Methane estimates from the Arctic double, but there's no cause for alarm

From the University of Alaska, Fairbanks

Study: Arctic seafloor methane releases double previous estimates

The seafloor off the coast of Northern Siberia is releasing more than twice the amount of methane as previously estimated, according to new research results published in the Nov. 24 edition of the journal Nature Geoscience.

The East Siberian Arctic Shelf is venting at least 17 teragrams of the methane into the atmosphere each year. A teragram is equal to 1 million tons.

“It is now on par with the methane being released from the arctic tundra, which is considered to be one of the major sources of methane in the Northern Hemisphere,” said Natalia Shakhova, one of the paper’s lead authors and a scientist at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. “Increased methane releases in this area are a possible new climate-change-driven factor that will strengthen over time.”

Methane is a greenhouse gas more than 30 times more potent than carbon dioxide. On land, methane is released when previously frozen organic material decomposes. In the seabed, methane can be stored as a pre-formed gas or asmethane hydrates. As long as the subsea permafrost remains frozen, it forms a cap, effectively trapping the methane beneath. However, as the permafrost thaws, it develops holes, which allow the methane to escape. These releases can be larger and more abrupt than those that result from decomposition.

The findings are the latest in an ongoing international research project led by Shakhova and Igor Semiletov, both researchers at the UAF International Arctic Research Center. Their twice-yearly arctic expeditions have revealed that the subsea permafrost in the area has thawed much more extensively than previously thought, in part due to warming water near the bottom of the ocean. The warming has created conditions that allow the subsea methane to escape in much greater amounts than their earlier models estimated. Frequent storms in the area hasten its release into the atmosphere, much in the same way stirring a soda releases the carbonation more quickly.

“Results of this study represent a big step forward toward improving our understanding of methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf,” said Shakhova. She noted that while the ESAS is unusual in its expansive and shallow nature, the team’s findings there speak to the need for further exploration of the subsea Arctic. “I believe that all other arctic shelf areas are significantly underestimated and should be paid very careful attention to.”

Methane bubbles collect under the ice.

Photo courtesy of Natalia Shakhova

Methane bubbles collect under the ice.

The East Siberian Arctic Shelf is a methane-rich area that encompasses more than 2 million square kilometers of seafloor in the Arctic Ocean. It is more than three times as large as the nearby Siberian wetlands, which have been considered the primary Northern Hemisphere source of atmospheric methane. Previous estimates performed for the ESAS suggested that the area was releasing 8 teragrams of methane into the atmosphere yearly.

During field expeditions, the research team used a variety of techniques—including sonar and visual images of methane bubbles in the water, air and water sampling, seafloor drilling and temperature readings—to determine the conditions of the water and permafrost, as well as the amount of methane being released.

Methane is an important factor in global climate change, because it so effectively traps heat. As conditions warm, global research has indicated that more methane is released, which then stands to further warm the planet. Scientists call this phenomenon a positive feedback loop.

“We believe that the release of methane from the Arctic, and in particular this part of the Arctic, could impact the entire globe,” Shakhova said. “We are trying to understand the actual contribution of the ESAS to the global methane budget and how that will change over time.”

Shakhova and Semiletov are also affiliated with the Pacific Oceanological Institute at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch, as are research team members Anatoly Salyuk, Denis Kosmach and Denis Chernykh. Other members of the research team include Dmitry Nicolsky of the UAF Geophysical Institute; co-lead author Ira Leifer of the Marine Sciences Institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara and Bubbleology Research International; Valentin Sergienko of the Institute of Chemistry at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch; Chris Stubbs of the Marine Sciences Institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara; Vladimir Tumskoy of Moscow State University; and Örjan Gustafsson of the Department of Applied Environmental Science and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University.

###

=============================================================

So the real question here – is this doubling to 17 Tg a big problem? Let’s look at the numbers they cite:

The East Siberian Arctic Shelf is venting at least 17 teragrams of the methane into the atmosphere each year. A teragram is equal to 1 million tons.

Houweling et al. (1999) give the following values for methane emissions (Tg/a=teragrams per year):

Methane_sources

Table from Wikipedia

The estimated total emissions totals 600 Tg/a, sinks total 580 Tg/a. The previous estimates of CH4 emissions are already accounted for somewhere in the table above, perhaps with oceans, then it adds 8.5 TG/a to the balance sheet.

8.5/600 is a 1.4% increase, hardly anything dramatic. It may be even be below or near the error band for these estimates.

But all that is being reported in MSM stories, like this one in Scientific American is about a doubling of methane release, and of course, that makes people worry.

At times like this, it is useful to have another look at the IPCC AR5 draft report graph on how methane in the atmosphere stacks up against model projections:

IPCC_AR5_draft_fig1-7_methane

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

79 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mbur
November 27, 2013 5:10 am

I’m not trying to find missing heat or anthing else.Sorry ,but,I’m just commenting on a study put forth by some reasearchers and posted on this fantastic website.
I am not a professional commenter.So, my comments must be taken lightly .Hopefully they will make points to think about.
Maybe my point was that the atmosphere is colder than the ocean and land.And no matter what out gasses or emits ,there is, most of the time(especially in the arctic but maybe other places too…) a colder atmosphere at the surface/interface of the ocean .Then it freezes and changes the interface dynamic.That’s how you can have a volcano under the ice,no matter the heat and so called pollutants the cold atmosphere dominates. More methane and other gasses usually means more life,due to the activity of the process it self.Heat and compounds are created that biologics can use,and they sure do use it.Life struggles with nature and survives and government wants to CO2-n-Troll (control) it.
Thanks for the interesting articles and comments.

Kyle
November 27, 2013 6:00 pm

@Konrad – ““Greenhouse gas” is the language of liars. The net effect of radiative gases in our atmosphere is atmospheric cooling at all concentrations above 0.0ppm.”
Please post the science supporting this claim. Else consider it effectively retracted.

mbur
November 28, 2013 5:32 am

Thanks to the Moderator for pointing out that thing about “least dense water”.
You know maybe i’m not as technical as some others….but,
I have always thought that water was its lowest density when it was in…vapor phase.
And it can be vapor below 0°c.
There’s also some overshoot at 1kbar to 10kbar where water is liquid below 0°c.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phase_diagram_of_water.svg
http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physical_Chemistry/Physical_Properties_of_Matter/Atomic_and_Molecular_Properties/Intermolecular_Forces/Unusual_Properties_of_Water
Quote from website above:”All substances, including water, become less dense when they are heated and more dense when they are cooled. So if water is cooled, it becomes more dense and forms ice. Water is one of the few substances whose solid state can float on its liquid state! Why? Water continues to become more dense until it reaches 4°C. After it reaches 4°C, it becomes LESS dense. When freezing, molecules within water begin to move around more slowly, making it easier for them to form hydrogen bonds and eventually arrange themselves into an open crystalline, hexagonal structure. Because of this open structure as the water molecules are being held further apart, the volume of water increases about 9%. So molecules are more tightly packed in water’s liquid state than its solid state. This is why a can of soda can explode in the freezer.”