
Image Credit: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)
By WUWT Regular Just The Facts
From the Insurance Journal:
“The 2013 Atlantic hurricane season looks set to go down as a big washout, marking the first time in 45 years that the strongest storm to form was just a minor Category 1 hurricane.
There could still be a late surprise in the June 1-Nov. 30 season, since the cyclone that mushroomed into Superstorm Sandy was just revving up at this time last year.
But so far, at least, it has been one of the weakest seasons since modern record-keeping began about half a century ago, U.S. weather experts say. Apart from Tropical Storm Andrea, which soaked Florida after moving ashore in the Panhandle in June, none of this year’s cyclones has made a U.S. landfall.”
“It has been “a very strange sort of year” in the unpredictable world of cyclones, said Jeff Masters, a hurricane expert and director of meteorology at Weather Underground. “We’ve been in this multi-decadal pattern of activity but it just didn’t happen this year,” Masters said, referring to the prolonged period of increased hurricane activity that began in 1995.”
“There were two short-lived Category 1 hurricanes this year, making it the first Atlantic season since 1968 when no storm made it beyond the first level of intensity, according to the National Hurricane Center.
It has also been a year marked by the fewest number of hurricanes since 1982 and the first since 1994 without the formation of a major hurricane.
In terms of so-called “Accumulated Cyclone Energy” (ACE), a common measure of the total destructive power of a season’s storms, 2013 ranks among the 10 weakest since the dawn of the satellite era in the mid-1960s, said Dennis Feltgen, a spokesman for the Miami-based National Hurricane Center. “The ACE so far in 2013 is 33 percent of normal,” he said.”
“Phil Klotzbach, a Colorado State University climatologist, readily admits that the forecasts are based on statistical models that will “occasionally fail,” since the atmosphere is chaotic and subject to fluctuations that cannot be predicted more than a week or two in advance.”
For reference here are Global Tropical Cyclone Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) – 1971 to Present;

Global Tropical Cyclone Frequency- 1971 to Present;

Global Hurricane Frequency – 1978 to Present;

US Hurricanes 1851 – 2010;

and Australian Region Tropical Cyclones 1970–2011 (Severe tropical cyclones are those which show a minimum central pressure less than 970 hPa);

So I guess that we don’t need to buckle up for those Category 6 hurricanes after all?:
If you look at superstorm Sandy on October 29th, the ocean water east of New Jersey was nine degrees fahrenheit above average. That’s what put so much more energy into that storm. That’s what put so much more water vapor into that storm. Would there be a storm anyway? Maybe so. Would there be hurricanes and floods and droughts without man-made global warming? Of course. But they’re stronger now. The extreme events are more extreme. The hurricane scale used to be 1-5 and now they’re adding a 6. The fingerprint of man-made global warming is all over these storms and extreme weather events. Al Gore – Washington Post
To see more information on Sea Ice please visit the WUWT Tropical Cyclone Page and WUWT “Extreme Weather” Page.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Kevin Burnett says:
October 27, 2013 at 3:01 pm
Few doubt that the planet is warmer now than in the LIA or the interval c. 1944-76. The issue is whether the minor difference is a normal, natural fluctuation or something extreme, unprecedented & caused by human activity. The correct answer is no, there is nothing at all unusual about the apparent warming from c. 1977-96 & the observed flat-lining c. 1997-2006 (even with a super-El Nino) & cooling since then.
I know the Pacific is named for being just that, and compared to the Atlantic it is quite expansive so that typhoons can be born and die without making any landfall, (e.g. currently Raymond s.w. of Baja California). Consequently there is not as much media hype about the typhoons that it does generate. Are there any theories/models for attempting to predict frequency of Pacific storms that reach hurricane categories?
Dusty says: October 26, 2013 at 2:47 pm
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) – Click the pic to view at source[/caption]
Dusty says: October 26, 2013 at 3:37 pm
Is there useful purpose for creating this graph?
If it was an accurate representation of the tropical storms that strike land, then it would be a valuable graph, however I am not sure that it is.
I’m not sure what to make of your bolded portions of their explanation. I have no clue what they mean by “This new indicator is calculated only for periods in which tropical storms and hurricanes are consistently active. Results for periods where tropical system activity is extremely infrequent (i.e. a few observations for the entire period of record) were difficult to work with and were subsequently left out of the index.” Did they skip 2011 because Hurricane Irene and TS Don and Lee weren’t worth the effort or something?
Your interpretation seems as good as any. Their methodology seems arbitrary, which has no place in science.
I think my last question still pertains: For what useful purpose is this graph being created? Or put differently, What will this graph help climate scientists understand?
I have to do more research before I strip the NOAA NCDC U.S. Climate Extremes Index (CEI) off the WUWT Reference Pages, but based on my initial research, I am wondering if the Climate Extremes Index was developed to help propagate the “Extreme Weather” meme, e.g.:
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="578"]
Here is the CEI data;
http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cei/
and here are there images:
http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/images/cei/
At this point the NOAA NCDC U.S. Climate Extremes Index (CEI) and associated graphs are suspect.
@AussieBear: ” Sandy was “super” because of death and destruction for the reasons you just described and it was only a Category 2!”
When Sandy finally hit New Jersey and New York it was a tropical storm. What made it bad was when Sandy met up with the cold front coming from the west, which kept it running right along the coast while slowing it down, allowing it to hammer the Jersey shore and New York City and its environs for an extended time.
A quick look at the National Hurricane Center’s web page for the Atlantic says – “No Tropical Cyclones At This Time”: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/
[heh]
It should pointed out that the alarmists have long predicted that hurricanes will become more intense and more numerous due to “global warming”. Here’s a news article from last July – just when the alarmists thought we were going to get a bumper crop of Atlantic hurricanes:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2013/07/08/climate-change-global-warming-hurricanes/2498611/
Storm warning: Climate change to spawn more hurricanes
by Doyle Rice, USA TODAY 4:44 p.m. EDT July 8, 2013
The Atlantic Ocean — where most hurricanes that impact the USA come from — is projected to see more hurricanes develop.
The world could see as many as 20 additional hurricanes and tropical storms each year by the end of the century because of climate change, says a study out today.
The study was published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), written by top climate researcher Kerry Emanuel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
…
Emanuel’s study used six newly upgraded global climate computer models to simulate future hurricane activity around the world. His study found that these killer storms will not only increase in intensity during the 21st century, as many previous studies had predicted, but will also increase in frequency in most locations.
To Aussiebear:
Following onto DCE‘s reply, Sandy also struck at not just
high tide on the New Jersey & New York coast, but during a spring tide.
This caused the high tide to be significantly higher than normal, enhancing
the flooding.