The AGU Chapman gabfest is being streamed live. Up this AM, are two notable alarmists who will surely provide back to back entertainment. Times are U.S. Mountain.
| 10:05 a.m. — 10:25 a.m. | Scientific Uncertainty in Public Discourse: The Case for Leakage Into the Scientific Community Stephan Lewandowsky |
| 10:25 a.m. — 10:45 a.m. | The Battle to Communicate Climate Change: Lessons from The Front Lines Michael Mann |
Gleick will be up at 3:40 p.m. — 4:00 p.m. with Grand Challenges at the Interface of Climate, Hydrology and Water Systems
I’d say his biggest “grand challenge” is overcoming his self admitted crime. Though, AGU doesn’t seem to care.
You can watch online, details follow.
Full schedule here: http://chapman.agu.org/climatescience/live-web-session-schedule/
Watch live online: http://chapman.agu.org/climatescience/virtual-meeting/
They ask for your name and email address to watch, likely so they can solicit you for membership later. But, it seems any name/email address will do.
Or, you might just try skipping direct to the live link they presented to me after registration:
http://chapman.agu.org/climatescience/virtual-meeting/live-video/
Supposedly, you can submit questions to the speakers. We’ll see.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I’m waiting for the surprise appearance of Anthony Weiner who will take about protecting underage girls in the internet age.
The Warmunistas problem is not a failure to communicate but the failure of their anti-scientific program.
just asked a question
“do you those who commit fraud in science should be prosecuted”
Unable to watch all of the broadcast, so could some who can tell WUWT if the question was asked and answered?
“The Battle to Communicate Climate Change”
The temperature doesn’t change much at all for a 1,000 years or so, then it whoooshes up.
How difficult could it be to communicate that ??
Heh heh heh
Michael Mann and his “Steady State Theory”. Earth was in a “Steady State” for 1,000’s of years until evil man[n] came along and made it a hockey stick.
So how much do they get for speaking fees? Not counting reimbursement for travel.
Warm and Warmerer.
I’m watching the video feed, it’s having trouble keeping up with the load.
I’m getting the sense it’s part support group to help everyone keep the faith. Sure doesn’t look like a bunch of geologists I’ve seen.
Then again, the beer probably doesn’t come out until lunch.
While waiting, take this quiz. Note the appeal to consensus.
http://www.pewresearch.org/quiz/science-knowledge/
Sorry. Not interested. I get enough of this kind of inappropriate application of statistical analysis (and outright just plain kindergarten level of understanding) and political maneuvering in the public educational system. It discourages me greatly to see how wide spread it is in other disciplines.
My tweets to Chapman. None answered satisfactorily.
$omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 6m
@ClimateOfGavin Why is ocean not rising now if co2 sole driver? #climatechapman http://sealevel.Colorado.edu
View conversation
Reply
Delete
Favorite
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 7m
@ClimateOfGavin Partially true. Increase stems not from co2 alone and you know it #climatechapman
View conversation
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 9m
@PeterGleick Wrong Peter, and arrogantly calling ppl who disagree stupid is not a communication strategy #climatechapman
View conversation
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 11m
@RebekahDJones If you want to win the #climate argument I am the guy you need to convince, using actual scientific facts #climatechapman
View conversation
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 12m
@RebekahDJones Trolling? Attempting to discuss the actual science is trolling? #Climatechapman
View conversation
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 20m
@windbarb Ocean temps increased much less than IPCC models predicted. Why isnt that the discussion? #climatechapman
View conversation
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 20m
@windbarb Completely wrongOxygen a contaminant in the atmosphere, created by photosynthesisY not go back to that atmosphere? #climatechapman
View conversation
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 29m
#ClimateChapman misses the point, science does NOT support #climatechange craziness. THAT is the issue. Different baselines, diferent facts.
Expand
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 32m
Can someone at #climatechapman ask why carbon dioxide levels within geologic norms is dangerous? #SciencePlease
Expand
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 32m
Can someone at #climatechapman ask about the fact that temp has not increased in last 16 years?
Expand
$omaticHypermutation $omaticHypermutation @Hypermutation 34m
Communicating #climatechange requires facts and a winning scientific argument. Nothing helps until you actually have that. #climatechapman
I’m watching the video feed, it’s having trouble keeping up with the load.
Load of what? Oh wait, nevermind.
Mike Bromley the Kurd near the Green Line says:
June 9, 2013 at 8:44 am
> While waiting, take this quiz. Note the appeal to consensus.
> http://www.pewresearch.org/quiz/science-knowledge/
Judging from the results, most people taking the test have never heard of the consensus.
20% of the test sample got “Which gas makes up most of the Earth’s atmosphere?” right. Sigh. I assume the answer most often chosen was oxygen (20%), but I suppose it could have been CO2 (400ppm). Bigger number and all that….
Anthony and climate audit got kudos with last speaker. Anthony on surface stations project.
Tuned in for about an hour so far. It seems to me quite appropriate that this is occurring on a Sunday morning. It really had the feel of a Sunday Go To Meetingcom. Pastors and congregation. They even recently announced a heretic was on Twitter with a little sunny symbol.
I never really got into the whole revival/congregation thing. Logging out.
Gotta love the quote” … I conflabulated….at the drop of a non-existent needle.”
Michael Mann’s multiple illusions : a runaway warming Earth, whose causes Mann is valiantly
fighting , virtually alone (despite his 97% majority), battling Big Oil (read : Arab forces),
providing himself with high ranking (but phony) title (Nobel laureate). And now, with
static temps, a severe lack of ammunition. It’s tough out there, boys, says the battle-
hardened Mann, but I won’t rest as long as my govt welfare funding holds out.
What a man, that Mann.
Numb and Numberer.
Michael Mann on now. I’ve never heard him before. Whether he’s right or wrong he seems awfully smug.
Are not reruns of the three stooges outlawed in the US?
As I continue to listen, I feel that smug’s too mild a word. Isn’t all he’s saying just ad hom attacks?
Ric Werme – says – June 9, 2013 at 8:58 am:::
“20% of the test sample got “Which gas makes up most of the Earth’s atmosphere?” right. ”
As of now it’s still 20% – I would dearly love to know what people are giving as a response – more than likely O – but wouldn’t it be interesting if it were CO2?
I’ve never heard him either, and as everyone knows, I’m not a scientist. But listening to Mann’s Lysenko bit and political carbon tax argument right now, I feel as if I’m listening to a public relations guerrilla workshop on how to get an idea across.
Actually, this is an amazing discussion. This is how these people operate and think? Complaints that they have to open up their code to justify their hypotheses?
You’re (ha ha ha … just having a little fun centered on the word ‘your’ now!) direct link worked for me:
http://chapman.agu.org/climatescience/virtual-meeting/live-video/
.
The general public ought to hear this. They are doing themselves no favors with this sort of discussion.