Lexicon Shift Alert: global warming gets another name change

Back in 2010, I pointed out that White House science adviser John Holdren had made a shift in naming conventions for the twice renamed “global warming”.

The lexicon shift in 2010

It seems that another shift in the lexicon has occurred, again at the White House. Organizing for Action, President Obama’s campaign machine declared Tuesday that there was a new name.

The Washington Times picked up on this shift, and I’ve updated the graphic to reflect the new name.  There’s also a poll to choose/predict the next name after this one.

The doomed planet movement has been losing momentum. Inconvenient scientific findings have confirmed the lack of any significant warming of dear old Earth over the past 16 years. It’s hard to scare people into action when nothing bad is happening. That’s why the White House has changed its vocabulary again — first “global warming” was changed to “climate change” — and now the correct name of the scam is “carbon pollution.” It’s a way to paint carbon dioxide as if it were black soot billowing out of industrial smokestacks. Carbon dioxide is actually what humans exhale, and it’s food for plants.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/13/wearing-out-words/#ixzz2c3XmuaV7

Its seems that since global warming has stalled, and scientists are puzzled by it, plus major players in science are poo-pooing the “climate disruption/extreme weather angle, they had no choice but to make a lexicon shift.

Here is the updated graphic to reflect the lexicon shift. Feel free to share far and wide:

global_warming_name_changes

What should the next name be? Take the poll, you can also add your own answer. Be sure to post your new answer in comments. (I’ll add some of the best ones manually)

[NOTE: for some reason the poll won’t display other answers from voters in the voting or the results, so I disabled it – A]

h/t to Small Dead Animals for some of the names

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

375 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jimbo
August 15, 2013 11:36 am

Not only do we need a new name for global warming but a new prayer.
Our Co2, which art in heaven,
Damned be thy name,
Thy power be gone,
Emissions be none,
On Earth as as well as in heaven,
Give us this day our daily rations,
And forgive us our emissions,
As we forgive those who emit against us,
and lead us not into electrification,
but deliver us from evil dioxides,
For his is the kingdom, the power and the Al Glorey for ever and ever, Carbon.

rabbit
August 15, 2013 11:39 am

I withdraw my suggestion of “carbon injustice” as a quick Google search shows it to be already in use, apparently in all seriousness.
So hard to keep up.

Don
August 15, 2013 11:41 am

Got a couple
Climazilla, Climax and my personal favorite “World War C”

August 15, 2013 11:41 am

Call it what it most likely is: The End Holocene.

August 15, 2013 11:41 am

I like: “It’s SO Frikken COLD!!!!!”

Mike Doner
August 15, 2013 11:42 am

“Super-Climate-Fragilistic-Expect-The-Most-Atrocious”
Mary Poppins, Disney and Fantasy-land. Sums it up quite nicely.

Reply to  Mike Doner
August 15, 2013 11:49 am

Doner – YOu got a winner as well!

Joe Haberman
August 15, 2013 11:44 am

An amendment to my previous post (Rotten Climate): Climate Rot!

August 15, 2013 11:44 am

“Inconvenient Weather” seems appropriate in many ways.

Ben
August 15, 2013 11:46 am

ClimaTaxation
The end result of the political, non-science nonsense campaigns.

Roberto
August 15, 2013 11:47 am

Climate Later

tty
August 15, 2013 11:47 am

In Sweden the MSM have already chosen the new term it is “Chaos Weather”.
Whenever there is a thunderstorm, or an ordinary storm, or a blizzard, or downpour, or three or more warm days in a row, then the dread CHAOS WEATHER has struck again.

August 15, 2013 11:49 am

Earth clearly has a case of Climate Crabs

MikeP
August 15, 2013 11:50 am

How about Temperature Dysfunction? You can take a pill (tax) to increase cash flow to the government and cause it to expand …

jon
August 15, 2013 11:51 am

Climate flatulence – it stinks

DirkH
August 15, 2013 11:51 am

If Carbon pollution goes, so must Water pollution (simplified for Water Vapor pollution; water vapor being the strongest greenhouse gas). A water-polluted atmosphere.

eyesonu
August 15, 2013 11:51 am

Climatic Church of the Goracle

Jason H
August 15, 2013 11:52 am

Irritable Climate Syndrome is already a human condition. It’s almost always a self-inflicted
one at that.

RockyRoad
August 15, 2013 11:52 am

Communist Climate Control–for taxing and controlling the masses, using weather as an excuse.
That’s what this is all about, right?

John Whitman
August 15, 2013 11:55 am

A choice should be:
C.O.O.L.I.N.G.
Climatically Omitted Overheating Loses to Industrial Gases
John

August 15, 2013 11:56 am

I like CCC: Carbon Compromised Climate.

August 15, 2013 11:56 am

How about we just call it Desperate Rampant Important Virtual Extreme Lies. Drivel for short.

Martin457
August 15, 2013 11:56 am

Cult Against Strengthening Humanity.
Cash for short.

Ant
August 15, 2013 11:57 am

Anal Gore: The Climate Porn peddled by Al Gore & Co.

2klbofun
August 15, 2013 11:58 am

“Weather”

cosmic
August 15, 2013 11:59 am

Carbon Disruption.
It covers all bases, suitably vague it doesn’t even offer to make any predictions. Disruption is a bad thing and to be fought against, it doesn’t have to be defined clearly. Carbon we know is bad and something has to be done about it. Even sceptics can agree we are seeing Carbon Disruption in the form of levies and ill-judged measures to tackle climate change.

Verified by MonsterInsights