The AGU Chapman gabfest is being streamed live. Up this AM, are two notable alarmists who will surely provide back to back entertainment. Times are U.S. Mountain.
| 10:05 a.m. — 10:25 a.m. | Scientific Uncertainty in Public Discourse: The Case for Leakage Into the Scientific Community Stephan Lewandowsky |
| 10:25 a.m. — 10:45 a.m. | The Battle to Communicate Climate Change: Lessons from The Front Lines Michael Mann |
Gleick will be up at 3:40 p.m. — 4:00 p.m. with Grand Challenges at the Interface of Climate, Hydrology and Water Systems
I’d say his biggest “grand challenge” is overcoming his self admitted crime. Though, AGU doesn’t seem to care.
You can watch online, details follow.
Full schedule here: http://chapman.agu.org/climatescience/live-web-session-schedule/
Watch live online: http://chapman.agu.org/climatescience/virtual-meeting/
They ask for your name and email address to watch, likely so they can solicit you for membership later. But, it seems any name/email address will do.
Or, you might just try skipping direct to the live link they presented to me after registration:
http://chapman.agu.org/climatescience/virtual-meeting/live-video/
Supposedly, you can submit questions to the speakers. We’ll see.
Remember that noted UFO, umm, “expert”, and nuclear physicist Stanton Friedman thinks that people who do not accept his version of reality regarding ETs are “unscientific”. It seems like certain types of people are cut from the same cloth. I often think that some people deserve to be Buzz Aldrined.
Alvin says:
June 9, 2013 at 11:18 am
13/13 in the Pew quiz. They should have listed Water Vapor in question #12
—
Yeah, me too. I think they should also have qualified the CO2 question with ‘nearly all climate scientists’ and not ‘nearly all scientists’
I went over the results and analysis page but could not find how many thought that co2 “makes up most of the Earth’s atmosphere“. I wonder what percentage thought this given all the endless propaganda around ‘dangerous’ co2???
“About the Quiz: Chemical Reactions, Control Groups and CO2”
http://www.people-press.org/2013/04/22/publics-knowledge-of-science-and-technology/
This is junk !
Alley up now and uses a mischaracterization of Plate Tectonics to support his assertion that Climate ‘Science’ and its ‘Predictions’ are better. Did I hear “infinitely better’? He uses a slide with a time-line from Fourier (Greenhouse Effect), Tyndall and Arrhenius THEN puts in Plank, Einstein and Wegener [really does not belong because he got a lot of physics wrong that was explained in the 1960’s by a lot of physicists].
I’m getting sea-sick from the spin that’s gushing here.
I had to stop. No point in watching further.
It’s just junk !
I’m knowing now that my 23-year membership with AGU is dead.
That would make them the Apathetic Gleickian Union.
Can we please stop teasing Michael Mann, he did not ask to be a public figure.
His TV appearances, paid speaking engagements, hiring of a publicist, and newspaper article were all entirely involuntary. He was forced, against his will, to do all these things.
“10:25 a.m. — 10:45 a.m. The Battle to Communicate Climate Change: Lessons from The Front Lines Michael Mann”
What we have here is a failure to communicate common sense.
Astounding, Lewandowsky Michael Mann’s warmup band. And it closes out with Gleik.
What a loserfest.
Liarpalooza?
Lewandowsky writes false alarmist science and he’s on the money train with the rest.
Please feel free to snip this but it is already the filtered version of what I’m thinking.
Is Peter typing more “internal” memos? Who did he pretend to be this time?
You mean that his arm is bent behind his back painfully during the sham scam poor pitiful me mannian love fest?
If it is, I rather think that maniacal’s reaching back to pat his fat wallet would be the real cause for any arm malformation?
I would dare say they all three met their Peter Principal levels… They have certainly shown their level of incompetence.
Blimey its a packed out event – go to the livestream feed, number in the top right is 74 watching atm.. I reckon most of them are from WUWT.
Got a poor chap on atm getting all depressed over climate change – I know how he feels…
Hmmm … Gleick (sp?) would like to debate the Heartland Institute on the topic/subject of “Ethics” …
Rather hypocritical of Mann to diss Big Oil when the alarmies are getting a lot of their money from BP, Shell, ExxonMobil, etc. But also quite in character for him.
Or, you might just try skipping direct to the live link they presented to me after registration:
http://chapman.agu.org/climatescience/virtual-meeting/live-video/
=========================
I just watched the last 20 minutes (all in a row).
Interesting.
Ok, in that last 20 minutes, methane raised its ugly head, and Gleick avoided a pointed question.
Go Home says:
June 9, 2013 at 8:27 am
And all their expenses are tax deductible. That’s why academics travel so much. It is also why you will find them giving a lecture to one friend.
Jeff Condon says:
June 9, 2013 at 2:32 pm
Mann has given up all pretense of science. Gleick, Lewandowsky, and Mann are now the three stooges of climate science.
Man Bearpig says:
June 9, 2013 at 12:06 pm
=============================
Interesting idea.
97% of climate scientists believe ……. whatever it is we’re supposed to have been told they believe and ….
……. 97% of real scientists believe they’re full of shit
Leakage? Yuck.
Mann’s got Lewandowsky as his warm up act? Well if you’re a loser back home Down Under then try the Big Apple of losers I suppose-
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/climate/sceptics-put-heat-on-climate-change/story-e6frg6xf-1226660995986
@Theo Goodwin. Unfortunately, not true.
“These people” (they have no scientific stance) are totally deluded. They only seek to “engage” in the confused over “Climate Change”. They know full well those who have lived the lies for no outcome.
You cannot lie to someone who knows better however, they admit its easy to delude the babes in the woods.