Craig Rucker of CFACT writes:
You’d be surprised at what they don’t know at the UN climate conference in Bonn.
Then again, maybe you wouldn’t.
Although the evidence keeps mounting up, most of the delegates in Bonn are unaware that there had been no warming for 16 years.
Watch CFACT’s latest video update from Bonn and see for yourself.
CFACT’s Mission Bonn is your eyes, ears and voice at the UN climate talks and at the ICLEI forum.
- ICLEI wants to bring UN Agenda 21 to your town.
- The UN wants a binding climate treaty signed in Paris by 2015.
- The Obama administration has vowed to put the brakes on the U.S. economy in the name of climate with, or without, Congress.
We have much more to report on these crucial developments and the threat they pose to the United States and the free world.
source: http://cfact.org
oneworldnet says:
“ I was aware of climate change before the scientists started investigating” and ”you really do need a reality check, you seem to be wallowing in delusion”
Since the first calculations of human-induced climate change was circa 1896, that would make you either at least 117 years old (and then you’d have had to been aware as a newborn) or it is you that is wallowing in delusion and in serious need of a reality check, or perhaps it was in a former life that you became aware, or maybe you’re a time traveler.
(Too many options to choose. /sarc)
oneworldnet: the true face of “warmists”. Facts are meaningless. Attempting to insult people who really don’t care one way or another what he types.
I say leave him… his hostility and loopy logic is a good example of what’s wrong with alarmists everywhere.
Oh yeah, oneworldnet, there are rules on this site. They’re pretty simple. All you have to do is follow them and you can insult and correct us all day long.
oneworldnet: “banned words and ‘parapeters’ for the site”
“you just can’t hyandle it”
“I have hatred only for liars who consistently refuse to learn from people more able and intelligent and educated than they.”
Still mulling this one over ….
One world; take bex and have a good lie down.
oneworldnet: The British Met (Climate and Meteorology) Office confirmed that the data in The Daily Mail was from the Met and was correct.
If you have a problem with that data, take it up with the Met.
Oneworld, you are delusional, and possibly a danger to yourself and others. Get help.
The question, sadly left unanswered by the interviewers, is whether the complete unawareness about climate data and/or the inability to read it is
a) a requirement, or
b) incidental
to being a climate delegate in Bonn.
Well, I did get a good laugh out of the comments of oneworldnet. The disconnect with reality is amazing. S/he complains about woodfortrees when all it does is graph official data accessible to anyone with half a brain. If s/he was so smart s/he would graph the data itself and prove to everyone that woodfortrees is wrong. Of course, that will never happen. Now back to the real world where measured temperatures continue to fall. The latest RSS for May just came in at .139.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthly_time_series/RSS_Monthly_MSU_AMSU_Channel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt
Keith nails it.
(It doesn’t have anything to do with trying to control temperatures across the globe, if it ever did. They just want your money and your subservience.)
Richard M says:
June 7, 2013 at 5:51 am
I was going to point out that WTF was both a science site and a treasure, but concluded oneworldnet may have actually been praising WFT. Near as I can tell (I didn’t look very far), he’s so consumed with rage he will strike out at anything within reach.
oneworldnet: “the Mail, a scurrilous right-wing rag”
By showing the British people at large the correct Met data, David Rose managed in the course of a few months to:
– have the UK policy on wind farms changed entirely
– have the Climate Change government advisors reduced from 36 to 6, and pushed back to arm’s length
– have the UK decarbonizing target dropped, two days ago.
– have the fellow who wrote
“Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.
One of the early signs of madness is an indulgence in compulsive displacement activity, which could not be a better description of the whole COP process.”
and on the Climate Change Report
“Criminologists have observed that the victims of confidence tricksters are often willing—indeed, eager—to believe the story to which they fall victim
The more absurd, fantastic or fabulous the story, the more willing they are to believe it.
The report is an example of a confidence trick that has been willingly absorbed by the Government and members of the Committee.
It contains .. a fairy tale in which one wants to believe:
it has a faraway country, mysterious powers that we attribute to ourselves, and pots of gold—green gold—at the end of the rainbow.”
fellow whose name is Peter Lilley, become the Prime Minister’s advisor on foreign policy.
In particular setting the UK position in such climate meetings.
Present at every cabinet meeting.
There are few journalists who have achieved more in shorter time.
Confess it, oneworldnet, you are simply envious of him…
The only question is, who will be the David Rose of the US?
These young delegates at this conference are just staffers hired to fill these departments for the govt. It is no big task to find young adults with whatever degree- biology or whatever to accept this type of position. I worked for an environmental group for a while after my college degree.
The question is: why are the govts all lined up at these conferences? It is not that hard to poke a hole in the man-made global warming theory, and it will hurt big business.
So the question is: what is in it for the govts?
The answer is: steady inventment returns from green investing.
http://www.unpri.org/signatories/signatories/
All modern govts promise their civil service employees very generous retirement plans. The govts rarely fire ppl, so the job is secure until retirement. If someone retires at age 62, and lives to 82, the wage and health care covg is more costly in retirement than in the employed phase.
This only works one of two ways. One: deficit spending. Two: take a portion of earnings and invest it as it is “earned,” hope the investment grows, then use those returns on invetment to fund these costly retirements.
So, govts have billions and are looking for markets to yield the greatest return.
Along comes the U.N. It tell govts: hey, sign on to this global warming idea, AND invest on the ground floor in green technologies, and your pension obligations will be covered – if and only if this happens: we get enough countries to sign on, then we are all in this together, and we institute a continuing private expense in which we govts can invest. In other words, we force private business to live a certain way, including making them incur expenses, and we invest in those expenses.
Would you rather tax your companies, or develop “green” standards fo rthem to follow? Same diff, but which sounds better on the campaign trail? Do you see where I am going with this?”
And so the countries have hurried to line up and commit to the AGW belief, and have been shepherded to green investments by Al Gore and other green investment fund managers (“Generation Investment Management, LLP” is Gore’s “large investor” investment mgmt firm).
The rest is just follow-through. Such as forming some department of sustainability or whatever, hiring some true believers and some college kids, and attending these dog-and-pony shows.
William Astley says:
June 6, 2013 at 4:25 pm
“If Obama tries to circumvent the checks and balances in the US constitution he will be impeached.”
=================================================================
As long as Obama is black, he won’t be impeached.
This is the one behind all those Carbon Policies, wind turbine building, solar panel subsidies, tax collecting and public brain washing (unfortunately / fortunately not all succumb) on behalf of the EU & associated (cant get enough of your cash to waste) sub organisations
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GiJxkH2I2VY/UHRDpDRcdEI/AAAAAAAAqTI/mXLN7WZHOfA/s1600/ernst_stavro_blofeld_copy_jpg-magnum.jpg
Moderators, thank you for letting us see some of oneworldnet’s comments: his abusive stupidity condemns himself and reminds us all how hate-filled some of the alarmists really are.
[Reply: there were far worse comments, but they have been deleted. Maybe they should have been left posted, for readers to judge. — mod.]
“As long as Obama is black, he won’t be impeached.”
The funny part is that he really isn’t.
If these fascists fail to stop on polite logic and science, what’s the next move? Last time people didn’t wake up to the danger of clowns like this until after Poland was half gone.
ba says:
June 7, 2013 at 7:59 am
“If these fascists fail to stop on polite logic and science, what’s the next move? Last time people didn’t wake up to the danger of clowns like this until after Poland was half gone.”
When your world leaders are FDR, Hitler and Stalin, where do you go for sanity?
Socialism was simply en vogue.
oneworldnet says:
June 7, 2013 at 4:57 am
“William Astley: ‘From Their Own Mouths: Global Warming is a Fraud’ – so another denier site that makes it all up. Checked any sources?? No thought not. You appear to be virulently anti-ecology, never forgiven the hippies and greens for being right all along?”
You want a source? Comme plaisir.
1975 `Endangered Atmosphere’ Conference: Where the Global Warming Hoax Was Born
Mead, Schneider, Holdren and Lovelock
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/highlights/Fall_2007.html
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/GWHoaxBorn.pdf
See, of course also The Club Of Rome
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
– Club of Rome,
CO2AGW was a made to measure pseudoscience for the CoR’s purposes; QED.
This is not a matter of what is scientifically or empirically correct, or even of what they *beleive* is correct. This is a matter of what is the most effective way to keep the sheep afraid and compliant so the wolves may retain and increase their power.
onewordnut needs to be sent back to his basement corner w/o a cookie.
Anthony…..
Would you please bind up all of oneworldnet’s posts into a thread and label it the Friday Funny.
ROFLMAO
When I do a linear regression on the NOAA Global record from 1997/03 through 2013/03, I get a small warming trend of +0.04 C per decade which is not significant. If I cherry pick a starting point of 1999/03 to include the La Nina without the preceding El Nino, that increases the trend to +0,07 C per decade. The problem with the no warming for 16 years claim is that to the average person looking at the chart, it appears to be false. And the other side will accuse us of cherry picking by showing that starting a year earlier or a year later increases the warming trend making it look like the 16 year claim is the result of cherry picking. It’s not but most folks won’t understand that. Try to explain statistical significance to most folks.
If we start the regression in 2001/01, we see a negative trend. In fact, any starting point from 2001/01 thru 2006/12 yields a negative trend. After that the trend bounces between positive and negative because it is such a short span.
Wouldn’t claiming only no warming for 12 years make the point just as well without looking wrong.
oneworldnet says:
June 7, 2013 at 4:48 am
“Woodforthetrees.org, now that’s a science site isn’t it?”
==================================
As a matter of fact, it is. WFT is a science site that is accepted and used by both sides of the debate. Sorry you don’t like the facts it produces.
My mind is made up, don’t confuse me with facts…