We always talk about and are lectured to about how “weather is not climate”. Of course that’s a flexible meme, because now when the weather turns hot or bad, climate is to blame.
I had to go to Walmart today to pick up something, and as I walked down the aisles looking for things, this jumped out at me. Unfortunately, it was so ridiculous, it made me laugh out loud, and I got stares. So, I’m sharing this humor with you.
I suppose it was only a matter of time before some enterprising company did this.
http://www.tresemme.com/Products/Climate-Control/Climate-Control-Shampoo/
Gotta love that “defend your hair against bad weather” line. Now even when CO2 or weather modification driven hordes of tornadoes descend upon us in retaliation for our climate sins, we can avoid bad hair days.
Of course, shampoo only goes so far. They need “climate control body spray” to really be effective. /sarc
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Hilarious.
How about sending Mike Mann a bottle with next year’s calendar ?
TRESemme’
Used By Professionals
NEW
Advanced Formula
Climate Control
SHAMPOO
Freaking priceless! Marketing gone berserk.
You couldn’t make it up! Priceless!
Anthony – I am shocked, shocked to find you shopping at Walmart. With all your big oil funded millions, don’t you have -people- to do that for you?? And can’t you afford to have them shop at a more upscale location? Target?? 🙂 🙂 😎
Translation – Use it!
you might get killed by a hurricane/tornado/storm/ice age/solar flare/ etc, etc – BUT at least ypu hair will look good?
the best bit of this will be extracing the urine out of anyone who buys it!
You’ve Gotta Wash That Mann Right Out of Your Hair.
From The Movie AGW Unspecific
That looks like a product I need to try. Rapid changes of climate from all the travel that I do makes my hair look like I got parole just as the warden pulled the switch.
Just curious, how much does it cost?
All those millions of bubbles now captures 400 ppm of CO2 and can be safely disposed off.
Now we can all do our bit for carbon sequestration and the planet while at the same time ensuring we are LOOKING GOOD .
What’s not to like?
“Just curious, how much does it cost?”
What does it matter if it can save the planet?
I got a Homer Simpson haircut…so all i need….
is some Mop-N-Glow….and i’m good to go….
So….A tornado may kill me but my hair would still look good?
I love free enterprise. Suckers will buy this and someone will get rich. Good for them.
Climate control – rinse, lather, repeat
=============================================
Will the madness never end!!
This shampoo should sell in the Ozarks we have a lot of climate change. We get cold from Colorado, heat from Texas, rainouts from the Gulf of Mexico, etc. A young married man from the Ozarks ordered breakfast while on a job away from home. He ordered the eggs fried hard, bacon burned to a crisp and the biscuits scorched black. The waitress said that she had never taken an order like that. “Do you want anything else?” “Yes… frizz up your hair and sit across from me. I’m homesick!”
A little OT but we have a brand of bottled water in Australia that assures us it is “suitable for vegans and vegetarians”.
Is that why Mike Mann keeps a perfect hairdo?
=================================================================
Then it must not contain any dihydrogen monoxide.
http://www.dhmo.org/
(I know. Old as the hills.)
It ain’t shampoo, its realpoo.
Shampoo, Advanced Formula, Climate Control?
No!
Get me a barbecue with Advanced System Climate Control, then I’ll be happy.
Mike Mann would need only a very small bottle, unless it works as sun cream as well!
Now all we need is a breath mint that neutralizes our CO2, and an antacid is gets rid of the methane.
Time for a slogan competition…
“Three degrees of hold in every can”?
Does it turn your hair green?
OT
It seems the Australian “ABC” is making posting a false claim regarding the Cook consensus paper here:
http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2013/05/16/3759876.htm
The claim is: “97% of scientific papers relating to climate change share the view that humans are the cause. ”
This is false. The Cook paper can only claim that “Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.”
“scientific papers relating to climate change” does not mean the same as specifically “expressing a position on AGW”
The ABC tax payer founded website is giving the reader the impression that “97% of scientific papers relating to climate change share the view that humans are the cause. ” How can that be if 66% of the papers surveyed don’t even mention it!
They have no shame, and this settles it.