles like fast flowing rivers provided by dredging. You know that and I know that but the EA believe otherwise.
I live a few yards from the sea in South Devon. Yes, the ‘spring’ high tides being coincident with the bad weather was unfortunate otherwise the gales would not have had as great an effect in some places.
Another very big consideration is the wind direction. The wind direction piled up the waves in some places but in our village the waves were small. We have had far worse as we are most affected by easterlies, not westerlies.
tonyb

January 8, 2014 5:18 am

PMQs today. Some MP (heard not who) challenged the PM to confirm that these extreme weather events are related to Climate Change.
David Cameron was weaselly but did seem to do so.
I await Hansard’s Parliametary record with interest.

Carbon500
January 8, 2014 5:54 am

bern235 says:
January 7, 2014 at 6:41 pm
“Yes, It is made worse & more frequent by climate change. Climate change is driven by increasing atmospheric co2 concentration.
Keep denying and finding reasons for denying but climate change is happening through human’s actions on the planet.”
If your post is not a ‘wind-up’, then I find your comments staggering. How can you come up with comments like this when datasets such as the Central England Temperature record (CET) and from NASS/GISS clearly indicate that global temperatures are in fact quite stable within a limited range, despite a mild (about 1 degree Centigrade) warming over the 20th century. Direct links to such data on this website are often given on this website.
Do you really think that they are all fraudulent, a part of some conspiracy?
I have my suspicions that you’re young, have been influenced by biased and scientifically illiterate teachers at school, and consequently haven’t been given much of a critically scientific mindset – you’re far too accepting of the stories we’ve all been subjected to (ad nauseum) over the years.
Do some research of your own – ask yourself if something’s plausible, and look at what’s out there in the real world.
As an example, the UK’s CET at no time shows an average yearly temperature over 11 degrees Centigrade – and that’s since the mid 1600s, and that’s despite increasing CO2 levels (you do know what the concentration of CO2 is and how it’s varied over the years, I take it?)
I’ve lived here in the UK since the 1940s, and haven’t noted any climatic changes which might be perceived as threatening. Cold winters, warm winters, wet summers, dry summers, cooler years, warmer years – we’ve had them all. As I often joke, come to the UK and escape the disaster.
It’s getting to the stage where perfectly normal weather events (however severe) are being described as harbingers of the coming climatic holocaust by the warming brigade.
The abysmal performance of computer models (i.e. calculations) has been widely commented on.
And finally, there’s the most unscientific aspect of it all as far as I’m concerned. As I never cease to point out, no-one has published a paper describing a laboratory experiment to demonstrate the effect of varying CO2/water vapour concentrations under controlled conditions using modern equipment.
No one.
I’ve written to and had this confirmed by the UK’s MetOffice. The whole catastrophic man-made (anthropogenic) global warming (CAGW) scenario is a house of cards, lacking this vital, essential foundation stone.
Stop worrying, and start researching!

January 8, 2014 7:14 am

Reblogged this on Cornwall Wind Watch and commented:
and a lack of drainage infrastructure going in as well. Our parish council recently voted down a large housing estate based on surface water run off and it being sited in an area which has had flooding problems for years. rubber stamped approval of course.

January 8, 2014 7:52 am

From the UK Prime Minister’s Question Time in Wednesday 8th January 2014
Tim Farron (Westmorland and Lonsdale) (LD):

Paul Goggins was a decent, humble man and, in my experience, one of the most effective and fair Ministers the House has seen. He will be very sadly missed.
The Prime Minister will know that the science is clear that the extreme weather conditions affecting our communities, including around the Kent estuary in Westmorland, are at least in part a destructive and inevitable consequence of climate change. Given that he has said that this should be the “greenest Government ever”, will he now agree to support the carbon reduction targets so that we can take real action to protect people and property?

The Prime Minister:

I agree with my hon. Friend that we are seeing more abnormal weather events. Colleagues across the House can argue about whether that is linked to climate change or not; I very much suspect that it is. The point is that, whatever one’s view, it makes sense to invest in flood defences and mitigation and to get information out better, and we should do all of those things. As for carbon reduction targets, this Government are committed to them and we worked with the last Government to put the Climate Change Act 2008 into place. That would not have happened without our support. We also have the green investment bank up and running in Edinburgh, and we are going to be investing billions of pounds in important green projects.
Q10. [901802]

David Cameron doing his best Bon Jovi impression:
Slippery When Wet

January 8, 2014 9:54 am

In the not to distant past, bad weather would have the officials burn someone (a witch) at the stake or in other places, offer you up to the gods as a sacrifice. People shouldn’t sit back and smugly claim we are now to refined for such shenanigans. Just 60 years ago the world populations did a good job of destroying much of humanity for even less definable goals.

uberteuchter
January 8, 2014 10:21 am

The news that Scotland has just experienced it’s wettest ever month interests me. It’s been my long held belief that Scotland’s weather patterns are optimised for perma-drenching; any attempt to alter them can only decrease rainfall. The only way to increase rainfall here is to physically boil the seas faster. The fact that we experienced this record rainfall without any particular flooding tends to confirm my belief. It’s also worth noting that we don’t build on floodplains in Scotland because there isn’t any terrain flat enough to qualify.

Kelvin Vaughan
January 8, 2014 11:02 am

Kelvin Vaughan says:
January 7, 2014 at 11:55 am
Central England 25 year Average Maximum Temperature
1888 to 1912 13.9 °C
1913 to 1937 13.9 °C
1938 to 1962 13.9 °C
1963 to 1987 14.0 °C
1988 to 2013 13.9 °C
Oooops copied out wrong figures it should have been.
1888 to 1912 12.7 °C
1913 to 1937 12.9 °C
1938 to 1962 13.2 °C
1963 to 1987 13.2 °C
1988 to 2013 13.9 °C

Matt G
January 8, 2014 12:02 pm

The rainfall extreme records from the Met Office below show how extreme rainfall can be in the UK and many recent events are nothing compared to what can happen. Many records are before global warning was even suppose to be a scare. The data only goes back to the early 20th century and there have been reports in history of much wetter periods back during the Little Ice Age. This was a period where storms instead of tracking its usual place towards Iceland would often go towards the UK instead.
http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/lia/little_ice_age.html
Highest 24-hour rainfall totals for a rainfall day (0900-0900 GMT)
Country Rainfall (mm) Date Location
England 279 18 July 1955 Martinstown (Dorset)
Scotland 238 17 January 1974 Sloy Main Adit (Argyll & Bute)
Wales 211 11 November 1929 Lluest Wen Reservoir (Mid Glamorgan)
Northern Ireland 159 31 October 1968 Tollymore Forest (County Down)
The highest 24-hour total for any 24-hour period is 316.4 mm from 0000 to 2359 on 19th November 2009 at Seathwaite, Cumbria.
UK rainfall records for short durations
Minutes Rainfall (mm) Date Location
Highest 5-minute total 32* 10 August 1893 Preston (Lancashire)
Highest 30-minute total 80 26 June 1953 Eskdalemuir (Dumfries & Galloway)
Highest 60-minute total 92 12 July 1901 Maidenhead (Berkshire)
Highest 90-minute total 117 8 August 1967 Dunsop Valley (Lancashire)
Highest 120-minute total 193# 19 May 1989 Walshaw Dean Lodge (West Yorkshire)
Highest 120-minute total 155# 11 June 1956 Hewenden Reservoir (West Yorkshire)
Highest 155-minute total 169 14 August 1975 Hampstead (Greater London)
Highest 180-minute total 178 7 October 1960 Horncastle (Lincolnshire)
* Approximate value.
# Reservations about Walshaw value, Hewenden value is next highest accepted value.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/weather/climate-extremes/#?tab=climateExtremes

Carbon500
January 8, 2014 11:26 pm

Paul Homewood – I read the Prime Minister’s comments with a sinking feeling. Well done for sending the FOI request – I hope you get a reply. It’s nice to see all the meteorological data that people have sent in response to your article. It’s a pity the majority of the UK’s politicians don’t seem to be aware of of this sort of information. I sent a letter enclosing a print-out of the CET to my MP, who failed to even acknowledge my letter (sent to the Houses of Parliament).
Ah well – I suppose we have to keep chipping away and hope that one day reason will prevail!

tonyb
Editor
January 8, 2014 11:52 pm

carbon500
the only solution is to actually meet your MP at a local surgery as I did a few months ago. They are past masters at waving away information sent by post or email
You might find it useful to use one of my graphs, either of Cet or of fuel costs against our declining temperatures.
http://climatereason.com/Graphs/
tonyb

Myrrh
January 9, 2014 1:40 am

Devastation by flooding in Ireland too… But from the beginning the warnings gave the cause as coincident with high tides.
From the 2nd January:
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/weekend-flooding-warnings-dublin-northern-ireland-180705933.html
From 4th january more record tides: http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Record-tides-and-floods-as-severe-storms-lash-Ireland-with-more-on-the-way-238705731.html
Interesting looking at the rain across the GB and Ireland via radar on the accuweather site 7th Jan: http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/strong-winds-and-heavy-rain-to/21759520

Carbon500
January 9, 2014 7:37 am

tonyb: Thank you for your suggestion and kind offer of the use of your graphs, both of which I’ll take up. I suppose it’s the way things are now – on the odd occasion when I wrote to my MP in the past, I always received a detailed reply in response to my question.
Clearly my ‘green’ MP hasn’t got an answer to the points I made.

D Cage
January 10, 2014 1:30 am

While there is a desire to refer to profound sources for climate information may I refer to an ordinary housewife’s diary from the WW2 mass observation program to record everyday thoughts of ordinary people. In this she records weather that makes our current bad weather as an example of climate change a clear cut non event worthy of taken only as factually reliable as a politicians pre election speech; The diary of “Nella Last’s War: The Second World War Diaries of ‘Housewife 49′” A second volume of her diaries, “Nella Last’s Peace: The Post-war Diaries of Housewife 49” is even more relevant to this case.
As for flooding any visitor to Abingdon can see the plaque showing the level of the flood in the sixteen hundreds.
My favourite though and winner of the climate stupidity of the year has to be the BBC program in which the said the floods were exceptional and almost certainly climate change from industrial CO2 but forgot that one of the people they talked to had said the village name derived from old English for “village in the lake”. An interesting snippet which I confirmed at the time from a book of place names.

CaligulaJones
January 10, 2014 11:35 am

I’ve always found a bit of history is usually in order around these discussions:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/34439/34439-h/34439-h.htm
August 8, 1808.—A remarkable storm occurred at Norwich. Streets were inundated and cellars flooded. “The roaring of the waters in falling from the roof to the lower leads of the Cathedral was so tremendous as literally to drown the noise of the thunder that accompanied it.”
January 28, 1809—In consequence of a rapid thaw, the low lying parts of Norwich were flooded. “Some of the houses were six or seven feet under water,” and boats were rowed in the street at St. Martin-at-Oak. The marshes below Norwich were so inundated that the course of the river could not be traced, and the barge proceeding to Yarmouth had to return, in consequence of the men being unable to find the channel.
February 16, 1816—A high tide at Yarmouth. The Denes and the west side of the haven were inundated. A similar occurrence had not been recorded since 1791. A flood also took place at Lynn.
January 15, 1820—Very severe weather set in. The thermometer fell to seven degrees. A rapid thaw took place on the 18th, and a flood ensued.
March 1, 1820—A severe storm and high flood occurred in the Lynn district.
November 16, 1821—A severe storm took place. The roads were in many parts of the county rendered impassable by the heavy rains, and the marshes and low grounds were flooded.
July 14, 1824.—A severe thunderstorm occurred at Norwich after a period of very sultry weather. “Almost immediately after the tempest a cloud of immense magnitude and extreme density, having the appearance of a mass of snow, passed over the city. Drifting with a strong westerly wind it was so low as to envelope a considerable portion of the Cathedral spire. Its passage was attended with a very curious phenomenon. The current of the river, which had previously been sluggish, suddenly became very rapid, as if propelled by the irruption of some mighty flood. This acceleration lasted about ten minutes, the cloud having once passed over, the stream gradually resumed its former rate of progression.”
Etc, ad nauseum.

1 3 4 5