Multiple, Intense, Abrupt Late Pleistocene Warming And Cooling: Implications For Understanding The Cause Of Global Climate Change

Guest essay by Dr. Don J. Easterbrook

Dept. of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA

The results of oxygen isotope measurements from ice cores in the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets several decades ago stunned the scientific world. Among the surprises from the cores was the recognition of multiple, late Pleistocene, extraordinarily abrupt, intense periods of warming and cooling. The most precise records of late Pleistocene climate changes are the ice cores of the Greenland Ice Sheet Project (GISP) and the Greenland Ice Core Project (GRIP). These cores are especially important because the ages of the ice at various levels in the core have been measured by counting annual layers in the ice, giving a very accurate chronology of climatic fluctuations determined by measurement of annual layers.

clip_image002

Figure 1. Oxygen isotope fluctuations in the GISP2 Greenland ice core. Red = warm periods, blue = cold periods. Up on the vertical axis is warmer (Plotted from data in Stuiver and Grootes, 1997)

clip_image004

Figure 2. Temperature fluctuations in the GISP2 Greenland ice core. Red = warm periods, blue = cold periods. (Plotted from data in Cuffy and Clow, 1997 and Alley, 2000)

Figure 1 is the oxygen isotope record from the GISP2 Greenland ice core from 11,000 to 15,000 years before present (BP). Although it is not a direct measure of temperature, the 18O/16O ratio is a proxy for temperature. Figure 2 is the reconstructed temperature record for the same time interval, based on data from Cuffy and Clow (1997), modified by Alley (2000). Comparison of the two different approaches in Figures 1 and 2 shows essential agreement.

The temperature variations shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3 correlate very well with other geologic data that has led to recognition of several named periods of warming and cooling. The named periods of warming and cooling discussed below were established long before the same climatic events were discovered in the ice cores.

[1] Bølling warm period: Abrupt, intense warming 14,500 years ago resulted in sudden wholesale melting of the huge continental ice sheets that occupied vast areas in North America, Europe, and Russia and extensive alpine glaciers in mountainous areas. What made this warming so remarkable was not only its abrupt onset, but also its intensity. Temperatures in Greenland rose 20°F (~12° C), about equal to the total cooling of the late Pleistocene glaciation, to near present-day levels in about one century (Figs. 1, 2). Although this temperature change is for Greenland, simultaneous glacial retreat all over the world indicates that this was a global event. Prior to the ice core analyses, such large swings in temperature were believed to have taken a thousand years or more. This warming event, known as the Bølling (Figs. 1, 2) lasted only a few hundred years, but temperatures rose to near-modern levels.

[2] Older Dryas cold period: At the end of Bølling, temperatures suddenly plummeted about 20° F (~11°C) from the Bølling maximum in a few hundred years (Figs. 1, 2), initiating the Older Dryas cold period, which lasted from about 14,300 to 14,000 years before present (BP). Temperatures returned to near full glacial levels and glaciers halted their rapid retreat.

[3] Allerød warm period: About 14,000 years BP, temperatures once again rose abruptly and the Allerød warm period began. It lasted until 12,800 years BP, but was not as warm as the present or the Bølling. However, the rate of warming was very intense ~8° F (~4.5°C) accomplished in as little as a single century.

[4] Inter-Allerød cold period: Near the end of the Allerød warm period (13-14,000 years BP), temperatures dropped precipitously, ~14° F (~8°C) in about a century (Figs. 1, 2) during a time known as the Inter-Allerød cold period (IACP). Temperatures returned to near full Ice Age levels but persisted for only a few hundred years, so glaciers halted their retreat but did not rebuild to former extents. Just as suddenly as it had cooled, the IACP warmed abruptly 9° F (~5°C) and temperatures returned to Allerød levels.

[5] Younger Dryas cold period: 12,800 years ago, temperatures plunged ~14° F (~8°C) to full glacial levels where they remained for 1300 years during the Younger Dryas (YD). Because of the abruptness, intensity, and duration of the cooling, the YD is the best known of the Dansgaard/Oerscher events. Glaciers, including remnants of the huge ice sheets and alpine glaciers, re-advanced, leaving moraines as footprints of their former presence. Temperatures rose sharply, about 21° F (~12° C) 11,500 years ago, marking the end of the Younger Dryas cold period and the end of the Pleistocene Ice Age. Additional details of the YD may be found at http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/19/the-intriguing-problem-of-the-younger-dryaswhat-does-it-mean-and-what-caused-it/

Radiocarbon and isotope dating of glacial moraines in regions all over the world and abrupt changes in oxygen isotope ratios in Greenland and Antarctic ice cores indicate that the Younger Dryas cooling was globally synchronous. Evidence of Younger Dryas advance of continental ice sheets is reported from the Scandinavian ice sheet, the North American Laurentide and Cordilleran ice sheets, and the Russian ice sheet. Alpine and ice cap glaciers also advanced during Younger Dryas cooling in both the Northern and Southern hemispheres, e.g., many places in the Rocky Mts. of the U.S. and Canada, the Cascade Mts. of Washington, the European Alps, the Southern Alps of New Zealand, and the Patagonian Andes Mts. of South America.

Multiple Climatic events within the Younger Dryas

The Younger Dryas cooling was not just a single climatic event. Climatic warming and cooling occurred not only before and after the YD, but significant climate fluctuations also occurred within the YD. That these were global events that occurred in both hemispheres is shown not only by the ice cores of Greenland and Antarctica, but also in glacial deposits of the major, late Pleistocene ice sheets of the world, all of which experienced multiple moraine-building episodes as did alpine glaciers.

clip_image006

Figure 3. Oxygen isotope record from the Greenland ice core showing an abrupt temperature drop 12,800 years ago, 1,300 years of cool climate, and sudden warming 11,500 years ago. Up on the vertical axis is warmer. (Plotted from data in Cuffy and Clow, 1997 and Alley, 2000)

Figure 3 shows a plot of oxygen isotope variation within the YD. Temperatures fluctuated up and down at least a dozen times, some brief warming periods reaching near-Allerød levels. That these climatic fluctuations were real and global in extent is shown by multiple YD and IACP moraines in the Puget Lowland of Washington, Loch Lomond in the Scottish Highlands, European Alps, Rocky Mts., Alaska, Cascade Range, Andes, New Zealand Alps, and elsewhere.

Magnitude and rate of abrupt climate changes

How do past temperature oscillations compare with recent global warming (1978-1998) or with warming periods over the past millennia? The answer to the question of magnitude and rates of climate change can be found in the δ18O and ice core temperature data (http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/24/easterbrook-on-the-magnitude-of-greenland-gisp2-ice-core-data/).

We can compare the warming and cooling in the past century to approximate 100 year periods in the past 25,000 years (Fig. 4). Not all of the periods noted here are exactly 100 years̶̶—some are slightly more, some are slightly less, but they are close enough to allow comparison of magnitude and rates with the past century.

clip_image008

Figure 4. Magnitudes of the largest warming/cooling events over the past 25,000 years. Temperatures on the vertical axis are rise or fall of temperatures in about a century. Event number 1 is about 24,000years ago and event number 15 is about 11,000 years old. At least three warming events were 20 to 24 times the magnitude of warming over the past century and four were 6 to 9 times the magnitude of warming over the past century. The magnitude of the only modern warming which might possibly have been caused by CO2. (1978-1998) is insignificant compared to the earlier periods of warming. (Plotted from data in Cuffy and Clow, 1997 and Alley, 2000)

Implications of multiple Younger Dryas and Inter-Allerød climatic fluctuations

The multiple nature of YD moraines in widely separated areas of the world and in both hemispheres indicates that the YD consisted of more than a single climatic event and these occurred virtually simultaneously worldwide. Ice sheets and alpine glaciers were sensitive to the multiple YD phases.

What can we learn from all of this?

(1) The ice core isotope data were hugely significant because they showed that the Younger Dryas, as well as the other late Pleistocene warming and cooling events, could not possibly be caused by human emissions of CO2 because they occurred thousands of years before such emissions had any effect on atmospheric CO2.

(2) The magnitude and intensity of multiple climatic fluctuations has been up to 20 times larger than warming during the past century.

(3) Single events, i.e., volcanic activity or cosmic impacts, cannot have caused the abrupt Dansgaard/Oerscher warming and cooling events because of the multiplicity of warm/cold events over periods of thousands of years.

(4) The absence of a time lag between the N and S Hemisphere glacial fluctuations precludes an oceanic cause and is not consistent with the North Atlantic Deep Ocean Water hypothesis for the cause of the Younger Dryas.

(5) The abruptness of the climate changes and their multiplicity could not have been caused by slow, Croll-Milankovitch orbital forcing, which occurs over many tens of thousands of years. Since fluctuations to and from full glacial climates occurred over short periods of time, clearly a cause other than the Croll-Milankovitch theory is capable of causing the Ice Ages .

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

89 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RACookPE1978
Editor
June 3, 2013 8:04 am

DesertYote says:
June 2, 2013 at 2:04 pm

Its interesting that the upper paleolithic Magdalenian culture managed to survive with all of this climatic variation. Not only did this culture survive, but these people managed to find the time to produce some wonderful pieces of art.

We know absolutely that “men” can cross the entire North American continent in less less than 2 years: less than 6 months across the mid-plains (St Louis for example) to California, Oregon, Washington. Lewis and Clark expedition from Washington DC all the way to the Pacific coast, wintering over on the Missouri River in the Dakota’s. The Spanish conquistadors from mid-Mexico to Colorado to Texas to the California Baja peninsula in only 2-3 years. So, assuming that “ancient men” needed hundreds or thousands of years to “inhabit” north America seems utterly wrong.
Likewise, the effect of humans near the Dryas events WOULD BE different than any earlier climatic changes: If all around you, people in your tribe are starving and winter is longer and longer, would not the “new” affect on large mammals through fires and hunting and loss of prey be dramatically different?
Today’s universities cannot afford to admit any adverse environmental effects due to the “noble savage” of pristine wilderness and “pure” non-capitalistic non-European (evil) non-Christian societies – they’re too politically-corrupt to be scientifically-correct. but, combining very rapid climate change from meteor impact (perhaps) combined with frequent hunting and killing of large land animals could explain several otherwise “coincidental” simultaneous phenomenon.

James at 48
June 3, 2013 8:18 am

We’re living on borrowed time. Greens love to worry about sustainability. Their version of this worry is based on the now-discredited Malthusian Horror. I also worry about sustainability but my version is a bit different: How will we sustain the gains when our current Holocene Eden comes to its inevitable end? I believe this to be a bit of a rhetorical question since it is probably not possible to sustain the gains. When the switch flips back to cold, billions will likely perish.

DesertYote
June 3, 2013 9:02 am

RACookPE1978 says:
June 3, 2013 at 8:04 am
DesertYote says:
June 2, 2013 at 2:04 pm
###
I’m sorry, I don’t understand what you are trying to say. I was commenting on a Late European Paleolithic art producing culture that exihbited a developmental continuity of 6000 years precicly because they developed stratagies to accomadate dramatic climatic variations. The point being, that mankind is amazingly adaptable, and if a primitive culture can adapt to climatic variablity, with their limited technology, then modern man will have no proble. What point were you trying to make?

beng
June 3, 2013 9:11 am

***
David Middleton says:
June 3, 2013 at 8:00 am
***
Saw a researcher on a ScienceChannel program in a Ohio cave that contained the YD soot layer (no other distinct layers were visible). He scraped a magnet just above, then below the layer. Nothing. Then on the layer. He blew it off to remove anything not sticking, & it had collected a layer of metallic-gray dust — iron dust. Not a geologist, but pure iron dust is hard to come by except from an extraterrestrial impact, I would think.
It’s certainly possible that an impact or bolide played a role in the extinctions, but it almost certainly didn’t trigger the YD glacial stadial.
Don’t agree you can be sure of that. The climate situation at that point, from the ice-cores, was already unstable & a significant impact (especially in the sensitive NH region) could have triggered a much longer-lasting & even global climate-shift. The YD laid down a meter-thick layer of fine, wind-blown dust in the Chesapeake Bay area (directly above the soot layer) that no other event caused for hundreds of thousands of previous yrs. There’s something different & unique about the YD.

Beta Blocker
June 3, 2013 9:42 am

RACookPE1978 says: …… Lewis and Clark expedition from Washington DC all the way to the Pacific coast …

And ….. they managed to do it without GPS or Google Maps.

Editor
June 3, 2013 10:02 am

.@beng,
Irrespective of what you saw on TV, there’s nothing in the literature about layers of iron dust at the YDB. Most of the impact theories revolve around magnetic spherules, nano-diamonds and the so-called “black mat.”
While all of these could be indications of an impact, or more likely a bolide, they can all be interpreted as other things. Pigati et al., 2012

Black mats are common features in paleowetland deposits and typically represent shallow marsh environments. In this study, we investigated black mats ranging in age from approximately 6 to more than 40 ka in the southwestern United States and the Atacama Desert of northern Chile. At 10 of 13 sites, we found elevated concentrations of iridium in bulk and magnetic sediments, magnetic spherules, and/or titanomagnetite grains within or at the base of black mats, regardless of their age or location, suggesting that elevated concentrations of these markers arise from processes common to wetland systems, and not a catastrophic extraterrestrial impact event.

The DO events occurred like clockwork during the Late Pleistocene with a frequency of 1,500 years (+/- 10%). Few climatic features can be documented as having such regularity. While a bolide certainly could have played a role in the extinctions (some recent work is rather compelling), it is highly unlikely that it coincidentally caused a glacial stadial to occur on the exact same schedule as it had been occurring throughout the most recent Quaternary glacial stage.

beng
June 3, 2013 11:59 am

***
David Middleton says:
June 3, 2013 at 10:02 am
.@beng,
Irrespective of what you saw on TV, there’s nothing in the literature about layers of iron dust at the YDB. Most of the impact theories revolve around magnetic spherules, nano-diamonds and the so-called “black mat.”
***
I guess the TV, the researcher, and I were just making it up? Jeesh. And it is in the literature — iridium, unoxidized iron, magnetic spherules & nanodiamonds have been documented in some (but not all) of the layer sites.
Yeah, I’m well aware of the DO events. And the fact that the climate was teetering on a DO event doesn’t preclude an impact (or any unusual disturbance like a meltwater pulse) from precipitating one — it might trigger it.

J.Seifert
June 3, 2013 1:23 pm

Easterbrooks paper conclusions: `It was neither this and it was neither that…”
But what WAS the cause then? …. He does not know. Better see the explanation
on 5 acting climate drivers, see http://www.knowledgeminer.eu/eoo_paper.html
JS

weltklima
June 3, 2013 1:52 pm

To David Middleton:
The effect of a bolide is the disturbance of the regular clock-wise schedule of D-O
spikes. Please have a look at the 27-37 kaBP background graph at
http://www.knowledgeminer.eu/eoo_paper.html. The bolide at 31 kaBP does not
cause the EOO-spike, but knocks the ensuing spike off the graph and causes
time delay for the next ensuing spike. Cheers JS

Lars P.
June 3, 2013 1:55 pm

Don J. Easterbrook says:
June 2, 2013 at 2:43 pm
Thanks for the answer and clarification Don!

Gail Combs
June 3, 2013 4:54 pm

Russ says:
June 2, 2013 at 8:27 pm
Reblogged this on The Next Grand Minimum and commented:
These abrupt change are some to think about, but they take place over generational periods. They do not happen over night.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Actually abrupt change is not just generational but can happen within a decade.
Dr Easterbrook is addressing changes in the 100 year time scale but Dr. Richard Alley, and his colleagues found that the last ice age came to an abrupt end over a period of only three years. link and found local warmings as large as 16°C, occurred repeatedly during the slide into and climb out of the last ice age.
Dr. Alley chaired the National Research Council on Abrupt Climate Change. for well over a decade and in 1999 was invited to testify about climate change by Vice President Al Gore. (Not that Gore actually listened) In 2002, the NAS published a book “Abrupt Climate Change:

Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable Surprises (2002)
Executive Summary
“…Recent scientific evidence shows that major and widespread climate changes have occurred with startling speed. For example, roughly half the north Atlantic warming since the last ice age was achieved in only a decade, and it was accompanied by significant climatic changes across most of the globe. Similar events, including local warmings as large as 16°C, occurred repeatedly during the slide into and climb out of the last ice age….
climate models typically underestimate the size, speed, and extent of those changes. Hence, future abrupt changes cannot be predicted with confidence, and climate surprises are to be expected.
The new paradigm of an abruptly changing climatic system has been well established by research over the last decade, but this new thinking is little known and scarcely appreciated in the wider community of natural and social scientists and policy-makers….”

Woods Hole Observatory warned about wide temperature swings a few years ago:

Abrupt Climate Change: Should We Be Worried?
….Fossil evidence clearly demonstrates that Earth vs climate can shift gears within a decade, establishing new and different patterns that can persist for decades to centuries….
This new paradigm of abrupt climate change has been well established over the last decade by research of ocean, earth and atmosphere scientists at many institutions worldwide. But the concept remains little known and scarcely appreciated in the wider community of scientists, economists, policy makers, and world political and business leaders. Thus, world leaders may be planning for climate scenarios of global warming that are opposite to what might actually occur….

Brian H
June 4, 2013 12:51 am

Trying to dodge “attractors scattered all over the place” is a mug’s game. It leads to total fearful inaction. The only rational course is to treat the odds of favourable and unfavourable consequences as equivalent and try to maximize resilience in capacity to respond to either.

June 4, 2013 5:14 am

Middleton
I’m afraid that your megafauna extinction assertion may only be true for parts of North America. For a contrast, In Europe the megafauna died out roughly 13ka 14C BP (~16ka cal BP), whilst co-existing with humans for tens of thousands of years.
In Siberia mega fauna thrived thoughout the Younger Dryas in some refugia, especially the Taimyr peninsula, until some hundred years into the Holocene, without a shred of evidence of humans witnessing the event.
Some species like the giant elk died out well in the Holocene and there are also some “suspect” young carbon dates of American mastodos to well into the Holocene.

Editor
June 4, 2013 9:13 am

@lefturnandre,
I didn’t say that all of the megafauna bought the farm…

Three things clearly distinguish the YD from prior Later Pleistocene DO glacial stadials:
1) Rapid extinction of many megafauna, particularly outside of Africa and parts of Asia.
2) The rapid expansion of humans into the areas in which the megafauna rapidly went extinct.
3) YD was the last Late Pleistocene glacial stadial.
It’s certainly possible that an impact or bolide played a role in the extinctions, but it almost certainly didn’t trigger the YD glacial stadial.

Personally, I think the primary driver of the megafauna extinctions was the relatively rapid movement of humans into North America and Northern Europe & Asia during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene. Each and every deglaciation would have been massively disruptive to megafauna habitats. The glacial stadial/interstadial transitions would have also featured quite a lot of glacial outwash-induced habitat disruptions. Throw in the arrival of skilled human hunters and their hunting dogs during the Oldest Dryas and that habitat disruption eventually became terminal for most of the megafauna. There’s ~30,000 feet of Pleistocene sediment in some parts of the Gulf of Mexico deepwater. That sediment largely got there as a result of glacial outwash.