The bogosity of Winter Storm Bodil

There’s so much desperation to tie extreme weather to climate change these days, that some people have taken to photoshopping faked images to make the point. In case you didn’t catch that, it’s a double entendre. Observe.

Sadly, even the Danes have picked up the Weather Channel’s silly naming of non tropical and winter storms. It even has a Wikipedia page. This photo of winter storm “Bodil” is circulating today on Facebook, Twitter, and other social media as it approaches Denmark:

Bodil_Twitter

One look at the mesocyclone in that locale told me it was bogus, not only is it meteorologically unlikely, the light is all wrong. It’s comically bad. But the hilarity has to do with the fact that the image is doubly bogus. It has been photoshopped twice. Once to put the storm over the city, and a second time to take out the logo identifying it as a gag image produced by a satire website.

Here’s the “gag” image:

9GAG_Bodil

Source: http://9gag.com/gag/a5dXzNG

Note the 9GAG logo (above my drawn red arrow) has been removed and is now in the wild as shown above in Twitter. Yes, that’s right, they faked the fake.

Here is the original mesocyclone, from Montana, USA

Montana_cyclone

Source: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/570972058977542637/

The picture from Denmark that mesocyclone was added to is of Nyhavn canal, in Copenhagen, a touristy spot. It also has its own Wikipedia page.

While I couldn’t find the exact night photo used to make the fake, this one its very close, taken just a few steps up from the original vantage point:

Update: The original Copenhagen scene has been located, h/t to ArtRubicon and Helge K

Nyhavn_orginal_bodil

This fake of “Bodil” now join the ranks of other faked weather events, such as this laughable faked photo supposedly from Hurricane Sandy:

fake_ny_storm[1]

About.com Urban Legends has this explanation:

It was created by combining a fairly standard image of New York Harbor with a 2004 photo of a supercell thunderstorm taken by professional storm chaser Mike Hollingshead.

And this faked one from Hurricane Katrina:

090911_blog_hurricane_approach[1]

So, if you see somebody pushing any of these faked photos as proof of (take your pick: global warming, climate disruption, Al Gore is near, Bigfoot, Chemtrails, weather control, or increasing extreme weather) set them straight.

UPDATE2:  I forgot to add a link to this example of photoshopping from a couple years back, where Al Gore had to add hurricanes to his book cover. He couldn’t even get the hemispheric rotation right, likely because he’s never heard of the Coriolis Force.

Not finding any, Gore airbrushes in hurricanes for his new book

 

 

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
114 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rogerknights
December 9, 2013 5:26 am

Alan Robertson says:
December 7, 2013 at 6:50 pm
. . . the holiday season is the perfect time to mint a new word or phrase- like it’s a gift to the world.

Here’s a new acronym I thought of yesterday: UNIPOCC.
It sounds silly–hence I urge us all to use it–but it’s perfectly accurate: United Nations Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change.

rogerknights
December 9, 2013 5:38 am

PS: Or IPOCC for short.

rogerknights
December 9, 2013 5:50 am

PPS: At least IPOCC (or UNIPOCC) is pronounceable. One wonders why it wasn’t used in the beginning for that reason. Creators of abbreviated names usually try to make them so (i.e., make them acronyms), using the first letters of prepositions if necessary, to avoid forcing people to spell out the letters when they speak.
But I suspect the reason was that it sounds silly–which is all the more reason for us to use it.

Chris Wright
December 9, 2013 6:29 am

James McClellan says:
December 7, 2013 at 2:54 pm
“I never DREAMED it had anything whatsoever to do with Politics or the climate change argument, I just bought it was a beautiful picture. I still think so. Si none e vero, e ben trovato! May I suggest lightening up a little, brother and sister rationalists, for fear of appearing as boringly dogmatic as the other side?”
The original picture is extremely beautiful, it shows the wonder and power of nature.
But *this* picture is not beautiful. It is ugly, stupid and immoral. Anyone who cares for integrity and the truth should fight against this evil nonsense. The outcome of this battle for the truth will determine the future wellbeing of mankind.
Chris

Craig Loehle
December 9, 2013 6:32 am

More photoshop/trickery: taking photos of steam from cooling towers with lighting to make them look gray, then calling them “carbon pollution” or “pollution”.
A long ago photo of a stream with dead trees along it caused by HOT WATER release with a cooling tower in the background and a story about the nuclear plant pictured, implying that the trees died from radiation.

Edohiguma
December 9, 2013 10:56 am

But you gotta admit. It looks AWESOME!

December 9, 2013 2:01 pm

I long for the old days when a picture really was worth a thousand words.

December 9, 2013 2:14 pm

JamesS says:
December 7, 2013 at 5:18 pm
“From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” – K. M.
The very first time I saw this, I wondered, “Who gets to decide one’s abilities, and who gets to decide one’s needs?”
Why doesn’t EVERYONE think this when they see it?

======================================================================
I don’t know.
It should be more along the lines of, “From each according to his willingness;, to each according to his needs.”
We don’t need to give authority to “decide” to anyone beyond the giver.

December 9, 2013 2:16 pm

OOPS! Only “willingness” should be in bold.

Janice Moore
December 9, 2013 2:28 pm

“But *this* picture is not beautiful. It is ugly, stupid and immoral. Anyone who cares for integrity and the truth should fight against this evil nonsense. The outcome of this battle for the truth will determine the future wellbeing of mankind.” Chris Wright {emphasis mine}
Well said!
***************************
lol, good point, Gunga Din; we can’t trust a picture’s face value message, now. Heh, thanks to all the con-artists out there, NOW, a picture is worth at least 10,000 words (to clarify and correct)!
******************************
Well, OssQss, you probably won’t even see this
(sorry I didn’t notice your second video before just now — I just kept quickly scanning back over this thread for Robert of Ottawa who never did answer my question…),
as you are so very happily occupied watching the AGW video stream, but, fwiw:
Thanks for the fun. lol did you notice how they used the Santa “laying a finger aside of his nose” pantomime (around 1:10)? Heh, guess that meant he was about to goooo up the chimney. Crazy Japanese humor (:)).

Janice Moore
December 9, 2013 2:33 pm

Hey, Gunga Din> — it was an important message. Happens to all of us sometimes. One time, almost my entire post ended up in italics. Sure hope I never do THAT again.

December 9, 2013 2:56 pm

ModSquad, Thanks for fixing my typo.

December 9, 2013 3:14 pm

littlepeaks says:
December 8, 2013 at 6:21 pm
Since when did we start naming winter storms? I’ve noticed that The Weather Channel is also naming winter storms. Wonder if we can start naming areas of fair weather.

=====================================================================
“We” never did. As far as I know it’s only TWC. I think last year the NWS told TWC “Thanks but no thanks” to the idea. But they persist. I suppose they are trying to make falling snow seem to be something unusual.
Who owns TWC now? NBC? Look for them to push the naming nonsense also.

December 10, 2013 9:46 am

Lemme just debunk this debunkiness. Was it made to prove a point? Nope. I was made because why the […] not. No agendas, no nothing, just because. Have Danes picked up on a weather channel trend? Nope. Get ya heads of of your [….]. We’ve been doing it for centuries. Welcome to the rest of the world.
[Cut out the cursing and swearing. Mod]

1 3 4 5