A grand experiment is being conducted in the Arctic this year that may not only falsify a prediction made in 2007, but may also further distance a connection between Arctic air temperature and sea ice decline.
You may have noticed the countdown widget at the top of the right sidebar. I’ve been waiting for this event all summer, and now that we are just over a month away from the Autumnal Equinox at September 22, at 20:44 UTC., (4:44PM EDT) signifying the end of summer in the Northern Hemisphere, this seemed like a good time to start the countdown. If there is still significant ice (1 million square kilometers or more as defined by Zwally, see below) in place then, we can consider that this claim by Maslowski in 2007 to be falsified:
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7139797.stm
What is most interesting though, is that Arctic temperatures seem to be in early decline, ahead of schedule by about 30 days compared to last year’s record melt:
Figure 1A: Overlay of temperature plots for 2012 and 2013 from the Danish Meteorological Institute.
Note that in Figure 1A, for 2013 the temperature has fallen below that which is needed to freeze seawater (approximately -1.8°C according to Peter Wadhams) at 271°K (-2.15°C). It is also approximmately 30 days ahead of the date that the temperature fell to the same value last year, and so far, the current situation with early colder temperature seems to be unique in the DMI temperature record back to 1958. However, it is worth noting that DMI has a caveat not to take the actual temperatures too literally.
…since the model is gridded in a regular 0.5 degree grid, the mean temperature values are strongly biased towards the temperature in the most northern part of the Arctic! Therefore, do NOT use this measure as an actual physical mean temperature of the arctic. The ‘plus 80 North mean temperature’graphs can be used for comparing one year to an other.
As if on cue for that caveat, shortly after I prepared figure 1A, DMI updated their plot to show a bit of a rebound:
Figure 1B DMI plot for today.
But there are other indications, for example this plot from NOAA ESRL, showing air temperatures well below freezing in the region:
Figure 2: Surface air temperatures in C Source: NOAA ESRL – Click the pic to view at sourceAnd, extent this year is ahead of extent for this time last year and within the standard deviation range (grey shading):
After a new record low in Arctic sea ice extent in 2012, the phrase “Nature abhors a vaccum” comes to mind as indicators suggest this melt season may end earlier than usual. The earliest that a turn in Arctic melt season was recorded in the satellite record was on September 2nd, 1987. With 14 days to go, will we see an earlier turn?
If we do, it might suggest (as many believe) that sea ice melt is directly tied to air temperature and the effects of increased CO2 on air temperature via the polar amplification we are often told about where the Arctic is the fastest warming place in the world.
Figure 4: The map above shows global temperature anomalies for 2000 to 2009. It does not depict absolute temperature, but rather how much warmer or colder a region is compared to the norm for that region from 1951 to 1980. Global temperatures from 2000–2009 were on average about 0.6°C higher than they were from 1951–1980. The Arctic, however, was about 2°C warmer. Based on GISS surface temperature analysis data including ship and buoy data from the Hadley Centre.
Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_amplification
If the melt continues, and turns around the normal time, which is usually +/- 5 days of the Autumnal Equinox on September 22nd, then we can assume other forcings are dominant this year, such as ocean currents and cycles like the AMO, winds, and ocean temperature below the sea ice. There’s also the unanswered question of the effects of black carbon soot.
If in spite of the early drop in temperatures, the Arctic sea ice extent ice drops below 1 million square kilometers, as NASA’s Jay Zwally famously predicted (with an assist from AP’s Seth Borenstein): “…the Arctic Ocean could be nearly ice-free at the end of summer by 2012″ then most certainly all bets are off.
But if we see an early turn, it will falsify Maslowski’s and Zwally’s forecasts. Also, if the melt marches on despite the colder temperatures, it will force a reconsideration of what is really driving Arctic melt patterns.
Interestingly, the final ARCUS sea ice forecast has been published on August 16th,and the ranges of predictions are quite broad, spanning 2.2 million square kilometers from the most optimistic NOAA’s Msadek et al. at 5.8 msq/km to the perennially gloomy “Neven” whose Artic Sea Ice blog poll predicts 3.6 msq/km.
See http://www.arcus.org/search/seaiceoutlook/2013/august
They write:
The Sea Ice Outlook organizers decided, with input from contributors and readers, to skip an August report this year in favor of a more thorough post-season report.
However, we provided this webpage to post and share individual contributors¹ August outlooks; the individual outlooks are below.
Since ARCUS didn’t plot them, I’ve plotted all the participant forecasts below.
Figure 5: plot of September Arctic Sea Ice Extent Mean forecasts submitted to ARCUS in August 2013.
Interestingly, I discovered that Robert Grumbine has participated in two forecasts (Wu and Wang) as a co-author, each with a different prediction, so that seems rather odd to me.
WUWT’s value is based on a weighted calculation of the top five vote getters in our poll here: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/11/sea-ice-news-volume-4-3-2013-sea-ice-forecast-contest/
The most popular value picked by WUWT readers was 5.0 msq/km 8.9% (94 votes), though it wasn’t a runaway vote, hence I opted for a weighted average of the top 5 vote getters.
Most importantly, none of the ARCUS forecasts participants suggested an ice-free Arctic, which is bad news for Maslowski’s prediction.
No matter what happens, we live in interesting times.
As always the WUWT Sea Ice reference page has interesting plots of data at a glance: http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/sea-ice-page/
UPDATE: Commenter “jimbo” adds in comments –
Here is a compilation of ice-free Arctic Ocean / North Pole predictions / projections from scientists for the past, present and future.
Xinhua News Agency – 1 March 2008
“If Norway’s average temperature this year equals that in 2007, the ice cap in the Arctic will all melt away, which is highly possible judging from current conditions,” Orheim said.
[Dr. Olav Orheim – Norwegian International Polar Year Secretariat]
__________________
Canada.com – 16 November 2007
“According to these models, there will be no sea ice left in the summer in the Arctic Ocean somewhere between 2010 and 2015.
“And it’s probably going to happen even faster than that,” said Fortier,””
[Professor Louis Fortier – Université Laval, Director ArcticNet]
__________________
National Geographic – 12 December 2007
“NASA climate scientist Jay Zwally said: “At this rate, the Arctic Ocean could be nearly ice-free at the end of summer by 2012, much faster than previous predictions.” ”
[Dr. Jay Zwally – NASA]
__________________
BBC – 12 December 2007
“Our projection of 2013 for the removal of ice in summer is not accounting for the last two minima, in 2005 and 2007,”…….”So given that fact, you can argue that may be our projection of 2013 is already too conservative.”
[Professor Wieslaw Maslowski]
__________________
Independent – 27 June 2008
Exclusive: Scientists warn that there may be no ice at North Pole this summer
“…..It is quite likely that the North Pole will be exposed this summer – it’s not happened before,” Professor Wadhams said.”
[Professor Peter Wadhams – Cambridge University]
__________________
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Vol. 40: 625-654 – May 2012
The Future of Arctic Sea Ice
“…..one can project that at this rate it would take only 9 more years or until 2016 ± 3 years to reach a nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean in summer. Regardless of high uncertainty associated with such an estimate, it does provide a lower bound of the time range for projections of seasonal sea ice cover…..”
[Professor Wieslaw Maslowski]
__________________
Yale Environment360 – 30 August 2012
“If this rate of melting [in 2012] is sustained in 2013, we are staring down the barrel and looking at a summer Arctic which is potentially free of sea ice within this decade,”
[Dr. Mark Drinkwater]
__________________
Guardian – 17 September 2012
“This collapse, I predicted would occur in 2015-16 at which time the summer Arctic (August to September) would become ice-free. The final collapse towards that state is now happening and will probably be complete by those dates“.
[Professor Peter Wadhams – Cambridge University]
__________________
Sierra Club – March 23, 2013
“For the record—I do not think that any sea ice will survive this summer. An event unprecedented in human history is today, this very moment, transpiring in the Arctic Ocean….”
[Paul Beckwith – PhD student paleoclimatology and climatology – part-time professor]
__________________
Financial Times Magazine – 2 August 2013
“It could even be this year or next year but not later than 2015 there won’t be any ice in the Arctic in the summer,”
[Professor Peter Wadhams – Cambridge University]
__________________





I have a hard time seeing the relevance about worries about Arctic summer sea ice levels.
The original issues, I believe, was about polar bear survival. But those fears have proven
baseless, and polar bear populations are affected by more than just sea ice. Nor would sea levels be much affected, since this is sea ice. Besides, we can measure sea levels directly.
Anyone have a good reason why this should be of concern?
@jorge
I would call Jonathon Amos disingenuous.
That is polite-talk for a liar.
Not surprised looking at his fellow travelers.
“Maslowski … used data sets from 1979 to 2004 to constrain their future projections.”
…and that is, somehow, NOT cherry-picking?
arthur4563 says:
August 18, 2013 at 7:09 pm
Albedo. It’s not a good reason, but it is one given. Lack of summer sea ice is supposed to be a positive feedback to alleged CO2-induced, but in fact it makes little difference. At the angles of incidence in the Arctic, seawater is almost as reflective as ice. I think. Not that it matters, since the difference of a million square kilometers for a month or so isn’t important.
Give me a dollar on the under, Nick.
An ice-free summer has failed to materialize for the most extreme predictions (posited as maybes), so now we will have to see if the mid-range predictions will do better. (posited as more likely). Meanwhile, the trend is still down, and still much greater than AR4 projections. July 2013 closely tracked the linear decline for that month (NSIDC extent data from 1979 to 2012). Way too premature to be talking about “recovery”, as opposed to the normal year-to-year variance superimposed on the long-term downward trend.
(Big thumbs up for the preview button. Thanks)
“Impending catastrophe”
What is the time constraint on “impending”, and what are the catastrophes? Are you implying a handful of years or decades? And could you supply some cites for the timeline of predicted catastrophes so I can put it in context on a post that is focussed on one season of one year?
ShrNfr says:
August 18, 2013 at 5:03 pm
Look up millenarianism. It is a main source of what we have suffered from for twenty years or so. It seems that a change of millenium focuses many minds on apocalypse. Alarmists are typical millenarians.
milodonharlani says: reduced albedo
I’ve seen that before and dismissed it as a valid reason.
It’s really quite impossible to defend these failed predictions – they were offered , not as hypotheses, or possibilities, but as certainties. That’s why the predictors are viewed as so
stupid – it’s not their predictions, per se, but the fact that they put them forward as inevitable.
Of all people, you’d think weather folks would know better.
arthur4563 says:
August 18, 2013 at 7:35 pm
I don’t buy albedo, either. But it’s a lame excuse to replace polar bear extinction.
arthur4563 says:
August 18, 2013 at 7:09 pm
I have a hard time seeing the relevance about worries about Arctic summer sea ice levels…. Anyone have a good reason why this should be of concern?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Because Al Gore has been so very worried about it and the Polar Bears.
James says:
August 18, 2013 at 6:03 pm
“Anyway, I do have fun submitting a guess and watching the ice. Thanks for running the blog”
=============
If it weren’t for this blog, would your comment be heard ?
I’ll stop now, before I say something I might regret.
Nick – I am actually sympathetic to the fact that your friends are changing their tune to reflect data. This is a good thing. I assume they now realize that “the science is NOT settled.”
Please go back to them and tell them that they should append “the science is NOT settled” to the beginning of each article they publish. Maybe if they do that then the IPCC, the media and the politicians will realize, the science is NOT settled.
Further, to prove their good faith, they should attack the term “climate denier” used by many to describe anyone who does not believe the science is settled. This term is offensive and vile. As an incentive, you should point out to them that moving the goal posts shows they do not believe the science is settled and someone might apply the ad hominem attack to them.
In looking at the JAXA graph I noticed something about this this time of the year. Basically, if the ice extent for a given year is above another years extent for this time of the year, it’s minimum is above that of the year with the lesser extent (2005/9 are the exceptions). So the bottom four in order are 2012, 2007,2011, and 2008 for example and their extents at this time are in the same order. If this pattern holds then I would guess we should see a minimum for 2013 between or just above that of 2010 or 2008. So possibly 4600000 or thereabouts?
Y min mid Aug
3 6032031 6640313
4 5784688 6611250
6 5781719 6339219
5 5315156 6100156
9 5249844 6160625
8 4707813 5909688
11 4526875 5548906
7 4254531 5241406
12 3489063 4939688
13 5867813
I predict that it will be completely unimportant if any summer incurs an ice minimum extent below 1M KMS
Hummmm, seems a good time to share 😉
http://www.history.com/shows/your-bleeped-up-brain/videos
The Oricle of Delphi did a better job at predicting the future than these so-called “scientists”.
I am still insulating my house. You see the sun is cooling, and will yield min output about 2021-2022.
The resurgence of Arctic Ice may influence the Canadian Government to suspend the 25 Billion dollar arctic patrol vessel program, which was necessary for Canada to assert sovereignty over the NW Passage and the Arctic Ocean.
The ice commeth.
Quick, Mr. Obama, tweet it.
Nick Stokes:
I am truly curious. Do any of your models incorporate the present age of the Holocene?
I think N. Stokes will be keeping his eye on the elections on the 7th. He may not have a job after this date.
So how is that detla t thing just working out any way?
Any one care to comment on how much ADDITIONAL heat is being rejected into space because of the lower air temps as compared to normal?
The utter failure of Maslowski’s prediction is obviously due to the well known and verified “Gore Effect”…
From the BBC article:
“Former US Vice President Al Gore cited Professor Maslowski’s analysis on Monday in his acceptance speech at the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony in Oslo.”
Theo Goodwin said @ur momisugly August 18, 2013 at 6:49 pm
That was rather well put…
Paul Westhaver says:
August 18, 2013 at 8:55 pm
The ice cometh.
———————
The Mann goeth.