Hawaiians 'won't know what rainfall is'

Apologies in advance for the Vinerism.

From the University of Hawaii ‑ SOEST, something that doesn’t seem to be a problem based on the past data I’ve found:

whaw_rainfall[1]

Source: USGS

It seems clear when you look at the peaks of 1997/1998 and 2004/2005 (both big El Niño years) that Hawaii is a slave to ENSO more than anything else. Even in the press release they admit their best models can’t predict future rainfall reliably, and even though new approach (which is the focus of the new paper) falls short. So, given their blunt admissions of uncertainty, I don’t even know why this press release exists – Anthony

=============================================================

Less rainfall expected for the Hawaiian Islands

Almost imperceptibly, rainfall over the Hawaiian Islands has been declining since 1978, and this trend is likely to continue with global warming through the end of this century, according to a team of scientists at the University of Hawaii at Manoa (UHM) and the University of Colorado at Boulder. This latest Hawaii rainfall study, published in the March 13, 2013, early online issue of the Journal of Geophysical Research, supports previous work conducted at the University of Hawaii. What has been unclear, however, is whether this drying trend will continue.

“For water resource and ecosystem management, and for other societal needs, we need to know whether this drying trend will continue this century,” says lead investigator Oliver Elison Timm at the International Pacific Research Center, UHM.

As of now, not even cutting edge climate models have enough resolution to capture the diverse rainfall pattern over Hawaii, where dry and wet areas often lie only a mile or even less apart.

To work around this problem, the team devised a method called ‘statistical downscaling.’ They first got a take on the effects of the general drying trend on local heavy-rain days by reanalyzing observations from 1978 to 2010 at 12 rain-gauge stations spread throughout the islands. Studying hundreds of weather patterns during such days, they identified the typical atmospheric circulation patterns in the North Pacific that favor heavy rains over Hawaii.

“The patterns we saw did not surprise us,” recalls Elison Timm. “For example, we found that the typical winter Kona storms with moist air-flow from the South often produce torrential rains in the islands.”

Using those weather patterns linked to heavy rains, the team developed a statistical model that estimates the number of heavy rain events during a year. They found that the large circulation patterns over the mid-latitude and tropical North Pacific have already shifted since 1978 so that fewer weather disturbances reach the Islands during the rainy season from November through April.

“We can’t predict individual rain events with our method,” clarifies Professor Thomas W. Giambelluca, Department of Geography, UHM, “but it gives us a very good estimate of the number of heavy rain events in a given season based on the large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns.”

Combining information from their statistical model and cutting-edge climate models driven with the projected increase in greenhouse gases until the end of this century, the scientists conclude that we can expect the recent trend towards drier winter seasons with fewer heavy-rain days to continue through the end of this century.

“It is extremely difficult to take all the uncertainties into account and our overall result may not apply to all sites in Hawai’i,” cautions Senior Researcher Henry Diaz from the University of Colorado. “We are just beginning to understand the details of how climate change will affect the Hawaiian Islands. We do not know yet how further warming will impact extreme heavy downpours.”

###

Citation:

Oliver Elison Timm, Mami Takahashi, Thomas W. Giambelluca, and Henry F. Diaz, 2013: On the Relation between Large-Scale Circulation Pattern and Heavy Rain Events over the Hawaiian Islands: Recent Trends and Future Changes. Journal of Geophysical Research, (early online-release in March 2013, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50314/abstract )

Funding:

The project was supported by grants from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the Pacific Island Climate Change Cooperative and the Pacific Islands Climate Science Center. Additional funding was provided jointly by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District, and the Commission on Water Resource Management, Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
G P Hanner
April 24, 2013 10:02 am

Hey, Sparks.
I’m having trouble understanding your comment.
Islands like Niihau lie in the rain shadows of larger, higher islands lying to windward, e.g., Kauai blocks rain on Niihau, unless the Kona winds are blowing. Ditto, islands like Kahoolawe, which is down wind from Maui, and even the western slopes of The Big Island itself, with its two main mountains that top 13,000 feet msl EACH. The western sides of both Oahu and Kauai are quite a bit drier that their windwards sides. In fact, they are dry enoug that cacti and other succulents do very well, thank you.

April 24, 2013 1:12 pm

RA Cook … no problem … send me a link please

April 24, 2013 3:32 pm

In January I was at the vineyards on the slopes of the Mauna Loa, just down from the Kiluaua volcano and on the opposite side of the mountaintop from the Mauna Loa Observatory. The vineyards are in a “drought”, but one of a nature not what you might think: 70″ of rain/year instead of 130″ of rain/year!
The north side of the Big Island is clearly in a drought, with the grasslands dry and dead. There are also lots of dead deciduous trees on the flanks of Mauna Loa that drought has killed off. The problem is that the rock beneath the surface is a highly porous, empty lava tube sponge that drains away whatever rain that falls. It is retention rather than rainfall that make things a drought. At the same time, the Mauna Loa observatory is above the regular cloudbase of 9,000′ ASL, and is in a near-perpetual desert environment of < 7" of rain per year. That is why the observatory is there: no rain, no clouds, great viewing.
We are told that the Arctic air masses have changed because of more open Arctic waters, though there is more Arctic open water only during a few months of the year, and not during the cold winter, so I dunno about that. Now we are told that the Pacific ocean has surface winds that have also changed, but I guess not by ice. Somehow global warming did this. Sure are a lot of regional changes that are all caused by a global change of a few points of a degree in the last 30 years.

Jeff Alberts
April 24, 2013 6:55 pm

We’re probably going to see a lot more of this kind of Dorito-driven science from Colorado and Washington State, since they both legalized pot.

tobias smit
April 24, 2013 10:00 pm

Alan Watt ?? Denial level 7,
Please let all of us know. HOW do you get to denial level 7 ? Are you advancing? Is that good or bad?,Or is that up or down, or maybe perhaps merely perceptibly sideways? Oh and does it depend if it is morning or evening at EST or Daylight saving time in October or is that March 2013 0r April 2013? In NYC or London? Please, please! You have to help us out Alan, or even point us into, like, any direction ? (anywhere, anywhere or any what, when or how? and no hockey sticks allowed).
Level 7, wow, it must have a meaning!
(fun off)

April 25, 2013 7:04 am

tobias smit says:
April 24, 2013 at 10:00 pm

Alan Watt ?? Denial level 7,
Please let all of us know. HOW do you get to denial level 7

It’s a takeoff on Scientology OT (Operating Thetan) levels. As I recall their progression you get to OT Level 7 and the next step is to go “clear”. I recall many years ago seeing some posters promoting a couple of Scientology bigwigs who described themselves as “OT Level 7 and CLEAR for years” — the longer you’ve been “CLEAR” the more advanced you are. See here . Somehow comparing Scientology to the Church of Catastrophic Climatology seems apt.
My adoption of this title was in response to a WUWT post a year or so back I believe regarding the Mann Gang wanting sceptics to be publicly branded “Climate Change Denialists” or some such. I suggested we print up fancy certificates and wear the term with pride.

tobias smit
April 27, 2013 10:35 pm

Watt, sorry I am a little late with my reply , but I am much clearer now.
But CCD certificates are hard to explain to my friends (but I am proud of them), the size of only one of them takes up a whole wall. :).

April 29, 2013 11:08 am

G P Hanner says:
April 24, 2013 at 10:02 am
Sorry, I forgot the “joke tag”. I was making a light remark about the relative size of rain drops to an island in regard to the size of rain drops relative to a continent.